The British Unicorn Charter Party Manifesto

The British Unicorn Charter Party Manifesto.
Yes, the British unicorn Party has adopted part of the name of the proposed written constitution (in our Policy 4 in our Constitution section) into our name. Before the Manifesto, here’s a Report On The Conspiracy To Murder One Of Our Co-Founders, Paul O’Callaghan, for his whistle blowing:
Criminal Conspiracy To Conceal Killer Hospital!

Picture3

Recording Of Manager Admitting Knowledge Of Horrors in 2003 But Nothing Was Done Judge Wants Hidden
Judge Kills Democracy – Blocks Party From Ballot Box
Plot To Kill Public Report Author – a Hero Who Relearnt To Walk Properly To Join Police On The Run For His Life as he is for “Disposal” (to be killed)!

Picture2

Incriminating photo: Deciding Which Policies YOU Vote On Judge Venters To Protect Doctors (the 3 standing), justifying UK civil disorder and inciting civil war.
The Scandal The Conspirators DON’T Want YOU To Read:

Picture3

Picture4

“We Make Complete Cock Ups On a Regular Basis” – PRU Manager Su Lawrence Lethal Princess Royal University Hospital
Rogues Gallery Of Offenders Who Are Covering Up Another Mid-Staffs Scandal

pic 5 pic 6

Offender Kershaw –the ring master Covert recordings and video recording of lethal PRU lying Drs Quirke

pic 7pic 8pic 9

Offender Lisa London Offender Phillip Bradley Nest of Offenders, Bromley Police Station

pic10    pic11

Offender June Venters and (3nd from left) with Doctors at their joint surgery.

The Scandal The Conspirators DON’T Want YOU To

Picture3

pic 13pic 15

Covert recording of manager the Authorities want covered up; dangerous to Bromley & Sevenoaks Drs Reuter and Dr Quirke & Manager Su Ash
Corrupt Police, Judge & Hospital Manager In Conspiracy To Protect Lethal Hospital
Whistle Blower covertly videotaped hospital manager, Su Lawrence admitting to,
“We make complete cock-ups on a REGULAR basis” &
“60% of patients never leave with a confirmed diagnosis”!!!
This was 2003. Since then, despite knowing how terrible their hospital was they did nothing, causing more preventable horror and death at their hospital, relatives of dead victims saying thinks like, “you are better off seeing a witch doctor” than going to PRU. In 2012, our policy sheets linked the cases to our evidence of the hospital manager.
Hospital boss John Watkinson, Su Lawrence and Mike Musto, by persecuting Paul to gag him were able to cover up the hospital horrors so caused deaths and suffering at the PRU from 2004 The following cases of horror, prove the recordings are in the Public Interest as they show hospital management knew how terrible the hospital was in 2003 but did nothing, and the Dr recordings confirms how negligent the Drs are. Paul’s imprisonment is an attempt by hospital management, local WPC and (to silence a Report on them) the CPS& judge to cover-up this scandal to protect staff from manslaughter charges and justify Lewisham Hospitals closure. Here are just some of these which would have been prevented if Paul had been supported:
Qype User dmarti… “My mother was admitted for a routine operation on her stomach. After 8 and a half hours in surgery and being kept completely in the dark she was brought down to the ward. After complaining that the epidural she was given was not taking away the pain and the doctors and nurses telling her the pain was caused by the gas they used in the op my mum started going downhill. 2 days after the op my mum was taken into intensive care and consequently passed away the following morning. We have just had the PM results back and she died from septacemia and peritonitas, had this been diagnosed when my mum knew something was wrong there would be a strong chance she would be here now”.

Qype User fergus… “My 90 year old father was taken by ambulance to PRUH after cutting his head open his mobility was very poor and he was complaining that day of breathlessness. He was admitted at 11 a.m. At 4p.m find him sitting forlornly in a wheelchair in amongst a whole bank of nurses and doctors. They had apparently ordered a taxi to take him home. An old man who could barely walk, lived alone and didn’t have his walking stick with him was being sent home by taxi. I spoke to the doctor who was discharging him, my concern was his reported breathlessness, she said his chest X-ray was fine but he had a UTI for which they had prescribed him pills. I took him home. He said he was gasping for a cup of tea. In the 5 hours he had spent at PRUH not one member of the ‘caring’ profession had thought to offer him a cup of tea. My biggest regret is that I trusted the doctor who said he was fit to be discharged to go home alone. I fed him and settled him then returned to my home in Cambridge. He passed away that night”

Qype User stuart…

“Don’t go to the PRU you’re better off visiting a witch Dr!”

“In the past 4 years, 5 of my friends have been admitted to the PRU with, seemingly, minor problems. Two died directly through procrastination and negligence. One spent a month waiting for an MRI scan and the other two were given the run-around for months before getting treatment. The deaths of two friends were, without question, preventable had the doctors done their jobs properly. One waited two weeks before being referred to Kings even though, on admission, they were told that this would happen immediately. They lost too much weight in the PRU and, by the time they did get to Kings, they were too unwell to be operated on. Kings then spent two weeks getting them strong enough during which time the aggressive cancer had just started to metastasize. The second friend was kept waiting 6 months to start a simple and inexpensive treatment for Hemochromatosis, even though considered top priority, but died a week before their first appointment. A third friend, was told they needed an urgent MRI scan and was admitted for two weeks and then discharged without the scan. They were re-admitted where they were told that the only way they’d get a scan was if they bed-blocked to prevent the PRU from cancelling it. To my mind, 28 days of bed care must be considerably more expensive than outsourcing a scan to a local private hospital. Anyway, if you want to remain alive, I strongly recommend you go elsewhere!

“If you want to kill someone off then send them there!”

“Absolutely disgusting! Im only 15 years old yet I felt the need to complain because of the way my grandad is being treated in hospital (he is a cancer patient) The staff and nurses are very rude and sarcastic. My grandad hasn’t been offered or changed into a clean gown and is still wearing a gown covered in blood from an operation days ago!!! My nurse put in a drip into his arm and did it wrong, and hour lately his arm had swelled double the size, and then multiple nurses struggled to even find a vein!! I feel like I know more than these nurses! He has gotten so much worse; Another operation that nearly went wrong! Not only this, they couldn’t even be bothered to check the records before they went into a serious surgery. My grandads had cancer twice and the last time he had it was in his throat, the doctors said they had a really hard time getting the tube down his throat. Well perhaps they should of checked the records and listened when they were told he has had cancer of the throat TWICE! I can’t even explain how disgusted I am, Im scared for his life because they don’t know what they are doing and he is a very ill man!!!!! Something needs to change about this stupid health care system at Farnborough hospital, there are many other issues that have occurred since he’s been at this hospital and IT NEEDS TO CHANGE!!!

Qype User luckym “It was unfortunate that my son’s treatment had to be carried in PRUH. “Awful manipulating staff.”

“Started with the receptionist who after making us wait for over an hour in the surgical outpatient area, claims she never saw us! Her sarcasm and ruddiness was witnessed by fellow patients and supported by a nurse who threatened that if we don’t leave she will make sure that we never have treatment on the NHS! You might think that your complaint would be supported and properly investigated by the PALS, Patient Relation Staff, Chief Executive etc, but no it will not. When I asked them to use the evidence of the CCTV camera and fellow patients, I was told this is not a court.

“I was told that the staff I complained about are highly respected employees!”

“And when I asked whether my complaint has gone on those two named staff’s files, I was simply told No, they both have clean file. Now I can understand how this is possible. By not filing this and other complaints, there is no problem. If there is no problem, there is no need to change”.

Qype User andrew… “My girlfriend was admitted by ambulance to the PRUH in agony with a prolapsed disc. Gas and air was denied to her for several hours and she was left sobbing in pain for at least an hour before anyone came to see her. Eventually she was given some painkillers and we were asked to leave, despite our pleading that she was in too much pain to go anywhere.

“The senior doctor was incredibly arrogant and uncaring”.

She spent the next five days in agony and taking an ever increasing cocktail of pain drugs until eventually an ambulance took her to Kings Hospital. Unlike the PRUH, Kings actually assessed her and a neuro specialist then came to see her. He ordered an MRI and she was kept in overnight and given proper pain relief. Kings then operated the next morning, performing an emergency discectomy. Incredible, isn’t it? One hospital actually assesses a patient and decides that emergency surgery is required while another, just a few miles away, hands out pain killers that did nothing for the pain, and insisted we leave. I’m delighted by Kings and disgusted by the PRUH”.

Qype User disapp… “I am very concerned that the PRUH is the main hospital for the Bromley area. My son was admitted to casualty following a seizure and we are awaiting test results and a diagnosis. Getting test results is a nightmare and very slow. Compared to Kings Hospital which seems amazing in comparison the PRUH seems lethargic and disinterested. Am looking into getting private health care back up as I don’t feel that this hospital is adequate. It makes me scared to think that this is all that is available in this area”.

Qype User Glen 8 “This hospital is a huge disappointment. It is seriously let down by many staff in the large part unmotivated by any sort of ongoing training or standards of procedure. There is no can do feeling it is all dismal muddle. Compare the atmosphere of competence in Kings or St. Thomas’ or Guys, or even Lewisham and I feel utter frustration that locally I feel at risk in my hospital. If I had choice I would refuse treatment in PRUH. There many more cases of horror to tell but we can’t afford the extra pages.

June Venter’s, Lisa London and Mike Musto have covered up how these and others deaths should have been prevented.

Hero Who Relearnt To Walk Properly To Join Police On The Run For His Life
& The Corrupt WPC Who Framed Him

pic 7Picture11 - CopyPicture12

The Offender who should be in prison; the “Heroic” Whistle Blower Who Should Be a PC; with David Shaylor.
Investigator Of Psychiatry To Be Killed Because Of His Findings!
Party Policy Response: To “Forgive” Anyone Who Kills Conspirators
Today if a Judge does not like a Public Report’s findings or a political party policy they will find the leader/Author guilty of “offending” so have a psychiatrist advice they be “placed Under Section” for “disposal” for a year to be pumped with antipsychotic drugs to death.
The commissioned Public Report author and co-founder of British Unicorn is on the run as he is to be “placed under Section” for “Disposal” (killed) due to the Public Report results, which include: another Mid-Staffs Hospital style scandal at the Princess Royal university Hospital, Bromley; an epidemic of medical negligence as the General Medical Council, Crown Prosecution Service, Judges and psychobabblists always rule in favour of negligent Doctors, even prosecuting the victims. He found that psychology and psychiatry were not sciences but tools to cover up medical negligence and suppress freedom of thought and speech.
1.A hospital manager was caught on covert camera (above left) admitting, “We make complete cock ups on a REGULAR Basis” and “60% of patients Never Leave With a Confirmed Diagnosis”. That was 2003
2.An attempt to expose this in 2004 was met with legal threats so the tiny political party was co-founded by the author to take control of the council and set up a health centre to help the victims. Authorities ignored it for 7 years till Report
3.Meantime many cases of preventable suffering and death occurred, leading relatives of some victims to say “If you want to kill someone off send them there” (the hospital) and “you’re better off seeing a witch doctor than going there” (the hospital). This showed now that despite knowing how bad their hospital was, staff had done nothing to improve it,
4.The Hospital Trust chief executive Matthew kershaw (nicknamed the NHS Axeman) needed the hospital in question to look as good as possible so it could replace a neighbouring hospital he wanted closed, so had author arrested.
5.CPS so desperate to suppress Public Report exposing their bias, that they even claimed the author for covertly videotaping (something the media and others do) his negligent Doctors to prove negligence was itself “harassment”.
6.At the authors Appeal (at his initial trial solicitor didn’t present any evidence so was tagged for 3 months!) the part time Judge June Venters presiding on his case had in fact a pro-bono law clinic in a G.P.’s surgery and that surgery referred patients to the Hospital involved in the authors case, so TWO conflicts of interest. She restricted the evidence confirming the author’s work as true, to just 1 minute of just 1 recording and his two defence witnesses to 3 minutes.
7.Knowing full well the psychiatrists would want to destroy the author for exposing psychiatry as a non-science she ordered he be psychiatrically assessed. The psychiatrist (who refused to view the evidence the Judge refused to view) ruled the author was delusional because he was “insulting the specialties of psychology and psychiatry and not recognizing their legitimacy” so requires “antipsychotic drugs for a year in a mental unit (sound familiar? Christian Church not being recognized so they burnt such people at the stake). This will torture him to death.
8.The author was a victim of medical verbal abuse and negligence of his balance organ damage and said drugs cause vertigo, so he fled the Court. He and his carer have had 20 years of their lives ruined already. Local Police have been so desperate to catch him (so to protect their WPC who lied the authors Party was, “not real” when it was real, so enabling the CPS to accuse him of “harassment”) that they smashed down his cousins front door using 50 Police Officers.

The Cover Up
Party Co-founder Paul O’Callaghan is to go in a psychiatric ward to be tortured to death with anti-psychotic drugs as he wrote a commissioned Public Report about how Judges, the Crown Prosecution Service and psychiatrists regularly cover-up the epidemic of medical negligence.
Meanwhile, the Judge has a pro-bono law clinic in a G.P. surgery which refers patients to the Princess Royal University Hospital and wanted to suppress the evidence in the Public Report and our policy sheets, how the PRU Hospital staff knowingly allowed since BEFORE 2003 patients to suffer and die, leaving patients to comment on web sites, “You’re better off seeing a witch doctor than going to the PRU” and “if you want to kill someone off send them there” (the PRU). For promoting our policy to take control of Bromley Council to establish a health centre for the victims of the PRU it was deemed “harassment”. Paul was to stand in the 2015 General Election in Bromley but will run for London Mayor in 2016. Paul wrote to the big five party leaders requesting they suspend the General Election in the 3 Bromley Borough constituencies until Venters’ attempt to deny voters the democratic right to decide on voting for policies, has been removed. Now he wants the General Election jn Bromley re-run when his Party can take part.

NEVER in modern Britain has a political party leader faced being locked up for having political policies or producing a Public Report. Not since the Chartists of 1850’s has there been UK political party leaders having to go into hiding and be caught.

Paul O’Callaghan will be the first political prisoner in modern times, but instead of being hung he will be tortured to death, being pumped with anti-psychotic drugs and denied the medication he needs for his organ damage. For the first time ever Paul had to see a psychiatrist for the Judge and he reported that for having and promotion of political party policies being promoted by it’s co-founder/leader was “his mental illness and offending” Then having ignored Paul was talking about in the near future and central government in the long term, the psychoabblist said this that Paul had “grandiose delusions” (e.g. being convinced that his that his party would gain power, and would have widespread support). He decrees that exposing the flaws and horrors of psychology and psychiatry in the Public Report and through the promotion of policies to attack these flaws and horrors was, “insulting the specialties of psychology and psychiatry and not recognizing their legitimacy” exposes a mental state of psychiatrists: that they regard this as justification for branding someone as suffering from delusional disorder. Modern psychiatrists believe themselves to be in the Catholic Church of the 15th Century, but instead of burning non-believers, they slander them, lock them up and torture them with lethal drugs to death.
Judges & Psychiatrists NOW decide which policies you can and can’t vote for!
In November 2014 Judge June Venters said she was “going to put a stop to this”. By “this” she meant the exposure of killer hospital., the Princess Royal University in Bromley, Kent. By ruling against Paul O’Callaghan Venters has called him a liar, (having refused to see the evidence). Since 2003 patients have suffered and died at the PRU Hospital when these horrors should not have happened because hospital management KNEW in 2003 how lethal the hospital. was, as was captured in the above covert recording. When the evidence of this and of how lethal the hospital was, the whistle blower was threatened in 2004.
Now, despite co-registering a political party so to promote a policy to help the victims of the PRU, the hospital management had their local PC lie to the Crown Prosecution Service the Party was, “not real” and then local judiciary refused to hear the whistle blowers evidence. A Judge in the Appeal had two conflicts of interest.
Paul was also prosecuted because he was the primary author of a commissioned Public Report, “Health Charter” which exposes the constant bias of the Police, C.P.S., psychiatrists and Judges to protect negligent (white) Doctors and instead prosecute and imprison the Doctors dead victims families campaigning for justice. The Public Report also exposed HOW psychiatry and psychology were NOT sciences, but tools to conceal medical negligence and suppress freedom of thought and speech using NLP (reported on before in UK Column) and Cognitive Therapy.
The Appeal Judge, June Venters, having refused to view much of the whistle blowers evidence and restrict his witnesses (which she said she was reluctant to even hear), had Paul psychiatrically assessed knowing full well the whistle blower had revealed psychiatry was not a science but a tool, finding similarities between psychiatry and the Nazi’s Gestapo. The psychiatrist of course ruled the whistle blower was suffering from “delusional disorder” because the latter did, “not recognize the legitimacy of psychiatry and psychology”, recommending that for producing a commissioned Public Report and having political party policies, he should be “placed under Section” (locked in a mental ward) and pumped (as the whistle blower would refuse to take them voluntarily) with “antipsychotic drugs”, which would worsen the latters balance organ damage.
There is no law stating that a person requires X, Y and Z qualifications to write a Public Report and the political party had members, a big Manifesto, a Constitution AND was registered three times with the Electoral Commission (the latter is only required if a Party wants to stand it’s candidates at an election, under the Party name otherwise the candidates stand as Independents). All of this was ignored by PC Lisa London, the CPS and the judiciary.
Yes – You just read it correctly: For having political party policies and producing a Public Report, both of which exposed a lethal hospital, a UK political Party leader and an author of a Public Report, is to be tortured in a locked psychiatric ward for a year, likely to kill him.
The Judge has blocked a political Party from using the ballot box, something Gerry Adams and Sien Fein NEVER even experienced.
Our whistle blower is Paul O’Callaghan and is on the run for his life. When campaigner against Forced Adoption, Kellie Cottam was locked in a psychiatric ward and refused the drugs they were forcibly injected into her, meanwhile Free Festival organiser, Phil Russell, after being committed and drugged, came out barely able to walk or talk, a vegetable almost, dying soon afterwards, (his death was never fully explained). Campaigner “Lance” describes psychiatric wards as “gulags”.
Of significance is that after being threatened for attempting to expose the PRU horrors in 2004, Paul O’Callaghan and Alexander Forbes registered the British Unicorn Party (the electoral commission rejecting normal names) and campaigned for at most 10 weeks over a 7 year period. The PRU Hospital and Authorities ignored them. Within 7 days of 3 copies of the Public Report going out Paul was arrested for “harassment” for promoting his political party policies. Only a month later was he charged with a “malicious communication” – issuing the Public Report……
The Key Implications Of This Case Are (firstly for democracy/constitutional):
1.That unelected Judges & Psychiatrists can decide WHICH political party policies an electorate can vote on, which also demonstrates, in addition to the evidence in the said Public Report, psychiatrists are a threat to freedom of speech and thought. (this is despite being registered with Electoral Commission, having members, big Manifesto and constitution)
2.The Police, Crown Prosecution Service and Magistrates/Judges can arrest, prosecute and find guilty party leaders for promoting (in the AVERAGE WAY!) policies, on the false grounds it is “harassment”.
3.By denying a political party the use of the ballot box it gives party members no choice but to launch (or at least incite) a coup against parliament/Government as it would be the ONLY way said Party can obtain power to implement it’s policies. Theoretically this risks civil war (one could imagine the headline, “Judge Tries To Incite Civil War”!) or more realistically civil disorder at elections for preventing a Party from taking part using the ballot box.
4.By suppressing a commissioned Public Report by Judge, Crown Prosecution Service, Police and psychobabblist it is absolute proof of democracy (the right to choose which policies we want to vote for or not, ion addition to freedom of speech) is now dead in the UK!
5.By suppressing a Public Report by hounding the primary author it means ANY Public Report commissioned by a pressure group, charity, a genuine Think Tank (if they exist), can be suppressed on the grounds it is a “malicious communication” and the author(s) prosecuted.
6.By blocking a political party from having medical policies to end this epidemic of negligence, it means families who have lost relatives through medical negligence and can’t get justice (and worse been prosecuted for trying to expose their plight), have no where to channel their anger into legally trying to bring the Doctors to justice (through helping the Party set up health centres for victims and have Doctors legally punished, so instead take the law into their own hands, their anger becoming rage which then provides the Authorities to increase security around Doctors….
7.Locking up a leader (co-founder) of a political party )(however small) makes that person the UK’s first political prisoner in the full meaning of the term, in decades, making Britain no better than the old Soviet Union or modern China.
8.All this confirms the Public Reports conclusions: that the Police, Crown Prosecution Service and Judges are ALWAYS biased in favour of white negligent Doctors and against those who campaign for treatment or justice for victims of Doctors negligence.
9.That there is a conspiracy to suppress another Mid-Staffs Hospital Scandal, this time at the PRU, so to ENABLE the closure of Lewisham Hospital which the PRU is to partly replace, (which South London Healthcare Trust boss Matthew Kershaw was over seeing).
10.There is a conspiracy to suppress an epidemic of medical negligence due to Drs attitudes as exposed in the Report.
11.That there is a conspiracy to conceal the evidence that Drs DO lie in medical records and letters about what they and a patient say and do during a consultation (just compare the Drs notes to the covert recordings), the CPS declaring and Magistrates/Judge agreeing covert recordings of Drs are SUDDENLY harassment when there is no such law on this.
12.By prosecuting someone for “harassment” specifically because they covertly recorded their Doctors being negligent in consultations, then for Judges and Magistrates to agree with this, when there is NO LAW which says everyone else can be covertly recorded but NOT Doctors, then refusing to view the very same evidence to prove the recordings were justified., proves the Public Report finding correct: that Judges and the Crown Prosecution Service are always biased in favour of Doctors. The CPS claimed the recordings, (with images from the recordings on policy sheets as proof of what we revealed was true) was itself “harassment” yet accused Paul of giving “false information” about Drs!! There is nothing in Law which says it is illegal or harassing to covertly record Doctors but OK to covertly record anybody else. Grant and Binney Clarke have recently covertly recorded nurses without their knowledge but the Sevenoaks police and CPS haven’t arrested and prosecuted them for harassment. Prosecuting Paul was so to cover up video recordings of a hospital manager admitting to “We make complete cock ups on a REGLAR basis” and “60% of my patients never leave with a confirmed diagnosis”, showing managers knew how bad their hospital was but did nothing to stop further suffering and death there, another Mid-Staffs Hospital scandal, something the hospital were desperate to cover up.
13.That the whistle blower (co-founder of the Party), having had 20 years of his life ruined by Doctors (9 of those years intensely requiring nightcare rendering his Mum seriously chronically ill, until he found the mild medication to ease his symptoms) instead of being respected for his work (with additional ill health of ear noises caused by neglected polyps) is now to be locked in a psychiatric ward to be tortured.
14.His mother has lost their home through the financial debt she got into just for fighting to get him treatment. The nightcare he needed has resulted in symptoms of fiobremalyga and symptoms of bowel cancer as her immune system was so run down. Now Paul has had to flee for his life, his landlady has terminated his flat let and his Mum taken his belongings into her broken flat which can now be declared a fire hazard and the land lord will throw it all out. Meanwhile Paul is homeless.
15.For Paul he has balance organ damage which the Doctors refuse to investigate the extent of and polyps causing ear noises in recent years. Anti-psychotic drugs (for writing pumped into him creates vertigo/balance difficulties. Increasingly Paul has been caring for his Mum (when his vertigo is not worse or ear noises back), putting on her shoes and socks and on and off chairs because she is in too much pain to bend. In the past 6 months she has collapsed whilst sitting on the loo, Paul’s cousin (who has sclerosis of the liver and is also very ill, not having been given long to live) having been there to help her. Without Paul there will be no one to care for his Mum. June Venters only cared about pointing her finger at his Mum when adding further restraining Orders stating, “And I’m ;looking at YOU, Mrs O’Callaghan” (there is a witness to this)
Re-learnt To Walk To Join Police – But Instead To Be Jailed & Killed
The fact that Paul O’Callaghan re-learnt to steer himself properly without a stick so primarily to join the Police yet is still framed by Bromley Police shows how deeply involved the Police are in this conspiracy, breaking down his cousins door to search for Paul. . In comparison when fights at the Farwig Pub occur in the same street as his cousin lives in, Bromley Police “understand” why someone punches someone else, sympathizing with the attacker, so take no action. But 50 officers can line that same street to catch a whistle blower who never acted illegally, to protect a lethal hospital!
Railway author Paul would like nothing better than return to railway writing, once his organ damage is investigated so accurate treatment be I.D., given £1.6 million in compensation (it was half before arrested) to set up his Unicorn Retreat Centre for medically neglected, (see facebook) and ‘cos of police interference, let Paul join, having re-learnt to walk (steer) properly to join Police as, ironically, Paul was in 2013 to hand leadership of British Unicorn to co-founder Alex Forbes who commissioned and directed Paul as to the sort of recommendations the NHS Justice Group wanted. Healthy Alex now has more party responsibility.
Despite being able to be locked up for 2 years for fleeing Court, Paul had to flee as, having ruined 20 years of Paul’s life, the Drs and their acolytes wanted not just ruin the rest of Paul’s life, but kill him as documentation showed they want to section him for a year and pump him with antipsychotic drugs (Paul will refuse to take the medication but as has happened to campaigner Kellie Cottam, he will then be forcibly injected with drugs), vegetating and killing him. This is because Paul found in the commissioned Public Report that not only was psychiatry and psychology not sciences, but with the courts and Police, suppress freedom of thought and speech and cover up medical negligence.
Once Paul has his organ damage extent established, compensated with £1.6 million (double what it was before Lisa London) to establish his retreat centre for the medically neglected, Paul will return to just writing about railways. He is NO radical – he wants a quite, healthy happy life
Paul O’Callaghan has had 21 years of his life ruined by purposeful medical negligence, suffering from horrific nightmarish symptoms for first 9 years then, having found his mild medication for the worst symptoms, has continued to suffer chronic symptoms due to the continued neglect of his organ damage. Now he is to be placed in a locked psychiatric ward and tortured, possibly to death, by antipsychotic drugs in a locked psychiatric ward because he dared expose his case and others. Unlike the victim, Offender Lisa London has had a relationship, has the career Paul wanted but which she has abused, and has 2 children. Lisa didn’t have to re-learn to apply to the Police. Her colleague, Offender (DS) Paul Craig, disgustingly protected her (and thereby the conspiracy to protect the PRU) when he had Paul arrested and the Crown Prosecution Service launch another prosecution of Paul for petitioning for him to join the Police and to replace Lisa London who would be imprisoned in Holloway Prison for perverting the course of justice.
Paul’s Nightmare in Brief:
Paul O’Callaghan’s being locked up for Party Policies: to help victims of another Mid-Staffs Hospital Scandal; to stop the epidemic of purposeful medical negligence; to class racism as a Serious Mental Illness; to stop Forced Child Adoption; and for co-authoring a Public Report on the epidemic of and causes of medical negligence. Paul O’Callaghan has had 20 years of his life ROBBED by purposeful medical negligence (Drs covering up each others negligence caught on covert recordings “you seen too many”) and for legally campaigning for treatment and compensation by co-founding the tiny British Unicorn Party, was sentenced to being electronically tagged, pay Court costs and a Restraining Order in 2013. He Appealed the verdict (not sentence) in 2014 but, instead of Charges thrown out, Judge Venters not only upheld the verdicts but (“very rare and unusual” to increase sentences in Appeals) wants Paul in prison/mental hospital for co-authoring the Public Report and having Party policies for the electorate to vote on and ordered Paul be psychiatrically assessed (the Public Report found psychiatry and psychology exists not just to commit and cover up medical negligence but, to condition and control society, suppressing freedom of thought and expression). Despite obeying the Restraining Order (and why we can’t name 2 lethal Drs and a WPC), he’s still going to ‘prison’! There is an OFFICIAL CONFLICT of interest: Venters set up a Warlingham Pro-Bono legal & G.P. surgery combined with Drs’ Hinkes and Cohen explaining why ‘it’/she said “wanted to put a stop to this” (prevent victims of PRU Hospital lying ‘drs’ being saved and object to negligent Drs being called “evil”. His Carer’s body’s has been devastated due to the drs. (since bowel cancer signs ETC) Imprisoned so physically damaged & on-going, medically neglected Paul O’Callaghan will be beaten or killed and in Mental Ward pumped with lethal drugs first, for having policies; Britain has become a TRUE fascist state AND akin to modern China..
Paul’s endured constant rocking ETC vertigo for 20 YRS ‘caused’ by organ-damage ETC, Drs REFUSING to investigate the extent to protect their predecessors’ negligence. For 10 years Paul also suffered ‘vibrating’ vertigo (the physical sensation of laying on a see-saw moving at high speed, real genuine torture), sparking his vision to swiftly vibrate etc side-to-side. Until he found a mild medication which had even been PURPOSELY withheld from him by the LYING Drs. “none exist”. Mum had to provide the night-care+(which was caused by his Mum says, “the pathologically lying sadistic drs.’ evil) etc. he needed ,battling to endeavour to acquire treatment primarily to stop his “torture”, which ‘finished’ my body ‘engulfed’ etc. &forced out/‘lost’ my house”. After 13 yrs of additional torturous ear noises, polyps were discovered ‘be’ the ‘cause’ but, he had, to quote a Dr “seen too many Drs already” (‘who’ had neglected to look for even polyps!) so his polyps were NOT to be removed. PAUL is the one suffering distress & ALARM – NOT the so-called ‘Drs’..: Paul has been battling to get a medical investigation into all damage and thus get accurate treatment for 19 YEARS. Paul suffers from constant rocking vertigo (having not experienced physical stillness in 19 YEARS) and car engine sounds and physical vibration in the left ear, caused by the medical negligence by Drs. For 9 years, Paul suffered attacks of vibrating vertigo (like laying on a see-saw moving at high speed), sparking his vision to violently shake side to side. In 1994, when a tuning fork test on his ears (where the balance organs are) was done it caused him intense pain so the ENT Dr (A Salama) performed the test on himself, stating the test did not cause him pain so the test should not cause Paul pain! G.P.s & hospital Drs used psychology to dismiss the “indications of a viral infection” (lumps on his head and white patches on chest) as caused by “no siblings and no father”, to refuse to investigate the extent of organ damage and treat the torturous symptoms so to cover up the ENT Drs & each-others negligence. A Homeopathic Dr found Paul had vestibular neuronitis, a physiotherapist confirmed he relied on his vision more than he should (ignored by Drs) and medical examiner (not a Dr) found he had paresis of the inner ear, yet Drs denied any medication as he did “not suffer enough” (!) and lied there was no medication to stop the symptoms when a commonly prescribed treatment did exist. After sufferers answered questionnaires Paul found medication, Serc to ease suffering, then years re- learning to steer without a stick. Paul’s Mum lost their home from the debt she got into to get him treatment. Paul suffer torturous ear noises caused by polyps the Drs refused to remove as they say Paul has “seen too many Drs”. In 19 YEARS Paul has YET to receive an MRI or CT scan of his ears (balance organs)!!!!!!! This is because the Doctors cover up each others medical negligence, which was why the covert audio and later videotaping of the Drs was done to prove this. how little or much he does of a day increases the speed and strength of the rocking sensations. If he don’t do anything, then he won’t sleep hardly and the profound vertigo will substantially increase, etc. naturally.. Thus, Paul has to do some activity but, the right activity if possible inc of various lengths, etc; hence, the different types of voluntary work (2009-’11) showed doing just at till work (e.g. SITTING for 2/3 hrs.) made his vertigo worse at night as opposed to two afternoons during the week e.g. doing some carrying, some walking about, some sitting (a recycling charity) (although inc. of back pain etc…), and, as well, still can’t do too much re the vertigo, as can go, ‘giddy’, etc.! Some nights, whilst laying on right side/semi on front, his balance seems to ‘jam’ (get ‘caught’) and begin to go into vibrating vertigo (which the serc usually suppresses). Being too active during afternoons helps cause this. When walking to shops (particularly after a really bad night of ear noises keeping him awake more than usual etc) he goes ‘giddy’ (on some occasions still having to turn back), he can’t steer straight, veering off to left, etc Indoors (usually) and outdoors, head can go ‘woozey’ (giddy sensation restricted to head etc) Sitting in a chair feels like he is bobbing about in a boat. In bed difficulty still laying on right and laying on back, as these positions amplify vertigo strength and speed which drs have refused to investigate. Standing is of course worse: feels like he is in a lift going up and down.. If vertigo is slightly stronger than usual, he is not able to wash up. The problem with preparing a meal is the rapid bending down to an oven, turning to the kitchen side, then back to the fridge etc – the quick turning causes giddiness. Judge June Venters wants to put Paul (described as “heroic” by the public) in a prison or mental ward like this
After finding no-one wanted to know about his plight, Paul tried blowing the whistle with his own news sheet on the PRU Hospital, but Bromley police on orders of hospital management and security boss Mike Musto hounded him, so hid then with others formed the British Unicorn Party, a democratic meritocracy: that upon achieving 100 members all members elect the Party leadership. Any member can stand providing they have the merit of experiencing continued hardships. The constitution allows for any member to submit a policy of their own, including personnel policies of their own plights on any subject, providing it does not contradict existing policies. After 2005, when finances allowed (on average 2 weeks a year, not in 2008, 9 or 11) we promoted policies to get registered Bromley voters to join Party so we could stand candidates at local council elections, sign nomination papers so candidates could stand as M.P.s and fund our Party.
In 2012 the PRU Hospital local WPC Lisa London with her puppet PC Phillip Bradley drove to Eastbourne (Paul had fled there in 2005) to arrest him on the grounds he’d “harassed 2 of the Drs at the hospital!!! Neither corrupt cop investigated if the Party had members, interviewed the Party Secretary, asked for our Manifesto or Constitution and didn’t even make the mistake of assuming we had to be registered with Electoral Commission (we were until we found out a Party only needed to be registered when standing candidates under the Party name). WPC Liar lied to the Crown Prosecution service our Party was, “not real”.
Hospital boss Matthew KERSHAW (“the Axeman”) was closing Lewisham Hospital on grounds PRU was a good hospital so needed the truth about the PRU covered up. The Crown Prosecution Service ignored her corruption, as they wanted a Public Report, “Health Charter” suppressed as it exposed how the CPS and the Courts ALWAYS protect NEGLIGENT Doctors, prosecuting and locking up the Doctors victims (or relatives) for campaigning for treatment. Paul was key contributor to this Report, (his case shows how Dr after Dr will neglect a patient so to cover up their predecessors negligence the recordings show how abusive and lying Drs are. At Greenwich Court his solicitor failed to call witnesses and left 99% of evidence on his desk whilst the 3 magistrates would not stop the Court hearing because the “doctors are already here”! Paul was crucified in Court of course, then Judge Nigel Dean had Paul fined and electronically tagged, effectively for campaigning for promoting his own Party’s policies in leaflets along roads picked at random. Between July 2013 and October 2014 Paul obeyed his immoral Restraining Order by not promoting health policies in case it “alarmed or distressed” Doctors, something the Venters didn’t know existed until after her verdict. The only thing which happened between those dates is that the British unicorn Party adopted a policy to stop the other epidemic of Forced Child Adoption and to class racism as a Serious Mental Illness (4 days after promoting the latter but 2 months after issuing a petition to replace Lisa Liar, Paul was accused of harassing her when the petitions never entered her borough. Neither of these policies were mentioned of course in the Court). Protecting London so to protect the PRU was DS Paul Craig. In Court, Paul explained that the British Unicorn Party was promoting health policies, including in Bromley to attract local residents to join the Party so we would have Bromley Borough registered voters as members who could stand at council elections so to be councilors, take control of the Bromley and use it’s funds to set up a health centre for PRU victims, (another Mid-Staffs type scandal hospital the Authorities are trying to cover-up). Paul described how it would have MRI and CT scanners, run by radiologists who would inform, not Drs, but Homeopaths, Herbalists and Osteopaths what they found. His was the prime case for justifying this. Covert recording Doctors committing verbal abuse, lying to him about treatment and (when compared to their medical reports about the consultations) proved Doctors lie in medical reports. Unlike Binney Clarke of Sevenoaks who covertly recorded nurses and media covertly record lots of people, the CPS opted to claim Paul had harassed the Doctors by covertly recording them (!) then claimed Paul was lying about what two Doctors had said when the recordings would prove otherwise.
During Appeal, Offender Dr Jennifer Quirke DID lie, justifying the covert recording. In consultation she lied, “THERE ARE NO DRUGS TO TAKE AWAY THE SYMPTOMS” and doctors can’t improve “A LOT OF THESE SYMPTOMS CERTAINLY NOT WITH MEDICATION”. Of course there was Serc which Paul later revealed had eased the symptoms. She lied she would never refuse to treat a patient for fear of litigation when in fact she had told Paul’s G.P. she wouldn’t treat him ‘cos she feared litigation, (Paul’s barrister failed to show her the letter/ challenge her on this). She lied Paul just moaned about previous negligent Drs when Paul was telling her to put together like a jig saw puzzle all the facts and symptoms so to identify the extent of the organ damage so accurate treatment could be prescribed, but she refused only offering psychobabble and no serc (Venters would not view the whole video (just 3 minutes) to listen to what 1st dr had REALLY said). She claimed it was irrelevant that Paul had been already diagnosed! Offender Dr Goldingwood told lies, including he recommended Paul see Linda Luxon, when in fact it was dr Riorden Eva who did this in a letter to Dr Iris Reuter (Paul’s barrister failed to produce this letter/challenge the 2nd Dr ). At Appeal Judge Venters (with a magistrate Offender Burtwell following Venters’ lead)) restricted covert recording of 20 minutes of just one Dr to 3 minutes (at 3.01pm) The CPS guy claimed Paul was obsessed with the Drs, when Paul after exposing them in 2004-5, only had Policy Sheets issued 2 weeks in 2006,7,10 and 12 and was a co-author of Public Report (again legal) he’d been reluctant to do. Offender Venters voiced she didn’t see the point in letting the Party Secretary Alex Forbes (to prove party real and the Public Report commissioned through him) or Paul’s mother speak (to back Paul up as witness to the consultations), but relented only allowing both to speak for 3 minutes. Yet, she let 2 Drs and a security boss speak at length. Paul says a UK FBI would stop Police conspiracies with others. For Venters with such Dr links to be appointed to Judge Paul, shows this conspiracy to put Drs before patients runs very deep.
The other reason for Paul’s persecution was a Public Report, Health Charter, commissioned by the NHS Justice Reform Group (led by Miguelle Cuebells and Ann Reeves) and Alex Forbes the Public Report, established a common pattern through medical negligence cases, that: Doctors CHOOSE to neglect patients due to prejudices, neglecting, persecuting and even killing patients; psychology and psychiatry are NOT sciences but modern types of condition and control, which Doctors use to commit and cover up negligence; Doctors are able to commit these horrors as the Crown Prosecution Service, Police and the Courts always protect negligent Doctors (even when they kill) but arrest, prosecute and find guilty and lock up the negligence victim or (usually) their relatives for campaigning for treatment or justice (google David Glass case for example); the General Medical Council only strike off negligent Doctors who are not white (hint of racism); that patient charities, AVMA all refuse to help victims of medical negligence, the latter breaking their remit in this so claiming charitable status fraudulently; that hundreds of M.P.s have looked the other way on this issue. The conclusion: if this epidemic is not addressed, then patients or surviving parents will take the so-called law into their own hands, killing not just Doctors and anyone who got in their way to protect the Doctors, but bomb medical union conferences, Police Stations, massacre security staff at Court Houses whilst trying to kill Judges, magistrates and juries (if the latter’s aren’t killed on emerging from the Courts), lure into a trap and destroy a Police Fire Arms Unit. Having had their child murdered by Doctors who are then protected, the parent prosecuted by the CPS for trying to get justice, it is quite feasible for a distraught parent to copy suicide bombers and drive an oil tanker into a hospital.
In the section proving an institutionalized bias of CPS and Courts ALWAYS protecting negligent Doctors was this example: When Doctors attempted to kill 12 year old David Glass (who had survived other bouts of serious ill health) by pumping him with diamorphine, his family had to fight the Drs, hospital security and Police to pull the diamorphine from the boy to save him, the CPS opting to prosecute the family, not the Drs for attempted murder. Judge Shawcross insured much of the family’s side of events was diluted, got his guilty verdict and locked the family up! The Report recommended that in such situations, if the victims (the patient’s family) killed the Drs, security staff, Police Officers in saving the patient or the Judge and jury out of revenge for such a prejudiced verdict they should be pardoned. June Venters should have thanked Paul for exposing this bias so it could be tackled to prevent destruction of Court Houses, but gasped at this Reports conclusion when Paul defended it in arguments with the CPS fool! This reinforced the Public Reports conclusion that Judges, like Venters, are biased and showed she lied in interviews claiming to be interested in “Social Justice” from a “young age”. She has the view of all Judges: patient’s must respect negligent Dr or be punished. Paul said, “Stalin would be proud of June Venters”. In another case it showed how Drs used psychology and psychiatry to commit medical negligence, having the perverted Mental Health Teams cover up the negligence, when Doctors refused to investigate the obviously physical disease of Sophia Mirza, opting instead to claim it was mental, having a Mental Health Team (including psychiatrist) and police take her away from home and health regime getting her better, torture her in a mental ward, reversing her recovery killing her.
Paul’s Mum lost her home due to the cost to stop Paul’s genuine nightmarish symptoms. The night care ran down her immune system leaving her with pleurisy and symptoms of bowel cancer. PRU Drs like David Goldingwood did nothing, leaving Paul to suffer horrific symptoms now to be jailed for exposing him so Dr is ‘upset’, 9 years after his exposure, just after the Public Report came out exposing the PRU hospital linking a covert recording by Paul of a hospital manager admitting the PRU horrors in 2003, then did nothing, allowing preventable suffering and death.
Paul Appealed the verdict (not sentence) in 2014 but, instead of Charges thrown out, Judge Venters not only upheld the verdicts but (“very rare and unusual” to increase sentences in Appeals) wants Paul in mental hospital for co-authoring the Public Report and having Party policies for the electorate to vote on and ordered Paul be psychiatrically assessed (the Public Report found psychiatry and psychology exists not just to commit and cover up medical negligence but, to condition and control society, suppressing freedom of thought and expression). Despite obeying the Restraining Order, he’s still going to ‘an asylum. There is a CONFLICT of interest: Venters set up a Warlingham Pro-Bono legal & G.P. surgery combined with Drs’ Hinkes and Cohen explaining why ‘it’/she said “wanted to put a stop to this” (prevent victims of PRU Hospital lying ‘drs’ being saved and object to negligent Drs being called “evil”. Imprisoned so physically damaged & on-going, medically neglected Paul O’Callaghan will be beaten or killed and in Mental Ward pumped with lethal drugs first, for having policies; Britain has become a TRUE fascist state AND akin to modern China.
The only thing which happened between the initial and Appeal trials is that the British unicorn Party adopted a policy to stop the other epidemic of Forced Child Adoption and to class racism as a Serious Mental Illness (4 days after promoting the latter but 2 months after issuing a petition to replace WPC Liar, Paul was accused of harassing her when the petitions never entered her borough. Neither of these policies were mentioned of course in the Court). Protecting London so to protect the PRU was DS Paul Craig. In Court, Paul explained that the British Unicorn Party was promoting health policies, including in Bromley to attract local residents to join the Party so we would have Bromley Borough registered voters as members who could stand at council elections so to be councillors, take control of the Bromley and use it’s funds to set up a health centre for PRU victims, (another Mid-Staffs type scandal hospital the Authorities are trying to cover-up). Paul described how it would have MRI and CT scanners, run by radiologists who would inform, not Drs, but Homeopaths, Herbalists and Osteopaths what they found. His was the prime case for justifying this. Covert recording Doctors committing verbal abuse, lying to him about treatment and (when compared to their medical reports about the consultations) proved Doctors lie in medical reports. Unlike Binney Clarke of Sevenoaks who covertly recorded nurses and media covertly record lots of people, the CPS opted to claim Paul had harassed the Doctors by covertly recording them (!) then claimed Paul was lying about what two Doctors had said when the recordings would prove otherwise.
The Public Report Recommendations to AVERT massacres of Doctors and their protectors (which Venters wants “to stop”) now policies: Drs to lose legal right to deny patients available treatment or medical investigation (e.g. scans) but patients to gain legal right to order Drs to do these actions. All hospital facilities (e.g. scanners which radiologists read the results of for Drs) to be available for Homeopaths, Herbalists and Osteopaths who will gain legal right to override Drs misdiagnosis (with a patients consent). That General Medical Council committees are stripped of Doctors and replaced by victims of medical negligence, Homeopaths, Herbalists and Osteopaths. Cranial-Osteopaths gain the legal right to prescribe antibiotics); maths ‘A’ Level replaced by Human biology ‘A’ Level as requirement to train as Doctors thereby allowing Working-Classes to join the killers profession (having found blatant Discrimination is a motive for medical negligence). Psychology and psychiatry outlawed and their official practitioners taken out of society. That the Crown Prosecution Service is replaced, it’s current prosecutors held to account for their prejudices. All G.P. and hospital consultations to be openly recorded depriving Drs of their ability to twist and lie about what was said, when writing their medical reports. Negligence victims imprisoned for killing negligent Drs, their supporters, CPS prosecutors, Judges or bombing the BMA or psychobabblist conferences, will be released from prison
In the section proving an institutionalized bias of CPS and Courts ALWAYS protecting negligent Doctors was this example: When Doctors attempted to kill 12 year old David Glass (who had survived other bouts of serious ill health) by pumping him with diamorphine, his family literally had to fight the Drs, hospital security and Police to pull the diamorphine from the boy to save him, the CPS opted not to prosecute the Drs for attempted murder, but instead prosecute the family. Judge Shawcross insured much of the family’s side of events was diluted, got his guilty verdict and locked the family up. The Report recommended that in such situations as this and others, if the victims (the patient’s family) killed the Drs, security staff, Police Officers in saving the patient or the Judge and jury out of revenge for such a prejudiced verdict they should be pardoned. June Venters should have thanked Paul for exposing this bias so it could be tackled to prevent destructions of Court Houses, but gasped at this Reports conclusion when Paul (as co-author) defended it in arguments with the cps PROSECUTOR. This reinforced the Public Reports conclusion that Judges, like part time Judge Venters, are biased and showed she lied in interviews claiming to be interested in “Social Justice” from a “young age”. She has the view of all Judges: a patient’s must respect negligent Dr or be punished. She has ordered a psychiatric report on Paul and intends to lock him up on 1st December, just like writers in the old Soviet Union were and modern China are. Stalin would be proud of June Venters. In another section it was shown how Drs use psychology and psychiatry to commit medical negligence, then have the perverted Mental Health Teams help cover up the medical negligence. One case detailed was about Doctors refused to investigate the obviously physical disease of Sophia Mirza, opting instead to claim it was mental, having a Mental Health Team (including psychiatrist) and police take her away from home and health regime getting her better, torture her in a mental ward, reversing her recovery killing her. Now the psychoabblists will lie Paul is mental to cover up the Public Report and the horrors of the PRU.
Now, with constant rocking vertigo due to organ damage, ear noises caused by polyps, found Serc medication himself, re-learnt to walk properly, 20 years of life ruined (9 years 6 days a week on average imprisoned at home) and campaigning legally and producing a Public Report, Paul is likely to be tortured and killed in prison or Mental Ward, so the conspirators escape justice.

Picture11 - CopyPicture15Picture16Picture17

On the run: Paul to be jailed as a political prisoner and tortured to death for our polices will be UKs own Nelson Mandela and Yulia Tymoshenko. Alex Forbes.
The Party has a policy to avoid executing anyone, whilst at the same time giving victims families and victims the recognition that the crime would deserve the death penalty if that in itself wasn’t a bad act: this policy is intertwined with the party’s policy on introducing a Written Constitution. This addresses the issue of execution which the Party follows: Whilst it will be law for an elected Judge to state that for the most horrendous crimes execution by hanging should be the penalty (such as conspiring to help Doctors kill patients), the perpetrator can immediately plead for Forgiveness for the specific crime they should be executed for so will be automatically spared the death penalty and given a real life sentence instead. Therefore, the victim or victim’s surviving relatives have it recognized that the perpetrator committed a crime justifying their execution but no one gets executed because that to can be regarded as evil and often innocent people are executed. Any perpetrator who wants to martyr themselves by refusing to ask for Forgiveness, will clearly have lost their self-preservation instinct so will be declared insane and put into a common sense asylum until their self-preservation instinct returns for them to plead.
Paul is just a railway author, not a ‘professional’ campaigner, writing railway books to raise money to develop a retreat centre for the medically neglected (see facebook, Unicorn Retreat Centre & Sanctuary) which he would initially purchase with compensation money from the Doctors for negligence victims offering Alternative and complimentary medical services with radiologists offering MRI & CT scanners, all funded once open by New Age, drama and TV workshops. The entire proceeds from his first railway book he donated to Chloe Laslett’s Fight For Sight campaign. Once he had his career and accurate treatment with a Supporters Association running the retreat centre, he would quit British unicorn Party handing it fully to Alexander Forbes (who, with the NHS Justice Group, commissioned the Public Report). Now, with constant rocking vertigo due to organ damage, ear noises caused by polyps, having found Serc medication himself, re-learnt to walk properly, 20 years of his life ruined (9 years 6 days a week on average imprisoned at home) and campaigning legally (with political party) and helping produce a Public Report, Paul is likely to be tortured and killed in prison or Mental Ward, so the conspirators escape justice.
The Public Report They DON’T WANT YOU TO READ –Boring It’s NOT
By suppressing the Public Report, “Health Charter” June Venters has given it the best confirmation required about it’s conclusion on Judges: that they are always biased in favour of (white) negligent Doctors.
Just like her suppression of a tiny political party having POLICIES, SUPPRESSING A Public Report is further evidence that democracy is dead in Britain.
A Public Report can be written by anyone. There is NO law stating one needs X, Y Or Z qualifications to do so. It helps if it is commissioned (like the one in question was). It sets out the: Problem(s); What will happen if the Problem is NOT fixed; And how to fix that problem through changes in the Law.
By setting this legal precedent of suppressing the Public Report Health Charter, Venters has now made it possible for Public Reports commissioned by other pressure group[s, charities, think Tanks, individuals and Government to be banned.
Therefore if the original 3 page Public Report (pre-dating Julie Bailey’s campaign) became public now, if Cynthia Barker (now Head of the Care Quality Commission) was still in the CEO at NHS West Midlands (responsible for the Mid-Staffs) could have had the hospital’s local PC arrest the author and the CPS Charge him with a “malicious communication”.
Venters was well aware the Public Report was exposing how psychiatry and psychology is used by Doctors to commit and conceal medical negligence with help from psychiatrists. In addition, it sets out how psychiatry and psychology were not sciences but tools with which to suppress freedom of speech and thought. Paul called out that it was the psychobabble the Party was fighting and Venters looked back smiling sinisterly as she left the Court Room.
Once more, the Report’s conclusion were proven beyond doubt as the psychiatrist (arranged by Paul’s own solicitor, Heidi Leaney, of Kaim Todner) recommended that for writing the commissioned Public Report and having political Party policies Paul should undergo “disposal” by being “placed under Section” for a year to received “anti psychotic drugs” for his “offending”. The psychiatrist (who didn’t sign the Report – at least was not on Paul’s copy) refused to see or listen to the evidence Venters had barred from the Court Room, instead only using the distortions and lies of the Crown Prosecution service, confirming psychiatrists have a pre-determined conclusion and so use artistic license and lies to justify their false conclusion.
Jonathan benson, in Natural News (24/4/14) wrote, “Modern psychiatry has become a hotbed of corruption, particularly the kind that seeks to demonize and declare mentally ill anyone who deviates from what is regarded as the norm”, (the same definition as Personality Disorders), which means in the Aztec Kingdoms, if you were against human sacrifice and psychiatrists existed, you would have been declared to have Personality Disorders or ODD (defined as ongoing pattern of disobedient, hostile and defiant behavior” which can be applied to whistle blowers and campaigners). This illness is fiction like ADHD created by Dr. Leon Eisenberg, who admitted when dying it was fake. .
Mr Benson reports, “An even greater danger to using this subjective approach in the diagnosis of mental illness is that it threatens to curtail freedom of speech and political dissent. The US government has already tried to declare those who oppose its tyrannical policies, or who simply question them, as having “political paranoia,” a type of mental illness”. Characterizing non-conformity as ‘mental illness’ a hallmark of totalitarian government In Britain, as Paul O’Callaghan’s case shows, the psychiatrists are the totalitarians. “Psychiatric incarceration of mentally healthy people is uniformly understood to be a particularly pernicious form of repression, because it uses the powerful modalities of medicine as tools of punishment, and it compounds a deep affront to human rights with deception and fraud. Doctors who allow themselves to be used in this way… betray the trust of society and breach their most basic ethical obligations as professionals.” — Richard J. Bonnie, Professor of Law and Director of the Institute of Law, Psychiatry and Public Policy at the University of Virginia British Unicorn Charter Party have made it the number 1 policy to destroy psychiatry.
The Public Report was, ironically something Paul didn’t even want to do: Paul thought it would be ignored so a waste of time. He agreed to use his cross referencing skills to find common factors between negligence cases, creating the Public Report, after two years of pressure from his Party co-founder, Alexander Forbes, who wanted Paul to work with the NHS Justice/Reform Group led by Miguell Cuebells and Ann Reeves, which was not getting very far at anything. Interestingly, UK Column (Kay) spotted that a member of this Group, Ernest Berry, is a neighbour of Ken Clarke….
Paul told Alex that if they wanted a Public Report to promote, he would do that: using cross referencing skills to find common factors of victims in dealings with various bodies and professions and put these into chapters of their own to highlight the EXTENT of those bodies failures. Alex reported back that the NHS Justice Group had agreed and thereafter Alex joined the NHS Justice/Reform Group. those contributing to it were to be known as the Common sense Chartists. When Paul was arrested, Alex ran away and the Group did not respond to Paul.
Until the Public Report was produced, British Unicorn Party was ignored. Paul had planned in 2012 to release 2,000 more policy sheets to gain members from Bromley to stand at the council elections and if this failed to gain members, give his role in the British Unicorn Party to Alex Forbes to solely lead.
Paul told UK Column, “I was genuinely shocked a Public Report I’d sent (Matthew) Kershaw (the new CEO of South london healthcare NHS Trust whom Paul had NEVER contacted before), “to get him to read the detailed account of my case within the Public Report so he would instruct his Doctors to admit their crimes so subsequent Doctors would cease their negligence top cover up their predecessors negligence. Bromley had done this to protect Greenwich Doctors.”.
Unaware Kershaw needed the PRU to look squeaky clean so it could close Lewisham Hospital, Kershaw had Head of PRU security Mike Musto and local WPC Lisa London move against Paul (see earlier reports).

The Public Report The C.P.S and Psychobabblists Want Suppressed – Boring It’s NOT:
First and foremost it set out the cases of medical negligence, including Paul’s case (already described), and many other cases, in particular, Sophia Mirza and Child X (to show the evil of psychiatry), Jay Suddell (to show how Doctors can kill and go on practicing) and David Glass (how not only are Doctors protected by the CPS and Courts, but the victims’ family are locked up for saving the victim from being killed by Doctors). .
Next in the second half, it featured the uselessness (driven by prejudice) of the General Medical Council protecting white negligent Doctors hypocrisy of one law for Doctors and one for everyone else by the Crown Prosecution service and Judges. It set out that Judges are so biased in favour of negligent Doctors that victims of Doctors and this injustice should be forgiven for taking the law into their own hands with Doctors and seeking revenge on the Judges and Crown Prosecution service.
This Report also revealed in the final chapter how time after time, sourcing sections from previous cases, how psychology and psychiatry is used to conceal negligence, helping Doctors in one case torture a physically ill, medically neglected patient, causing her death. This chapter went on to explain the motive for psychobabblists.
It also stated that, “Psychobabble” (psychology and psychiatry) “exists to cover up the failure of science, including medicine (be accidental or on purpose) and to condition and control society, since religions have now little effect in this”.
Psychobabblists were very willing to help negligent Doctors commit medical negligence (dismissing physical illness as mentally caused, as this increased psychologists and psychiatrists ‘clients’ and therefore their income, but also increased status and legal power.
Two cases from the Report are worth repeating here: Child X and later Sophia Mirza:
Child X was a 13 year old boy diagnosed with M.E. disease by his local hospital. He was THEN sent by local; Doctors to Great Ormond Street Children’s Hospital. When the parents saw the unit their son was to attend they refused to submit him to the unit, run by a psychiatrist. The boy’s symptoms were of not being able to see or move or be able to feed himself. The following year he was being tube fed at his local hospital. The local Drs wanted the boy to attend Great Ormond Street’s psychobabble unit and used Social services to wage a six month legal battle where the Judge made the boy a ward of court where upon he would be forced into the hospital unit.
The parents fled Britain with their son to Europe (where Interpol were informed to search for them). For some unknown reason, the father returned to Britain to give himself up. He was arrested for contempt of court. The father was informed that the boy must attend Great Ormond Street Children’s Hospital by the end of the week. The mother then brought their son back to Britain where at his home, Police raided it and took the boy to Great Ormond street to be tortured. Nurses there accused him of being “awkward” instead of physically ill. He had gone into the ward able to walk, but whilst in there he was reduced to using a zimmer frame, his chin on the bar and his ankles scrapping along the floor. A dr asked the boy if he realized how much his NHS bed was costing! After 8 months of separation from his parents they regained custody of him and rescued him. But the boy’s identy was blocked by a Judge, only to be known as Child X. The psychiatrist behind this torture was Michael Prenderghast.
PSYCHONEUROINMUNOLOGY/ Page 136 of PUBLIC REPORT.
The horrors Sophia Mirza suffered was based on the flawed belief (excuse) that mental illness causes physical illness. The Public Report reveals this in a section on “Psychoneuroimmunology”. The Report sets out how psychobabblists believe, “are claiming” that our emotions “have their own cells” and “emotional cells fights physical ill health and therefore justify psychobabblists claims that physical illness can be caused and cured emotionally/psychologically. “Psychobabblisats believe the brain and the mind (the person) are 1 in the same. Is a person their brain then? Psychobabble/science researchers BELIEVE that cells which destroy disease (macrophages) interact with so-called cells which behave, quote, “like” chemical versions of emotions! The word “LIKE” shows the researches DON’T actually know for certain even, yet these researchers claim can justify (explain) the belief they peddle that emotion can effect physical illness”.
In one fail swoop, this paragraph undermines a key weapon the Doctors have to cover up medical negligence by claiming mental illness is causing a patients physical illness, whilst also undermining psychologists and psychiatrists ability to increase their number, power and status.
The Public Report PARA 4, PAGE 130 stated, “The psychobabblists have a perverted belief system: In Sophia’s case, Baginski fantasized that Sophia’s ‘fictional illness’ was caused by Sophia wishing to “regress to the womb” and that she could not face life. Psychiatrist G Stanley Hall remember perversely thought that being an Only Child was “ a disease in itself”. Prenderghast joked to a lecture at a hospital about his patients, describing one ill girl as ‘looking like a granny’. Psychobabblists dream up fictional illnesses so they can class everyone as mentally ill (e.g. regression and conversion dissociate disorder”): they have an obsession with sex is also found as so many psychobabblists worship the evil Freud (sigmund who was obsessed with blaming most issues on sex, nosing in on a victims love life, ‘a relationship of lovers) and obsessed with how a persons illness makes them “feel” (so to establish a way of blaming a physical illness on emotional feelings).
Psychobabblists believe those who are very environmental by recycling are suffering from, “obsessive compulsive disorder and this often occurred in perfectionists who are drawn to a moral cause’. Thus if you recycle or a perfectionist you are defined as mental! This slander was stated by Dr John Morgan, consultant and lecturer in psychiatry at St Georges Hospital, London. He continued his slander, ‘If they perceive a firm is misbehaving they believe it should be punished by being avoided, and spread the word about these sinners to their social network”. Maybe environmental campaigners, including Greenpeace, should picket outside Dr Morgan’s hospital; and persecute him, before they are deemed unfit to have children next?
For big businesses polluting etc, being able to have their critics silenced by having them branded mental and Sectioned on the grounds they are a Danger To Others is quite feasible thanks to Dr Morgan, as a few years ago a protestor known to Police for this action was arrested and prevented from going on a demo by being Sectioned Under the Mental Health Act for 3 days”.
These three latter paragraphs quickly show how far psychobabble has spread and reveals the harm it can inflict. These are not revelations the Authorities want out as it can lead to the destruction of psychiatry, a powerful tool to suppress freedom of thought and speech.
The Report exposes the two primary tools of conditioning and controlling society to suppress freedom of thought and speech: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and NLP, the latter UK Column have reported on a lot.
CBT
The Public Report found how psychobabblists would identify “cognitive distortions” in their ‘client’ referring to the distortions as, “errors in thinking”, a phrase blatantly displaying how CBT is about changing how people think to suit the psychobabblist and their employers: the Authorities.
The psychobabblelist who assessed Paul for producing this Public Report recommended Paul undergo “therapy” for his “offending” (this being writing the Public Report!).
Paras 2 – 9, page 131
“The psychobabblists (e.g. behavioural therapists) will be the person to identify “cognitive distortions” in their client!!! These distortions are also referred to as, “errors in thinking”.
The treatment (cognitive restructuring) consists of 3 types: Working in a 1 to 1 situation of client and practitioner, where the practitioner tries to reason with the client about what the latter views as the formers distortion; in a group where emotional experiences take place; and the most popular method is one where the clients behaviour pattern is altered. Victims of doctors negligence have been told during the negligence, that they need Cognitive Behavioural Therapy as psychobabblists believe themselves that behaviour influences a person’s perception of themselves and attitudes. It’s common sense that it’s the opposite way round.
The Danger
A). It’s not just a threat, as it is actually coming up in medical negligence cases. People who have been medically neglected have been told during the negligence, that if they changed their perception of themselves/their illness they will get better. Of course they didn’t, the treatment making them more ill because their illness was physical, physically caused, but the medical doctors/psychobabblists refused to accept that.
If such a patient does not realize they’re physically ill or is unable to prove they’re being medically neglected, they will believe their attitude towards themselves/their illness is making them ill, but because it’s not a psychological illness the C.B.T. will not improve them so they will become depressed (becoming genuinly mentally ill to the delight of you know who’s). So both the doctors and the psychobabblist get away with negligence.

B). The other danger is it’s ability to condition people. It’s the psychobabblist who decides what a patients errors of thought are.
So if a victim of negligence is critical of Doctors, the psychobabblist will say that is a cognitive distortion and try and change the victims view of the guilty doctors/and those protecting them. No doubt even if the Doctors were caught on video tape committing the negligence, the psychobabblist would still try to change the victims view, thereby proving beyond doubt the bias of psychobabblists to protect doctors and justifying their mass destruction”.
This last paragrap[h is poignant as this is exactly what happened to our author of this conclusion: the Judge had a psychiatrist declare Paul was “delusional” and required “antipsychotic drugs for a year, so to change his “offending” (writing the Public Report.
The Public Report continued on CBT:
“Central Government could also have psychobabblists use C.B.T. to condition people into perceiving their criticism of the Governments policies as being “errors in thinking”, as well as freedom of speech.
There are instances when people DO need to change their perceptions in order to build confidence (but not to the ego levels of yobs), but it’s up to THAT PERSON to decide which of their own perceptions need to change. Not somebody else, particularly NOT someone who doesn’t know them.
More facts on C.B.T.
1.Supposedly rigorously tested scientifically.

2.Emory Uni (Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.) scientists claim that C.B.T. could treat fertility problems.

3.C.B.T. is being used to treat bulimia, depression, phobia’s, schizophrenia, obsessive compulsive disorder, and the physically caused M.E. disease (which many doctors negligently refuse to accept is caused physically).

4.C.B.T. operates on a BELIEF system: that it is the way you think of yourself (i.e. in wrong ways) the world and other people. SO NO ACTUAL EVIDENCE then? Just a BELIEF. C.B.T. is about making such person’s think differently about themselves, the world, other people. A tool easier to misuse, and has been. Did the Nazis invent C.B.T like they did psychotropic drugs?

5.Doctors, nurses, physiotherapists, social workers, occupational therapists and of course psychobabblists can inflict C.B.T?

6.C.B.T. patient’s receive “homework” (a diary of why they did something they are receiving C.B.T. for, and how it felt at the time, and what action they took and, most alarmingly, how they physically felt. This last point the C.B.T. practitioner covers regards as relevant is alarming. It proves the C.B.T. practitioner believes physical symptoms are caused by psychological aspects, (which is stupid).
On page 132, paras 2 and 3, the Public Report continued, “Another reason for C.B.T. is that it is economically cheaper. The Government quango, National Institute for Clinical Excellence, (N.I.C.E. an organization which covered up the evidence of secret recordings of doctors committing negligence on purpose) have begun recommending C.B.T. as a primary and complimentary treatment.
The Department of Health (also guilty of the same offence as N.I.C.E. are) is diverting money to C.B.T. from other forms of psychobabble, so no wonder the psychobabblists are arguing over whether C.B.T. can treat all disorders.
C.B.T. is the ultimate non-violent weapon doctors have to condition a patient into accepting the doctors medical negligence. C.B.T. must be and will be outlawed.
The Public report went on to refer to an Economist close to the Government (2012) had recommended C.B.T. be forced upon people claiming benefits for mental illness (not even recognizing that those with physically caused illness are misdiagnosed(for various reasons)with mental illness.
The Public Report even exposed psychologists idiocy when the latters attack those who experienced supernatural events, (picking on the weakest evidence or ignoring the evidence all together, never looking at the strongest evidence), so to slander the person(s) who had the supernatural experience. There was even reference on page 137 to the mild mannered confrontation between David Icke, and major psychobabblist Chris French (of Goldsmith College, a major nest in psychobabble), exposing how psychologists ignore evidence and instead use prejudice to base their case upon as French was exposed as having read none of David Ickes books.

NLP:
The other tool of suppression of freedom of speech and thought, exposed in the Public Report, is NLP:
Paras 10 – 14, (NLP) page 138 stated this:
“N.L.P. practitioners are suppose to be different to other experts who study to understand human behaviour, in that N.L.P. practitioners take into account the effect the N.L.P. practitioners have on who/what they’re studying. An N.L.P. practitioner is trained to I.D. distortions and generalizations in a clients linguistic and behavioral patterns. What are N.L.P. practitioners to think they can identify what is a distortion in a person’s speech with out knowing them, only having been “trained” to deal with a client?
N.L.P. Target:
N.L.P. practitioners believe that people express how they view the world through language and behaviour (bleedin’ obvious), but then believe that one’s language shows how people can disregard information, distort one’s view of the world and generalize to the extent that it cause people to have a bad view of the world!!!!
N.L.P. practitioners are supposed to unpeel a clients words so to discover a deeper meaning and the context behind the clients words. To do this the N.L.P. practitioner listens for the deletions, distortions and generalizations in the person’s speech.

Examples of N.L.P. Use As Treatment: Part 1.
If a person says they “don’t like flowers” the N.L.P. practitioner will use specific questions to discover (in this example) that the person is allergic to some flowers. The N.L.P. practitioner will bizarrely believe that because the person has used that phrase that they “don’t like flowers” it would mean that the client will not go near any flowers! N.L.P. is flawed, as the next example will confirm:
If a person spots a famous person and says, “I know you” the speakers is not meaning by their language they know the famous person, but are simply relating they recognize the famous person. So N.L.P. practitioners should return to the drawing board on how they perceive a person’s speech can indicate a problem with their clients attitude of themselves/others/the words.
The use of N.L.P.: Part 2: Curing The Supposed Problem
However, if the N.L.P. practitioner strikes it lucky with a client who’s speech reflects what they think of themselves/others, then what will the N.L.P. practitioner do nex? The N.L.P. practitioner believes that to cure the client of their (in effect) attitude problem, being influenced by how they relate the problem verbally, is by taking certain actions, explained by the following example: If a person says they can’t do something the N.L.P. practitioner will ask what they mean by “can’t”, as the practitioner will refuse to believe the client can’t do something (“can’t” being a word which is viewed as “limiting” themselves in changing and therefore is a “language violation”).
*Now this explains why so many psychobabblists don’t accept a client can’t do something even though external factors dictate the client can’t.

Para 1 page 139 and paras 8 to 10) stated this: “The psychobabblists will behave like this due to their in experience of life (e.g. how a client lives) and their voluntary (due to their own idiocy) subjugation to be conditioned in psychobabble.
*N.L.P. therefore explains/is a likely source for psychobabblists using N.L.P. beliefs on patients who are physically ill but the psychobabblist (e.g. psychiatrist) view the illness as mental.
The Report stated further down the page, “N.L.P. explains the behaviour of psychobabblists/medical Doctors methods when they can’t accept a patient who (really is) physically ill.
*Example: The patient tells the Dr./psychobabblist they can’t stand up or swim because they’re so helplessly ill, the latter will reply, yes they can, if they change their attitude to the illness by not saying “can’t”. This argument can also be applied to the greater threat of cognitive behavioural therapy which should be outlawed, as it not only deals in speech.
If N.L.P. was destroyed/outlawed the psychobabblists and doctors would lose a useful tool to commit medical negligence”.
Thus, with this lethal horror N.L.P. can be used for we come to the manslaughter of Sophia Mirza. A victim of a psychiatrist who refused to believe she was physically ill, helping Doctors conceal that her illness was physical. Paul O’Callaghan has written much on the horrors of Doctors horrors, both persecuting/torturing patients or neglecting them to death. Paul says Sophia’s case is the worst he’d ever read because she was both persecuted, tortured and died as a result when she had been initially recovering, prior to the torture. This was the first time, after doing so many cases, that Paul was in tears over. Many New Ageists, despite Sophia having done yoga, refuse to read this, lying that reading it will give off bad vibes and one should meditate happy thoughts to bring about change, going into lar lar land, but this is an excuse the weak minded and selfish give themselves so not to face reality. We urge you to read this, edited abridged summary of Sophia’s case:
Sophia Mirza
Prior to becoming ill 1973 born Sophia Mirza had been in 2 car crashes, had suspected meningitis soon after for which she had a lumber puncture for and had at 19, multiple VACCINATIONS for holidaying in Africa, which didn’t prevent her catching two doses of malaria.
In autumn 1999, she fell ill with tiredness and supposed flu, unable to move from her bed to her bath at a friends house in Brighton. Unable to travel back to Luton due to the vibrations of a car, she moved into a flat which registered carbon monoxide. Sophia developed allergic reactions to chemicals, electro magnetic fields from gadgets all over the flats in addition to natural EM Fields from other people. The hypersensitivity symptoms were compounded by severe pain, vomiting, insomnia, extreme fatigue, earache, cramps, stiff neck. She could even feel the tower block swaying in the wind. She was diagnosed with Chronic fatigue Syndrome (another name for M.E. disease) though the name barely covers the symptoms Sophia was getting.
Her G.P., Sheila Firth, rather than try to help find the physical cause to Sophia’s symptoms, contacted the local psychobabble (mental Health Team) service, led by a psychiatrist, Dr Price. As a result Catherine Connolly offering to, “help you with your current difficulties” which can mean being locked in a psychiatric ward and tortured. Price met with Sophia, declared he had “concerns” and thereafter had Connolly interfere with Sophia’s fight to survive. Sophia’s mother notified the Mental health team they were not required. Connolly continued her real harassment of Sophia, insisting Sophia receive psychobabble treatment for her physical illness and plan for her future, G.P. Firth later notifying Sophia’s mother that Sophia should be put in a care home soher mother could “get on with your own life”. This was the Mental Health Team’s first attempt to remove Sophia from her mothers protection. In 2001 Firth wrote a letter accusing Sophia of making herself ill and her mother as “colluding” in this, later informing the mother that the Team could not cure Sophia of her illness. This poses the question: why were they interfering? From Firth’s letters it becomes clear that Firth was more interested in Sophia being “interactive” than in identifying the physical illness so a treatment could be found.
By August 2001 Sophia had improved (eating an organic diet), but her hypersensitivity remained. Medical records show that by October 2001 Firth was chasing psychiatrists, trying to have one of them join the lethal circus Sophia had to endure. Dr Gregory Baginzki. Firth lied to Sophia’s mother regarding Sophia being removed from her home stating, “that will never happen”. In October 2002, Connolly visited Sophia’s home, writing a Report later revealing how Mental Health Social Workers look for an excuse to brand someone mentally ill by even asking historical questions about wars, able to retain in memory a given address, and much venom directed at sophia’s mother being a witness.
Despite how physically ill she was quote “appeared to be control of the conversation, at times I felt controlling the session” showing that social workers suffer from “delusional disorder” as Sophia was far too till to do this, but unlike whistle blowers with recorded evidence, Catherine Connolly was not branded “delusional”. In Paul O’Callaghan’s case he was found to be delusional because he were “insulting the specialties of psychology and psychiatry and not recognizing their legitimacy” so deemed to require “antipsychotioc drugs (sound familiar? Christian Church not being recognized so they burnt such people at the stake). Under Connolly’s inquisition, Sophia denied she was depressed. Connolly then tried to portray the hypersensitivity compounded by severe pain, vomiting, insomnia, extreme fatigue, earache, cramps, stiff neck and feeling the tower block swaying in the wind, was due to violence she saw her father inflict on her mother and that because her father was of Pakistani origin and Sophia was of mixed race, that the father would not love them! This is known as Social History Questioning (in Paul O’Callaghan’s case, he refused to answer the questions when put to him, knowing full well how Mental Health Team pervert the truth to reach a pre-determined conclusion. . The Holy Grail of psychobabble to portray any kind of emotional issue Even one 20 years in the past) as the cause of physical illness.
The Public Report stated how psychobabblists create fictional mental illness so to conceal medical negligence and suppress freedom of thought and speech, which we saw In Paul’s case (for exposing amongst other things in the Report, the creating of fictional mental illnesses has itself been used to claim he has “delusional disorder” by the very people he is exposing!). In Sophia’s case Connolly referred to fictional illnesses not being found of, “no evidence of thought block, thought insertion or thought broadcasting”!!! That November Baginski visited Sophia. Connolly wrote that there was “insufficient grounds for detention under the Mental health Act”. After Bagtinski met with Sophia for 20 minutes, he then the next day gave a public lecture to an audience about Sophia without her permission. Afterwards Baginski notified Sophia’s mother that he believed Sophia’s illness was a mixture of phobias, anxiety, compulsions and, perversely, (which is normal behaviour for psychiatrists) that Sophia wished to regress to the womb so could not face life so allowed her mother (who was of course protecting Sophia from the Team’s horrors) to control her life.
He wanted Sophia’s mother to see a psychologist who would have Sophia’s mother view Sophia’s illness in the same way as Baginski did (the tools of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Neuro Linguistic Programming being of course on hand for psychologists to do this).
He then threatened that if Sophia did not improve within 6 months and her mother refused to allow Sophia to be Sectioned under the Mental Health Act he would go to Court to have her Sectioned even saying he would have the Police break down the front door to take Sophia (which they did). These threats were admitted by him in a letter by him to Firth which Sophia’s mother seized a copy of.
With Sophia’s mother refusing to budge, on having Sophia sectioned, Firth then wrote to Baginski (27/12/02 Boxing Day) wanting to have the mother assessed under the Mental Health Act. When an Investigating Officer performed a white wash after Sophia’s death, he wrote about his interview with Firth regarding this incident, quote, “was prepared to consider sectioning Mrs Wilson because of her inappropriate beliefs about the nature of Sophia’s illness and her complete lack of insight”. So here’s the proof that Drs are like Nazis: that if you have a belief which doesn’t suit a Dr you can be locked up for it. At the time of this incident, Bagisinski would not even make such a move, informing Firth it was “unsupportable”.
After waiting just 2 months for Sophia to recover and not 6, Baginski notified Sophia’s mother that if Sophia had not improved by the end of the month, she would be Sectioned. Sophia had improved under a South African Doctors direction using protocol. Her use of pain killers was down, periods were normal, eating only every 2 hours instead of 6 hours, have bedroom window open for 15 minutes a day, was able to speak to her mother for 20 minutes and use the intercom, her speech was clear, rembered dates for birthdays and had hopes for the future.
This was January 2003. Baginski, Firth and Connolly were however preparing to reverse this progress, directly causing her to relapse, causing her death.
Next (11th February) Firth wrote to Sophia, stating she could no longer be her G.P. as Sophia would not engage withy the Mental team, then on 24th March it was Firth who lied to David Lepper M.P. that Sophia had diagnosed herself with M.E. when this was not the case.This was when Firth had ceased to be her G.P. On the 16th May 2003 the three persecutors attempted to access Sophia’s flat, but Sophia’s mother blocked them. On the 11th july 2003 they returned with Police, broke down the door, the police guarded the bedroom door whilst Sophia under went an Inquisition by the 3 persecutors, (Sophia recording on Dictaphone what was said) continually getting Sophia to repeat herself, (even that she was too physically ill to leave the room). Baginski thought the South African Drs treatmnent irrelevant because he had never seen Sophia, but what mattered was that the treatment was improving Sophia, which didn’t suit the Teams pre-determind outcome: sectioning Sophia. Sophia pleaded with them not to take her to the Mental Unit (this would turn out to be pleading for her life). They sectioned her, without the Dr giving a diagnosis, (which wasn’t required).
Sophia was taken to the what is officially known as a “Place Of Safety” but as is often the case the opposite of a meaning of place’s name was what it really was: A Place of Torture:
In a locked ward (just like Child X was placed in), her blood pressure was never taken, given processed hospital food instead of the special diet the South African Dr put her on, the nurses kept coming in and talking to her (instead of clearing her room) and Baginski when he turned up sat next to the bed, swinging his legs so his feet kept hitting Sophia’s bed causing her vibrations (remember she was suffering from hypersensitivity, as Baginski well knew), causing her to be even more ill for 8 hours. This torture lasted for 2 weeks. Her solicitor got her out. Afterwards Sophia’s health never recovered. She became allergic to all foods, causing her knife type pains in the head then 5 weeks later drinking water had the same effect. Her glands swelled up like balloons and she felt the blood stop circulating in her legs. At the end of October 2005 she caught an ear infection and her neck swelled up to the size of a football. On the 23rd November 2005, sophia couldn’t move herself an inch and she lost the ability to sleep. On the Friday 25th November Sophia died, leaving her wrecked body. Before she died she had the awful task of agreeing for her body to be cut open to find the cause. At the first autopsy the cause of death could not be identified, even after her heart was removed and sent for tests. A second autopsy was carried out by Dr Chaudhain of Romford and Dr O’Donovan of Cambridge which involved the removal of the spinal cord. Here the Doctors found, “…unequivocal inflammatory changes affecting the special nerve cell collegian (dorsal root ganglia) that are gateways (or stations) for all sensation, going to brain through spinal cord. The changes of dorsal root ganglionitis seen in 75% of Sophia’s spinal cord were very similar to that seen during active infection by herpes viruses (such as shingles)”. The Brighton Coroner then ruled “she died as a result of acute renal failure arising effecting of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome”.
Sophia’s mother was now able to make a complaint (as Sophia had feared 5that whilst alive, a complaint would just get her sectioned again). A white wash was performed, the three persecutors kept their jobs. The public Report also details this.
Sophia Mirz’a case was the first one in the Public Report.
The chapters concluded recommending that psychobabblists be incarcerated on an island prison on St Kilda, away from harming society, until they could be cleansed of their psychobabble.
Since the Public Report was produced flaws in a third psychobabble tool, Personality Disorder, have come to light when used in cases of Forced Adoption and could be used in an Updated Public Report.
To conclude this section we will end with this Chapters opening example of how psychobabblers are shown in the Public Report to be the new Priests of Britain to turn to:
Paras 3 – 4, page 125 stated, “On the BBC TV’s One Show, a reporter was undertaking a report on ghosts. She was shown evidence caught on camera of a ghost. Rather than accept evidence, she decided to ask the OPINION of a psychobabblist, a psychologist, rather than accept evidence.
This is how infected British Society and the world has become with psychology: choosing to value opinions over evidence. This is at the root of psychobabblists persecuting the physically ill
Psychology is the STUDY of the mind, as deduced by behaviour and how it works. Deduced means to arrive at (a conclusion or knowledge) by REASONING from OBSERVED facts. To reason depends on an individuals “ability to think”.
So in the end a psychologists conclusion depends on him/her having a good ability at thinking so to reason which aspects of behaviour has relevance to a person’s state of mind being relevant to study. In plain English, psychology is about a person having good guess work and opinion, and not allowing their ignorance and prejudice to interfere with their reasoning
Meanwhile psychiatry is about studying mental illness. Psych means to intimidate a person by making him/her feel uneasy”.
——————————————–
The Public Report’s other recommendations at the end of each chapter on the issue included: Homeopaths, Herbalists and Osteopaths given equal legal and medical status to Doctors so they could arrange MRI and CT scans for patients (highlighting how the BMA union had been “conducting” a “witchunt” against Homeopathy).
It also touched on how the ex-M.P. Dr Evans Harris (Lib Dem) had been trying to make it that when a person dies, their organs would automatically be removed for transplants (or for science) – an extra incentive to Doctors to neglect to death patients they don’t regard as deserving to live (due to prejudices). The 1979 film (unlike the modern remake) Coma staring Michael Douglas, can give you a good idea of this. Evans Harris since ceasing to be an M.P. has been heavily involved in the right-to-die campaign… Harris is one M.P. worth continuing to monitor.
The most powerful; recommendation was that Doctors should lose the legal right to deny patients treatment or force treatment on a patient. Various cases described earlier you should refer back to, to see the justification for this Recommendation.
The Public Report revealed how useless (and illegitimate) the House of commons was in dealing with the menaces of Doctors.
Two chapters recommended the Christian and Bhakti Yoga view of Forgiveness for victims or their relatives (usually parents of dead child victims of medical negligence) who take the law into their own hands as Doctors are above the law. Or, as in the David Glass case, have to fight Doctors, hospital security staff and Police to prevent a patient being murdered by Doctors, in order to save their relative but are then prosecuted due to the in built bias of the Crown Prosecution service and the Courts to protect Doctors (providing they didn’t steal money like Dr Shipman did), so should be forgiven if they attack the CPS or Judges when released from prison.
The primary case in the Public Report used to justify this act of forgiveness was the case of David Glass, which we repeat here. It highlights most strongly the prejudice the Crown Prosecution service
Here it is worth repeating in an abridged form the case of David Glass to epitomize the bias of the Crown Prosecution Service:
Currently there is a campaign led by the sinister ex-M.P. Dr Evans (axe patients rights to life) Harris for patients to have the Right To Die, allowing a Dr to kill a patient if the patient asks for it. Yet Doctors already have a right to kill patients when it is against the patients (or their parents) wishes. This is usually through negligence protected by the Courts, but in this case it was more direct. Whilst a shocking case in itself, the David Glass case was featured in the Public Report to show how pro-Dr biased the Crown Prosecution Service are. It also shows that the Nazi Germany policy of murdering the disabled was underway in Britain in 1998.
David Glass was negligently mistaken as “still born” so did not receive any help breathing, until after 55 minutes when he started screaming, only then being placed on a life support machine but expected to die. He didn’t die, so he had already survived TWICE. This is important. As a result he was left with severe learning and physical disabilities. In July 1998, after having had previous relapses in his health yet survived, David was admitted to St Marys Hospital Portsmouth due to complications from removing his tonsils causing septicemia. On the 30th July the hospital staff decided David was dying and no further intensive treatment would be provided. Naturally his family objected and were described as “confrontational” and a “demanding family” for objecting to David being left to die. The family insisted throughout that David would recover and during this period he did improve, though a Dr Wozniak wrote on the 3rd August. “I think (David) would not survive this illness” and that “we may need to consider measures to relieve distress e.g…..morphine….and Mum felt that this was not appropriate at present”.
He was discharged in September, but had to be re-admitted on the 8th following a chest infection striking him. Doctors now discussed using morphine to reduce his distress, (too much morphine kills, remember). His mother refused consent for this to be administered and made it clear that if David’s heart stopped beating she expected the staff to resuscitate him. Dr Joanne Walter (pediatrician) thought this was against David’s best interests (in other words killing him was better!) and that quote, “morphine and TLC (tender loving care)” was all that should be given and, “I do not believe that further intensive care in (David’s) best interest” and later that David would not receive cardiac massage or intravenous or any other drugs to resuscitate him.
In her medical notes, Walter wrote, “I have told (Ms Glass/David’s mother) that we can give morphine to alleviate distress even vs. their wishes (and we can – I am assured by the Official Solicitor that no Judge has ever overturned a Doctors decision to withdraw treatment/alleviate symptoms), but we wouldn’t without telling them”. Thus the Official solicitor confirmed the pattern (bias) of Judges to rule in favour of Doctors.
David was re-admitted twice in October and David began, the Doctors claimed, “dying from lung disease” but David had survived other relapses so the family disagreed, knowing that administering morphine to reduce the pain also reduced David’s chances of survival, which led to a meeting between David’s Mum, the Hospital C.E.O. – and a female Police Officer the hospital had “secured. In a letter to the local M.P. the CEO admitted to instructing the Doctors to administer a minimum dosage of morphine, yet the then Government claimed the CEO did not interfere in the Doctors judgment. If David was dying then the Doctors would not have had any objection in taking David home to die. Yet when his mother said she would do this, the WPC threatened she would arrest her if she did, thus ensuring that David would remain at the Doctors mercy to be killed by morphine. She even told the mother to quote, “shut up and listen to the Doctors. At 7pm diamorphine (of an adult dosage) began to be administered to David. A “Do NOT Resuscitate Order” 2was placed on David’s medical notes WITHOUT consulting his mother. The “peaceful and settled state” the Doctors described David was in the next day because of the morphine in fact made him “dopey” and his breathing worsened. Walker then stated she wanted the morphine to continue so he would “slip away peacefully” (she wanted to commit euthanasia but without anyone’s consent making it murder). Soon david was turning blue.
The family protected David and his mother so she could remove the diamorphine to save his life, by literally fighting off the Doctors, hospital security staff and Police. The hospital refused to provide an antidote to the morphine, which was only obtained when Carol took him home and called in the G.P.
David recovered, the Crown Prosecution service refused to prosecute the Doctors but instead prosecuted the family, showing just how biased the Crown Prosecution service is. The Judge refused to allow emphasis on the application of the morphine and their barristers failed to point out the Doctors started the violence. found the family guilty. David’s Aunt Diane Wilde (who had been resuscitating David when the Doctors assaulted her) was sentenced to 12 months whilst two other relatives were each sentenced to 9 months. On Appeal these were reduced to 9 and 4 months, by Justice Hidden on the grounds it was “mercy” for David. Hidden ranted, “Everyday, all around this country, difficult clinical decisions have to be made by members of medical staff which can not always be understood, fully appreciated or agreed with members of the patients family. They must not be allowed to be subjected to vilification, abuse and assault”. David’s mother was “disgusted” with the Judges verdict and that the “drs tried to kill David”.
The Public Report concluded this case by stating, “This is why Doctors continue to persecute, abuse, maim and kill: because the law protects Drs”.
It recommended that in such cases of violent confrontation where Doctors were trying to kill a patient then those protecting the family should be forgiven even if the Doctors or their acolytes are killed in the process. And if such family members are jailed and take revenge on the CPS and Judges by killing the Judge or CPS prosecutors for jailing them, they should still be forgiven.
The British Unicorn Party have adopted all this as policies.
Report Warns Of Hospital Massacre – Local Authorities Persecute Author
The Public Report also warned in it’s conclusion that if negligent Doctors did not cease to be above the law then a parent who’s child has been murdered by a Doctors negligence due to the Doctors attitude, unable to get justice but instead prosecuted by the Crown Prosecution Service for campaigning for justice, will copy Muslim terrorists and carry out a massacre at a hospital or against the Crown Prosecution Service. This conclusion was based on the increasing acts of physical violence upon Doctors by negligence victims and their parents as a result of medical negligence. The PRU Hospital and Mayday in Croydon were identified as both likely to suffer such massacres as a result.

British Unicorn Charter Party: Philosophy & Constitution
The UK Party Who’s Leader is TO BE Locked In A Mental Ward Because Of Our Policies:
All Parties have a philosophy or central defining theme: The Tories believe in free market economics and value a person by their financial worth (!). the Labour Party (supposedly) believe in nationalization and socialism. The Lib-Dems believe in European integration. The Green Party put the environment at the heart of it’s policies. Ukip believe in leaving the European Union.
For the British Unicorn Charter Party it’s overriding philosophy is that it is common sense that only those with the experience of continued hardship can be qualified to solve the causes of continued hardship and that psychology and psychiatry are the causes of Britain’s descent into insane suffering so should be destroyed.
Our operation is therefore of a combination of democratic meritocracy: that upon achieving 100 members all members can stand to be elected to the Party leadership providing they have the merit of experiencing continued hardships. British Unicorn constitution allows for any member to submit a policy of their own, including personnel policies to their own plights on any subject, providing it does not contradict any existing policies.
The British Unicorn Charter Party’s governing body, the Unicorn Committee, have responded to Judge Venters by not just adopting ALL Public Report “Health Charter” recommendations,(infuriating evil Judge Venters) but more:
The British Unicorn Charter Party’s governing body, the Unicorn Committee, have responded to Judge Venters by not just adopting ALL Public Report “Health Charter” recommendations,(infuriating evil Judge Venters) but more:
There is nothing in law which gives a Judge the right to determine which political party policy the public can vote on.
Our Primary policies (all of which are in accordance with and not contradicting, the G. Common Sense Charter) are:
1.Due to the extensive tentacles of psychiatry and psychology permeating throughout all aspects of society, degrading it, (conditioning and controlling minds) and how the Kaim Todner psychiatrist has declared an author of a Public Report mentally ill because of the authors Report conclusions and for having political party policies (for which a psychiatrist has no right to decide which policies the public should and shouldn’t vote on), has led this Party’s governing committee to conclude that every aspect of society can be healed extensively with the destruction of psychiatry and psychology (they make the insane sane and the sane insane!). Therefore it is NOW the NO 1 Policy to destroy psychiatry and psychology. The B.U.C.P. declares war on all psychiatrists, psychologists and Mental Health Teams. Through the justifications for this Policy, the public will be educated as to WHY their local psychiatrists and psychologists are lethal. Once in power as part of the new coalition Government, the new F.B.I. will be instructed to round up the psychiatrists, psychologists and Mental Health Teams for removal out of society so to protect freedom of thought and speech and prevent future concealment of medical negligence. Common Sense Mental Health Experts will replace psychiatrists, basing their conclusions on all evidence, not prejudices or guesswork and not to reach a pre-determined conclusion. Thus, Racism (objecting to a person because of their natural skin colour) and believing a family to be superior by birth will be declared serious mental illnesses. A Department for Health & Common Sense set up to destroy psychiatry and psychology.
2.Doctors to lose the legal right to deny patients available treatment or medical investigation (e.g. scans) but patients to gain the legal right to order Doctors to do these actions.
3.All hospital facilities (e.g. scanners which radiologists read the results of for Drs) to be available for Homeopaths, Herbalists and Osteopaths who will gain legal right to override Doctors misdiagnosis (with a patients consent).
4.That the General Medical Council committees are stripped of Doctors and replaced by victims of medical negligence, Homeopaths, Herbalists and Osteopaths.
5.AVMA and Liberty leaders are put on trial for claiming charitable status fraudulently (which is stripped from them).
6.That the Crown Prosecution Service is replaced, it’s current prosecutors held to account for their prejudices.
7.Cranial-Osteopaths to gain the legal right to prescribe antibiotics; that all Doctors will be under Homeopathic control & maths ‘A’ Level replaced by Human biology ‘A’ Level as requirement for applicants to train to be doctors thereby allowing Working-Classes to become doctors (having found blatant Discrimination is a motive for medical negligence).
8.All G.P. and hospital consultations to be openly recorded thus depriving Drs of their ability to twist and lie about what they and the patient said, when writing their medical reports. Drs to be legally forced to recognize the W H O ruling that the disease M.E. (C.F.S.) is caused by a virus/ bacteria.
9.Fluoride banned as long term use rots brain cells and bones.
10.Any medical negligence victim, or their parent or a supporter or a whistle blower who is imprisoned for killing a Bromley or Croydon Judge or magistrate will be FORGIVEN and released from prison.
11.Any medical negligence victim, or their parent or a supporter or a whistle blower who is imprisoned for infiltrating and killing the Crown Prosecution Service staff in their officers or assassinating ex-CPS Director Kier Starmer (now M.P. and straight onto the Home Affairs Select Committee) or his successor Allison Saunders, will be FORGIVEN and released from prison.
12.Any medical negligence victim, or their parent or a supporter or a whistle blower who destroys Bromley Police Station will be FORGIVEN and released from prison
13.Transport, Energy & Environment are interlinked so our primary policies here are: Reopening old trunk railway lines (e.g. Rayader, Portmadoc-Bangor, Frome-Wells-Glastonbury, Lewes-Uckfield) but not building brand new ones; no road or no airport expansion and wind turbines to be increased but out at sea (UK noisy enough); alms-houses to be built on a grand scale to house homeless (and creating jobs) on brownfield sites; All suburban homes to be limited to owning 1 car and 1 van. Green Energy Pass of paying 20% less tax awarded to those who recycle 80% of everything (including water) and rely exclusively on public transport. . Airlines fuels to be taxed. All councils to have eco-villages. Bradbury Pound system introduced.
14.Britain leaves European Union; The manufacturing industry will be re-launched. Ulster handed to Republic of Ireland.
15.All candidates for parliament will need to pass a threshold of having experience of continued hardship so to qualify as candidates.
16.The G. Common Sense Charter will be introduced as Britain’s written constitution guaranteeing human rights, freedom of speech etc.
17.Education: Allotments will be created in all schools which will teach Human Biology as important as Maths, English and Science, with classes for Spirituality and debates. School leaving age extended to 17 as it will take a year of upheavals in education to cleanse it of psychology.
18.: All employers will need to prove they require applicants require anything higher in Maths than GCSE (so more Working Class people become Doctors reducing purposeful medical negligence of Working Classes).
19. The Republican Guard (based on the Spiritual Warrior philosophy) introduced to be both Britain’s own F.B.I. and replace the Met Police, valuing brains and morals above brawn, due to racism and how local Police (e.g. Bromley) collude in crime with local officials.
20.Support for free Tibet and an independent Kurdistan.
BRITISH UNICORN PARTY MANIFESTO
BRINGING COMMON SENSE BACK TO BRITAIN

Picture18

VOTE BRITISH UNICORN

Important Notice:
By voting us, the B. U. P., you will be giving approval for our policies here in the Manifesto. As far as we are concerned, all that matters is YOUR approval for our policies-NOT the losing political parties YOU rejected.
Is what YOU think (by voting for us) which matters to us – Not what the other political parties think.
Why should THEY try and bog down and kill or adapt the policies you wanted as law.
We will ignore the other parties by keeping the House Of Commons and Lords closed for six months whilst the policies you voted for are implemented as laws. Our M.P.s YOU elected will approve our policies, in our political party’s debating chamber, on the day after you elected us.
The professions who will be required to carry out our policies will be instructed to do so on the following day.
Any new policies or adaptations to new policies will be put forward only when Parliament is recalled.
We Offer YOU A New Britain

B.U.P. conferences will be at the future New Age/Permaculture, Unicorn Retreat Centre & Residency, (piloting Green methods of Energy etc, holding a seasonal republican parliament and an annual Spiritual & Folk Music Festival,). Patients who doctors refuse to tube feed, starving them to death, will be tube fed here instead. Republican Guard, consisting of those rejected by Police and armed forces on medical grounds, will, when we’re elected take over military bases (to prevent Royalist coup). We support Tibetan independence and democracy for Burma. Our Main Policies Are:
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
1A. Until we are elected to Government, the B.U.C.P. will fight Council and Mayoral elections with our PRIME policy: to establishindependent health centres in each Council to help the victims of doctors, consisting of a medical reference library where they can self-diagnose a medically neglected illness; receive Alternative and complementary health treatments; have access to an X-ray and MRI brain scanner; a Health Inspectorate at each one will investigate and publicly report on the attitude and competence of health workers and health watchdog bodies. Our Radical News Centre’s will be established to help those people ignored by the corporate (official) media, by giving them a voice. Both will promote common sense as an alternative to deranged psychobabble. All psychobabblists will be outlawed, rounded up by, and replaced by, Experts in Common Sense.
1.B. Once in Government doctors will be prevented from selecting patients to harm (i.e. a Dr. will no longer be able to refuse to treat a patient due to a prejudice against the patient or to cover up a colleagues discrimination against a patient), because it will be a criminal offence; the General Medical Council replaced by a new body of non-health workers so health workers can no longer regulate themselves; our Health Inspectorates to replace all existing other health watchdogs in each district, members being elected (candidates coming from outside the district so are unable to be blackmailed by health staff) to sit on the body with powers to refer doctors to the new G,M.C. & sack local health officials;
2. Paul O’Callaghan to finally receive a medical investigation into the extent of the infection damage he has so accurate treatment can be prescribed and the negligent doctors and those protecting them, are punished in a manner he deems fit for12 years purposeful negligence of him.
3. Secondary schools to identify (using Common Sense Philosophy) a child’s talents and arrange an apprenticeship with a state profession or business for the child to go into upon leaving school or college (if the child wishes to) so to help the child discover their purpose in life; only good behaviour will be rewarded in secondary schools by allowing such children to take an hour a week out of lesson time so they can pursue a project of their own which the child believes will benefit them in their C.V./exams. All schools will have allotments to teach children how to grow their own food. Secondary school Pupils who disrupt others learning or are violent will be kicked out of school – not pampered to.
4. Yobs will be punished with at least a year in Common Sense Mental Health Borstals, (Hard labour by day, Common sense Mental Health Treatment in the evenings). The existing Police Services will be barred from discriminating against average and strong spectacle lens wearers. People who behave themselves at Secondary school, to work hard, can have weak eyes so because of their work have to wear spectacles over the police limit, yet such person’s are ideal for the Police; all Police Officers will be able to own a business outside their Police division area; a new Police Service, the Republican Guard, will take over all fire arm services of existing Police Services, where an existing Police division is failing the local populace, (e.g. in Bromley) the Guard will replace it and across Britain provide F.B.I. style services. Only Working Classes will be Judges gaining Authority by being elected. The Monarchy will beabolished, Income from the Duchy’s of Cornwall and Lancaster, plus savings made from opening up the Palaces as museums and funds the mini-wind turbines for the poor. Sunday closing will be reintroduced. Public will have right to restrain yobs for Police to collect.
5. Environment, Transport, Immigration & Energy (Green Issues) are intertwined: Only by-passes for safety will be built; closed ‘trunk’ railway routes reopened. No new housing on green field sites so immigrants will be settled in less populated regions until they’re full – then all immigration will cease. Public transport increased/ made safe, before urban homes are taxed for having a 2nd car. Britain will be self-sufficient in energy needs by becoming the lead country in Green Energy, (so UK can NOT be blackmailed by foreign countries). New homes will: NOT be built of concrete/glass, walls will be sound proofed against Low Frequency Sound, have solar panels/mini-wind turbines with water recycling facilities and neighbourhood allotments. Funds from reduced Monarchy to fund mini-wind turbines for the poorest homes. Water and railways renationalised (everyone has a right to live/ have water and have it provided). Airline fuel to be taxed. Regions will have a minister for these Green issues so problems can be solved. Anyone going Green (recycling/using public transport) will have a Green Energy Pass so to pay less tax. Cornwall, Wales and England to be constitutionally equal to Scotland. Legislation to encourage ecovillages to be established as local councils will need their help when the Peak Oil crisis occurs.
6. Tony Blair and his government are to be put on trial for War Crimes in Iraq and for the bombing of Serbian State TV.
7. It’s common sense that in order to understand society and solve it’s problems, is NOT by studying the problems but to EXPERIENCE those problems. Continued hardships are experienced by ONLY the Working Classes, YET for centuries the Minority (Posh people) have ruled the majority (Working Classes). We will strip all law making positions, courts and other state funded organisations of people who lack the said experience, so only the Working Classes will be able to make laws. A written constitution (the Common Sense Charter, which once implemented will take it’s name from a genuine spiritual town) will be established, guarantying freedom of speech and right to protest on any issue in a public place during daylight hours. The BBC is publicly funded mostly by the Working Classes YET practise only employing posh people as news readers/reporters (saying the posh “yuerrr” to say YEAR). Only Working Classes will be employed as they are the majority of the population, as reporters and newsreaders need to have the best understanding of news which is usually related to continued hardships and that can only be understood by experience, not study. BBC funding will be split between itself and a new state rival broadcaster, both funded by commercial broadcasters franchise payments, (the licence fee replaced by these payments). Thus commercial broadcasters can dispense with public service programmes, the BBC rival broadcaster (H.Q. in Scotland) replacing commercial companies public service programmes so the BBC doesn’t have a monopoly.
8.Experiments on animals will cease, but IF experiments on creatures really are needed then they will be on paedaphiles and serial rapists.
9. A religious parliament (of Buddhists, Christians, Hindus, Muslims, Jews, Osho Sannyasins, Pagans and Sikhs) will be set up, to introduce Common Sense Philosophy to their religions and reduce religious extremism. Parliamentary seats will be allocated reflecting the religions size in the U.K.).
All B.U.C. P. policies are based upon Common Sense Philosophy:
To understand society and solve peoples hardships one must understand the cause. The best way of understanding the causes of such hardships is NOT to study them but to have experience & understand them. The people experiencing continued hardships are the Working Classes in all countries. So only the Working Classes should hold law- making positions and conduct enquiries into problems of society, (e.g. form the Government, be M.P.s, Government officials, Judges etc). We support capitalism as hard work should be rewarded with good living, but NOT with legal power.
2 If people are denied the right to voice their experiences and opinions on any topic and publicly protest on any topic in any public place, then, combined with being wronged going un-addressed by the Authorities, will cause such person’s frustrated anger.
3.To have Authority over others is to be accountable to the people by the most democratic and meritocratic methods
4. A spiritual gathering is for celebrating being at One with each other and nature, but living life is about being an individual so to achieve our purpose(s) in life by being individuals, (between lives, we’re all at One with each other, making any type of discrimination (racial etc) and war’s, immoral and stupid). Helping those in need is the most spiritual act. An Afterlife exists. We have other lives and can repeat a life.

The B.U.C. P.-An Introduction
The B.U.C. P. has it’s origins in a campaign by a victim of doctors, who the laters had selected to harm. No one would help that victim , (M.P.s, solicitors, C.A.B., AVMA, Liberty, old C.H.C.s, G.M.C. Health Department etc) everyone refusing to see the evidence of medical files, audio and video secret recordings, fearing their action of helping him would destroy Britain’s doctors. His recordings prove that doctors:
1.Doctors tell patients there is no treatment to ease a patients suffering when in fact such treatment does exist and it’s existence is common knowledge amongst NHS doctors.
Doctors ARE selecting patients, who they’re prejudiced against, to neglect (discrimination).
Doctors with hold medication from patients they DON’T LIKE (discrimination)!
Doctors continue previous doctors negligence so to cover up their predecessors negligence.
Doctors write lies in medical records about what they & a patient says (just compare files & the recordings).
Doctors verbally and physically assault patients, jeering and sneering at patients seriously ill.
Doctors perform medical examinations on themselves to diagnose patients.
So the doctors victim released his own news sheet advertising his plight and evidence. Nobody would still help him, but the doctors received plenty of help, sending the Police, local press and others after him. He counter attacked, with an updated news sheet, destroying the careers of a Police Chief, and a reporter. The doctors solicitors threatened him with legal action if he continued his campaign, so he co-founded this political party, so his objective for medical treatment is now a political policy and the campaign to achieve this is now a political party. He had out smarted the solicitors. This is because to maintain the charade of democracy in Britain, a political party can have any policy it wants. A final notice to the doctors and their allies to co-operate or the B.U.P. would begin operations, was followed by the Hospital boss announcing his departure and in the same week the replacement of the local press Editor…
It is common sense that if one is ill, one can not fight any other injustice. Plus, one can NOT achieve their full potential/achieve their purpose(s) in life. Therefore the health policies arte the B.U.P.’s PRIME policies, over riding in importance all other policies, (which in effect would receive 20% of all campaigning attention).
There is NO other legal way of making doctors cease selecting patients (from amongst the genuine Working Classes, due to snobbery) to harm. Currently a Dr. can deny a patient available treatment by law.
However, British Unicorn Charter Party is NOT a single issue party. We recognise that single issue parties do not form Governments, (the Green party have yet to get an M.P.). this is because the public have more than one issue/problem requiring solving.
If we are to be taken seriously by the public, (and therefore be a real threat to the negligent doctors/their unions) we need to have policies on other issues.
The British people regard health, education, crime and jobs as their prime issues, and thankfully now, the Environment is catching up.
Our policies in these areas, like health, are influenced by Common Sense Philosophy, which is a guide to achieving one’s purpose in life and is to replace psychology. We know it’s time for politics to become spiritually driven, instead of ego driven. The world has become too materialistic, causing some people to be driven into the arms of puritans (fundamentalists) of religions. Other people are going into the madness of psychology to find a purpose to their lives and try to do good, when psychology is one of the psychobabbles which is the cause of so much suffering in society.
If people are helped to find (or just recognise even) they have a purpose in life, they would not be materialistic or become puritans, or allow themselves to be conditioned into psychology. Psychobabble is about forcing people to conform to the Authorities standards. We also know that the Social Class system is the other main cause of CONTINUED hardships and that it has got worse as there are now 4 Social Classes in Britain, people of the three higher Classes pretending/deluding themselves into believing to be of the next Class down due to some mentally ill shame they have for their own Class. Thereby, the real Working Class are not recognised by the Authorities. Plus a semi-Class exists.
Instead of being a soulless factory, schools will be reinvigorated by having the conscious goal of helping children find their talents so to understand their purpose(s) in life.
Yobs and true criminals will be locked up so they can’t inter fear with other people achieving their purpose(s) in life.
Respect for the environment, to live at one with it, would be achieved as everyone would understand how it helps us achieve our purposes in life, along with helping other creatures achieve theirs.
Politicians are driven by ego and lack experience of continued hardships, (because they’re mostly posh). Being driven by mild spirituality (as opposed to puritanism) and being Working Class is what will make good politicians. They will have the genuine drive to help others (as the prime way of being spiritual is to help others) and have the skills of understanding better how to solve the majority (Working Class) people’s problems.
The old political parties won’t ever solve your problems, because they are simply too set in their ways, offering only slightly different ways of managing Britain, not revitalising Britain. We will revitalise Britain because Britain needs it.
Here are our policies in detail:.
B.U.C P. Health Policy 1: Independent Health Centre in Bromley Borough to serve Bromley, Greenwich & Sidcup residents due to the Case of Paul O’Callaghan. To be implemented when elected to control Bromley Council.
What WE propose to do, based on the evidence of Paul O’Callaghan’s suffering and Suzanne Lawrence’s’ revelatory statement is to save Bromley and Greenwich residents from suffering and possibly early death (by medical negligence) by providing you with a health centre Paul O’Callaghan wants to set up for negligence victims:

It will be known as RIVENDELL HOUSE and will be the first Independent Health Centre. It will offer a public service: a free medical reference library, where the medically neglected or their parents, can cross reference their symptoms with illnesses so being able to self-diagnose their illness, giving them greater leverage to force doctors to cease their medical negligence and help the patient (Drs cover up a colleagues negligence by refusing to investigate or diagnose the victims illness correctly, if at all).
In addition, alternative (Homeopathy, Osteopathy and Herbalism) and complementary (e.g. shiatsu, yoga, massage) health treatments (with hopefully discounts for known victims of ongoing negligence) will be on offer. A public record of all doctors and other health workers (e.g. social workers) accused of negligence by patients (not the centre) will be established for all people. I.H.C. management members will form a District Health Inspectorate to inspect the attitude and competence of all health workers, social workers (who take doctor’s sides) and the supposed watchdogs (e.g. PALS, ICAS, Patient Forums, GMC), and official patients groups, publishing an annual report to the local/regional households.
The Advice Centre would provide negligence victims with: advice on the little human rights they have (until we are in Government to change this)with Drs and the massive rights Drs have; helping negligence victims form verbal and written cohesive, articulate arguments with Drs and their acolytes; helping negligence victims with grammar and technology in producing leaflets to advertise their plight; attend victims meetings with Drs and social workers as advisors or as legal witness to the meeting, possibly recording the meeting secretly; loan and help teach negligence victims how to use bugging equipment when advisor can’t attend.
A shop in Rivendell House (having a long shop front window so to attract shoppers) will sell all types of second hand items to help fund the establishment.
In addition there will be a café. This would sell both traditional café food and vegan food, but no alcohol. (For an idea of the café service we suggest you visit Revitalise, opposite the town hall, in Hove, East Sussex, formerly known as Planet Janet, which was established by a pair of Osho sannyasins). The café will exist in two parts, each part the width and length of Revitalise, separated by a fold up ‘wall’. One part will be the formal tables and chairs café, whilst the other half will be the informal carpeted and cushioned (shoe racks at back) part known as The Snug, for drinks only. It is in this latter part where a stage (2ft high and big enough for 3 people to perform on at once) will be located (in front of the window so to bring in more ‘punters’). In the evenings musical performances of Jazz, Folk and New Age music would be performed here, along with lectures, poetry readings and debate, the fold up ‘wall’ being folded up so the whole café can benefit from the performances. One night a week the tables, chairs and cushions will be cleared away so the whole space could be held for dancing, (though the Bodywork room could hold dancing, it wouldn’t be on the ground floor so wouldn’t attract ‘punters’). Arts and crafts and books would also be sold here (available to brows to buy in the Snug, so safe from food).Having a café with more than one purpose, but each purpose separated between daytime and evenings will stand a better chance of success.
A key aspect of the Independent Health Centre will be that the ill won’t have to pre-book to attend a class, but just drop in. Many ill people don’t know if they are well enough to do something on a day to come until on that day, so can’t pre-book (unless they can afford to pay a cancellation fee for not turning up). Thus the ill who need alternative and complimentary health treatments much more than healthy people, are deprived of these treatments. Not having Drop-In classes therefore also deprives alternative/complimentary health centre’s of income. Not having to pre-book at the I.H.C. will be of more benefit to the medically neglected than discounts on treatments. In addition all treatments/classes would begin no earlier than 11 am, the last classes being at 8 pm, thus enabling those with illnesses which causes them hours to get to sleep, can use the classes.

Justification of I.H.C. in Bromley (to serve Greenwich also): Case of Paul O’Callaghan Proving Purposeful Medical Negligence Part 1: THE GENERAL PRACTITIONERS / THE GREENWICH NEGLIGENCE

Please Note: This Justification was produced prior to the conspiracy to kill our co-founder from 2012 to present (2015):

In June 1994 Mr. O’Callaghan began feeling sick a lot, reduction in sleeping and his catarrh had increased. G.P. Dr. Peter Oxford laughed at his situation. So he changed G.P. surgeries just as the vertigo struck. By the end of July Paul O’Callaghan, 18 years of age, had vertigo sensations like he was laying on a see-saw moving at high speed CONSTANTLY (along with constant rocking, rising and falling sensations) when he tried to rest, with his vision CONSTANTLY shaking. REAL TORTURE. He HASN’T EXPERIENCED STILLNESS IN 14 YEARS! The vertigo sparks his VISION TO SHAKE NIGHTMARISHLY. When one source of balance fails (e.g. inner ears struck by serious infection damaging them) it puts more pressure on other sources of balance information (e.g. the eyes). So when one closes their eyes vertigo naturally increases from simple rocking, so hindering a person’s ability to sleep: if a severe sufferer then opens their eyes their vision will be juddering or shaking violently (even though the sufferer is still, in a still environment), the brain having been deprived of a remaining source of balance information. Paul O’Callaghan had to pace up and down the room having to be held up right, so to re-gain sufficient balance for the vibrating vertigo and shaking vision to cease. Mr. O’Callaghan discovered this pacing is what mild vertigo sufferers are supposed to do when they have JUST an attack of vertigo alone (most vertigo victims have vertigo CONSTANTLY). A physiotherapist confirmed he relies on his vision, more than he should, there are head lumps indicating a serious infection, pain in ears when tuning fork test performed and “paresis of the inner left ear” have all been ignored, as will be explained. The more a vertigo victim does the harder it is for them to suddenly stop and be still (rest), the brain taking longer to be ‘informed’ by the balance sources because of the inner ear damage, so the vertigo sensations continue in strength, in most victims never ceasing but reducing to a simple rocking after a while of torture. Hence why, most victims are “stuck at home”. It’s a catalogue of purposeful omissions and negligence. . Only since he has gone on Serc (Betahistine) has he regained the ability to sit up right in an ARM chair to rest.

He had so many strange (to a patient but shouldn’t be strange to a Dr.) symptoms and was so ill he took his Mum with him to help explain his increase in symptoms to the new G.P. Clarence Thenuwara (and as a witness as Thenuwara was a bully) This was a disabling infection, which resulted in his being too weak to lift knife and fork, body/head/face ‘numb’/weightless, etc.; breathing problems; his vision shaking and vertigo sensations that he was CONSTANTLY moving when resting (unable to close eyes) – REAL TORTURE (e.g. laying in bed physically feeling like he was laying on a see-saw moving at high speed). The G.P. had prescribed dangerous Stemetil tablets but these of course made the vertigo worse (which Mr. O’Callaghan now knows commonly does more harm than good as other sufferers have told him through his research). Dr. Thenuwara told his mother she could NOT speak on his behalf at any time!!! On another occasion he asked Mr. O’Callaghan’s mother WHY she had not spoken on his behalf!!! Mad? He diagnosed Mr. O’Callaghan as suffering from what he called the “feeling virus”, but never explained what he meant by this, (and no Dr. since has contacted Thenuwara to ask him what was meant by this!). In the hot sun Mr. O’Callaghan was cold. So in desperation due to his medically neglected suffering, Mr. O’Callaghan tried electro-acupuncture, which stopped the vibrating (see-saw) vertigo sensation from being constant, so Mr. O’Callaghan was finally able to rest. His shaking vision also stopped being constant. The acupuncturist said he had an “infection”.
Thenuwara finally said he would make appointments for an Ear, Nose & Throat Dr., a neurologist and a Chest Physician. Instead he made 2 appointments for Mr. O’Callaghan to see the Chest physician and NONE for the neurologist. When asked why he had done this he struck Mr. O’Callaghan off and sent him back to his previous G.P.s in Averyhill Road, New Eltham. So much for changing Doctors as the Patients Association dribble about. Mr. O’Callaghan got worse over the weekend following Thenuara’s visit so his Mum called in a locum Dr. who just said he needed T.L.C. and used Mr. O’Callaghan’s mothers phone for a private call!
One of Dr. Oxfords colleagues, Dr. Margaret Taylor who came out (grudgingly) to Mr. O’Callaghan, was in his mother’s hallway, expressed concern for Mr. O’Callaghan, until his Mum said he was her son: “Oh! I thought he was your husband” Taylor exclaimed, then her attitude changed!: She then ran up the stairs burst into his room and demanded “What are you doing in bed?”. She also snapped at his Mum how could she know he had lost weight, when his Mum pointed this out, on the grounds there were no scales, when clothes too tight for him were now falling down upon him! Mr. O’Callaghan was so ill his mother was, having to lift a knife and fork to feed Mr. O’Callaghan. His Mum called in Oxford. He said he could do nothing and left looking frightened. Had he realised he’d committed negligence? He wrote in Mr. O’Callaghan’s medical records that he’d taken “A Levels” and was “dyslexic”, as if trying to blame the illness on the fictional illness of “Stress”.

Paul O’Callaghan managed on just 1 day to go out to the Brooke Hospital where a nurse (“Mary”) was the first orthodox health practitioner to ask real questions. She asked his Mum if she thought he had “Guillian-Barre Syndrome” (something the neurologist secretary had said Mr. O’Callaghan’s symptoms sounded like when she told his Mum he had no appointment with the neurologist). The Junior Dr. couldn’t be bothered with him but did admit he knew “what G.P.s are like” being negligent. Mr. O’Callaghan later suffered his FIRST attack of vision shaking side to side after he had closed his eyes sitting up, coming on as soon as the vibrating vertigo (swinging side to side sensation) had started. His Mum called an ambulance. The Brook Junior Dr. said the attack was instead of a headache. A few days later Paul O’Callaghan tried Dr. Russell Housley He only wanted to know if he had any Siblings and if his Dad lived at home. Housley admitted that the lumps on the lower back of Mr. O’Callaghan’s head were “lymph glands which rise and fall with a viral infection”. He asked which A levels Mr. O’Callaghan took and proceeded to blame his illness on them (“stress” a common excuse Doctors use to commit negligence) instead of the infection he himself had I.D. Housley could have prescribed Serc but chose to prescribe nothing. SO IF YOUR CHILD TAKES EXAMS AND CATCHES AN INFECTION THE DOCTORS WILL LET THEM DIE. Should exams be banned so to protect children from sick doctors like Housley is open to debate. The few symptoms he did write down he got wrong.

They could just have prescribed the medication Serc but CHOSE not to do so because Mr. O’Callaghan did NOT meet with their prejudices (discrimination) because he did not have “a father living at home” and had “no siblings” (NO hereditary illness questions were asked…). No-one even asked if his father was dead; he is from a brain defect in 1997.

Since 1994 it’s taken Mr. O’Callaghan 9 years to confirm that he has to rely on vision more than he should for balance and that the remains, at least, of “paresis of the inner left ear” because Bromley doctors tried to protect their Eltham colleagues and DSS harassment because only a Homeopath would help him, not a Dr.

MEN AND WOMEN ARE ALLOWED TO BECOME DOCTORS WHO SHOULDN’T BE. SOMETHING’S BEEN WRONG IN THE MEDICAL SCHOOLS AND STILL IS. A DOCTOR WILL TREAT PATIENTS WHO MEET WITH THEIR PREJUDICES, BUT NOT OTHERS. His Mum’s lost £300,000+ having to move house etc to get Mr. O’Callaghan slight treatment. Had the New Eltham doctors prescribed Serc, even after the first dose of acupuncture which eased the vertigo Mr. O’Callaghan had (due to the negligence) it wouldn’t have been too late but, because of Thenuwara/Sylvestor and co. he had to have a second dose which changed the vertigo. A Nurse (& neurologist’s. secretary!) was the only one to ask physical questions (!): her written report went ‘missing’…
Sub policy: G.P.s Clarence Thenuwara, Peter Oxford, Russell Hailsley, Jean Mckinnon and Margaret Taylor to be Struck Off (though most would have retired by now/March 2008) and imprisoned for 14 years.

Justification of I.H.C. in Bromley (to serve Greenwich also): Case of Paul O’Callaghan Proving Purposeful Medical Negligence Part 2: Salama & Stokes

SALAMA
Mr. O’Callaghan’s Ears, Nose & Throat Dr. was Dr. Salama. He was described by another patient’s relative as “a pig”. During Mr. O’Callaghan’s consultation he performed a tuning fork test on Mr. O’Callaghan’s ears, putting the flat end of the fork against Mr. O’Callaghan, behind his outer ears. This caused incredible pain in his ears , particularly in the left one, where in 2002 “paresis” was found, but Salama chose not to investigate this:
When Mr. O’Callaghan asked him why it had caused him so much pain Salama first said “Sorry” (!) and then performed the test on his own ears and said “It doesn’t do it to me” (cause him pain)!!!!!!! OBVIOUSLY his ears were healthy and the test proved something was wrong with Mr. O’Callaghan’s. When Mr. O’Callaghan’s Mum pointed this out to this man who was suppose to be a Dr., Salama ran round the room, appearing to have a nervous breakdown, and disappeared through a side door, (to see his colleague/friend T.C. Stokes – the Chest Physician). He returned to tell them the Chest Physician would deal with Mr. O’Callaghan’s ear problem.

It is because of Salama that the subsequent doctors have attempted to hinder Mr. O’Callaghan obtaining treatment/ proving serious infection damage/proving purposeful negligence.

Salama is living proof that mentally ill persons are allowed to practise as Doctors, (what same person would diagnose a patient by performing a simple medical test on themselves!). This fact is at the route of the subsequent negligence (and thus suffering) Paul O’Callaghan has had to endure.

HOW MANY PEOPLE HAS DR. SALAMA NEGLECTED? DR. SALAMA IS HIGHLEY DANGEROUS AND IS MAD.
STOKES
Chest physician T C Stokes (who was “known” to the Plumstead Law Centre), like Dr. Housley FIRST questions were: “Do you have brothers and sisters?” and “Does your father live at home?” . He NEVER asked about hereditary illnesses, if Mr. O’Callaghan’s father was alive or dead, symptoms, lumps, medical history! So Mr. O’Callaghan tried telling him the symptoms but he ignored Mr. O’Callaghan so the latter’s Mum tried telling him. He snapped at her to “Shut up or get out” despite Mr. O’Callaghan being legally entitled to a witness. The nurse apologised after for Stokes’ behaviour. He VERBALLY told Mr. O’Callaghan he had M.E. disease (which provoked persecution by the DSS to stop Mr. O’Callaghan’s benefit as their DSS Dr. Allan did not recognise M.E., calling Mr. O’Callaghan a liar and attempting to assault Mr. O’Callaghan-all taped), but in his letter to G.P. Mary Sylvester (“Dear Mary,”) he wrote Mr. O’Callaghan a “true vertigo” caused by an “infection”! His true diagnosis.
NO MEDICATION I.E. SERC. Stokes neglected Mr. O’Callaghan because he had “no siblings” and no father living at home (he wrote this in the letter to Sylvester which Mr. O’Callaghan has a copy of, before the original mysteriously disappeared). To Stokes and Housley the symptoms could not be real because Mr. O’Callaghan had “no siblings” so they had to be psychological (ignoring the lumps on his head, loss of weight etc), which is really a mad form of DISCRIMINATION. So because of their prejudices Mr. O’Callaghan did not receive treatment (i.e. Serc). Plus Stokes had to cover up Salama’s negligence. Stokes should have referred Mr. O’Callaghan to a neurologist and neuropath or ENT Surgeon; discovered the “paresis in the inner ear” etc.

HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE NOT MET WITH A DOCTOR’S MAD PREJUDICES – THEREFORE, HAVE NOT RECEIEVED MEDICAL TREATMENT (medically neglected), USING PSYCHOBABBLE (counselling) TO DO SO? SINISTERLY, THERE IS AN OFFICIALLY HIGH DEGREE OF AFRO-CARIBBEAN PEOPLE BEING BRANDED MENTAL AND LOCKED UP. IN FEBRUARY 2004 it has been revealed that black mental health patients are racially discriminated against…Yes Mr. O’Callaghan’s case is ONLY CHILD DISCRIMINATION, BUT THIS PROVES DOCTORS DO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST PHYSICALLY ILL PATIENTS, SO ARE CAPABLE OF ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST PHYSICALLY ILL PATIENTS. The doctors hold life and death in their hands REGULARLY unlike the Police, so need to be investigated to discover how rife discrimination is by doctors against patients.

The senior partner at the G.P. surgery, Dr. Jean McKinnon would not do anything but described Mr. O’Callaghan as an “unhappy boy”. NO wonder-as he was being medically neglected. He did visit a private Homeopathic Dr. who diagnosed he had “vestibular neuronitis” (an inner ear infection) but being into Homeopathy meant the G.P.s would ignore him as doctors view Homeopathy as a threat to them.
The medical records for pre-2000 have MYSTERIOUSLY disappeared… Unluckily for the doctors Mr. O’Callaghan obtained copies of some of them before they did ‘disappear’. His Mum moved house for him to have a G.P. and now has lost £346, 000 because of the doctors negligence. Only in 2002 was the paresis etc identified and Mr. O’Callaghan obtained mild treatment thanks to his own research, in 2003 which he could have had in 1994! It’s taking so long because Bromley and London doctors and the former health authority did ALL they could to prevent Mr. O’Callaghan from obtaining the confirmation of my illness and prescribe effective treatment as to allow this would prove the Eltham doctors had been purposefully negligent/discriminated. Now those doctors are currently being exposed

Picture19
Unluckily for the doctors Mr. O’Callaghan had a micro cassette recorder running whilst with them.
FACTS IGNORED BY STOKES & SALAMA AND FOUND BY OTHER NEGLIGENT DOCTORS:

1.Dr. Martin Prevett of Moorfields Eye Hospital wrote that Mr. O’Callaghan had a “peripheral VESTIBULAR disturbance” like the Homeopathic Dr. had wrote of. He also suggested “brain stem demeylination” (an inflammation of the brain which can be caused by encephalitis-which can cause oscillopsia, a form of shaking vision). See below

2.Dr. Iris Reuter (the first neurologist of any kind Mr. O’Callaghan saw in 2001when he should have seen one in 1994) also suggested that Mr. O’Callaghan had “encephalitis” and “demeylination” , NOT knowing Prevett had already said that nor that the Cranial-Osteopath he’d visited had suggested a brain disease. See below

3.ENT Dr. David Goldingwood (who knew Salama) verbally stated Mr. O’Callaghan’s “symptoms are indications of a brain infection”. NO investigation to rule out a brain infection/damage has been undertaken. He also wrote Mr. O’Callaghan should see an ENT surgeon, but neither he nor any other Bromley Dr. has done this. More negligence. See below

4.Physiotherapist Ms Hindle (Paul O’Callaghan had by now been medically neglected so long those of his own age group, like Ms. Hindle had established careers) had Mr. O’Callaghan perform an exercise with his eyes shut to establish if he relied on his vision more than he should for balance. Just doing the exercise once sparked vibrating vertigo and a massive attack, so Ms. Hindle had to hold him up right so he could pace up and down the room to re-balance the balance /stop the shaking vision and vibrating. This is standard procedure for people who JUST have attacks of vertigo (the minority). See below

5.Scientist Mr. Coelho performed tests on Mr. O’Callaghan and found he had “paresis of the inner left ear” (explaining the pain the tuning fork had caused in 1994, but which Salama ignored because he’s stupid or mad). He also found a “labyrinthine disturbance”. There are actually 5 types of labyrinthines but neither his boss Linda Luxon, nor Bromley Dr. Quirk have even bothered to work out which 1 Mr. O’Callaghan has. More negligence. See below

6.In 2003 Serc medication Mr. O’Callaghan discovered and found it stopped him being awoken to date, with vibrating vertigo and shaking vision.
If Oxford, Thenuwara, Salama and Sylvestor etc had prescribed Serc at least, Mr. Paul O’Callaghan would NOT have had to have had the second dose of acupuncture which changed the vertigo and shaking vision.

Sub Policies: A. Salama, T.C. Stokes and Mary Sylvestor to be Struck Off and imprisoned for 13 years, (though T.C. Stokes may well be dead now from old age).
PREVETT.
Mr. O’Callaghan managed to visit a private Homeopathic Dr. who diagnosed “VESTIBULAR neuronitis” (inner ear infection) but Sylvester ignored him, (as this undermined Stokes’ protection of Salama). Mr. O’Callaghan also visited MOORFIELDS EYE HOSPITAL; Dr Martin Prevett who in his letter to G.P. Sylvestor also wrote Mr. O’Callaghan had a “peripheral VESTIBULAR disturbance” or “brain stem demyelination” (an inflammation of the brain which can be caused by brain infection encephalitis, which causes oscillopsia (which can happen with out the eyes having to move).These facts consistently arise below. However Prevett CHOSE to do nothing because Mr. O’Callaghan had “no siblings” (discriminating questions again); sneered mockingly at Mr. O’Callaghan relating how the tuning fork had caused him pain, asked no hereditary questions or medical history, just siblings and father questions. PREVETT IS A DANGEROUS DR. He also barred illegally Mr. O’Callaghan’s Mum as a witness from being present. He has 20 years ahead of him to commit discrimination. He needs to be struck off permanently NOW!

Sub Policy: Martin Prevett to be Struck Off and to serve a 13 year prison sentence for purposeful medical negligence, verbal abuse and discrimination.
Justification of I.H.C. in Bromley: Case of Paul O’Callaghan Proving Purposeful Medical Negligence Part 4: Howlett & Bromley Health Authority

HOWLETT & Balachandran/ THE BROMLEY NEGLIGENCE BEGINS
Paul’s Mum moved house to get Paul treatment. New G.P. Dr. Balachandran referred Mr. O’Callaghan to ORPINGTON HOSPITAL’S DR. W.P. HOWLETT in 1996. He proceeded to use social history questioning (the name given to make the doctors practice of establishing if a patient met with their mad prejudices sound O.K.): Did Mr. O’Callaghan have siblings, but asked no questions about hereditary illnesses etc, all on tape, etc. He refused to read Mr. O’Callaghan’s list of symptoms he had prepared so to save NHS time and money, but he wanted Mr. O’Callaghan to take a while now recounting 2 years of symptoms! He turned Mr. O’Callaghan’s list upside down on the table, so Mr. O’Callaghan turned it back up. This happened twice more so Mr. O’Callaghan read the list to him, (he hadn’t been able to read a full page till 1996). No treatment was forthcoming. He wrote he expected to SEE Mr. O’Callaghan’s vibrating vertigo symptoms! Idiot. He was asked to explain why he had asked discriminating questions. He said he would explain “at the end” of the consultation. He never did.

Sub Policy: W.P. Howlett to be Struck Off and imprisoned for 14 years.

JANE MEEK & CLAIRE PERRY
After Howlett the GP chose to leave Paul O’Callaghan’s treatment to the Pure Homeopath, who doctors hate! Thereafter the GP failed to sign his own referral letter for Mr. O’Callaghan to attend a specialist hospital. Bromley C.H.C. said they could not get Balachandran to sign his own referral letter-that Mr. O’Callaghan’s Mum had to. The GP manageress was abusive to his Mum and struck both of them off his patients list. Bromley Health Authority’s Chief Executive Claire Perry and ECR Manager JANE MEEK refused NHS funding for Mr. O’Callaghan to attend the hospital on the grounds of “finite resources”, which were spent at the time instead on radio project for yobs to play with (Cray Youth Radio), which Bromley C.H.C. Chairman Patrick Parker refused to allow discussion of at a public meeting, despite it being on the agenda! When challenged at the next meeting with a micro. recorder he refused to explain his actions and objected to the recorders presence. So obviously if he is at a meeting undercover recordings are justified. (He went on to be on the Board of Bromley Hospitals Trust. No surprise there!). Association of CHC’s Chairman Peter Walsh commented on this by saying “the vast MAJORITY of CHC’s do a good job”! Not even Mr. O’Callaghan’s local M.P. would help him get treatment, John Horam, despite being Health Minister. When Mr. O’Callaghan finally had the money for a private appointment and a new GP, the hospital refused to see him other than by an NHS appointment-which they knew he could not obtain. Perry is now Chief Executive of Lewisham Hospital NHS Trust.

Justification for I.H.C. in Bromley: The Case of Paul O’Callaghan Proving Purposeful Medical Negligence Part 5: David Goldingwood

In the February of 2000, Paul O’Callaghan suffered his longest attack of vibrating side to side vertigo and side to side shaking vision, unusually beginning whilst standing up (washing up) and for the first time the sensation the environment was spinning. The already mentioned standard pacing up and down the room stopped this (see Part 1).

Unlike previous attacks, he was left unable to walk in straight ahead, without veering off to the left, thus was left with a walking stick with which to steer (until 3 years after starting Serc enabled him to cease using the stick see Part 7). It was now apparent that the homeopathy had failed, forcing Paul O’Callaghan to register with a 4th G.P. Practise.

There is not much to assess here of the G.P. he regularly saw, Dr. Anna Wilkinson, as incredibly she co-operated with him in all ways she as a G.P. was required to do. Unlike previous Drs Mr. O’Callaghan saw, it is believed Anna Wilkinson was not Upper Class but Middle Class… She agreed that the New Eltham G.P. Practise (see Part 1 and 2) had ‘lost’ his medical records on purpose to hide their medical negligence.

Anna Wilkinson referred Mr. O’Callaghan to ENT Dr. David Goldingwood of Farnborough (now Princess Royal Uni) Hospital run by Bromley Hospitals Trust who is of a major interest to us. The appointment and hearing test took place in December 2000.
Goldingwood’s crimes can be summarized as one of no action and failure to produce an accurate report of what was said by Mr. O’Callaghan and himself (as the recording when compared to the Report shows). Uniquely, Goldingwood appears guilty of sexual discrimination.

1.Whilst awaiting to attend Goldingwood in the waiting area outside, Paul O’Callaghan and his mother witnessed a young adult female patient enter Goldingwood’s room with the voice of Goldingwood calling to her she could bring both her mother and boyfriend in with her. In Paul O’Callaghan’s Report Goldingwood thought it of significance to write how Mr. O’Callaghan attended with his mother. The conclusion from this is clear: Goldingwood has no problem with young women attending with their mother, but not young men. As a stand alone point this discriminatory attitude is of not much use against him/justifying the I.H.C. but with the below factors is another nail in the career of Goldingwood/justification for the I.H.C.

2.Goldingwood during the consultation told Paul O’Callaghan that the description of the symptoms he gave, were, quote, “indications of a brain infection”. Goldingwood had not yet been told by Mr. O’Callaghan or his mother, that this is what the cranial-osteopath the previous year, and Prevett in 1995, had also both suggested, ( the latter stating “encephalitis” and brain stem demeylination” and “peripheral disturbance”). However, this statement by Goldingwood was never included in his Report.

3.Goldingwood had also stated that he “believed” he knew the biological/physical cause of Mr. O’callaghan’s vision shaking side to side when vertigo intensified. However he failed to reveal this in his Report.

4.What Goldingwood did write was full of accidental or purposeful inaccuracies. Firstly, he referred to Mr. O’Callaghan as having, “constant horizontal juddering or shimmering of vision”. What Mr. O’Callaghan did say was that during the first month of the vertigo and shaking vision, (July 1994) that everything in his vision would shake down to his lower right then back up again every 2 or 3 seconds and the vibrating vertigo was constant, from an hour after getting up each morning, causing him genuine torture of a night. Mr. O’Callaghan related how this ceased being constant after the acupuncture (last weekend of July 1994), but which changed the vibrating vertigo and shaking vision into attacks. In addition Mr. O’Callaghan never uses the word “shimmering”.

5.The most bizarre claim by Goldingwood is that he says an alternative health practitioners “suspect diagnosis” (thus showing his prejudice of alternative health practitioners), was “Multiple Sclerosis”! Neither the Homeopath nor osteopath stated Mr. O’Callaghan had this. The M.E. misdiagnosis he also attributes to an unidentified alternative health practitioner, was in fact by a G.P. and T.C. Stokes. Clearly, Goldingwood is trying to shift blame of this misdiagnosis off of his colleagues (though by now Stokes would have retired) and onto his rivals.

6.Thus, it is unsurprising that Goldingwood would not criticize ENT Dr. A. Salama for his negligence (performing the tuning Fork test on his own ears to diagnose Mr. O’Callaghan), instead describing Mr. O’Callaghan’s experience with the Test as simply, “a painful experience” and not reporting what Mr. O’Callaghan said happened during the consultation with Salama. Goldingwood during the consultation revealed he knew Salam (not surprising) when he corrected how Mr. O’Callaghan should pronounce Salama’s name).

7.Another bizarre statement was Goldingwood claiming Mr. O’Callaghan was, “claustrophobic”. Again neither Mr. O’Callaghan nor his mother said this as the recording reflects.

8.Goldingwood tried to pervert the truth by making out that Mr. O’Callaghan did not need a walking stick to steer with by having him walk around the consultation room, as if making Mr. O’Callaghan appear a liar. In fact what Mr. O’Callaghan did say was that he couldn’t reach the local post box from his home without the walking stick, a distance which could not be replicated in Goldingwoods room. Goldingwood failed to point this out in his report…

9.Goldingwood failed to check the glands which a New Eltham G.P. (see Part 1) had conceded had risen “due to a viral infection” on either end of his lower head (occipital ridge), nor write about his white patches (vitiligo) which had appeared in summer 1994.

10.In paragraph 6 of his report, Goldingwood continued perverting the truth claiming Mr. O’Callaghan was “fearful” of “lying flat” and on these grounds an MRI scan was not feasible. Mr. O’Callaghan had in fact said it was difficult to lay flat on his spine, but never said he wouldn’t undergo the MRI scan.

11.His most shocking lie was to accuse both Mr. O’Callaghan and his mother, “could not explain” why he hadn’t seen a neurologist before, when both had explained the negligence by Salama, Stokes and Howlett. If Goldingwood had not been attempting to shift blame from the latter three Drs onto Mr. O’Callaghan and his mother, Goldingwood would have contacted Salama and Howlett to explain themselves.

12.At no time during the consultation nor in his report did Goldingwood suggest prescribing Serc medication (it would be 3 more years of suffering for Mr. O’Callaghan before this was prescribed).

13.Despite Doctors hatred for acupuncturists, Goldingwood was not interested in any side effects the acupuncture may have caused. The reason for this of course being Mr. O’Callaghan had acupuncture a month into the vertigo and shuddering vision – a month into the medical negligence forcing him to have needles wired to a battery by Ilkay Chirali.

14.Did not refer to the lumps (lymph glands) on Mr. O’Callaghan’s occipital ridge, (which 1994 Drs did in Reports)

In summary David goldingwood (thanks to his letter being compared to the recordings of the consultations) as an excellent example of how Drs pervert a patients answers by leaving out the patients answers. Clearly this Dr. is not to be trusted and alone justifies the I.H.C. in Bromley borough. He clearly does not choose to listen to patients answers. Goldingwood is STILL (March 2008) working for Bromley Hospitals Trust, justifying the Bromley I.H.C.

Sub Policy: David Goldingwood to be Stuck off for discrimination, purposeful medical negligence and conspiring to protect Dr. Salama. A 14 year prison sentence will be imposed upon him.

During 2001 Paul O’Callaghan had begun suffering a type of tinnitus caused by a winter infection. Dr. Wilkinson, having forgotten that Stemetil increased the strength of the vertigo to vibrating so caused attacks of shaking vision, prescribed stemetil for these ear noises. As soon as Mr. O’Callaghan started on these tablets (having not read the detailed name of the tablets on the box) suffered two attacks, making him then check the box to discover it was stemetil. Naturally he came straight of them. The fact that once more, unknown to Mr. O’Callaghan, that he was on stemetil, that it caused vertigo to increase, just like in summer 1994, should have told the Doctors something about what the damage to his ears was. The fact that since 2003 the Serc medication has supressed the attacks (except during an attempt at Active Meditation in 2003), also adds further evidence for Doctors to use to asses the cause of his vertigo (extent of balance organ and possible brain damage). During Paul’s research into vertigo (other sufferers answering questionnaires) he established that Stemetil was the treatment with the most side effects, perversely causing vertigo, and was commonly prescribed in the South. Yet Serc had the least side effects and was the most successful.

Justification for I.H.C. in Bromley: The Case of Paul O’Callaghan Proving Purposeful Medical Negligence Part 6: Iris Reuter And Linda Luxon

REUTER

Picture20

Reuter about to slam the table proving Doctors get violent with patients.

In 2001 Mr. O’Callaghan was finally referred to a local neurologist Dr. Iris Reuter, who said she would refer him to a vertigo specialist, (at last); have an MRI brain scan; dangerous lumber puncture and as an in-patient at Kings College Hospital, if nothing showed. But following “speaking to Goldingwood” as she said she would, he thereafter saw NO vertigo specialist, but an Eye Dr. who wondered why he was seeing him at Kings College. The M.P. had to acquire the MRI scan. When returning to Reuter she was asked WHY he had not been referred to a vertigo specialist?- Reuter slammed her hand on the table saying “Stop it” (Patients can’t even ask questions, let alone be aggressive, yet a Dr. can be aggressive).She claimed Mr. O’Callaghan had “not deteriorated sufficiently” to have encephalitis (unaware it can cause shaking vision and ignoring my now need to use a walking stick to steer with and lean on. In her referral letter to Professor Linda Luxon she did NOT state her claims of demyelination and encephalitis. She also wrote that Mr. O’Callaghan had seen a Dr. Markus when Mr. O’Callaghan hadn’t, but Howlett was 1 of his underlings but, how would she know about Howlett if Mr. O’Callaghan’s medical records were missing…? DR. REUTER IS NOW WORKING AT KINGS COLLEGE HOSPITAL, Denmark Hill.

Sub Policy: Iris Reuter to be Struck Off (barred from practicing as a Dr.) for purposeful medical negligence, conspiring with David Goldingwood to protect Dr. Salama. Reuter will be deported to her native Germany, upon release from her 14 year prison sentence.

LUXON

Picture21

Linda Luxon , left, caught on video lying.

On the second visit to Professor Linda Luxon of the National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, (after being sworn at by an Australian nurse because she didn’t except that doctors committed negligence on purpose-caught on tape), Luxon denied she had the MRI scan result when it was in front of her (in camera shot) First lie. She kept repeating Mr. O’Callaghan “may” have an inner ear infection, so as to not undermine Goldingwoods cover-up of Salama and co, She strangely wrote that his Mum didn’t shake her hand (mental vanity?)! In a later report she stated that her scientist Mr. Colheo had found Mr. O’Callaghan had “paresis of the inner ear” and a “labyrinthine disturbance” ( but has not bothered to find out which labyrinthines) supporting the VESTIBULAR diagnosis and explaining the tuning fork caused pain in ’94. Her physiotherapist Ms. Hindle, had Mr. O’Callaghan do an exercise with his eyes shut to discover if he relied upon his vision more than he should for balance: it sparked vibrating vertigo and a shaking vision attack, Ms. Hindle helped him pace up and down the room to stop the attack. LUXON IGNORED ALL THIS and even changed her mind about prescribing Mr. O’Callaghan medication. So still no Serc.

Significantly, she said she was “NOT COMPETENT TO DEAL WITH” (encephalitis).; His mother asked, confirming; “What? Encephalitis?” “YES. That’s for the neurologist to sort out” answered Luxon but-didn’t tell Reuter that in her letter to her, when Reuter had sent him to LUXON to I.D. the 1994 infection. Somebody is clearly lying as to who is responsible for this. YOU DECIDE. She also denied saying she was “not competent” (second lie) to I.D. the 1994 infection, yet said she didn’t “think you’ve got a brain problem causing the balance” (problem/vertigo) and “I don’t think the damage is causing the vertigo is in his brain”! Yet, by her own admittance she’s “not competent” to I.D. encephalitis and “I’m not the person to rule that out”.

Picture22

Luxon (left) with Mr. Coelhe. And then again (above). In her letter she wrote he wasn’t there!

Luxon wrote that her scientist (medical examiner) Mr. Coelhe, would, quote, “Never sits in on medical consultations”. In the video recording there he is sitting next to Prof Luxon during Paul O’Callaghan’s consultation with her. This is the most blatant lie of Luxon proving yet once more she can NOT be trusted.

Luxon wrote how Mr. O’Callaghan “was thought to be dyslexic” when he clearly stated that he was diagnosed dyslexic, this incident being significant as it proves

Luxon stated she would review Mr. O’Callaghan on one occasion after his single physiotherapy session. This never happened, and Luxon ignored the physiotherapists conclusions in her report dated 2/10/02 (Victoria Hindle’s Report was dated 12/12/02). Thus, she did not include the physiotherapists conclusion that Mr. O’Callaghan relied on his vision much more for balance than he should. Hinles Report confirmed very strong evidence of physical damage, which by this time had been neglected for 8 years. In order to protect Salama and subsequent Doctors who protected him, Hindles Report had to be ignored. This is why Luxon did not re-write her Report, despite even stating she would “review” him after the physiotherapy session.

To add insult to injury Luxon then tried to cover over her predecessors and her own negligence by indulging in slandering Mr. O’Callaghan as requiring “a psychiatric assessment to determine if there were any psychological problems” (2nd letter).

Luxon was in no position to decide if Mr. O’Callaghan required such a ludicrous assessment when she herself had not investigated the extent of the balance organ damage. She lied twice (possibly a third time – being investigated), failed to include the physiotherapists report which proved Mr. O’Callaghan relied on his vision for balance more than he should, showing his balance organs were severely damaged, failed to prescribe treatment on the grounds he didn’t suffer enough, and watered down her own scientists (in reality examiner’s) findings. It is standard practice for British Doctors to resort to psychobabble to cover up their own and colleagues medical negligence as other medical cases in this part of the Manifesto show. The use of psychobabblists and their willingness to be used in this way is one of the three reasons for our Policy to lock them all away, (see Social Affairs section for Policy details).
Clearly such a negligent liar as Linda Luxon is not a Dr. to be trusted.

Sub Policy: Linda Luxon to be struck off for purposeful medical negligence, lying consistently and being part of the conspiracy to protect Dr. Salama. She will serve a 14 year prison sentence.

Justification for I.H.C. in Bromley: The Case of Paul O’Callaghan Proving Purposeful Medical Negligence Part 7: Jennifer Quirke

LAWRENCE & WRIGHT & ASH

Picture24
Lawrence & Wright caught exposing the Hospital. Susan Ash

Rather than have the follow-up appt. with local neurologist (e.g. Reuter) Mr. O’Callaghan was ‘forgotten’ about… So he was forced to walk the streets leafleting, advertising his plight: this caused a small panic at Bromley Hospitals NHS Trust after he leafleted one of their officials road (leaflets were also delivered to Conservative Councillor Tim Steven’s street, but he ignored his plight.): acquiring an appointment with Reuters replacement – Australian DR. JENNIFER QUIRK (Reuters replacement at the Princess Royal University Hospital) and Trust official Suzanne Lawrence visited him, strangely with Head of Nursing Mike Wright (who soon resigned when they were exposed). Mr. O’Callaghan explained that the ‘94 infection could be I.D. and treated if the initial balance weakness, caused by the ’79 infection, could be located which could be done if one knew what the ’79 infection had been diagnosed as, but the files were “missing”; Lawrence said that, “knowing of the complete cock-ups we make on regular basis, I can quite believe they were lost”. She said it! Wright coughed here (did he guess they were being taped? Strong preservation instinct?). She conceded it was “unlikely we are going to find (them) be they hidden or lost”! (since then the infection which Mr. O’Callaghan had in 1979 or 1980 which probably weakened his ears, (causing a few brief seconds of vibrating vertigo when he was a small child once or twice a year) has been identified as Scarletina…
She accused him of making “an assumption” of the importance of the file/ to have the infections I.D., despite his research, and claimed that had he had G.B.S. symptoms in ‘94 an ambulance would have been called, refusing to believe in Doctors negligence. His mother tried to back him up here, but Lawrence snapped, “Did you hear what I just said?” yet throughout, it was they who were NOT ‘listening’, hence Mr. O’Callaghan’s and his Mum’s need to repeat themselves. He had told Lawrence twice he’d had only a single session of physiotherapy and corrected her when she thought he’d had “a series of infections” when he’d only told her of 2. Wright, (who patronisingly-like the doctors-kept calling him “Paul”) he had to tell twice who his GP was. Lawrence also raised her voice to say, “What do you want me to do Paul?” He replied he wanted an appt. with Dr. Dutta (an ENT Surgeon!) who accepts his profession lie. Lawrence said it was difficult as, “he’s quite a junior Dr.”; (so clearly they had checked him out despite him being in Bradford) no appointment was offered yet, she later asked again, “Tell me Paul, what else do you think I can do to help?”. He repeated his request for Dr. Dutta but this was ignored.
When he told her of Luxon denying she had the MRI result, Lawrence asked Mr. O’Callaghan, “Why do you think Prof. Luxon would behave like that though?” as if Mr. O’Callaghan was lying instead of contacting Luxon to establish why she would lie! This is just one reason why patients should tape doctors.
Lawrence admits that“60% of my patients that come into my hospital (Princess Royal Uni.) never leave with a confirmed diagnosis”. Stuff being a patient at Farnborough’s hospital. Sue Lawrence had told him, patronisingly, how he should “focus” on a list of medical facts ignored by Luxon, when he saw Quirk. Yet, when he informed Quirk of the list she just sniggered. …!
Quirke

Picture25

Audio recorder for 1994-2002 Drs. Jennifer Quirke caught on video lying.

One of these facts was the physiotherapists report/her findings: Paul O’Callaghan had told Lawrence that Quirk could obtain the report; Lawrence replied that’s a “very practical thing she could do”. Then Lawrence said Mr. O’Callaghan should tell Quirk (or should she be called Quack) that he should “want to see a copy of the report”; so Mr. O’Callaghan repeated that Quirk should obtain a copy of the report BEFORE he saw her. “Maybe I can help with that”, replied Lawrence! (no wonder they make “cock-ups”!!!). Yet, when he was with Quirk and Susan Ash (another hospital manager there to take notes Mr. O’Callaghan never had copies of), ASH covers-up the fact that Quirk DIDN’T have the report-i.e. His Mum asking; “Do you have the physiotherapists report?”

Ash interrupts before Quirk can answer, “Can I just ask us all” (strange language?) “Firstly for the sake of the notes here, could you please, could you give Dr. Quirk just 2 minutes?”… (“YEAH” AGREES QUIRK, UNSUPRISINGLY). His Mum endeavoured reiterating her question but Ash butts in, “Can we just have a few minutes to listen to what Dr. Quirk has to say, please.” Due to Ash’s protection Quirk never had to reveal she didn’t have the physiotherapist’s report.
2 months’ later Mr. O’Callaghan received Quirk’s report and then, strangely, a letter from Lawrence (with NO prompting from him) saying he was now being sent the physiotherapist’s report by Luxon’s hospital instead of Quirk because of patient confidentiality (!) and that could he pass it on to Quirk to put in her files (so she was not going to rewrite her report to take account of Ms. Hindles report, just like Luxon had left out.

THE COVER-UP OF THE PHYSIOTHERAPIST’S REPORT WAS COMPLETE.

The Physiotherapist had confirmed an important medical fact, undermining Luxon and co.’s cover-up of negligence so now it was down to Quirk to ignore it (ie cover-up).

Lawrence said she would “talk” to Mr. O’Callaghan after Mr. O’Callaghan saw Quirk but she never did. Instead, 2 months’ later he received Quirk’s own report, but BEFORE Mr. O’Callaghan could reply Lawrence wrote strangely to him that he’d been sent a copy of the Physiotherapist’s report by Luxon’s hospital INSTEAD of Quirk (a month after he saw her), because – of “patient confidentiality” and he was to then send it to Quirk so she could put it in her medical files!! (Quirk was NOT going to rewrite her report to take account of it). Yet, doctors are entitled to any medical reports about a patient (like was with Luxon’s report, which Quirk had).
Lawrence did NOT make this claim until AFTER Quirk had done her report to Mr. O’Callaghan’s G.P. The boycott of the Physiotherapists’ report was complete. How did Lawrence’s “chat” with Quirk go one wonders. Wright said Quirk would be “prepared to talk” with him; she was not.

When Mr. O’Callaghan had pointed out to Quirk that she needed to take into account what Goldingwood said but did NOT write, Ash butted in “If I could say at this point Paul” (like the doctors, Lawrence and Wright did, Ash patronisingly addressed him by his Christian name) “it would be very difficult for Dr. Quirk to comment on a colleague in another speciality. It would be inappropriate.”!! By implication this means that doctors can choose to ignore medical facts previous doctors have ignored so as to protect those latter doctors, by using Ash’s excuse! Quirk ‘hung herself’ again when she said she only wanted to know about 1 symptom!

For Quirk’s next trick; “THERE ARE NO DRUGS TO TAKE AWAY THE SYMPTOMS” and that doctors can’t improve “a lot of these symptoms. CERTAINLY NOT WITH MEDICATION”! She did not mention Serc which she should have been told of by Lawrence which Mr. O’Callaghan had discovered, and the GP (who was leaving) prescribed him 2 months earlier and has, to date (February 2008) prevented him being woken by shaking vision attacks-SOMETHING HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN PRESCRIBED IN 1994, at least before the second dose of acupuncture. Quirk was SHOCKED to hear he was on Serc and had no intention of prescribing anything, whilst other sufferers get prescribed treatment. She grudgingly endorsed it. Only Ash was interested in Serc.
IF Mr. O’Callaghan WAS PRESCRIBED TREATMENT AND IT IMPROVED Him IT WOULD PROVE NEGLIGENCE BY OTHERS OF LUXON, QUIRKS ETC PROFESSION IN 1994-6. So he had to remain ill to protect their profession.

Quirk could have investigated the “paresis of the inner left ear” and “labyrinthine disturbance” (UPDATE THERE ARE 5 DIFFERENT LABRYINTHINE problems and neither Luxon or Quirke has investigated even which one MR. O’Callaghan has got, yet they threatened him with legal action in 2005!!!!) and what he told her the physiotherapist had found etc, ignored by Luxon but Quirk CHOSE not to. One supposes she would claim it would be another “comment” on another Dr. in another capacity.
She also claimed it would be impossible to I.D. the 1994 infection now (2003), yet Reuter proposed to do that in only 2001!

Quirke wrote in her Report that the missing medical notes she was told of were G.P. notes. Lie. As the recordings shows, she was told these included hospital medical notes, including Bromley Hospitals very own W.P. Howlett.

An attempt to lure Mr. O’Callaghan into having psychobabble so to find ways of slandering him was attempted, as her Report acknowledges. Standard procedure for covering up medical negligence.

The final paragraph of Quirk’s report was a classic Dr. Twisting The Truth, event: First Quirke claimed there were, numerous “attempts to discuss his problems were made but often I was interrupted by them making yet another complaint”. In fact the truth was the opposite as the video recording shows: Mr. O’Callaghan and his mother trying to tell Quirk facts and Quirk refusing to listen, with Ash butting in.

Ash’s notes of the meeting have never been forthcoming, no doubt they would fail to match the recordings…

In her report Quirk chose to do NOTHING because she didn’t want to be taken to court for doing nothing. Mad Dr. Quack!

WATKINSON
Bromley Hospital Trust Chief Executive John Watkinson “HOPED” (so he didn’t know when he was supposed to be monitoring Mr. O’Callaghan’s case for John Horam M.P.) Mr. O’Callaghan HAD FOUND THE MEETING WITH QUIRK “HELPFUL”!!! Mr. Horam M.P. said he couldn’t do any more for Mr. O’Callaghan (he had done next to nothing) as Watkinson was “washing his hands” of Mr. O’Callaghan. His Mum’s lost £346,000 in having to move to a loss making house to get him treatment as well as money spent on phone bills and Homeopathy (1994-2000) in trying to get him treatment.

Throughout the consultation Jennifer Quirke only wanted to know about one symptom (!) Mr. O’Callaghan suffered. It is common sense that to diagnose a patient, a medical practitioner requires to know as many symptoms as possible a patient has.

Sub Policy: Jennifer Quirke will be Struck off the medical register for purposeful medical negligence, lying that there was no medication available and deported to her native Australia, once she served her 14 year prison sentence.

There is no Policy on John Watkinson as Mr. O’Callaghan’s supported campaign in 2004-6 resulted in Watkinson’s dismissal.

In 2004 Mr. O’Callaghan, with help, blew the whistle using his own journalistic skills on the Bromley dangerous Doctors. Despite the Authorities attempt to gag him, from Wales he received help in launching a counter offensive, resulting in the sacking of a Police Chief and a newspaper reporter who tried to protect the dangerous Doctors. In 2006, unable to return to Bromley so living in Eastbourne, Mr. O’Callaghan took further action resulting in the dismissal of a newspaper Editor and Bromley Hospitals Chief Executive John Watkinson.

Update (March 2008)
Since Jennifer Quirke, there has been little point in Mr. O’Callaghan attending any further Doctors as, like Jennifer Quirke, they will refer to past slanderous and flawed medical notes preferring to believe purposefully medically negligent Doctors medical notes over Mr. O’Callaghan.
Recently, Mr. O’Callaghan had a bladder infection forcing him to register with a G.P. practice in Eastbourne. His new G.P. co-operated fully, but the slanderous medical records by the discredited (as the evidence shows) Doctors (e.g. Luxon and Quirke) had yet to arrive. Whether his new G.P. will co-operate like Anna Wilkinson did or be influenced by the lying Doctors medical letters, once the medical records arrive, is unknown.
Paul O’Callaghan is currently demanding compensation as well as treatment, including the career the Doctors took from him (to be a Police Officer), though he is offering them an alternative, (to be trained to be an ENT Dr. even though he has no Maths A Level or GCSE Science). If the Doctors don’t meet his requirements this political party will continue.
In final conclusion: Paul O’Callaghan’s case, due to the immense amount of evidence, justifies an I.H.C. in Bromley, and (as one of many cases) justifies further I.H.C.s in London.
Mr. O’Callaghan had a weakness in the inner ears making him ultra vulnerable to the balance organ infection which struck him in 1994. The bully, Dr. Salama, due to his mental ill health, committed medical negligence. T.C. Stokes and Mr. O’Callaghan’s G.P. (Mary Sylvestor) conducted a cover up of Mr. O’Callaghan’s plight so to protect Salama’s negligence, by refusing to investigate the infection and the extent of damage it had caused. The G.P. was happy to take part in this cover up so to protect her negligent colleague Russell Hailsley. This motive is why the Homeopathic Doctor’s diagnosis of vetibular neuronitis was ignored, instead Stokes and Sylvestor lying to Mr. O’Callaghan that he had M.E. disease!
Subsequent Doctors (Registrar, W.P. Howlett (1996), ENT David Goldingwood/friend of Salama (2001), neurologist Iris Reuter (after “speaking” with Goldingwood 2001/2), Luxon (2002) and Quirke have moved to protect Salama and their predecessors parts in protecting Salama. Only Anna Wilkinson did not play along with the cover up, prescribing Serc, forcing Quirke to endorse it.
Mr. O’Callaghan has had the diagnosis of balance organ damage, (vestibular neuronitis, paresis of the inner ear etc) and lumps (lymph glands) arising on the lower back of his head, though no Dr. has bothered to investigate how an intensification of the constant vertigo (from rocking to vibrating) causes his vision to shake rapidly side to side (the Attacks) or the acupuncture effect in changing this.
The Serc medication has prevented vibrating vertigo (and thus the shaking vision attacks), giving him back a limited life and able to live semi-independently, (not needing night care like he did), and now even being able to endeavour to have the DSS arrange part time work for him.
Sadly Quirke had not bothered to investigate the beneficial implication the Serc effect showed, (i.e. how the Serc works, helps illuminate the extent of the balance organ damage).
The addition of an ear infection (leaving Mr. O’Callaghan with acute hearing) six years after the vertigo struck, and now a bladder infection, is not surprising as his immune system would be vulnerable to infections having been quote, “stuck at home for a decade”, helplessly ill because he was denied even the mild medication of Serc until 2003. Currently he still can’t wear the new spectacle lenses he needs because they are so strong, they increase the vertigo to vibrating when he tries to sleep after only 7 hours! The optician can do no more for him, stating it is, “up to the Doctors”. So Mr. O’Callaghan is slowly trying to phase in the stronger spectacles, a few hours a day.
After 15 years no Dr. has yet investigated the extent of his balance organ damage so to establish if another medication exists to compliment the Serc treatment, for treating Paul O’Callaghan.
What this case shows is how one Dr. after another is willing to continue medical negligence in order to protect colleagues.
UPDATE: For promoting the above policy, Paul O’Calllaghan was arrested, prosecucted and found guilty of “harassment” and communicating a malicious message” (as described at the start of this Manifesto). His solicitor did not present 99% of the evidence at Paul’s first Greenwich trial, (being electronoicallly tagged and fined and a restraining Order placed on him). At his Appeal Judge June Venters restricted immense defence evidence but allowed much CPS evidence. Venters has a p[ro-bono legal clinic in a warlingham Doctors surgery which refers patients to the PRU Hospital. As summarized at thebeginning, Paul Appealed but the Appeal Judge Venters had a conflict of interest with Doctors and through them the PRU Hospital, so wanted Paul in the hands of psychiatrists to be tortured and killed, which the psychiatrist (furious at Paul’s Public report finding that psychiatry was not a science, found that to be “insulting” and for not “recognizing the legitimacy of psychiatry and psychology” Paul should be sent for “disposal” (to be killed) by being “placed under Section” (locked in a mental ward) to be pumped with “antipsychotic drugs” for “a year”, which will torture Paul to death.

HEALTH POLICY 2: Anyone who has been imprisoned for killing a Judge, psychiatrist, CPS prosecutor etc will be FORGIVEN (heart of Christian and Hara Krishna belief systems) because they surppressed freedom of thought and speech or covered up medical neghligence.
Judges, psychiatrists, CPS prosecutors, Police Officers who suppress freedom of thought and speech will be execucted unless they beg for FORGIVENESS admitting their crimes publicly. If they refuse they will be deemed to have lost “self –preservation” so are mentally unfit to make decisions so will be placed under Section, until they regain their self-preservation instincts. By this policy, it is recognized that their crimes should deserve execution, but because this in itself is evil and sometimes innocent people are execucted, no one will ever be execucted. However, those FORGIVEN will be sentenced to Life in prison and Life will mean until they die.

HEALTH POLICY 3: General Medical Council To Be Replaced, Existing/Past G.M.C. Members Punished
The General Medical Council’s decision making committees to cease to have doctors upon them and instead victims (or their relatives) of medical negligence will reside upon these committees along with other non-health workers. This G.M.C. will be in London. There will be an additional Appeal Committee, based in Manchester, for both doctors and health workers to appeal to if they are dissatisfied with the London decision. Half of the Committees members and the Chair person MUST have experience of CONTINUED hardships, guaranteeing that Working Classes, (normally the negligent doctors victims). Justifications:
A). Dr. I. was cleared of “professional misconduct” by the General Medical Council. Dr, I. from the Yorkshire area and was a specialist in his field. The GM.C. had charged him (not the police) with 12 offences. Patients had died under his care. The ‘lucky’ one’s were just injured. Patients relatives were “mortified” of being cleared of serious professional misconduct, despite being found guilty of failure towards 3 patients. 1 patient died of a rectal tumour which could have been successfully operated on who’s spleen was damaged, but Dr. I. failed to spot this, (under the Democracy Party this would be classed as manslaughter), as the patient died. Dr. I. blamed this on a lack of funds when he was the one suppose to spot patients problems-not the money.

B). Doctors U. and B. gave 82 cancer victims the all clear following tests for breast cancer. 11 died as in many cases, these doctors would diagnose lumps in the breasts as begin tumours or CYSTS, with sufficiently ruling out cancer. Dr. B. failed to recognise the signs of malignant cancer and failed to take action when tissue samples were provided an, “equivocal results”. His secretary said he often did his private patients work instead of reading X-rays. Dr. B. was accused of letting his patients down, by “sheer laziness” said 1 expert at the G.M.C. hearing on these doctors actions. The 2 doctors had already been criticised by the then Chief Medical Officer, following a patients group’s complaints they were still practising. Despite the evidence against them, the G.M.C. not only cleared Dr. B. of bullying and intimidating other health staff, but also decided not to strike off either man. Instead they were only banned from mammography, (a part of radiology), conducting private work and would be supervised for 2 years. B. was also banned from holding any managerial posts.

C). The J family’s 6 year old daughter was admitted to O. Hospital for a routine operation, having been born with a congenital heart defect. She had been complaining of breathlessness and fatigue. Her consultant, Dr. T., decided to operate using a balloon catheter to clear a blockage in the child’s heart, but it burst – cutting off blood supply to the girl’s brain. The child’s parents had REFUSED permission for the catheter to be used in the operation, but Dr. T. ignored their instruction, so the girl died the next day.
The Coroner recorded a verdict of “misadventure” rather than manslaughter. The coroner Dr. G., said Dr. T’s action was “unwise” and “erroneous” .he also claimed it wasn’t difficult to understand the out rage and betrayal the family were experiencing. Dr. T. had told the girl’s parents before the operation, to seek counselling or psychiatric treatment” for their worries and concerns, about their child’s tiredness, as Dr. T believed they were imagining their child’s problems. (this is why counselling etc should be outlawed see separate Social Affairs policies).
Mr. J. said, “ We are still very angry. What that guy did was totally uncalled for. Totally un necessary. Without permission. It was unlawful. But I listened to the coroner summing up and he stuck by “strict guidelines” which doesn’t help us as a family”.

A year later Dr. T. was one of 4 doctors at the same hospital who treated a 16 year old boy of the S. Family who also had a congenital heart defect, preventing sufficient blood to the main organs. In 1996 the boy began coughing up blood (a hospital spokeswoman described the boy as “unwell”! More than unwell!). The doctors operated but he died 12 days later. The father accused the hospital of a conspiracy following the hospitals internal enquiry. The coroner decided that an inquest into the boy’s death was NOT necessary, despite the cause of death being admitted as “unclear”! At a meeting afterwards, Dr. T was mysteriously present when he had not been involved in the boy’s death at the hands of the other 3 doctors. Dr. T. had been involved in the boy’s health when the latter was younger, so Mr. S. is suspicious that Dr. T. was negligent in not supplying information about the boy’s medical history.

Mr. S. did not resign himself to the action of just living with the loss of his son (letting the doctors get away with the harm they had done), nor did he get violent like others do with negligent doctors. He took PEACEFUL direct action., trying to do something similar to what Paul O’Callaghan succeeded in: He decided to try and photograph the doctor’s posters in the hospital advertising that he accused the doctors of conspiracy and manslaughter.

Naturally there was a confrontation by the hospital objecting to the photographing of staff’s posters. What happened is unclear. The result was that the hospital had a High Court Injunction served on him (the British Unicorn Party will be looking for this Judge when we obtain power) stating that if he entered the hospital or went near the doctors homes (he had hoped to stand outside them advertising his son’s murder) he would be fined or receive a prison sentence. The hospital had feared for the safety of their doctors. Mr. S. when he returned (unclear if this return was when he tried photographing the doctors posters or on a subsequent visit) stating, “This hospital killed my son and these are the doctors responsible”. The hospital described this language in front of customers (whoops I mean patients) “accusatory language”, claimed to have “contorted themselves” for Mr. S. (I dread to think what they offered him).
It is unclear whether the 4 doctors (including Dr. T.) had threatened to sue Mr. S. for £50,000. or were actually going ahead with suing him. Were Capsticks solicitors involved in this case?

So in 1997/8 did the General Medical Council strike Dr. T. off taking into account both the child’s deaths being attributed to him? Take a wild guess.

Dr. T. was found guilty of professional misconduct and given a slap on the wrist, suspended for 6 months from working as a Dr.

The hospital was standing by Dr. T. at the time of the coroners hearing and reviewing his position. The J. family were planning legal action against the hospital.

D). The Bristol Baby Heart Scandal has been widely reported, so it’s not necessary to repeat in full. The facts regarding the case are:
29 children died and 13 suffered brain damage.
The 3 doctors W., D and R. were to have faced “involuntary manslaughter”.
All 3 were found guilty of putting lives at risk, the G.M.C. stating the doctors should have known that the surgical methods were “unsafe” and that they were, “not in the patients best interest”.
The Dr. who blew the whistle on these 3 doctors, was ostracised by his colleagues (doesn’t say much for his colleagues-clearly they should be struck off) and had to return to Australia.
Dr. D. blamed his “bad luck” as part of his “learning curve”!!!!!!!
The G.M.C. did NOT find the doctors were “clinically incompetent”!!!!!!
Half a dozen of the cases examined led to a guilty verdict.

Dr. D. was allowed to continue as a Dr. , only banned from working with children for 3 years, whilst the other 2 doctors who were already retired, were struck off.
One father shouted, “The G.M.C. protects working doctors. This was all predetermined before it started”.
A mother said, “They strike off the 2 doctors who have retired, but they say to (Dr. D.) ‘Oh, you’ve killed these children, that doesn’t matter. You carry on working, just don’t work for children any more. Just go and kill a few adults instead’. It’s just another farce. Just a waste of time”.

E). When Miss H. arrived back from Africa she became ill. She told her Dr. that she thought she may have a tropical disease, but the G.P. failed to listen (that’s normal for a Dr. – don’t listen to a patient self-diagnosis. They hate it so much that 1 health charity, tells patients NOT to tell a Dr. what they think it is, but to ask if the Dr. thinks it is the illness the patient thinks it is. This just proves how widespread such sick doctors are. The charity should have campaigned for such doctors to be struck off. Toothless fools). Miss. H.’s Dr. dismissed her symptoms as flue. She later fell into a coma and died. Her brother, a solicitor, wanted the G.M.C. to investigate her death from Malaria. He was told by the G.M.C. that he had to go through the NHS complaints procedure first, before going to the G.M.C., but later found this not to be true. The G.M.C. fined the Dr. £500. The brother was “sickened” by the fine as punishment.

F). The G.M.C. rarely strikes off a negligent Dr. and this practise is reinforced by their refusal to strike off those doctors who committed the discrimination against Mr. O’Callaghan. The General Medical Council are also inciting patient violence: Too often a patient can take years/decades to prove they’re ill and medically neglected, yet the G.M.C. WON’T act against a Dr. after 3 years from the negligence (so much for the Shipman Enquiry), such as they did WITHOUT even seeing the evidence in his case regarding the discriminating doctors, 1 of whom performs medical examinations on himself to diagnose patients!

G). The G.M.C. has done it again: Faced with 2 doctors to be punished over the death of a man in Faversham, Kent (in 2000), the G.M.C. chose, as usual, not to strike off the doctors permanently. Instead 1 Dr. was suspended for 6 months and the other for a year. 1 Dr. is retraining as a bio-chemist and the other one is now in India.
SO NEXT TIME THERE’S ANOTHER SHIPMAN BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE COMES TO LIGHT AFTER 3 YEARS THE G.M.C WILL DO NOTHING. These cases justify it’s abolition.

Policy 4: Paul O’Callaghan to receive a full medical investigation into his inner ear and possible brain damage & the Doctors involved in choosing to harm him, as the undercover video and audio recordings prove, will be hunted down punished, along with everyone who has tried to protect these Doctors, including any Judge/Jury who rules against any aspect of this policy.

This is a report by Paul O’Callaghan who has been purposefully medically neglected by NHS doctors for 10 years because he did not meet with their prejudices (discriminated against). So Drs.’ WITHHELD even a basic medication, whilst he appeared to be dying with brain tumour- type symptoms. He, therefore, had to resort to acupuncture, which changed the symptoms. His schooling was wrecked as his dyslexia went undiagnosed until he was 13, so had to receive individual basic tuition instead of crap schooling, (so the authorities threatened to take him away from his mother, till she had dyslexia diagnosed which they missed)), to help him overcome his dyslexia to achieve ’ A’ levels, only at 18 to then be struck by an inner ear/brain infection and denied treatment. He is now 31 yrs.’. Ruined education then this negligence has left him having never had relationship etc etc… and unable to pursue his careers. He fights for a real investigation into his ill health so treatment can be provided. His education was rigged against him and so has obtaining treatment. It would be nice if something was rigged FOR him. With both careers barred to him. Vertigo victims across the UK write to HIM for help! His NHS dentist won’t treat him as he was too ill to arrive on time by buses. If he gets treatment now and gets to work he will need to be treated like an 18 year old at 30 years because he hasn’t experienced/been denied adult life.
As we type this (November 2006), his mother’s home is being repossessed due to the financial cost of funding her son’s fight.

Picture26Picture25Picture24Picture29Picture30

Picture31Picture32 Picture33Picture34 Picture35Picture36Picture37

Real News; NewsShoppers Lying Front Page & Local Press Staff Cover Up; Sowter, Capsticks, Downing Street, GMC, Health Dept. Winterton letters

Bromley Police, GMC, Health Dept., Putney Law Firm & Courts WRONGLY Justify Violence Against Doctors
By Paul O’Callaghan

“My name is Paul O’Callaghan and the doctors have robbed me of the past 10 young BEST YEARS (supposedly) of my life (my 20’s). I was struck down critically ill rendering years of 24 -hour care. In July 1994 I fell acutely ill and with REAL TORTUROUS symptoms of not being able to rest/ stand/ sleep due to the CONSTANT physical sensation that I was moving: rising, falling, rocking, vibrating etc. VERTIGO. IMAGINE TRYING TO SLEEP LAYING ON A SEE-SAW MOVING AT HIGH SPEED-THAT’S VIBRATING VERTIGO. Vertigo is not a fear of heights. It’s caused by an inner ear/brain infection/disease. I HAVEN’T EXPERIENCED STILLNESS IN 10 YEARS! The vertigo sparks my VISION TO SHAKE NIGHTMARISHLY. When one source of balance fails (e.g. inner ears struck by serious infection damaging them) it puts more pressure on other sources of balance information (e.g. the eyes). So when one closes their eyes vertigo naturally increases from simple rocking, so hindering a person’s ability to sleep: if a severe sufferer then opens their eyes their vision will be juddering or shaking violently (even though the sufferer is still in a still environment), the brain having been deprived of a remaining source of balance information. I have to pace up and down the room having to be held up right, so to re-gain sufficient balance for the vibrating vertigo and shaking vision to cease. Have discovered this pacing is what mild vertigo sufferers are supposed to do when they have JUST an attack of vertigo alone (most vertigo victims have vertigo CONSTANTLY). A physiotherapist confirmed I rely on my vision, but she, the head lumps indicating a serious infection, pain in ears when tuning fork test performed and “paresis of the inner left ear” have all been ignored, as I will explain. The more a vertigo victim does the harder it is for them to suddenly stop and be still (rest), the brain taking longer to be ‘informed’ by the balance sources because of the inner ear damage, so the vertigo sensations continue in strength, in most victims never ceasing but reducing to a simple rocking after a while of torture. Hence why, most victims are stuck at home. It’s a catalogue of purposeful omissions and negligence.

From 1995 to 2003 my Mum and I tried to obtain help from solicitors, media, patients and human rights groups (like AVMA, Citizen Advice Bureau and Liberty). No one wanted to help because my case proved doctors commit negligence on purpose, so having ramifications for other negligence victims/their doctors in cases past, present and future. My local M.P. failed even to write to the health minister despite my requests (in 1996 HE was the health minister!). Details are in attached Real News. There is NO legal way doctors can be forced to treat a patient, let alone have a Dr. punished for negligence. Judges always and juries almost always rule in favour of doctors due to their prejudiced love of doctors. The law leaves patients with NO choice but to take either direct action or violence!!!!
I opted of course for direct peaceful action, in September 2004 (using money my Mum borrowed, financially ruining her, for me to use in a manner I decided so to get medical treatment), I produced 10,000 copies of my Bromley Real News sheet. In it I described my plight and to prove I was telling the truth, quoted and featured the images of the negligent doctors and officials I’d secretly recorded. I also condemned the doctors in the SAME way as the local newspaper editor had condemned car thieves and publicly (at a public meeting) received the local Police chief’s support for saying so.

Bromley Police’s Action States Journalism & Freedom Of Speech Is Mental!!!!!!!!
The NewsShopper reporter Richard Simcox reported how they were “inundated” with calls from “concerned” readers who received Real News, but NOT HOW they were all concerned (maybe because they were angry with the paper’s cover up of my case which I’d exposed?). Simcox lied that my paper was a “rant” when I was appealing for help and I’d exposed deadly doctors/health officials, like Suzanne Lawrence (now at Barking, Havering & Redbridge Trust). She admitted “We make complete cock ups on a REGULAR basis” and “ 60% of my patients never leave with a confirmed diagnosis”(yet they’re to get Foundation Status!). To prove Simcox was covering up these horrifying facts, putting his readers in danger, he ignored these facts and instead chose to report the COLOUR of the envelopes Real News’ were delivered in, (he can’t even mount a cover up-what a berk). 2 reporters even turned up at my home to ask the house sitter if he knew where I was by claiming they wanted to give me a present! Pathetic! Editor Andrew Parkes: ignored the fact that I stated I was condemning the doctors in the SAME way as he’d condemned car thieves and got Police support, (the P.C.C. backed him on this!!!); denied that his paper had covered up my case, lying that my “allegations” (what’s he think the recordings are?) were “obviously made up”! One of my 2 career ambitions was to work in journalism, so I should have these idiots jobs. The Bromley Hospital Trust contacted the Police rather than punish their staff and the Police hypocritically obeyed them despite the evidence, launching an “investigation” into my case, dragging off my Mum’s house sitter to find me, ( I was already else where to avoid a court injunction and then had to go into hiding). The Police then contacted the local mental health service, Oxleas Trust whom I’ve NEVER had anything to do with, to shut me up. Despite the evidence of me being physically ill and medically neglected, and that 2 doctors were mentally ill, Oxleas Tim Sowter preferred to believe the negligent Trust and Police over actual blatant evidence, proving that the Trust has a policy of viewing victims of negligence as mental so to protect doctors. How many physically ill negligence victims has Oxleas locked up as mad? There is a real danger this has happened so Oxleas patients should all have their cases reviewed by independent non-health workers. Bromley Police and Oxleas are a threat to freedom of speech/exposure journalism. The Police etc want to lock me up as mad and seize the tapes like they sectioned a protestor for 3 days to prevent him going on a demonstration. Bromley Police haven’t arrested the health official I’d exposed who lied to them! During the Winter, after only 2years as Police Chief, Dillnutt was replaced…

Putney Solicitors Dangerously Brand Freedom Of Speech “Harassment” So Are A Danger To Democracy
Now Bromley Hospitals Trust Putney solicitors, Capsticks, has described my peaceful campaign for treatment as “harassment” which is WHY I am launching this political party. Despite the obvious evidence I’m telling the truth about what the doctors said, Capsticks accuses me of “defamation” against the Trust (they’re the ones who have “defamed ME in files) and that I’d made “implicit and explicit threats of violence” in my news sheet and subsequent correspondence
with the Trust!!! I have NEVER threatened to harm a Dr. or incite others to lay a finger on a Dr. NEVER. I’ve
warned that “other people” in a similar situation to mine could resort to violence after seeing by my case that the law protects negligent doctors, due to the authorities were sending “out the message” that peaceful methods like mine would not be allowed. This is a case of “shoot the messenger”, (I suppose Capsticks view that phrase as threatening violence?)

Capsticks’ clients are responsible for losing me 8 of my past 10 years of life by denying me the mild medication of Serc suffering dozens of attacks and robbed of my 20’s, stuck at home on average 6 days a week for 9 of those years. The evil Capsticks want to shut me up so I suffer in silence (at home or, if I stop campaigning, locked up as mad so I could lose another 10 years)., whilst their clients receive Foundation status… (Oddly they only threaten legal action if I continue my campaign, not for all the 1,000’s of news sheets already delivered! Why?…). Capsticks are the ones making threats to my freedom of speech so I am passing their details to anti-fascist groups. My “correspondence” will be available on the British Unicorn Party web site so you can read for yourself that I’m the one telling the truth, unless Capsticks block it. The doctors can sue me but I can’t sue them (even if I paid I have been told!!!!).
The law & the General Medical Council are also inciting patient violence: Too often a patient can take years/decades to prove they’re ill and medically neglected, yet the G.M.C. WON’T act against a Dr. after 3 years from the negligence (so much for the Shipman Enquiry), such as they did WITHOUT even seeing the evidence in my case regarding the discriminating doctors, 1 of whom performs medical examinations on himself to diagnose patients!
SO NEXT TIME THERE’S ANOTHER SHIPMAN BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE COMES TO LIGHT AFTER 3 YEARS THE G.M.C WILL DO NOTHING. If that’s not a justification for it’s replacement I don’t know what is!
In addition, according to 1 solicitor, taking legal action against a Dr. after 3 years also applies!!! All judges & most juries rule in favour of doctors in negligence cases (when a Jury does find a Dr. guilty of negligence when he has actually killed the Judge disagrees and lets the Dr. go unpunished. How many years will it be before judges (or jurors) are being murdered in the street by distraught relatives? (asking this question is probably in Capsticks view “threatening violence”? It’s right that juries should be aware that a victim of negligence or relative would spend their life hunting down and killing them for ruling in favour of a negligent Dr. It’s a strong possibility if the dead victim is a child of a criminal). Capsticks sent their threatening letter 4 months after I released my news sheet, seeing I had no public help. I have put myself at risk, blowing the whistle on the doctors, yet receive no help for doing so.

The reason the Government won’t act to help is because my case proves how widespread the problem is: Health Minister Rosie Winterton M.P. and the Health Department’s Allan Jackson (on behalf of John Reid) are trying to class my case as requiring only a requiring a “complaint” being registered (which even their useless I.C.A.S. admit can’t “discipline” a Dr. or force them to treat a patient). Jackson’s colleague, Roberta Wallis, admitted that Ministers (elected M.P.s) can “not intervene” (proving un-elected doctors have more power than M.P.s). and PERVERSLEY said I should “discuss” my treatment with the doctors when they want to lock me up to shut me up! She’s either stupid or is being sarcastic.

Downing Street’s Katie Newell has written that Prime Minister Tony Blair has “thanked” me for the Real News I’d sent him appealing for his help. There was NO offer of help or even advice. So Mr. Blair is aware of recordings of doctors and officials committing medical negligence at Bromley Hospitals Trust yet covers this up, thereby allowing John Reid TO GIVE THE GREEN LIGHT TO THE TRUST IN JANUARY TO PROCEED TO THE 2ND STAGE IN OBTAINING FOUNDATION STATUS, knowing what’s going on…. Is this a SCANDAL or is this a SCANDAL.

In summary what Capsticks calls “harassment” is now a political party policy. A political party can have any policy they want. To say that a political party can’t would have massive implications for what little democracy there is and the other political parties. My recordings and copies of medical files prove what I say is true so Capsticks can get stuffed over there “defamation” rant. How can people campaign peacefully for treatment if they can’t even relate HOW a Dr has wronged them? People who have been treated O.K. by a Dr. will prejudicially not believe the victim. Suffering from medically neglected inner ear (and possible brain) damage causing the CONSTANT sensations of moving and shaking vision attacks, to be threatened by Capsticks in fight for treatment so ill just proves how evil Capsticks are (they specialise in protecting doctors. Something needs to be done about such solicitors).
Doctors & officials tell people that the problems in the NHS is due to a lack of money and beds. My evidence proves these are lies so they are desperate to shut me up. For my final prediction: I predict that between 12 and 30 years time the doctors and their protectors will be heading for the airports as my Party obtain Government. At no time has any Dr. tried anti-biotics to treat the infection causing the vertigo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
********MY EVIDENCE PROVES DOCTORS COMMIT NEGLIGENCE ON PURPOSE. That’s why they want to lock me up. Please Help.

——————————————————————————————————-
THE CASE IN DETAIL

THE GENERAL PRACTITIONERS / THE GREENWICH NEGLIGENCE
In June 1994 I began feeling sick a lot, reduction in sleeping and my catarrh had increased. G.P. Dr. Peter Oxford laughed at my situation . So I changed G.P. surgeries just as the vertigo struck. By the end of July I had vertigo sensations like I was laying on a see-saw moving at high speed CONSTANTLY (along with constant rocking, rising and falling sensations) when I tried to rest, with my vision CONSTANTLY shaking. REAL TORTURE. I HAVEN’T EXPERIENCED STILLNESS IN 10 YEARS! The vertigo sparks my VISION TO SHAKE NIGHTMARISHLY. When one source of balance fails (e.g. inner ears struck by serious infection damaging them) it puts more pressure on other sources of balance information (e.g. the eyes). So when one closes their eyes vertigo naturally increases from simple rocking, so hindering a person’s ability to sleep: if a severe sufferer then opens their eyes their vision will be juddering or shaking violently (even though the sufferer is still in a still environment), the brain having been deprived of a remaining source of balance information. I have to pace up and down the room having to be held up right, so to re-gain sufficient balance for the vibrating vertigo and shaking vision to cease. I have discovered this pacing is what mild vertigo sufferers are supposed to do when they have JUST an attack of vertigo alone (most vertigo victims have vertigo CONSTANTLY). A physiotherapist confirmed I rely on my vision, but she, the head lumps indicating a serious infection, pain in ears when tuning fork test performed and “paresis of the inner left ear” have all been ignored, as I will explain. The more a vertigo victim does the harder it is for them to suddenly stop and be still (rest), the brain taking longer to be ‘informed’ by the balance sources because of the inner ear damage, so the vertigo sensations continue in strength, in most victims never ceasing but reducing to a simple rocking after a while of torture. Hence why, most victims are stuck at home. It’s a catalogue of purposeful omissions and negligence. .

I had so many strange (to a patient but shouldn’t be strange to a Dr.) symptoms and was so ill I took my Mum with me to help explain my increase in symptoms to the new G.P. Clarence Thenuwara (and as a witness as he was a bully) This disabling infection, which resulted in my being too weak to lift knife and fork, body/head/face ‘numb’, etc.; breathing problems; my vision shaking and vertigo sensations that I was CONSTANTLY moving when resting (unable to close eyes) – REAL TORTURE (e.g. laying in bed physically feeling like I was laying on a see-saw moving at high speed). He had prescribed dangerous Stemetil tablets but these made the vertigo worse (which I now know commonly does more harm than good as other sufferers have told me). Dr. Thenuwara told my mother she could NOT speak on my behalf at any time!!! On another occasion he asked my mother WHY she had not spoken on my behalf!!! Mad? He diagnosed me as suffering from what he called the “feeling virus”. In the hot sun I was cold. So in desperation I tried electro-acupuncture, which stopped the vibrating (see-saw) vertigo sensation from being constant, so I was finally able to rest. My shaking vision also stopped being constant. The acupuncturist said I had an “infection”. Thenuwara finally said he would make appointments for an Ear, Nose & Throat Dr., a neurologist and a Chest Physician. Instead he made 2 appointments for me to see the Chest physician and NONE for the neurologist. When asked why he had done this he struck me off and sent me back to my previous G.P.s in Averyhill Road. So much for changing doctors as the Patients Association dribble about. I got worse over the weekend so my Mum called in a locum Dr. who just said I need T.L.C. and used our phone for a private call!

One of Oxfords colleagues, Dr. Margaret Taylor who in my hallway, expressed concern for me until my Mum said I was her son: “Oh! I thought he was your husband”. She then ran up the stairs burst into my room and demanded “What are you doing in bed?”. She also snapped at my Mum how she could know I had lost weight. I was so ill my mother was having to lift a knife and fork to feed me. My Mum called in Oxford. He said he could do nothing and left looking frightened. Had he realised he’d committed negligence? He wrote in my medical records that I’d taken “A Levels” and was “dyslexic”.
I managed on just 1 day to go out to the Brooke Hospital where a nurse (“Mary”) was the first orthodox health practitioner to ask real questions. She asked my Mum if she thought I had “Guillian-Barre Syndrome (something the neurologist secretary had said my symptoms sounded like when she told my Mum I had no appointment with the neurologist). The junior Dr. couldn’t be bothered with me but did admit he knew “what G.P.s are like” being negligent. I later suffered my FIRST attack of my vision shaking side to side after I had closed my eyes sitting up, coming on as soon as the vibrating vertigo (swinging side to side sensation) had started. My Mum called an ambulance. The Brook junior Dr. said the attack was instead of a headache. A few days later I tried Dr. Russell Housley He only wanted to know if I had any Siblings and if my Dad lived at home. He admitted that the lumps on the lower back of my head were “lymph glands which rise and fall with a viral infection”. He asked which A levels I took and proceeded to blame my illness on them instead of the infection he himself had I.D. Housley could have prescribed Serc but chose to prescribe nothing. SO IF YOUR CHILD TAKES EXAMS AND CATCHES AN INFECTION THE DOCTORS WILL LET THEM DIE. Should exams be banned so to protect children from sick doctors like Housley. The few symptoms he did write down he got wrong.

My Mum swore that if I had died then she would have killed the New Eltham and Brooke Hospital doctors. They could just have prescribed the medication Serc but CHOSE not to do so because I did NOT meet with their prejudices (discrimination) because I did not have “a father living at home” and had “no siblings” (NO hereditary illness questions were asked…). No-one even asked if my father was dead; he is from a brain defect. Both a G.P. and a local hospital doctor WITHHELD the latter’s diagnoses of my condition “a true vertigo” caused by an “infection” which has robbed me of the first 10 years of my YOUNG adult life.

It’s taken me years to establish that I have to rely on vision more than I should and that I’ve remains, at least, of “paresis of the inner left ear” because Bromley doctors tried to protect their Eltham colleagues and DSS harassment because only a Homeopath would help me, not a Dr. My case is the proof that doctors CAN kill patients, by negligence ON PURPOSE!

MEN AND WOMEN ARE ALLOWED TO BECOME DOCTORS WHO SHOULDN’T BE. SOMETHING’S BEEN WRONG IN THE MEDICAL SCHOOLS AND STILL IS. A DOCTOR WILL TREAT PATIENTS WHO MEET WITH THEIR PREJUDICES, BUT NOT OTHERS. My mum’s lost £250,000+ having to move house etc to get me slight treatment. Had the New Eltham doctors prescribed Serc,even after the first dose of acupuncture which eased the vertigo I had (due to the negligence) it wouldn’t have been too late but, because of Thenuwara/Sylvestor and co. I had to have a second dose which changed the vertigo. A Nurse (& neuro. sec.!) was the only one to ask physical questions (!): her written report went ‘missing’.
I will explain how the local doctors robbed me of the first 10 years of my life being stuck indoors at home on average 6 days a week from 1994 to 2003 (now it’s 5 days but I can’t get up till Midday as the vertigo keeps me awake till 4am in bed ). YOU can now discover WHICH doctors are selecting patients to neglect. IF YOUR DR. IS TWO-FACED.

SALAMA
My Ears, Nose & Throat Dr. was Dr. Salama. He was described by another patients relative as “a pig”. During my consultation he performed a tuning fork test on my ears, putting the fork against my ears. This caused incredible pain, particularly in the left one, where in 2002 “paresis” was found, but Salama chose not to investigate this:
When I asked him why it had caused me so much pain he first said “Sorry” (!) and then performed the test on his own ears and said “It doesn’t do it to me” (cause him pain)!!!!!!! OBVIOUSLY his ears were healthy and the test proved something was wrong with mine. When my Mum pointed this out to this man who was suppose to be a Dr., Salama ran round the room, appearing to have a nervous breakdown, and disappeared through a side door. He returned to tell me the Chest Physician would deal with my ear problem.

It is because of Salama still being a doctor at QUEEN MARY’S Hospital, that the subsequent doctors have attempted to hinder my obtaining treatment/ proving serious infection damage/proving purposeful negligence.

HOW MANY PEOPLE HAS DR. SALAMA NEGLECTED? DR. SALAMA IS HIGHLEY DANGEROUS AND IS MAD.

STOKES
Chest physician T C Stokes (who was “known” to the Plumstead Law Centre), like Dr. Housley FIRST questions were: “Do you have brothers and sisters?” and “Does your father live at home?” . He NEVER asked about hereditary illnesses ,if my father was alive or dead, symptoms, lumps, medical history! So I tried telling him my symptoms but he ignored me so my Mum tried telling him. He snapped at her to “Shut up or get out” despite me being legally entitled to a witness. The nurse apologised after for his behaviour. He VERBALLY told me I had M.E. disease (which provoked persecution by the DSS to stop my benefit as their DSS Dr. Allan did not recognise M.E., calling me a liar and attempting to assault me-all taped), but in his letter to G.P. Mary Sylvester (“Dear Mary,”) he wrote I’d a “true vertigo” caused by an “infection”! His true diagnosis.

NO MEDICATION I.E. SERC. Stokes neglected me because I had “no siblings” and no father living at home (he wrote this in the letter to Sylvester which I have a copy of, before the original mysteriously disappeared). To Stokes and Housley my symptoms could not be real because I had “no siblings” so they had to be psychological (ignoring the lumps on my head, loss of weight etc), which is really a mad form of DISCRIMINATION. So because of their prejudices I did not receive treatment (i.e. Serc). Plus Stokes had to cover up Salama’s negligence. Stokes should have referred me to a neurologist and neuropath or ENT Surgeon; discovered the “paresis in the inner ear” etc.

HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE NOT MET WITH A DOCTOR’S MAD PREJUDICES – THEREFORE, HAVE NOT RECEIEVED MEDICAL TREATMENT (medically neglected), USING PSYCHOBABBLE (counselling) TO DO SO? SINERSTLERY, THERE IS AN OFFICIALLY HIGH DEGREE OF AFRO-CARIBBEAN PEOPLE BEING BRANDED MENTAL AND LOCKED UP. IN FEBRUARY 2004 it has been revealed that black mental health patients are racially discriminated against…Yes my case is ONLY CHILD DISCRIMINATION, BUT THIS PROVES DOCTORS DO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST PHYSICALLY ILL PATIENTS, SO ARE CAPABLE OF ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST PHYSICALLY ILL PATIENTS. The doctors hold life and death in their hands REGULARLY unlike the Police, so need to be investigated to discover how rife discrimination is by doctors against patients.

The senior partner at the G.P. surgery, Dr. Jean McKinnon would not do anything but described me as an “unhappy boy”. NO Bl**dy wonder-as I was being neglected. I did visit a private Homeopathic Dr. who diagnosed I had “vestibular neuronitis” (an inner ear infection) but being into Homeopathy meant the G.P.s would ignore him as doctors view Homeopathy as a threat to them.
The medical records for pre-2000 have MYSTERIOUSLY disappeared… Unluckily for the doctors I obtained copies of some of them before they did ‘disappear’. My Mum moved house for me to have a G.P. and now has lost £250, 000 because of the doctors negligence. Only in 2002 was the paresis etc identified and I obtained mild treatment thanks to my own research, in 2003 which I could have had in 1994! It’s taking so long because Bromley and London doctors and the former health authority did ALL they could to prevent me from obtaining the confirmation of my illness and prescribe effective treatment as to allow this would prove the Eltham doctors had been purposefully negligent/discriminated. Now those doctors are currently being exposed.

Picture38

Unluckily for the doctors I had a micro cassette recorder running whilst with them.
FACTS IGNORED BY STOKES & SALAMA AND FOUND BY OTHER NEGLIGENT DOCTORS:

1.Dr. Martin Prevett of Moorfields Eye Hospital wrote that I had a “peripheral VESTIBULAR disturbance” like the Homeopathic Dr. had wrote of. He also suggested “brain stem demeylination” (an inflammation of the brain which can be caused by encephalitis-which can cause oscillopsia, a form of shaking vision).

7.Dr. Iris Reuter (the first neurologist of any kind I saw in 2001when I should have seen one in 1994) also suggested that I had “encephalitis” and “demeylination” , NOT knowing Prevett had already said that nor that the Cranial-Osteopath I’d visited had suggested a brain disease.

8.ENT Dr. David Goldingwood (who knew Salama) verbally stated my “symptoms are indications of a brain infection”. NO investigation to rule out a brain infection/damage has been undertaken. He also wrote I should see an ENT surgeon, but neither he nor any other Bromley Dr. has done this. More negligence.

9.Physiotherapist Ms Hindle (I’ve been medically neglected so long now those of my own age group, like Ms. Hindle had established careers) had me perform an exercise with my eyes shut to establish if I relied on my vision more than I should for balance. Just doing the exercise once sparked vibrating vertigo and a massive attack, so Ms. Hindle had to hold me up right so I could pace up and down the room to re-balance my balance/stop the shaking vision and vibrating. This is standard procedure for people who JUST have attacks of vertigo (the minority).

10.Scientist Mr. Coelho performed tests on me and found I had “paresis of the inner left ear” (explaining the pain the tuning fork had caused in 1994, but which Salama ignored because he’s stupid). He also found a “labyrinthine disturbance”. There are actually 5 types of labyrinthines I now know but neither Luxon, nor Bromley Dr. Quirk have even bothered to work out which 1 I have. More negligence.

11.In 2003 Serc medication I discovered and found it stopped me being awoken to date, with vibrating vertigo and shaking vision.

If Oxford, Thenuwara, Salama and Sylvestor etc had prescribed Serc at least, I would NOT have had to have had the second dose of acupuncture which changed the vertigo and shaking vision.

PREVETT.
I managed to visit a private Homeopathic Dr. who diagnosed “VESTIBULAR neuronitis” (inner ear infection) but Sylvester ignored him. I also visited MOORFIELDS EYE HOSPITAL; Dr Martin Prevett who in his letter to G.P. also wrote I had a “peripheral VESTIBULAR disturbance” or “brain stem demyelination” (an inflammation of the brain which can be caused by brain infection encephalitis, which causes oscillopsia (which can happen with out the eyes having to move).These facts consistently arise below. However Prevett CHOSE to do nothing because I had “no siblings” (discriminating questions again); sneered mockingly at me that the tuning fork had caused me pain, asked no hereditary questions or medical history, just siblings and father questions. PREVETT IS A DANGEROUS DR. He also barred illegally my Mum as a witness from being present. He has 20 years ahead of him to commit discrimination. He needs to be struck off permanently NOW!

HOWLETT & THENUWARA / THE BROMLEY NEGLIGENCE BEGINS
Mum moved house to get me treatment. New G.P. Dr. Balachandran referred me to ORPINGTON HOSPITAL’S DR. W.P. HOWLETT in 1996. He proceeded to use social history questioning (the name given to make the doctors practice of establishing if a patient met with their mad prejudices sound O.K.): Did I have siblings, no hereditary questions etc, all on tape, etc. He refused to read my list of symptoms I had prepared to save NHS time and money, but he wanted me to take a while now recounting 2 years of symptoms! He turned my list upside down on the table, so I turned it back up. This happened twice more so I read the list to him, (I hadn’t been able to read a full page till 1996). No treatment was forthcoming. He wrote he expected to SEE my vibrating vertigo symptoms! Idiot. He was asked to explain why he had asked discriminating questions. He said he would explain “at the end” of the consultation. He never did. So could YOU please write to him at 95 Landcroft Road, Dulwich, London SE22 and ask him why he discriminates.

JANE MEEK & CLAIRE PERRY
After Howlett the GP chose to leave my treatment to the Pure Homeopath, who doctors hate! Thereafter the GP failed to sign his own referral letter for me to attend a specialist hospital. Bromley C.H.C. said they could not get him to sign his own referral letter-that Mum had to. The GP manageress was abusive to my Mum and struck us both off his patients list. Bromley Health Authority’s Chief Executive Claire Perry and ECR Manager JANE MEEK refused NHS funding for me to attend the hospital on the grounds of “finite resources”, which were spent at the time instead on radio project for yobs to play with (Cray Youth Radio), which Bromley C.H.C. Chairman Patrick Parker refused to allow discussion of at a public meeting, despite it being on the agenda! When challenged at the next meeting with a micro. recorder he refused to explain his actions and objected to the recorders precence. So obviously if he is atr a meeting undercover recordings are justified. Association of CHC’s Chairman Peter Walsh commented on this by saying “the vast MAJORITY of CHC’s do a good job”! My Mum was crying on the phone to Meek asking “Do I have to get a gun and shoot the effin doctors?”, so to draw publicity to my plight. Meek slammed the phone down and called the Police, lying to them that Mum had threatened to kill her!!! The Police should have arrested Meek for lying to them. Not even my local M.P. could help me get treatment, John Horam. When I finally had the money for a private appointment and a new GP, the hospital refused to see me other than by an NHS appointment-which they knew I could not obtain. The illness is misery enough without the misery of neighbour harassment. Perry is now Chief Executive of Lewisham Hospital NHS Trust.

GOLDINGWOOD
In 2000 this cover-up of doctors’ discrimination against patients intensified: The medical records disappeared.
I did obtain copies before they did. In February I had a massive attack of shaking vision and spinning vertigo. This has left me with a walking stick to steer with. The new GP referred me to Dr. David Goldingwood of Princess Royal Uni. Hospital; he twisted my words (like previous doctors had); ‘failed’ to put in writing that he’d said my “SYMPTOMS ARE INDICATIONS of A BRAIN INFECTION” (an osteopath I’d tried suggested this also, before I went to Goldingwood); in answer to my own letter he didn’t deny that he had said it. He wrote (like other doctors) that I attended with my Mum. Who does he expect me to attend with when so ill/medically neglected I couldn’t find/have a girlfriend? Yet a young woman patient he allowed her not only to attend him with her mother, but also invited her to bring her boyfriend! I was male. She was female. I rest my case. I was afflicted by tinnitus from 2000.Goldingwood knew Salama.

REUTER
In 2001 I finally was referred to a local neurologist Dr. Iris Reuter, who said she would refer me to a vertigo specialist, (at last); have an MRI brain scan; dangerous lumber puncture and as an in-patient at Kings College Hospital, if nothing showed. But following “speaking to Goldingwood” as she said she would, I thereafter saw NO vertigo specialist, but an Eye Dr. who wondered why I was seeing him at Kings College. The M.P. had to acquire the MRI scan. When returning to Reuter she was asked WHY I had not been referred to a vertigo specialist?- Reuter slammed her hand on the table saying “Stop it” (Patients can’t even ask questions, let alone be aggressive, yet a Dr. can be aggressive).She claimed I had “not deteriorated sufficiently” to have encephalitis (unaware it can cause shaking vision and ignoring my now need to use a walking stick to steer with and lean on. In her referral letter to Professor Linda Luxon she did NOT state her claims of demyelination and encephalitis. She also wrote that I’d seen a Dr. Markus when I hadn’t, but Howlett was 1 of his underlings but, how would she know about Howlett if my medical records were missing…? DR. REUTER (a German) IS NOW WORKING AT KINGS COLLEGE HOSPITAL, Denmark Hill.

LUXON
On the second visit to Professor Linda Luxon of the National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, (after being sworn at by an Australian nurse because she didn’t except that doctors committed negligence on purpose-caught on tape), Luxon denied she had the MRI scan result when it was in front of her (in camera shot). She kept repeating I “may” have an inner ear infection, so as to not undermine Goldingwoods cover-up of Salama and co, She wrote that my Mum didn’t shake her hand (mental vanity?)! In a later report she stated that her scientist Mr. Colheo had found I had “paresis of the inner ear” and a “labyrinthine disturbance” ( but has not bothered to find out which labyrinthines) supporting the VESTIBULAR diagnosis and explaining the tuning fork caused pain in ’94. Her physiotherapist Ms. Hindle, had me do an exercise with my eyes shut to discover if I relied on my vision more than I should for balance: it sparked a vibrating vertigo and shaking vision attack, Ms. Hindle helping me pace up and down the room. LUXON IGNORED ALL THIS and even changed her mind about prescribing me medication. So still no Serc.

Significantly, she said she was “NOT COMPETENT TO DEAL WITH” (encephalitis).; Mum asked, confirming; “What? Encephalitis?” “YES. That’s for the neurologist to sort out” answered Luxon but-didn’t tell Reuter that in her letter to her, when Reuter had sent me to LUXON to I.D. the 1994 infection. Somebody is clearly lying as to who is responsible for this. YOU DECIDE. She also denied saying she was “not competent” to I.D. the 1994 infection, yet said she didn’t “think you’ve got a brain problem causing the balance” (problem/vertigo) and “I don’t think the damage is causing the vertigo is in his brain”! Yet, by her own admittance she’s “not competent” to I.D. encephalitis and “I’m not the person to rule that out”.
In addition she alleged her scientist Mr. Colheo would “never sit in” on a confidential consultation. He DID at first appointment-see picture
Below is a video image showing Colheo at my first consultation with Luxon on the left. BMA Letter below.

Picture39

LAWRENCE & WRIGHT & ASH

Picture40

Rather than have the follow-up appt. with local neurologist (e.g. Reuter) I was ‘forgotten’ about… So I was forced to walk the streets leafleting, advertising my plight: this caused a small panic at Bromley Hospitals NHS Trust after I leafleted one of their officials road ( leaflets were also delivered to Conservative Councillor Tim Steven’s street, but he ignored my plight.): acquiring an appointment with Reuters replacement – Australian DR. JENNIFER QUIRK (Reuters replacement at the princess Royal University Hospital) and Trust official Suzanne Lawrence visited me, strangely with Head of nursing Mike Wright. I explained that the ‘94 infection could be I.D. and treated if the initial balance weakness, caused by the ’79 infection, could be located which could be done if one knew too what the ’79 infection had been diagnosed as, but the files were “missing”; Lawrence said that, “knowing of the complete cock-ups we make on regular basis, I can quite believe they were lost”. Wright coughed here (did he guess they were being taped? Strong preservation instinct?). She conceded it was “unlikely we are going to find (them) be they hidden or lost”! She accused me of making “an assumption” of the importance of file/ to have the infections I.D., despite my research, and that had I had G.B.S. symptoms in ‘94 an ambulance would have been called, refusing to believe in doctors negligence. Mum tried to back me up here, but Lawrence snapped, “Did you hear what I just said?” yet throughout, it was they who were NOT ‘listening’, hence our need to repeat ourselves. I had told Lawrence twice I’d had only a single session of physiotherapy and corrected her when she thought I’d had “a series of infections” when I’d only told her of 2. Wright, (who patronisingly-like the doctors-kept calling me “Paul”)I had to tell twice who my GP was. Lawrence also raised her voice to say, “What do you want me to do Paul?” I replied I wanted an appt. with Dr.Dutta (ENT Surgeon!) who accepts his profession lie. Lawrence said it was difficult as, ”he’s quite a junior Dr.”; (so clearly they had checked him out despite him being in Bradford) no appointment was offered yet, she later asked again, “Tell me Paul, what else do you think I can do to help?”. I repeated my request for Dr. Dutta but this was ignored. When I told her of Luxon denying she had the MRI result, Lawrence asked ME, “Why do you think Prof. Luxon would behave like that though?” as if I was lying! This is just one reason why patients should tape doctors. Lawrence admits that“60% of my patients that come into my hospital (Princess Royal Uni.) never leave with a confirmed diagnosis”. Stuff being a patient at Farnborough’s hospital. Sue Lawrence had told me, patronisingly, how I should “focus” on a list of medical facts ignored by Luxon, when I saw Quirk. Yet, when I informed Quirk of the list she just sniggered. …!

*One of these facts was the physiotherapists report/her findings: I had told Lawrence that Quirk could obtain *the report; Lawrence replied that’s a “very practical thing she could do”. Then Lawrence said I should tell *Quirk (or should I call her Quack) that I “want to see a copy of the report”; so I repeated that Quirk should *obtain a copy of the report BEFORE I saw her. “Maybe I can help with that”, *replied Lawrence! (no wonder *they make “cock-ups”). Yet, when I’m with Quirk and Susan Ash (another hospital manager there to take *notes I’ve never had copies of-above right), ASH covers-up the fact that Quirk DIDN’T have the report-i.e. *Mum asked; “Do you have the physiotherapists report?”

*Ash interrupts before Quirk can answer, “Can I just ask us all” (strange language?) “Firstly for the sake of the *notes here, could you please, could you give Dr. Quirk just 2 minutes?”… (“YEAH” AGREES QUIRK, *UNSUPRISINGLY). Mum endeavoured reiterating her question but Ash butts in, “Can we just have a few minutes to listen to what Dr. Quirk has to say, please.” Due to Ash’s protection Quirk never had to reveal she didn’t have the physiotherapist’s report. 2 months’ later I received Quirk’s report and then, strangely, a letter from Lawrence (with NO prompting from me) saying I was now being sent the physiotherapist’s report by Luxon’s hospital instead of Quirk because of patient confidentiality (!) and that could I pass it on to Quirk to put in her files (so she was not going to rewrite her report to take account of Ms. Hindles report. THE COVER-UP OF THE PHYSIO. REPORT WAS COMPLETE.

The Physio. had confirmed an important medical fact, undermining Luxon and co.’s cover-up of negligence so now it was down to Quirk to ignore it (ie cover-up) . Lawrence said we’d “talk” after I saw Quirk but we never did. Instead, 2 months’ later I received Quirk’s own report, but BEFORE I could reply Lawrence wrote strangely to me that I’d been sent a copy of the Physio. report by Luxon’s hospital INSTEAD of Quirk (a month after I saw her), because – of “patient confidentiality” and I was to then send it to Quirk so she could put it in my medical files!! (Quirk was NOT going to rewrite her report to take account of it). Yet, doctors are entitled to any medical reports about a patient (like was with Luxon’s report). Lawrence did NOT make this claim until AFTER Quirk had done her report to my G.P. The boycott of the Physio.’s report was complete. How did Lawrence’s “chat” with Quirk go I wonder. Wright said Quirk would be “prepared to talk with me”; she was not.
When I pointed out to Quirk that she needed to take into account what Goldingwood said but did NOT write, Ash butts in “If I could say at this point Paul “ (like the doctors, Lawrence and Wright did, Ash patronisingly addressed me by my Christian name) “it would be very difficult for Dr. Quirk to comment on a colleague in another speciality. It would be inappropriate.”!! By implication this means that doctors can choose to ignore medical facts previous doctors have ignored so as to protect those latter doctors, by using Ash’s excuse! Quirk ‘hung herself’ again when she said she only wanted to know about 1 symptom!

For Quirk’s next trick; “THERE ARE NO DRUGS TO TAKE AWAY THE SYMPTOMS” and that doctors can’t improve “a lot of these symptoms. CERTAINLY NOT WITH MEDICATION”! She did not mention Serc which she should have been told of by Lawrence which I had discovered, and the GP (who was leaving) prescribed me 2 months earlier and has, to date (June 2004) prevented me being woken by shaking vision attacks-SOMETHING I SHOULD HAVE BEEN PRESCRIBED IN 1994, at least before the second dose of acupuncture. Quirk was SHOCKED to hear I was on Serc and had no intention of prescribing anything, whilst other sufferers get prescribed treatment. Only Ash was interested in Serc.
IF I WAS PRESCRIBED TREATMENT AND IT IMPROVED ME IT WOULD PROVE NEGLIGENCE BY OTHERS OF LUXON, QUIRKS ETC PROFESSION IN 1994-6. So I had to remain ill to protect their profession.

Quirk could have investigated the “paresis of the inner left ear” and “labyrinthine disturbance” (UPDATE THERE ARE 5 DIFFERENT LABRYINTHINE problems and neither Luxon or Quirke has investigated even which one I’ve got, yet they threaten ME with legal action!!!!!!) and what I told her the physiotherapist had found etc, ignored by Luxon but Quirk CHOSE not to. I suppose she would claim it would be another “comment” on another Dr. in another capacity.
She also claimed it would be impossible to I.D. the 1994 infection now (2003), yet Reuter proposed to do that in only 2001! In her report Quirk chose to do NOTHING because she didn’t want to be taken to court for doing nothing. Mad Dr. Quack!

WATKINSON
Bromley Hospital Trust Chief Executive John Watkinson “HOPED” (so he didn’t know when he was suppose to be monitoring my case for John Horam M.P.) I HAD FOUND THE MEETING WITH QUIRK “HELPFUL”!!! Mr. Horam M.P. said he couldn’t do any more for me as Watkinson was “washing his hands” of me. Mum’s lost £300,000 in having to move to a loss making house to get me treatment as well as money spent on phone bills and Homeopathy (1994-2000) in trying to get me treatment.
I request not only that I receive a real investigation into my vertigo and shaking vision (e.g. how is the vertigo physically making my vision shake, by doctors looking at the facts) and treatment, but also I need compensation: Financially (cover costs of fighting for treatment and 7 to 10 years lost wages) so to fund a health centre for the medically neglected , but also a career of my choice. If there is no cure, only treatment to suppress/reduce the strength of the symptoms then I demand a job of my choice tailor made to take into account my vertigo.

***My case PROVES doctors commit medical negligence ON PURPOSE and discriminate. NEGLIGENCE ***HAS KILLED people and my case PROVES IT HAPPENS on PURPOSE. This is WHY 1994 doctors ***have refused to accept I was ill and now can’t prescribe medication because it proves doctors will with ***hold medication on purpose to allow a patient to rot to death. This is one reason why the media have opted to cover-up my case. NOW THE TRUTH IS OUT. If Media, Prof. Southhall etc can record people secretly, so can I. In the U.S. a Dr has called for doctors to have the right to refuse to treat a lawyer (and his family) who represents a victim of negligence in court (further proof that doctors can think of purposefully neglecting patients). Mum is so ill now from caring for me and fighting the doctors and DSS, she is now too ill to put her socks/turn a tap on, is in agony/yells. The doctors MUST pay for her to have a cook and cleaner.

NewsShopper Editor Andrew Parkes has publicly called for “South American Death Squads” for car thieves. Commenting on this at the Bromley Police-Community Consultative Group public meeting, in front of 50 witnesses, Chief Superintendent David Dillnutt said he was “at one with the NewsShopper” in it’s call. So I stated in Bromley real News that I’d “prefer” for these proposed death squads to be extended by the government (so I’m NOT inciting or threatening violence as Capsticks claim so they should do the honourable thing) to execute doctors and health officials I’ve named above, their protectors (the Journalists, solicitors and human rights/pressure group members all named in the report “Why Doctors Are Above The Law”) along with the judge/jury who will not put these doctors in prison because of their prejudiced love of doctors. This was so to finally get publicity Plus, any one who tries to discredit me in order to help these doctors, or bans REAL NEWS. However I said I would “settle instead” for them being punished by being put in prison for 10 years.

DOCTORS KILL PATIENTS ON PURPOSE because it is reported in the media how a doctors negligence (not accidents) resulted in a patients death and my case proves doctors commit negligence on purpose. Therefore when a doctors negligence kills a patient it is likely to be on purpose.

THE CONSPIRACY TO SHUT ME UP. Why Doctors Are Above The Law
NewsShopper Editor Andrew Parkes called for “south American death squads” to be established for “car thieves” in 2003. Bromley Police Chief David Dillnutt (at a Police Public Consultative Committee meeting in front of 50 witnesses and Police Sergeant Amanda Weston and Group Official Amanda Evans) gave his support to this call saying he was “at one with the News Shopper”. This is what is known as ‘freedom of speech’. I then, as the Police SUPPORTED such calls, stated I “prefer” (AS NOTHING WAS GETTING ME PUBLICITY FOR MY PLIGHT) the GOVERNMENT (not anyone else so I was NOT inciting violence) that these “death squads” of Parkes should be extended to execute the doctors and those who had protected them, but that I would “SETTLE INSTEAD” for the doctors to be put in prison for 10 years. The Police chose hypocritically to “investigate” my preference list but NOT Meek lying to them (so Police DON’T care if they’re lied to by health workers) or Dr. Allan assaulting me!!!!.

The police then contacted the mental health body (Oxleas) who I’ve NEVER had anything to do with, to have them shut me up.
Andrew Parkes is not contacted by Oxleas’ Tim Sowter, (like I am), for what HE wrote in his paper and got Police support instead
I receive a letter from mental health official Mr. Sowter. By implication if Sowter is saying that calling on the government to execute wrong doers is mental illness, it means Andrew Parkes and many other people are mentally ill. Parkes is a liar, but he is NOT mentally ill.

If Sowter and the Oxleas NHS Trust do NOT view Parkes’ DEMAND for death squads for car thieves as needing their attention, but DO if one PREFERS negligent doctors and those protecting them being executed by the government, it PROVES BEYOND DOUBT THAT THE TRUST ARE BIASED, proving that the MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSION PROTECTS NEGLIGENT DOCTORS. This would prove what I reported in another report I did in the South West edition of Real News, REALLY Is HAPPENING and is another reason WHY the authorities are trying to brand me mental:

In the South West edition of Real News I pointed out that that the OFFICIALLY high degree of black people being sectioned could really be victims of doctors discrimination, and locking them up as mental was to gag them and discredit them, when they’re really PHYSICALLY ill. So the authorities are desperate to shut me up.

I am being branded “mental” must mean the right to freedom of speech is under threat. Mr. Sowter is a threat to civil liberties. How many victims of negligence who have criticised doctors, have Oxleas locked up as MAD….?
By implication if Mr. Sowter is saying that calling on the government to execute wrong doers is mental illness, it means Andrew Parkes and many other people are mentally ill. Sowter claims to have been contacted by the Police who are “concerned” about MY Real News paper being simply delivered to homes like the News Shopper is with Parkes’ death call. They were NOT concerned about Mr. Parkes’ paper being delivered to homes. This bias means that the Police are trying to protect doctors who are discriminating. Oxleas have now (March 2005) been invited by Health Sec. John Reid to apply for Foundation Status, as well as Bromley Hospitals Trust!!!

Despite doing the same thing as Parkes, who received Bromley Police support for doing his call, Parkes and his reporter Richard Simcox, ran a load of lies about what I said in Real News, when they were “inundated” with calls from readers who were “concerned” about my case, whilst the Hospital Trust called in the Police to jump on me.
Simcox lied when he said I had accused doctors of trying “to rob” me of 10 years of my life, when I WROTE doctors HAD robbed me of 10 years of my life and were continuing to. Simcox also lied that my REAL NEWS was a “rant” when it was an appeal for help and was exposing the danger Bromley residents were in (e.g. Su Lawrences statements of “complete cock ups on a regular basis” was totally ignored (preferring to report the colour of the envelopes some of the Real News’ were delivered in and the video recordings were NOT described as evidence to back up what I was saying/catching the doctors/health officials committing negligence/cover up, but simply as “images of doctors which appear to have been taken with a video camera”).
Parkes lied when he said my “allegations are obviously made up” when I clearly have recordings to prove I’m telling the truth.

Parkes then lied, “ We are not in the business of covering things up” when I had written to Parkes many times for his paper to run my case and My Mum had gone to his offices many times, even getting up a petition to help me get treatment which the papers journalists would not even look down at, let alone report it! Plus, a video

recording of members of the public condemning the health money going on yobs instead of hospital referrals like I needed, was given to the NewsShopper (involving it’s Rory Cavanagh and Nichol O’Neil who described the previous cover up of the petition as an “unfair” allegation against the paper!) who ignored it and Parkes ignored my correspondence to give back the tape. Despite doing nothing different to what Parkes had done, the Police, rather than support me, hypocritically launched an “investigation” into REAL NEWS but found it’s legal so are now trying to shut me up and grab the recordings by saying I’m mad. Whilst News Shopper reporters knocked on our house, questioning our house sitter, (HOW DID THEY KNOW WHERE I LIVED? Answer, they got my address from all the correspondence their boss Parkes had covered up.(my Mum rang the phone number and spoke DIRECTLY to Parkes who claimed their had been a “misunderstanding” ]and wanted to talk to me. If true he’d put that on his front page and tell the truth. It’s no doubt an attempt by Parkes to set me up or/and save his career (e.g. have a court injunction served on me). He also twisted what I’d said on a computer store. Since I counter attacked with a new front cover attached exposing their lies, Parkes took a lower profile until March and no report is credited as being by Simcox… UPDATE: POLICE CHIEF DILLNUTT WAS PERMANENTLY REPLACED IN 2005: The fact that he had was replaced by an Acting Commander over the Winter shows how Unplanned his replacing was.

British Government Health Secretary John Reid, didn’t bother to reply to the evidence that doctors were selecting patients to neglect to death, instead an Allan Jackson dismissed this major scandal as warranting only a “complaint” not bothering to read Real News where I denounced P.A.L.S. as useless as he told me to go to them (P.A.L.S. can NOT punish a Dr. or FORCE them to give me treatment. Stupid Jackson)!!! Jackson’s colleague, Roberta Wallis, admitted that Ministers (elected M.P.s) can “not intervene” (proving un-elected doctors have more power than M.P.s). and PERVERSLEY said I should “discuss” my treatment with the doctors when they want to lock me up to shut me up! She’s either stupid or is being sarcastic. Patricia Hewitt (new Health Sec.) is also covering up my evidence that doctors purposefully harm.

An attempt to cover up doctors discriminating. Like other victims of negligence it takes decades to prove a patient is really ill (because doctors cover up each others negligence) and the doctor is guilty of negligence but the GMC (a bunch of doctors) has a rule that after 5 years since the Dr. has committed that negligence, they will NOT punish that Dr. Co-incidence? I think not. The G.M.C. is truly evil, to allow doctors like Salama and Howlett to continue practising. HEALTH MINISTER ROSIE WINTERTON M.P. is either stupid or is covering up this scandal as she has written that I should make a ”complaint” when I am trying to force doctors to treat this infection damage and have the doctors punished, which a “complaint can not achieve either.

Downing Street’s Katie Newell has written that Prime Minister Tony Blair has “thanked” me for the Real News I’d sent him appealing for his help. There was NO offer of help or even advice. So Mr. Blair is aware of recordings of doctors and officials committing medical negligence at Bromley Hospitals Trust yet covers this up, thereby allowing John Reid TO GIVE THE GREEN LIGHT TO THE TRUST IN JANUARY TO PROCEED TO THE 2ND STAGE IN OBTAINING FOUNDATION STATUS, knowing what’s going on…. Is this a SCANDAL or is this a SCANDAL.
Its AMAZING! The doctors and co. would rather go to all this discrediting rather than finally treat me and compensate me

D S S HELP DOCTORS NEGLECT PATIENTS / HOW YOUNG PEOPLE END UP HOMELESS
As referred to earlier, the DSS hindered my fight and my carer’s search for medical treatment etc. DSS doctors,
officials and tribunals constantly lied/persecuted me, in breach of Government Rules and basic Human Rights’ violations (just like the Drs.!)in endeavours to stop my benefit e.g. denial of witness being present and of continued representation; Adjudication Officer ignoring consistent requests to explain her ‘Report’ alleging the blatant lie that I had no trouble ‘going out & about – & every day’, etc.when needed even 24hr. care, etc.-took yrs. & yrs. battling – alone hugely exacerbating mum’s own 30+yrs.’ struggle against her own totally incapacitating physical disease and especially her chronic excruciating back damage, etc. Even in ’96 she was still able to, ‘hang on in there’;but the DSS, together with the neighbours ‘finished her off’, ironically…

In November 1995, I had to attend (in afternoon thankfully) Dr. W. Michael C. Allan who would supposedly examine me to discover if I required BASIC Income Support benefit. He didn’t like me having a witness with me yet, invited a 50 plus year old male patient’s wife to accompany him!. When I began answering his questions, Allan would interrupt me by asking another question. He ignored medical facts. He twisted facts: e.g. I told him the vertigo kept me awake, he simply wrote that I “can’t – sleep”, not why I couldn’t sleep…ie medical condition He was sly: e.g. I told him “ I can write a few sentences”; later he accused me of lying, claiming I had said I couldn’t write (he was the liar as the recording proves) when I wrote just my name: “There you are. You said you signed it THERE O.K.”. I then reminded him that I’d TOLD him I could write my name, to which he just “Ummmmed”; Total ignorance.

When I informed him of Dr. Thenuwara’s diagnosis of the “Feeling Virus” he replied, “The What?!”. “Feeling Virus” I replied. “THE FEELING VIRUS!!” exclaimed Allan. Mum endeavoured to explain Thenuwara’s diagnosis, but Allan – as usual – interrupted: “What!… Arrrrh….WHAT!”.
This was not the only indication of Dr. Allan losing his mind (obsessed with saying “What”): When I told him how difficult it was to rest in a chair, he replied, “You don’t sit down to rest. You sit down to, be able to concentrate”! How does he rest when not in bed? Standing on his head?!

He did not listen to my description of how I couldn’t close my eyes to sleep (having to rely on my eyes for balance more than I should means that my brain takes longer to recognise that I’ve stopped moving as the inner ears don’t work-something Allan as a Dr. should have known/understood). I certainly couldn’t stand up right with eyes closed for more than a few seconds or an attack of oscillating vision attack will happen, in such position. Abusive Allan claimed I could simply because I was able to close my eyelids for a split second missing my point entirely.
I then described the attack to him I could suffer. Allan then called me a liar: “AH, PAUL. THAT IS NOT TRUE. YOU KNOW THAT’S NOT TRUE”.
Later Allan told me to “STAND TO ATTENTION WITH YOUR EYES CLOSED” (ex-army Dr.?). I refused. He repeated it. Knowing it would spark an attack and I would receive no help from him and would probably call me a liar, I refused.
DR. ALLAN THEN LUNGED AT ME ATTEMPTING TO PLACE BOTH HIS HANDS ON MY FACE TO FORCE MY EYES SHUT—ASSUALT! I stepped back. Allan had tantrum.
Dr. W. M. C. Allan suffers from the delusions not only because he believes people don’t sit in a chair to rest, but also believes he is in the army. Clearly Dr. Allan should be sectioned as he is not only mad, but PHYSICALLY violent towards innocent patients. He is certifiable. This is all on tape. At this time I had been MISdiagnosed with M.E. disease. The receptionist, upon hearing of Allan’s actions, if I had M.E., letting us know that Allan was prejudiced against M.E. victims. Even if NHS doctors revealed their true diagnoses of vertigo/ inner ear infection at least, Allan would still have been abusive because of my age. It is because of DSS staff like Allan WHY young adults are homeless on the streets.
I did complain to the DSS Dr Peter Bankey at DSS Sutton offices, who’s idea of an investigation was to ask Allan for his “comments”, concluding therefore that Allan had conducted himself properly.

Dr. Allan had stopped my I.S. benefit so I appealed to a so-called Independent Tribunal panel, (Chairman/solicitor
Mr. G. Robertson, Mrs. J. Moyer and Mr. J. Underwood) at Bexleyheath. They asked questions a 4 year old would know the answers to already and consistently interrupted my Mum. I presented them with the evidence. They twisted the Homeopaths report. Decided to endorse Dr. Allans decision to terminate my benefit. They were told of the medical negligence I was suffering so they made it harder for me to get treatment as without money one can not survive. This is what happened with the next tribunal.
The DSS then targeted my D.L.A. benefit. By law they were suppose to contact the “treating medical practitioner” who they knew was the Homeopath. Instead DSS Dr. Anne G. Hicks broke the law by writing to the G.P., Dr. McKinnon who illegally filled in the form.
Later a DSS Adjudication Officer claimed in a report I was “away from home most of the day 7 days a week”!!!! This was a lie. I was stuck at home all day on average 6 days a week (1 afternoon going to local shops, as when I stopped to rest after going out the vertigo would be intense/ I couldn’t rest out as I needed to lay on my side). Challenged to produce ‘evidence’ for their lie, they couldn’t. The A.O. (who don’t have to give their name) stopped my benefit. To prove bias the A.O. wrote that they “respect the expertise of the G.P.” and ignored the Homeopath evidence.

So I appealed and had to attend another tribunal panel (solicitor/Chairman Mr. A. Geen, Dr. Mansueto and a carer (who didn’t care so was clearly on a power trip). I registered my objection to a Dr. on the panel as it prejudiced the outcome. The Dr.: kept asking my mother to repeat herself/he wasn’t listening; didn’t understand Guillian-Barre Syndrome; did not ask any questions about my ill health, only if I had any “hobbies” (how could I practise them as I was so ill- or was this a trick question, sly creature). Geen dismissed the importance of evidence of DSS staff being contradictory. He was rude throughout. Did a Howlett demanding I
so ill recount now 3 years of symptoms/negligence when it was in writing for him. When my Mum stated how I was now well enough to have a friend over Geen replied “After all he is 21”, showing his age bias towards clients. Obviously they stopped my other benefit as the doctors were medically neglecting me/not giving me any support. My Mum had to visit DSS tribunals as she was now so ill from caring for me, fighting the DSS and being persecuted by the neighbours. On 2 separate panels were Robertson and Geen who treated her with respect (Geen apologised for not being able to grant my Mum more benefit in addition to renewing her benefit). They forgot who she was. The M.P. had to keep restarting my benefit. Now in 2004 the DSS have re-risen.

DSS Independent Tribunals consist of power crazed people who like stopping young adults benefits. Those who help the homeless should break these tribunals.
From 1995 to 2000 they hindered my fight for treatment/search for treatment to discover Serc. HAD THE DSS NOT PERSECUTED ME I COULD HAVE AVIODED MANY OF THE OSCILLATING VISION ATTACKS by discovering the Serc sooner.
DSS DOCTORS, ADJUTICATION OFFICERS AND INDEPENDENT TRIBUNALS consist of LITTLE HITLERS.

In late September 2006, John Watkinson announced he was leaving his job to start a new job in Cornwall (long way to go…), after Mr. O’Callaghan had issued a Final Notice to the local doctors and health officials that this Party would become operational if they did not co-operate.
In the same week that watkinson announced his departure, the Editor of the News Shopper was listed as a Jean May, not Andrew Parkes. How strange that Watkinson should leave when Parkes also went…

Any Dr. who selects patient’s to harm/commits medical negligence on purpose, and anyone in a position of legal Authority or has influence upon such Authority who protects such doctors and their action, will be punished in a manner deemed fit (unless they’re already dead by then).
The following men and women are guilty of this crime, in the case of Paul O’Callaghan, which had NATIONAL implications, (read his case for details):

The Doctors ( 1994-1996 who committed the discrimination, then 1998-2003 doctors who covered the discrimination up by prolonging the negligence): Dr. Peter Oxford; Dr. Margaret Taylor; Dr. Russell Hailsley; Dr. Mary Sylvestor, Dr. Clarence Thenuwara; Dr. Jean McKinnon; Dr. A. Salama; Dr. T.C. Stokes; Dr. Martin Prevett; Dr. W.P. Howlett; Dr. David Goldingwood; Dr. Iris Reuter; Dr./Prof. Linda Luxon; Dr. Jennifer Quirke.
THE MEN & WOMEN WHO INCITE VIOLENCE UPON DOCTORS
The Following men and women and organisations named below, by NOT acting to help Mr. O’Callaghan PROVE so thereby promote that the ONLY way a patient can get treatment/punish a Dr. is to use violence. Their message.

The M.P.s of England & Wales (Labour, Tory, Lib-Dem and Plaid Cymru) in 2004 and in 2006 (none of whom has wanted to see the recordings):
David Amess; Richard Allan; Charlotte Atkins; Douglas Alexander; Candy Atherton; John Austin; David Atkinson; Peter Ainsworth; Bob Ainsworth; Peter Atkinson; Graham Allan; Hilary Armstrong; James Arbuthnot; Nick Ainger; Diane Abbott; Michael Ancram; Janet Anderson; Adam Afrriye; John Burnett; Nicholas Brown; Alistair Burt; Paul Beresford; Stuart Bell; Annette Brooke; Keith Brady; Tony Banks, David Borrow; Richard Bacon; Colin Breed; Clive Betts; Kevin Barron; Angela Browning; Paul Burstow; Chris Bryant; Vera Baird; Graham Brady; Malcolm Bruce; Ben Bradshaw; Liz Blackman; Colin Burgon; John Bercow; Paul Boateng; Sir John Butterhill; Liam Byrne; Richard Bardon; John Barron; George Baker; Alan J. Beith; Nigel Beard; Margaret Beckett; Andrew Bennett; Tim Boswell; Norman Baker; Andrew Burnham; John Battle; Harold Best; Hilary Benn; Roger Berry; Harry Barnes; Kevin Bremner; Hazel Blears; Tony Baldry; Joe Benton; Dawn Butler; Simon Burns; Robert Blackman’s-Wood; David Barrows; Celia Barlowe; Peter Bottomley; Hugh Bailey; Anthony Blair; Karen Buck; Jim Cousins; Robin Cook; Allan Campbell; David Currey; Richard Caborn; William (Bill) Cash; Frank Cooker; Ann Coffey; James Clappison; Ian Coleman; Martin Caton; Paul Clark; Vernon Coaker; Jean Corston; Ian Cawsey; David Crawsby; James Cram; David Chidgey; John Cummings; Ross Cranston; John Cruddas; Claire Curtis-Thomas; Geoffrey Clinton-Brown; Jack Cunningham; Christopher Chope; Sydney Chapman; Harry Colier; Jeremy Corbyn; Ann Cryer; Ivor Caplin; Jon Cryer; Tony Coleman; Yvette Cooper; Charles Clarke; Derek Conway; Patsy Calton; Tom Clark; Tom Cox; Ann Clywd; Michael Clapham; David Chator; Jim Cunningham; Geoffrey Cox; Douglas Craswell; David Cairns; Rosie Cooper; Colin Challen; Kenneath Clarke; Greg Clark; Vinncent Cable; David Clelland; David Cameron; Mary Creagh; Tony Cunningham; David Cherington; Julia Drorron; Alan Duncan; David Drew; Andrew Dismore; Sue Doughty; Quintin Davies; Geraint Davies; Cherry Gillham; Jim Dowd; Hilton Dawson; Edward Davey; Stephen Dorrell; Wayne David; David Dean; Ian Duncan-Smith; John Denham; Gwyneth Dunwoody; Denzil Davies; Naddine Dorries; Janet Dean; Parmjit Dhanda; Phillip Dunn; James Daddridge; Phillip Davies; Johnathern Djanogly; David Davies; Tim Dobbin; Bill Etherington; Angela Eagle; Nigel Evans; Marina Eagle; Clive Efford; Huw Edwards; Louise Ellman; Jeff Elnis; Tobbias Ellwood; Natascha Engle; David Evenett; Lorna Fitzsimons; Mark Fisher; Barbera Follet; Hywe Francis; Derek Foster; Frank Field; Caroline Flint; Micheal Fabricant; Mark Francois; James Fitzpatrick; Paul Farrelly; Eric Forth; Paul Flynn;’ Michael Foster; Lynn Featherstone; Paul Farelly; Dr. Liam Fox; Mathew Green; John Grogan; John Greenway; Sandra Gidley; Andrew George; Bruce George; Chris Grayling; Win Griffths; Nick Gibb; Roger Godsiff; Domonic Grieve; Damian Green; Cherry Gilliam; Michael Gaper; Linda Gilroy; James Gray; George Galloway; Helen Goodman; Barry Gardiner; Andrew Gwynne; Julia Goldsworthy; Nick Griffith; David Gauke; Robert Goodwill; John Gummer; Michael Gove; Roger Gale; Nell Gevrardo; Bruce George; Paul Goggins; Paul Goodman; Jimmy Hood; Mark Hoban; Paul Holms; Sylvia Heal; Oliver Heald; Phillip Hammond; Nick Herbert; Gerald Howarth; Geoffrey Hoon; Kelvin Hopkins; John Hemming; Patrick Hall; John Hutton; Patrick Hall; John Hemming; Joan Humble; Harriet Harmon; David Howarth; Martin Howard; Sharon Hodgson; Adam Holloway; Meg Hiller; Greg Hands; Fabian Hamilton; John Heppell; Mark Hendrich; Dr. Evans Harris; Patricia Hewitt; Peter Hain; Alan Hazelhurst; Nick Hurd; David Heathcoat-Amory; Douglas Henderson; Simon Hughs; David Heath; Beverley Hughs; John Healy; Kate Hoey; Jeremy Hunt; Douglas Hogg; Michael Jabez Foster; Oona King; Paul Ketch; Kevin Jones; Michael Jack; Alan Keen; Piara Khabra; Fraser Kemp; Nigel Jones; Bernard Jenkins; Tessa Jowel; Ruth Kelly; Lynn Jones; Julie Kirkbride; Ann Keen; Brian Iddon; Andrew Lansley; Diana Johnson; Boris Johnson; Peter Kilfoyl; Alan Johnson; Glenda Jackson; Ashok Kumar; Sally Keeble; Huw Irranca-Davies; Stewart Jackson; Susan Krammer; Robert Key; Sadiq Khan; Daniel Kawczynski; Barbara Keely; Bob Laxton; Peter Levitt; David Lepper; Edward Leigh; Jacquie Lait; Elfyn Llewyed; Elainor Laing; David Liddington; Ivan Lewis; Ian Liddle-Grainger; John Leech; Tony Lloyd (1); Tony Lloyd (2); Martin Lancaster; Julian Lewis; Michael Lord; Stephen Ladyman; David Lammy; Peter Luff; Tim Loughton; Ian Lucas; David Laws; Alun Michael; Julie Morgan; Austin Mitchell; Patrick Mercer; Margaret Moran; Kevin McNamara; Alan Milburn; Dr. Andrew Murrison; Andrew Miller; Douglas Naysmith; Shona McIassac; Francis Maude; Theresa May; Ian McCartney; Eric Matlew; Denis McShane; Judy Mallaber; John Mann; Michael Moor; Brooks Newmark; Andrew MacKay; Mark Field; Christine McCafferty; Gordon Marsden; Ed Milliband; Laura Moffatt; Anne Milton; Rsemary McKenna; Michael Mates; David Mandell; Anne Milton; John McDonnell; Gillian; Merron; Robert Marshall-Andrews; Michael Meacher; Elliot Morley; Meg Mann; Fiona McTaggart; Andrew Mitchell; Chris Mullen; John Maples; Paul Murphy; Anne McIntosh; Denis Murphy; Daniel Norris; Humphrey Malins; John Reid; Adam Price; Jon Owen Jones; Joyce Quin; Andrew Reed; David Rendell; Andrew Rossindale; Hugh Robertson; Richard Page; Chris Pond; Joan Ryan; Eric Pickles; Stephen O’Brien; Barbera Roche; Chris Ruane; Mark Prisk; Stephen Pound; Nick Raynsford; Diana Organ; James Paice; Andrew Robatham; Dawn primarolo; Nick Palmer; David Ruffley; Christine Russell; Bon Russell; Jamie Reed; Dan Rogerson; Geoffrey Robbinson; Andrew Pelling; Richard Ottaway; Gwyn Prosser; Ian Peerson; Linda Riordan; Mike Penny; John Prescott; Joan Ruddick; Malcolm Rifkind; Bridget Prentice; Gordon Prentice; Bill Oliver; James Purnell; Owen Paterson; George Osborne; Kenneath Purchase; Mark Oaten; John Penrose; Abert Owen; Lembit Opik; Paul Rowan; Dennis Skinner; Llew Smith; Clive Solely; Ann Taylor; Sir Peter Tapsell; Ian Stewart; Stephen Timms; Graham Stringer; Desmond Turner; Robert Spink; Johnathern Shaw; Andrew Tyrie; Barry Sheerman; Gareth Thomas; Gerry Steinberg; Mark Todd; Stephen Twigg; Angela Smith; Mark Taml; Richard Shepherd; Andrew Selous; Graham Stewart; Gisela Stuart; Clare Short; Jack straw; Mark Simmonds; Marsha Singh; Sarah Teather; Dr. Howard Stoate; Mark Todd; Andy Slaughter; Ian Taylor; Mohammed Sarwar; Derek Twigg; Andrew Stunnell; Jon Trickett; Emily Thornsberry; Peter Soulsby; Don Touhig; David Taylor; Caroline Spelman; Phyllis Starkey; Jacqui Smith; Alison Seabeck; Martin Salter; Simon (Paddy) Tipping; Angela Smith; Richard Spring; Nicholas Soames; Anthony Steer; Mathew Taylor; John Smith; John Spellar; Helen Southworth; Grant Shapps; Neil Turner; Sir Michael Splicer; Dr. Richard Taylor; Hugo Swire; Mike Wood; Rosie winterton; Betty Williams; Robert Wareing; John Wilkinson; Nigel Waterson; Tom Waterson; John Whittingdale; Tony Wright (1); Tony Wright (2); Peter Viggars; Alan Williams; Kitty Usher; Hywel Williams; Jenny Willott; Ann Winterton; Malcolm Wicks; David Willetts; Robert Walter; Sir George Young; Ian Wright; Keith Vaz; Bill Wiggin; Ann Widdecombe; Rob Wilson; Phil Woolas; Jeremy Wright; Alan Whitehead; Shaun Woodward; Derek Wyatt; Joan Wally; Michael Willis; Angela Watkinson; Richard Younger-Ross; Claire Ward

Those in ‘Officialdom’ Who Have protected the doctors (none of whom has wanted to see the recordings):
Claire Perry and Jane Meek (both Bromley Health Authority); John Watkinson, Suzanne Lawrence, Anthony Levy, Carol Heatley and Susan Ash (all 5 Bromley Hospitals Trust); David firth (Capsticks solicitors); Clive Uren and Micheal Kerin (both Bromley P.C.T.); Rachel Syed, Alexis Oxberry and the G.M.C. Chairman (all 3 G.M.C.); Roberta Wallis Alex Paknadale, Judith Wright and Alan Jackson; (all 3 Health Depatment); N.I.C.E.; Howard Davies (Healthcare Commission); Timothy Sowter (Oxleas); tracy wain (National Neurology Hospital); Mr. Mc Cullock (Greenwich & Bexley Health Authority); Jane Schofield (Greenwich P.C.T.); Shami Chakrabarti and John Wadham (both Liberty); Peter Walsh and Christine Langley (AVMA); Leaders of Patients Association, Patients U.K. and Patients Concern; “Cherie” (Bromley Citizens Advice Bureau; Amy Barrick/Katie Ghorse (British Institute of Human Rights); Clarkson, Wright & Jakes solicitors; Leigh, day & Co. solicitors; Russell, Jones & Walker solicitors; Evill & Coleman; Louise Christian of Christian Fisher solicitor; Dr. Anthony Barton (a solicitor); Bindmans solicitors (there are more solicitors who refused to help); Dr. Balachandran’s 1998 manageress; Patrick Parker (Chair of Bromley C.H.C.).

Organisations Who Covered Up Doctors:
Conservative Party; Liberal-democrat party; Labour Party; Plaid Cymru; U.K. Independence Party; Green Party; Foundation for Democracy; new politics Network; Profile Alliance; Centre for Reform; The Fabian Society; Greater London Authority (Public Liason Unit); Government Policy Consultants Ltd; Policy Partnerships Ltd; London school of Economics; University of westminster; Adam Smith Institute; Institute for Global ethics; European Media Forum; New Policy Institute; New Street Research; Policy Studies Institute; Centre for Democracy & Development; Institute for Public Policy Research; Roundtree Foundation; Sustainable development Commission; Centre for Policy studies; National Consumer Council; Health Which?; Mayor Ken Livingstone; Lee Jasper; Campaign Against Racism & Facisim;

The media who covered up my case/protected the doctors selecting patients to harm:
Andrew Parkes, Richard Simcox, Rory Cannagh and Nicol O’Neil (all News Shopper); Melody Ryall (Kentish Times),

In addition any Judge or Jury ruling against him in relation to his campaign for medical treatment, will also be punished for ruling against Paul O’Callaghan, the victim, and not the other party (e.g. doctors).

Health Policy 5: District Health Inspectorates (formerly Independent Health Inspectorates):

District Health Inspectorates are to be established in all Primary Care and Hospital Trust areas. The D.H.I. will replace the P.A.L.S., I.C.A.S. and Patient Forums, as they are not only useless for medically neglected victims, but also can actually discouraged victims of taking action.

A). The daughter of C. was being treated with steroids for inflammation of the eye. The daughter died. The Inquest Coroner recorded a verdict of misadventure. He said the law made his life even more difficult: “ You are up against barriers that a normal human being couldn’t possibly contend with”.
“We are so outraged that this situation can occur without any kind of accountability that we are determined there must be a change in the law”, said
B). Case 2: The son of N. died of meningitis N. said, “We’ve been going through the hospital complaints system and it’s completely unstructured, informal and behind closed doors. The public aren’t aware what’s happening”.
“There’s no opportunity to cross question doctors with an independent public eye on it. We are trying to make the hospital complaints system more open and more public”.
(The number of cases when doctors have failed to recognise meningitis symptom’s in patients and most of the latter’s have died, and then the doctors and media talk about how the parents should recognise the symptoms when they do and the doctors ignore them could have a whole report in itself.

C). COMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCIL’S POWERLESSNESS
In 1996 Bromley Health Authority was confirmed by Bromley Community Health Council as denying MORE than 1 patient access to a specialist hospital due to “finite resources and a lack of funds”. However the B.H.A. DID have the funds of £1,700 to spend on a “feasibility study” to find out if local teenagers on an estate wanted a radio station to play with of their own and if it would encourage these teenagers to cease their criminal activities and reduce the addiction to drugs and alcohol use. The C.H.C. were powerless to stop it.

In effect a project to appease yobs and those who made themselves ill, taking priority over those who did NOT make themselves ill (the patients).

Interviews were conducted on camera with shoppers about the misuse of funds. All those interviewed condemned the health money being spent on the radio project instead of patients. One man said, “Bromley Health should have their heads examined”. This report and information on a petition of 100’s of names calling for the money to be redirected back towards patients, was given to the Bromley C.H.C. A local councillor described the C.H.C. (unaware of the Cray Radio affair) of being “toothless” and “pathetic”.

The Bromley C.H.C. were still powerless to stop the B.H.A. squandering their money on the yob project, it’s Chief Officer, J.B., had “no opinion” and that the C.H.C. “did not express a view on the Cray radio project”.
J.B. also criticised their replacements (now I.C.A.S., PA.L.S. and Patient Forums) as being confusing for the public when they wish to register a complaint and these bodies would not be as independent sufficiently as the C.H.C.s.
So an investigation was launched into whether Cray Radio was having any effect in it’s purpose, so if it didn’t then to force the funds to be returned.
Local people, interviewed at random (of which some were too scared to give their names) claimed the levels of yob violence had “trebled, trebled” in the years Cray Radio had been on the air. There was massive condemnation of the funding on Cray Radio. Whilst conducting the interviews a Cray Youth radio D.J. with friends, was stumbled upon quite by accident, acting illegally and even this youth condemned health money being spent on a project he was attending. Despite being a publicly funded body (the local council did and still does fund the project along with Barnardoes and Capital Radio), the operators of the project, Bromley Youth Agency (since renamed…) did not reply to requests for an interview on camera about the funding and to answer local peoples concerns. So after the statutory 3 week time limit in which a radio project was supposed to respond, a visit with camera switched on, was paid to the Cray Radio project.

The programme at the time of the visit was being presented by the project manager and a youth worker, NOT the youths….
On hearing a camera crew had entered the building the manager and youth worker became “excited” on the air, but when the youth worker came out and discovered why the crew were there, she then bundled the project manager, coming out of the studio, through a side door (which is actually quite amusing to watch on the video). Then both ladies approached, demanded the camera be switched off, refused to answer any questions about locals concerns or anyone else’s questions.
The youth worker put her hand over the camera lens.
Despite the crew leaving when they were asked to, there being NO signs of “No Trespassing” and that the Agency had failed in it’s legal obligation to reply to a request for an interview, the Agency sent a threatening letter (in just 48 hours) claiming that the crew were “trespassing” and that the Police had been informed. The Police later stated they knew nothing about it.

Locals were again interviewed, this time also about the non co-operation of this public funded body. All condemned them for refusing to be accountable. One lady said on hearing the youths were not doing the programmes but the Manager and the youth worker were instead, “ So they don’t do a proper job!? This is not a holiday. I don’t think they should be on the air at all. They should be off their arses and they should come here actually do something for the kids. If nobody’s going to it (e.g. Cray Radio not being presented by youths) “why are we” (taxpayers) “paying them?!” She said of Cray Radio’s non co-operation “What are they scared of? If they’re doing a good job they have nothing to be scared of. God knows what they do. Just boost their own ego’s”.
Funders of the programme were sent a copy of SAD Times asking for their comments on local peoples concern. One funder who was waiting for Cray Radio to fill in a form by the Autumn explaining how they spent their funds, decided not to wait and contacted Cray Radio immediately.
The. health authority’s M. K. (C.P. s successor) was informed that B.H.A. said the funding for patients would “compromise higher clinical priorities”, claiming the project had been “evaluated” and found to improve mental health and “reduced drugs misuse”. Another of Perry’s successors, J, S. said that Cray Radio was “likely to result” (so she didn’t know for certain) “in lower levels of smoking and alcohol use”.

Neither would offer any evidence to substantiate their claims. M.K., was asked a question about what he had said, but M.K. past this question about what he said to C.U. Both in letters and in papers, BHA/ C.P. had always admitted to funding Cray Radio. C.U. however said, “Bromley Health Authority has not provided funding for this initiative”. His colleague Dr. A. B. admitted, “Our predecessor organisation B.H.A. funded a feasibility study for the radio station back in 1996 and paid £1,700 to the project”. C.U. went on to be a Primary Care Trust boss….
After the funders were contacted the Agency then wanted to have a meeting to discuss any subsequent interview which might take place. The questions they were to be asked they wanted a copy of in advance. The radio project manager would not be present. With so many restrictions rigging the interview the interview never took place.
This investigation should have been carried out by Bromley C.H.C. but instead the C.H.C. gagged debate on the funding. On the 25th of September 2001 the Bromley C.H.C. had the Cray Radio affair registered issue in their “Notice Of Meeting” (this was in the form of a question to Mr. M.K. about whether Cray radio continued to receive health funds) document for the public meeting. Instead of allowing discussion of letting members of the audience speak, the Chairman of Bromley C.H.C. Mr. P.P. ignored the issue, ignoring Patients First’s P.R. Officer when she tried to bring it up, instead turning to other people to discuss hospital contracts. The P.R. Officer later compared Bromley C.H.C. to living in Hong Kong: “C.H.C. seem democratic but in practise they’re puppet regimes of the authorities like in Hong Kong. It appears to be democratic, but it’s ruled by the Chinese”.
The P.R. Officer did try to bring this matter up again but a member of the audience (believed to be another C.H.C. member) snapped, “Have respect for the Chair”. The Chair had so far allowed 1 man to ask 7 questions (as the Chair acknowledged when he allowed the man to ask an eighth question. The C.H.C. spent some time discussing open ended contracts/permit for a member of STAFF having a spousal visa and not a working visa.
This proved Bromley C.H.C. was more interested in the rights of health workers than the patients.
Bromley C.H.C. later stated it was up to the Chairman (P.P.) “to limit or extend the discussion depending what was on the agenda and in the knowledge of other priorities”. There was no discussion at all and the priorities were health staff rather than patients. The Chairman was able to select which issues registered on their own Meeting Of Notice document he wanted to discuss. The Minutes made no mention of Cray radio being on the agenda, let alone the P.R.’s Officer gagging, only that Mr. M.K. had not replied to the C.H.C. letter. Instead he passed the letter to the local Primary Care Trust to answer.

The P.R. Officer attended the next meeting on the 27th November 2001 to interview Mr. P.P. with a micro cassette recorder as to why he gagged her. He replied, “No” and that “it’s inappropriate that you bring something like that into the meeting as it is a general meeting”. When reminded Cray radio had been on the agenda of the previous meeting he replied “yep”. It was open to the public so a recorder could be taken in. Without the recorder there would be no proof of his “no”. Mr. P.P. is now unsurprisingly, a non-executive Director of the local Hospital Trust.
The Director of the Association of Community Health Councils, Mr. P. W., later defended C.H.C’s when the Bromley C.H.C.’s behaviour was presented to him: “ the vast majority of C.H.C.’s do a good job as local NHS watchdogs”. Clearly from his statement he believed not all C.H.C.’s did a good job. He did not state if he counted Bromley C.H.C. as one of those who were not in the majority… Mr. P.W. is now with A.V.M.A. (details of A.V.M.A. below).
Back at Cray radio some changes were carried out.
D). Regarding the doctors in Mr. Paul O’Callaghan’s case: BROMLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCIL were legally powerless to help make Dr. Balachandran (his 3rd G.P. practise he registered with) even sign his own referral letter to the specialist hospital (so his mum tried politely to obtain his signature but the G.P.s 1998 manageress & sec. were abusive and both Mr. O’Callaghan and his mother were both struck off!).They were totally useless in forcing the Bromley Borough Doctors to investigate the balance organ damage or prescribe treatment to Mr. O’Callaghan.
E). Citizens Advice Bureau’s, I.C.A.S., P.A.L.S. and Patient Forums.
Under Section 11 Of the Health & Social Act 2001 all Primary Care Trust’s, all N.H.S. Trusts and all Strategic Health Authorities have a duty to consult and involve patients (my case proves otherwise) and potential patients about health services provided. This can include asking local people for their opinions about if a service requires changing, it’s operation on decision which are to be made on planning new health services.

Commission for Patient & Public Involvement in Health (C.P.P.I.H.). This body is sponsored by the Department for Health but is not a government department and is suppose to be independent of the Government. It is due to be abolished after less than 2 years. It was set up in January 2003. It’s roles are (till abolition):

1.Laying out the criteria to which Patient Forums and those providing the local I.C.A.S. must meet.
2.Report to the Health Secretary how Patient Forums and I.C.A.S. are operating, giving the Sec. advice on these.
3.Carrying out reviews using the information from Patient Forums. Then reviews would not only be for the Health secretary but also for other bodies and person’s considered relevant.
4.Helping Patient Forums in co-ordinating their activities.
5.Making recommendations about and observing Patient Forums and I.C.A.S. providers.
6.Producing reports for those bodies it considers relevant: e.g. National Care Standards Commission (N.I.C.E.), National Patients Safety Agency and the Commission for health Improvement. It is not known if it would have considered Patients First or the Patients Association or Patients U.K. relevant bodies.
7.The C.P.P.I.H. were to have 9 regional offices, each of which were to oversee the below Network Providers in their regions. This is now to be done by the Department of health.

The Local Network Providers are the organisations which establish the local Patients Forum on behalf of the C.C.P.I.H. (it would be simply to cut out this middle man organisation to save money and complications). The contracts for L.N.P.s were to be established through competitive tendering of contracts. Each L.N.P. are to establish at least 2 Patient Forums by giving the P.F. members help with training, detailed information and management infrastructure and funding advice. Patient Forums are to communicate with each other, C.P.P.I.H. and other bodies via the L.N.P. The L.N.P. would pass on information from the C.P.P.H.I. and other bodies to the Forums. L.N.P.s would observe N.H.S. services, train staff for the Patient Forums who are suppose to help patients like the C.H.C. supposedly did.

Patient Forums (of which there are 2 types: one for a local primary care trust services and one for the local Hospital trust services) consist of local people carrying out the following functions:
1.Give information and advice to patients and carers about health services in the area.
2.Observe and review NHS services.
3.Produce a report and make recommendations only as well as giving advice to the local N.H.S. Trust about the latter’s services.
4.Interview patients and their carers about health services, reporting their findings to the N.H.S. which can be in the form of a report.
5.In certain circumstances a P.F. can provide an N.H.S. function in regard to a provision to give time in assisting patients/their relatives/carers.

However under legislation which passed through Parliament in the summer of 2003, N.H.S. Trusts which OPT TO BECOME N.H.S. FOUNDATION TRUSTS, will be BARRED FROM HAVING A PATIENTS FORUM.

Patient Forums established for P.C.T.’s will have the additional following services:
1.Represent the views of the public within the Health Trusts area about health officials.
2.Try to encourage public involvement in the formation and consultation of health policies.
3.Give advice about public involvement to the N.H.S. , public bodies and other public service providers.
4.Patient Forums will also be established, undertake themselves or commission others to operate the local I.C.A.S. who the Forum will arrange clients to go and see if the latters require it.

Independent Complaints Advocacy Services is the new complaints body which are to:
1.Ensure clients (patients) have access to the support they need.
2.Ensure the clients have advice and information (so what’s the support? I smell psychobabble).
3.Help a client pursue a complaint against N.H.S. service.
4.Attend meetings, write letters and speak on behalf of the client (as their advocate).
5.Advice clients of their choices the latter has upon receiving correspondence.
6.Explain to the client what to expect “realistically” from the outcome (e.g. that they won’t achieve anything more than registering their complain, though no doubt the psychobabblists will claim it’s to give clients a “sense of” (illusion of) “outcome” or some nonsense).

Until the P.C.T. Patient Forums are established (due to the mess the government has made of replacing C.H.C’s) I.C.A.S. in some areas will be provided by temporary providers. In London and the South East the Citizens Advice Bureau are to provide the I.C.A.S.’ This is a bad decision:
C.A.B. staff blame patients for their neglect not the doctors – fellow do-gooders. C.A.B. member “Cherie” (in early 1997) wrote a letter (with help from a supervising older woman) TO John Horam, M.P. (who was helping to try and keep Mr. O’Callaghan’s little DSS benefit going from 1996 to 2001 and obtain the specialist hospital appointment which was never obtained). Ms Cherie then wrote about Mr. Horam as if she was addressing somebody else! The letter was NOT signed and was NOT written on CAB headed paper, so Cherie could deny she ever wrote it (which looked highly possible). To add insult to injury Ms Cherie held his mother’s own letter in the air and demanded “look at it!” declaring it “befuddled”. “Remember. Always tape record CAB staff. When his mother pointed out politely her flaws this Cherie went and got a manageress type person to back her up/get rid of his Mum. This is NOT a case of 1 bad apple: In another incident a man working as a C.A.B. advisor accused Mr. O’Callaghan (via his Mum) of making up his symptoms from a book his Mum had got, (she got the book TWO YEARS after he had became ill). Terrifyingly these Dr.-Loving idiots now run ICAS. So it’s not surprising that a Mr. R. B. was not happy with the C.A.B. run I.C.A.S. service regarding the loss of his wife.

Patient Advice & Liason Service (P.A.L.S.). are established in every hospital in the form of a shop to provide:
1.Information about health services and local support groups patients , their carers and relatives can contact.
2.Resolve problems on the spot.
3.To direct people to I.C.A.S. and educate them on the complaints system.
4.To inform Patient Forums and Health Trusts about any problems in health services provided-acting as an early warning system to those organisation about problems.
5.reports would be published about these Trust’s services for the trust management who would publish the P.A.L.S. report and the managements responses to the findings, in the trusts annual report.
Claire Raynor Agony Aunt and President of the Patients Association said P.A.L.S. would “be a pal to patients”. They must be bad then (see section to find out why this view should be taken).

The local councils are to provide an Overview & Scrutiny Committee (in councils where there are social services departments) which can:
1.Summon NHS managers before them to give information on health decisions and changes to services.
2.Refer services which are being contested to the health Secretary.
3.Has to be consulted on any major changes to local health services and report their own recommendations locally.
4.Take over the role for scrutinising local health services.

To summarise this section, NO ONE has the power to force negligent doctors to treat a patient or punish the doctors and health officials. Just like the old C.H.C.’s but more complicated, putting people off taking action, which may not be an accident… All patients can get out of these new bodies is to register a complaint. The I.C.A.S. services admit that they must explain to a client the “realistic” outcome. That word says everything. So much for the complaints system. Meanwhile Patient Forums can’t get involved in an individual case and P.A.L.S. sound like they want to talk people out of taking action.
So you can just imagine with so many Dr. lovers running these organisations they are not going to like criticism (like C.A.B. don’t) of doctors by the doctors’ victims. These Dr. lovers view criticism as “aggression” and “violence” so will no doubt call security which will result in REAL violence on the security guard or the I.C.A.S. or P.A.L.S. staff. Plus when a victim (or more likely a parent of a dead child medically neglected to death) discovers all they can do is register a complaint, the dr. going un punished they will resort to violence.

The D.H.I. will be like the old Community Health Councils, but will have the following powers as the old C.H.Cs were useless, as Paul O’Callaghan’s case proves.

A). The Inspectorate members will live and work outside the area their Inspecting duties cover, thereby reducing the chance of becoming friendly and bias in favour of doctors or their clients.

B). The D.H.I. will be able to suspend local doctors, nurses and other health workers and then refer them to the new G.M.C. The doctors yearly licence to practise will be suspended.

C). The D.H.I. will be able to sack local health officials. The Secretary Of State for Health will act as the Appeal body.

D). The D.H.I. will be able to inspect and publish reports on any health service, including the behaviour and attitude staff have towards patients, without the threat of staff having the legal ability to sue for any criticism.

E). The Inspectorate will be able to visit ANY health establishment, any time anywhere.

F). The DH.I. will operate a Psychobabble Watch system, monitoring health workers for any psychobabble practise.

G). The D.H.I. will be able to instruct a health worker to treat a patient or be suspended.

H). A Health Advice Service will be run by the D.H.I. staff.. This service for example will find people a dentist or G.P. or Homeopath.

D.H.I. members (12) of the Inspectorate will be unpaid like the C.H.C. members were (except transport and lunch costs) and will consist of: 3 members nominated by the Dept. Of Health, 6 will stand for election (1 of whom will become the Chair person), when local council elections take place, and 3 will be nominated by Local bodies (such as the council and health groups). The paperwork and Advice Service will be carried out by the paid staff.

Health Policy 6:

Picture3Picture41

Above Negligent Doctors & Health Officials Committing Purposeful Medical Negligence Caught By Secret Radical Camera

Policy: Doctors are to lose the right to refuse to treat a patient, as Paul O’Callaghan’s undercover video and audio recordings and Drs medical letters about his case, justify.
Currently a Dr. can refuse to treat a patient, but if a patient does NOT want (psychobabble) treatment, a Dr. can force the treatment on the patient, proving the law is biased in favour of the doctors. In 2004 a dying man managed, through the courts, to have doctors carry on keeping him alive when he was unconscious. The General Medical Council appealed against this decision, wanting doctors to retain the right to decide if a patient should receive treatment or not. During the court case the Department of Health run by Patricia Hewitt M.P., also sent solicitors in to help the G.M.C. The dying man is Leslie Burke, has the degenerative brain condition, cereballar ataxia and will require artificial nutrition and hydration when he is no longer able to swallow. Mr. Burke had wanted this treatment to continue AFTER he loses the ability to communicate.
He is concerned that under the General Medical Council guidelines, the doctors were entitled to with draw the treatment when he is no longer able to communicate.
In 2004 a miracle happened: a Judge ruled in favour of a patient against the doctors, (Judge Munby in the High Court ruling that Mr. Burke did have a right to insist on treatment, so ruling against the G.M.C. which is run by doctors).
In 2005 the G.M.C., with legal help (in the form of lawyers) sent in by the Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt M.P. (proving that the Department Of Health puts doctors interests before that of patients), appealed against Judge Munby’s decision.
The appeal judges Lord Phillips of Matravers, Lord Waller and Lord Wall, ruled in favour of the doctors/G.M.C.

These judges claimed, “ Autonomy and right of self-determination do not entitle the patient to insist on receiving a particular medical treatment regardless of the nature of the treatment.
In so far as a Dr. has a legal obligation to provide treatment, this can not be founded simply upon the fact that a patient demands it”.
So doctors U.K. wide can continue to choose to medically neglect a patient as the law protects them.
In cases of where a patient wanted to be kept alive by food and water and the patient is competent to say so the doctors have to continue this as it would be “murder” not to do so. However, when he loses the capacity to want treatment to continue by saying so, the doctors could with draw the treatment – (THE VERY THING MR. BURKE WANTED TO AVOID HAPPENING SO HAD GONE TO COURT).
Leslie Burke appealed against the doctors victory in 2006, but lost.
So in summary, these 3 Judges have reaffirmed that people who CHOOSE to be doctors have the final say on whether people who DON’T choose to be patients, should receive treatment.
Paul’ O’Callaghan’s case (as reported in an article by Alexander Forbes):
After 10 years of suffering medical negligence, Mr. O’Callaghan has had to launch a political party so to create the legal powers to force the doctors to investigate and treat both his and others, disabling medical conditions.
He has blown the whistle, using undercover audio and video recordings of doctors committing purposeful medical negligence, placing these images and quotes in his own news sheet (10,000 produced with borrowed money). The doctors freaked out at their exposure and whilst their Police have mobilized to shut him up, the authorities and media (e.g. News Shopper) have covered up his plight, forcing him into hiding for 6 months.
A mild medication, which is commonly known about of amongst doctors for his illness, was with held from him by doctors for 9 years, till he discovered it through research and then his 4th G.P. (now gone) gave it to him. Had he had it a lot sooner he would have not have needed a walking stick to steer with and not lost his entire 20’s.

Picture42

Paul O’Callaghan was struck down by a disabling viral infection, causing him to suffer constant shaking vision, and vibrating vertigo, (like being on a see-saw moving at high speed), with lumps (glands) having risen on the back of his head, indicative of a “viral infection”. First G.P.s refused to help him due to a bizarre prejudice against those with, to quote the Doctors files and recordings of them, “no siblings”. Then an ENT Dr. (A. Salama) was both medically negligent and insane in his failed examination of Paul, performing a tuning fork test on Paul causing Paul agonizing pain in his ears, highlighting something was wrong, but then performed his test on his own ears and then said that because the test didn’t cause him, the Dr, pain – then Paul shouldn’t be in such pain!!!! It is this lunatic who subsequent doctors have been protecting by refusing to investigate the extent of his infection. The ENT Dr. referred Paul to a bullying Chest Physician to deal with Paul’s balance/ear problem (!) who with held (with Paul’s G.P.) his diagnoses that Paul had a, “true vertigo” caused by a “viral infection”. A private Homeopathic Dr. diagnosed Paul with vestibular neuronitis, but the G.P.s ignored him. No Dr. EVER gave him even any anti-Biotics!!!! At ANY time …

Dr. Iris Reuter caught on the hidden camera about to hit the table.

From 1994 until 2000, Paul was treated by a pure/lay Homeopath, who helped improve him until 1998. His Mum at one stage was having to lift a knife and fork to feed him, yet Doctors just laughed and demanded to know why he was in bed, upon learning he was his Mum’s son not husband, (no wonder Doctors write in medical journals how they fantasize about telling “loathsome specimens they have cancer and die soon”!). He had to endure horrific attacks of shaking vision sparked by vibrating vertigo whilst trying to go off to sleep and be awoken from the sleep. Yet the Doctors knew of Serc medication, but refused to prescribe anything for him, taking pleasure in his suffering, as they laughed and sneered at him, (hello Dr. Martin Prevett). He was never ever even prescribed ANY antibiotics. NOR EVEN JUST WEAKER, NOR SEPARATE EVEN, NEEDED LENSES….

Having already changed G.P.s once, Paul’s Mum moved house for Paul to have a 3rd G.P. practice, but the negligence continued, with discrimination, (1996). Battles then insured to get Paul to a specialist hospital, but the health authority refused him funding. After a big attack of shaking vision and vibrating vertigo reducing Paul to constantly using a stick to steer with, he saw further doctors who continued to refuse to help him. In 2002 two medical examiners on behalf of a prominent London Dr. broke with the cover-up and found Paul relied on his vision more than he should for balance, had “vestibular neuronitis, paresis of the inner ear and labyrinthinis disturbance, but the Dr. still refused to prescribe treatment or investigate the extent of the infection damage. A further Dr. reinforced this cover -up, lying that there was no treatment, being protected by a health official. A 2nd ENT Dr. (six years after the first) twisted in his Report what Paul had said, yet didn’t put in writing what he, the Dr., had told Paul, that Paul’s, quote, “symptoms are indications of a brain infection”, unaware this is what two previous Doctors and a cranial-osteopath had suggested Paul had, “encephalitis”. He was followed by a neurologist who objected to being asked questions by slamming her hand on a table, (if a patient did this it would be called violence!), by now the audio only recordings were replaced by hidden video recording. Another Dr. called Paul a liar, and physically assaulted Paul. Paul secretly recorded all these quacks for years and under took his own research to discover there was a commonly prescribed mild treatment for his symptoms, which ALL THE DOCTORS had withheld from him, which he then forced them to prescribe.

In other words: Had Paul had this mild treatment he would NOT have had to suffer so much or have the massive attack in 2000 which left him with a stick to use, until 3 years after he had started the medication. He got the medication because the G.P. he saw was the first Working Class Dr. he saw (and she was leaving the area so wouldn’t be around to be persecuted), and had the last, lying hospital Dr. endorse it. HE’LL NEVER EXPERIENCE PROPER SLEEP AGAIN…

He still suffers constant rocking vertigo and ear noises in periods, but a more accurate treatment can’t be prescribed because the Doctors still refuse to investigate the extent of the infection, (the mild medication he has, has it’s limits). Unsurprisingly, Paul is still a virgin.

Plus they are homeless as his Mum got into so much debt fighting the Doctors that she lost her house and is now in a bed-sit. They’re ruined. Paul can’t be a Dr. or Police Officer now because, respectively, of his age and his medical condition and spectacle lens strength. Whilst Paul has lost his twenties, being stuck at home ill on average 6 days a week for a decade, his Mum has lost her Middle Aged years from 42, having to do most things for Paul and be prepared to be woken by his screams during the night when Paul has been awoken by vibrating vertigo sparking his vision to shake because Paul was asleep so had his eyes shut, and his balance organs being damaged couldn’t alone cope with vertigo. His Mum is now chronically ill, particularly due to the night care Paul needed, climbing on and off chairs sometimes!

Yet there was Serc ALL the time which from 2003 to the present, has prevented such suffering, (it increases blood flow to the ears, but Doctors ignore this fact). Having lost their home, his Mum is in a bed-sit.

Paul has found he is a victim of a second conspiracy, which he can prove: Despite having absolute un-refutable proof that he is a victim of ongoing PURPOSEFUL medical negligence, no solicitor, journalist, M.P. Health Dept official, Patients or Human Rights group, Liberty (led by Shami Chakrabarti when she isn’t on TV most days), AVMA or, unsurprisingly, the G.M.C. is even willing to look at his evidence, let alone help him, refusing to recognise that Paul’s evidence exposes that Working Classes (those too poor to sue a Dr.) are in peril from evil NHS Doctors, dismissing Paul by telling him to just register a complaint, which can not force a Dr. to treat him or have the Doctors punished. He’s now learnt the MRI brain scan DID show up an abnormality, but the Doctors refuse to give him a copy for his cranial osteopath.

So when Paul heroically exposed the danger Londoners were in by producing and issuing his own news sheet, the Doctors and their allies hit back, sending the Police after him. Paul first fled to Wales, then retaliated with more news sheets, ‘took out’ the Police Chief, local newspaper reporter and later the latter’s editor and the hospital boss. Having failed to shut him up using the Police, the Doctors set their solicitors, Capsticks of Putney, on him threatening to take Paul to court for, “slander and defamation” if he “continued” with his leafleting (not for the 1000’s of leaflets already done, so indicative of a fear of taking him to court). Paul has found that there is ONE way around the law protecting Doctors: a political party can have ANY policy it wants and give justification for that policy. For a court to try and block that would have dire/civil war consequences for the Conservative, Labour and Lib-Dem parties in being able to have policies. So Paul has registered this political party enabling him to turn his objectives into political party policies, the promotion of which, with their justification, ALERTS YOU ALL to the danger you are in. Capsticks are furious but neutralised. It is our policy to reverse all court cases they have won.

No solicitor will even look at the evidence (including Bindmans and Leigh, Day & Co, (who told Paul to go to AVMA when Paul had already written that AVMA had refused to help him showing how stupid Leigh, day are), Evill & Colman, Charles Russell, Clarkson, Wright & Jakes, Russell, Jones & Walker, Dr. Anthony Barton, Louise Christian of Christian Fisher, Lord Andrew Philips, `Plus, the Patients Association, Patients U.K., London health Emergency, Liberty, AVMA, N.I.C.E., Health Dept, 600 M.P.s, GMC., Patients U.K., Patients Concern, Citizens Advice Bureau, King Fund and 12 Think Tanks. Residents have hailed Paul an, “inspirational man for bringing down people who were covering their own asses” and are “disgusted” with his ill treatment, expressing “sympathy” for him.

One BBC LDN journalist (recorded) lied the BBC could not transmit other people’s hidden recordings, when the BBC has done exactly that, (e.g. of Police Officers and other Working Class professions). Today, Paul continues to suffer vertigo and acute hearing, particularly in his right ear, waking him up.

“My health could worsen with age, so I need treatment and the career I’ve worked so hard to obtain, NOW – not later”. As Paul has had to rely on his eyes much more than he would have done had he had Serc, he now has to have stronger spectacles than he would have. Currently Paul O’Callaghan can’t wear the spectacles the optician has prescribed because the strength of the lenses he needs exacerbates his vertigo as after wearing them the rotating back and forth sensation is sparked when he closes his eyes to sleep. The optician can’t do anything and the Drs refuse. Paul still suffers continuous rocking vertigo and acute hearing in the right ear keeping him awake some nights. Paul’s case proves Drs are not experts in health and can’t be trusted. “I won’t shut up until I’ve got: treatment, my stated career, my Mum given her home back/£446,000, and a retreat centre to make up for robbed 14 years earnings had I had Serc sooner”.

In 2005 the Hospitals Trust Putney solicitors, Capsticks, has described his peaceful campaign for treatment as “harassment” which is WHY he is launching a political party. Despite the obvious evidence he’s telling the truth about what the doctors said, Capsticks accused him of “defamation” against the Trust (they’re the ones who have “defamed him in files) and that he’d made “implicit and explicit threats of violence” in his news sheet and subsequent correspondence with the Trust!!! He has NEVER threatened to harm a Dr. or incite others to lay a finger on a Dr. NEVER. He’s warned that “other people” in a similar situation to him could resort to violence after seeing by his and others cases that the law protects negligent doctors, due to the authorities sending “out the message” that peaceful methods like his would not be allowed. This is a case of “shoot the messenger”, (he supposes Capsticks view that phrase as threatening violence?)

A person representing his patients group, telling a west London hospital manager (where Mr. Blair was being interviewed live by the BBC) that doctors negligence is inciting patients to violence. She was immediately accused by the manager of threatening violence for simply TALKING ABOUT OTHER PEOPLES VIOLENCE and escorted from the building!!! (a BBC Press Officer present ran away at this point!). Both his case and this latter incident prove that the levels of ward rage doctors and health officials claim, just CAN’T be believed as they are paranoid about violence. So next time you hear this paranoia on TV, DON’T BELIEVE IT.

Capsticks’ clients are responsible for losing him 8 of his past 10 years of life by denying him the mild medication of Serc suffering dozens of attacks and robbed him of his 20’s, stuck at home on average 6 days a week for 9 of those years. The evil Capsticks want to shut him up so he suffers in silence (at home or, if he stops campaigning, locked up as mad so he could lose another 10 years) whilst their clients receive Foundation status… (Oddly they only threatened legal action if he continued his campaign, not for all the 1,000’s of news sheets already delivered! Why?…). Capsticks were the ones making threats to his freedom of speech so he is passing their details to anti-fascist groups. The doctors can sue him but he can’t sue them (even if he paid he has been told!!!!). Thus, Paul registered his political party, making his objective of full medical treatment etc a political party objective. He then invited Bromley Hospitals Trust and Capsticks to take him to court for the falsely accusing him of threatening violence in his news sheet and defamation. Now that Capsticks were unable to take him to court for harassment the Hospital trust Chairman declined, objecting to Paul’s invite. They realized Paul couldn’t get to court and that if they helped him into court by taking him to court they stood a chance of losing. So they opted to ignore him, which they continue to do in 2008, (apart from in 2006 when Paul’s ultimation: In early 2006 Paul gave notice to the Hospital Trust that he would launch his political party unless they gave him a medical investigation into the extent of his balance organ and possible brain damage, so accurate treatment could be prescribed to him, plus his compensation requirements. He was ignored. He repeated this notice to all Bromley Borough Tory, Labour and Lib Dem councillors the following August, and issued everyone with a final reminder at the start of September 2006. The week before his deadline, the Bromley Hospital Trust Chief Executive publicly announced he was leaving, with mixed feelings, and in that same week the local Hospital supporting newspaper Editor, suddenly quit without prior notice also. A complete re-run of what befell Police Chief David Dillnutt and reporter Richard Simcox two years earlier. Both had become liabilities to the Hospital so both were removed so not to be a liability in the fight with Paul.

Doctors excluded from Human Rights Act.

Whereas as Dr. or health official can just pick up the phone and have a solicitor pronto, patients like Mr. O’Callaghan can spend years trying to find a solicitor to act on either legal aid or by paying them. No solicitor would help. As he lay in bed unable to lift knife/fork etc in ’94, his Mum called the Greenwich & Bexley Chief Medical Advisor, Mr. MacClullogh, for help; he said Mr. O’Callaghan should play football!!! A health help line said he should attend the Dr. alone, so he’d be verbally abused with out a witness as he had been. The local M.P., Peter Bottomley, was on holiday.

His Mum approached various solicitors from 1995 to 2003 including: Leigh, Day & Co. (the opposite to Capsticks-supposedly specialising in helping the patients) who said he should try AVMA who he’d already tried and they were told in the covering letter he had tried AVMA already, proving they were too lazy to read the letter (they were also acting for smokers on a “no win, no fee basis” who had MADE themselves ill). Bindmans, (who’s Geoffrey Bindman regularly appears on C4 News) shockingly claimed he did not have a case!!! Other solicitors: Russell, Jones & Walker; Detlaff; Evill & Coleman; Clarkson, Wright & Jakes; Charles Russell; and Jack Rabinowitz; Louise Christian (who is now active it’s reported with another new political party involving a Redgrave actress) of Christian Fisher would not help, or Lord Andrew Phillips (who ignored his Mum’s letter) or Dr.-solicitor Anthony Barton. Solicitors said he didn’t have a case because the medical files are missing, yet that proves cover up. None of these solicitors have been willing to accept the recordings to listen to, just dismissing Paul’s case swiftly, accepting instead cases, which can’t prove purposeful negligence, so lose in court…

Since releasing Real News the solicitors CONTINUE to refuse to help, still making up their minds in 1phone call (never having listened and watched the recordings, so don’t get excited Capsticks). Solicitors claim his case is not human rights case and one in Woolwich claimed it is not even a medical negligence case. Are they terrified of hearing the recordings and matching them to the evidence?

Health Policy 7:

Medical Negligence (not accidents) and health practitioners choosing to neglect a patient’s illness, to be a criminal offence punishable , which matches that of the years the patient was medically neglected (if patient is dead then life in prison for doctor(s)). Protecting negligent doctors will also be a criminal offence for anyone who has done so since 1970, (e.g. judges, juries, solicitors, Police officers M.P.s etc)

Health Policy 8: All posh people, (those who’s parents and grand parents are/were of Aristocratic Class and Upper Class) or/and who pronounce the word YEAR as, yuerrr, will be barred for 30 years from training to be Doctors, thereby forcing the snob run Medical Schools to let in those of Middle, Working and Common Class descent.

Health Policy 9: All victims of medical negligence will be granted, as part of their compensation, the medical lessons and exam courses needed to be come a Dr.

HEALTH POLICY 10:

Myalgic Encephalomyeltis to be fully recognised as a physical illness/disease caused physically and for a health worker not recognise this will be a sack-able offence.

HEALTH POLICY11:

All doctors to openly record patients consultations (like Police do in interviews) with 2 tapes and then give 1 tape to the patient (otherwise the recording would probably ‘go missing’ like medical files so often do in negligence cases), so no one can lie in medical files (which Paul O’Callaghan’s recordings and files prove happens) about what was said and done.

HEALTH POLICY 12:

All doctors will practise on a yearly licence, which will be renewed or suspended by the local D.H.I. Inspectorate.

HEALTH POLICY 13: Doctors are banned from striking. Doctors choose to be doctors, patients (except boxers and drug/smoking addicts) don’t.

HEALTH POLICY 14: Doctors pay is linked to their performance, (more complaints equals less pay).

HEALTH POLICY 15: Medical reference libraries are to be established in all towns so patients can self-diagnose their illness if doctors have chosen to neglect them and the local C.H.I. has failed.

HEALTH POLICY 16: Osteopaths, Homeopaths and Herbalists are granted equal legal and medical status, so patients can choose to have one of them instead of a G.P. under the N.H.S. (who can refer such a patient for such things as a brain scan) (N.H.S. funding for such a patient being redirected toward the Alternative Health practitioner).

HEALTH POLICY 17:

All patients to have copies of all their medical files (or if dead, their relatives instead, or if too young, their parents) regardless of what slander the doctors may have written.

HEALTH POLICY 18:All Members of Parliament who are medically qualified will be barred from residing upon the Health Select Committee.

HEALTH POLICY 19: Patients (or of latter is a child, their parents) to have the legal right to override a doctors (mis)diagnosis if the patient has evidence contradicting the doctors (mis)diagnosis.

HEALTH POLICY 20: that a full enquiry is launched by non-health workers, who have experienced CONTINUED hardships, into how medical schools have allowed so many insane and dangerous people to become doctors. Victims of medical negligence to be able to reside upon application decisions of who can train to be a Dr.

HEALTH POLICY 21:All judges and juries who have ruled in favour of doctors in medical negligence cases or in any case where a patient (or surviving relative has taken 1 or more doctors to court about a medical issue) since 1970 will have their decisions reversed and be punished.

A). In August 2000, Mr. O.B.H.L.C. (he has a foreign name so it could be wrong) was jailed by the courts for 8 months for attacking staff at W.M. Hospital. The court room was told that Mr. (for short) L.C. had discovered the nurses were not taking his child’s illness seriously and attacked the nurses (why didn’t a nurse go and get a Dr. to treat his girl?). Afterwards the nurses were protesting about the violence they suffer.

B). Mr. M. arrived at the M. Hospital to discover his 2 year old son who had stopped breathing in the past, twice, had to wait all day. Mr. M. was concerned his child’s illness was serious. After a while Mr. M. spoke to a staff nurse about the wait for a Dr. However it was only after a Dr. M. approached the nurse to offer assistance to the NURSE (NOT the child so obviously the doctors were not that busy) that Mr. M. struck Dr. M. . Mr. M. got a 13 month prison sentence.

There have been further cases of medical negligence inciting violence at this same hospital, but they are beyond the remit of this Report. However, the Hospital was challenged by the editor of SAD Times on this issue. The Chief executive swiftly replied, denying his staff incited violence, but claiming that he’d investigate any such allegation of his staff inciting violence by negligence. From this it is clear it is doubtful if he’d be impartial.

C). Dr. N., an consultant anaesthetist, while off duty travelling, was NOT jailed for attacking a tube worker at Kennington Station, south London. Despite being found guilty by the jury, the Judge, Duncan Matheson Q.C. decided NOT to send the consultant to prison because there would be a lack of doctors!!!!!

D). Dr. W. of the V. Hospital, in North West England in 1995 performed an operation on Mrs. M. who lost many pints of blood after wards and died. During the operation Dr. W. had posed for pictures (and of a piece of her liver) for a medical research!. Even the staff were shocked at his actions here. In court he admitted he should have not continued with the operation after finding how big a tumour was and was close to important blood vessels. Apparently Dr. w. was NOT qualified to perform this operation.

He was suspended at the end of 1998, and the General Medical Council found him guilty of being professionally negligent in 10 cases, involving botched operations of women (4 dead and others maimed). He was suspended in January 1999. He was actually struck off the medical register by the G.M.C. but THEN LET BACK ON, on the condition that he did not perform operations.

The Police by then had begun to take an interest in him and in July 2003 was charged with Manslaughter.

The outcome was that the Judge Sir Stephen Mitchell, blamed the hospital and the coroner and told dr. W. “It was not your fault that you were allowed to go on operating” (Hasn’t the dr. got a mind of his own?) “for another 2 years. This conviction will have devastating effect on your medical career … in my judgement your one acute personnel failing is that you seemed to have insufficient appreciation of your limitations as a surgeon” (Is that not punishable?). The Judge blamed the hospital for allowing a surgeon to make his decisions, (Is a hospital chief executive supposed to decide about an operation rather than a Dr?).

E). During an operation on 16 year old girl Miss D., Dr. W., it was alleged, became aggressive, killing the girl.

He was inserting a catheter tube into Miss D.’s chest so to channel drugs into her as part of her treatment for acute myeloid leukaemia. The allegations were (not by relatives but by HOSPITAL STAFF) Dr. W. was due to travel to another hospital also in Cornwall, so rushed the operation. A nurse told the court that “The surgeon pushed and shoved quite aggressively” to put the tube into the girl”. (NOTICE HOW NURSES DON’T CALL SECURITY TO PROTECT A PATIENT FROM A DR.).She continued, “He swore because he could not insert the guide wire. He used so much force that (Miss D.’s) whole body shook. I was aghast at the language and the way the patient was being handled”. Another nurse said Miss D. had been, “butchered to death”.

The General Medical Council, as usual, had decided that neither should this Dr. be struck off.

Patients first predicted the court would rule in favour of the Dr. and were proved right.

He was cleared of killing her. The Jury only took 50 minutes to clear him of killing Miss D. (Too short to come to a decision based on absorbing all the facts. The jury members will be a matter for the British Unicorn party when we come to power). The jury were DIRECTED by the judge to decide if Dr. W.s actions were a significant cause of Miss D.s death and if his actions concluded an act of criminal negligence. The Medical Defence Union (Scotland) (which helps doctors with court actions so giving doctors an unfair advantage in court actions which the British Unicorn Party aim to put a stop to by making organisations like this so-called union criminal groups), supported Mr. W.s case. The union thanked patients who supported Mr. W.s side, (Dr. Lovers who object in local press letters pages to any freedom of speech to criticise a Dr. who Mr. O’Callaghan ridiculed in a cartoon in his news sheet, Real News). Miss D.s mother said of Dr. W., “I hope he can sleep at night”. She thought she had no choice but to accept the verdict. When the British Unicorn Party come to power not only will court decisions like this be reversed, but both the judge and jury will be hunted down and punished by the Republican Guard.

F). Now here’s the case of Britain’s own Nelson Mandela: In September 1999, David Collins, an Irishman of 33 or 38 years with 2 children, living in Milford Haven, Pembrokeshire, Wales, held a Dr. hostage at a hospital in Haverfordwest. He accused the hospital of being responsible for his mother’s death. He held Dr. P. (who was NOT involved in his mothers case, so Mr. Collins targeted an innocent!). It is believed Mr. Collins burst into the hospital staff room and took Dr. P. hostage at random. Mr. Collins was carrying a can of what he claimed (bluffed) was filled with a gallon of petrol, which he threatened to tip over Dr. P. It was later proved to be filled with only water. The hospital was evacuated as much as possible. Police marksmen surrounded the building (had Pembrokeshire Police killed him they would have been for life in prison when the British Unicorn party come to power). Mr. Collins demanded to speak with a reporter This was to be BBC Radio Wales journalist Gilbert John who spoke to Mr. Collins for an hour by phone. Mr. John complied with police requests NOT to detail Mr. Collins’ demands! The few broadcasters who covered the 3 day siege managed to get their facts wrong, by reporting Mr. Collins had been medically neglected. A member of patients First rang up to offer help for Mr. Collins to reassure him there are people in Britain fighting the doctors, but the Police were only interested if the member was a parasite (counsellor). Mr. Collins only took the action to draw attention to what had happened to his mother, (which doesn’t say much for the media, proving journalists who cover up negligence cases incite patient violence).

In March 2000, Mr. Collins was given a Life Sentence and according to the Western Telegraph (like the News Shopper, is Newsquest owned) informed Mr. O’Callaghan (via a relative) that in November 2004, Mr. Collins was still languishing in prison.

Whilst in Wales in hiding Mr. O’Callaghan managed to visit Haverfordwest library and obtained these further details on his case:

Collins was charged with assaulting and unlawfully detaining Dr. K.P. against his Will and making a threat to damage property belonging to the Pembrokeshire Derwin NHS Trust.
His solicitor, Paul Cooper confirmed there would be no bail application by his client.
The local press, which totally took the side of the doctors, even running a report 2 months later about how the hospital copped, (not surprising as 1 paper is owned by Newsquest which owns the Dr. loving News Shopper in south east London –see media section) and published his home address including number (Mr. O’Callaghan wrote to it but had no reply as his family appear to have moved).
The paper described how he was dressed for court but not his demands (just like the News Shopper describing the colour of the envelopes Mr. O’Callaghan’s news sheet arrived in but not the undercover recorded quotes of frightening statistics).
The cost of the siege was £20,000. £25,000. to Dyfed-Powys Police.
Officers in charge of the siege were Deputy Chief Constable Peter Clough; Chief Superintendent Paul Amphlett and Chief Superintendent John Davids.
P. refused to be interviewed about his experience.
After the siege Mr. Collins was held for 72 hours, but the 24 hours at the second hospital was not counted.
Mayor/councillor Mrs. Beryl Thomas-Cleaver thanked all those who combated Mr. Collins.
Meals were affected.
Security failure.
During siege help lines were put in for concerned relatives of patients.

The real victim is David Collins and his mother who everyone has forgotten. When the British Unicorn Party come to power Mr. Collins will be released and the judge who put him on prison, given the same sentence as the judge gave Mr. Collins.

G). The boy in this case was suffering from a physical disease. However, his G.P. arrived at his home with a social worker and a court order to remove the boy to a “place of safety”. An ambulance then arrived and took him to the local hospital for six months.

His illness had rendered him helpless so the doctors, who refused to recognise his disease, inflicted psychobabble treatment on him: This involved turning the boy upside down (when he was lying down) so he would have to force himself to turn over in order to breath (sadistic), put him in a swimming pool (of course he’d sink) and on a ghost train ride to try to make him jump with shock. They even put him in a standing frame (he was in a wheelchair normally) so to straighten his legs. On one occasion they left him like this so long, he collapsed. A psychologist and a social worker went along with the doctors misdiagnosis, asking the boy if he was on his (psychologists) “side”(agreeing with the psychologist and doctors misdiagnosis)!

This is just one of many examples of a doctors “place of safety” which really means a place where doctors can safely torture their victims, with support from a judge (judges never punish doctors for negligence). Judges always love doctors and psychobablists -(see Patient’s Lack of Rights document).

H). In 1996 another boy fell ill with a disease that the doctors refused to recognise was physical. The consultant brought in a psychiatrist who advised the boy should receive psychiatric treatment. This treatment the psychiatrist liked to inflict was supposed to stop their child victim supposedly “dwelling” on their symptoms by forcing the child to be more active. Of course there was no improvement (as he was physically ill). The fact the boy was not psychiatrically ill did not serve the psychiatrists purposes. The boy could not see, move or feed himself. After the so-called treatment he was being tube-fed at the local hospital.

However the deranged doctors wanted the boy to attend a unit at a certain world famous children’s hospital, to undergo the same so-called treatment. His parents visited the unit in advance and were horrified at it, so sought a second opinion.

As in the above case, the doctors were so desperate to ill treat the child that they got a doctor loving judge(s) who, after a six month legal battle, ruled in favour of/obeyed the doctors, granting a court order for the boy to be removed from his parents care, for compulsory psychiatric treatment in the hands of the disturbed doctors. This order of court was made despite the boy achieving the age of 16, so legally he was an adult.

The judge ruled the boy could only be referred to as “Child X”.

The parents fled with their son to Europe. The police (obeying doctors/ Dr. loving judges as usual) alerted Interpol! The boy’s father returned to Britain (why is still unknown) and was arrested for contempt of court and was told the boy must be returned by the end of the week. The boy’s mother returned with him. At dawn next day the police raided his home, snatched the boy away to this world famous, supposedly caring hospital.

Whilst at the hospital psychiatric ward he told another patient how both doctors and nurses were not listening to him (nurses are trained in psychology and sociology before learning how to do a drip feed. The nurses thought the boy’s disability was him being awkward.

He had entered the hospital able to walk but whilst there was made so physically ill, he was reduced to a zimmer frame, his chin on the bar and ankles scrapping on the floor. To add insult to injury a doctor asked the boy, if he knew how much his bed was costing and staff even threatened to take him into the city, which he could not physically cope with.

After 8 months of separation from his parents, the parents won/ regained ward ship of the boy. Court restrictions on the boy and his family, continued to prevent identification, despite him being 17.

Yet another case proving doctors use psychobabble to treat a physically ill person and gain support from psychiatrists and the courts.

It’s because of cases like these that Patients First propose to use their future retreat centre to protect such doctors victims on the run from the doctors.

I). Ms. M. died after receiving a dosage of the pain killer diamorphine at 8 times the permitted dose. Her son was battling to persuade the medical establishment to investigate his mother’s death. The G.P. Dr. W. was acquitted of manslaughter charges over her death. Yet at his trial, he admitted he had made “a terrible and tragic mistake”. The son wished the G.M.C. would investigate Dr. w. Her son said, “He has not even been reprimanded. They are just washing their hands of the whole affair”.

K). We return to hospital O. once more. This time it’s about 2 doctors having charges dropped. 12 year boy W. had non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (cancer) which was in remission (he was receiving chemotherapy for).

He received an injection in his spine instead of a vein. He died in agony 2 days later as his nervous system was destroyed, the injection fluid being like liquid fire coursing through his veins.

Senior Registrar Dr. M. was supposed to oversee the treatment but who was absent that afternoon and told a colleague Dr. L. (who had NEVER administered chemotherapy into the spine) to carry out the procedure. Dr. L. was suspended after the tragedy and when his contracted ended at the hospital, went to work at another hospital. Dr. M. was not suspended, but his contract has since expired with the hospital.

They were charged with Manslaughter following a coroners call for a Police enquiry a year later and a file was submitted to the Crown Prosecution Service. Both were released on bail.

As Patients first again expected, the doctors were not punished. The C.P.S. dropped the charges due to a witness Professor A. statement.

L). In the port town of P. in July 1999, appeal judges decided that in some cases generally where relatives and doctors could not agree on the treatment of someone seriously ill then the case should go to the courts.

However, despite coming to this ruling in the case which lead to this, the Appeal Judges ruled that in specific cases of relatives and doctors disagreeing they rejected the relatives in this case, attempts to have the doctors treatment of patient over ruled. (British Unicorn Party actually have a policy which once law, will enable patients and their relatives, the ability to over ride a doctors misdiagnosis when the relatives or patient has evidence contradicting the doctors diagnosis, however number of doctors are wrong).

The case began in October 1998 at a hospital in P. where 12 year old boy G. lay close to death. The NHS doctors decided that the boy should be given diamorphine and so allowed to die with, quote, “dignity”. “Nature” being “allowed to take it’s course”. His mother and 15 other relatives had to fight to resuscitate her son. Afterwards his mother went to the High Court to obtain a Declaration that P. NHS Trust acted in a manner beyond it’s legal powers. Eventually this lead to the High Court Appeal Judges who consisted of Mr. Woolf, Ms. Butler and Mr. Robert Walken. Judge Woolf said there had been a breakdown in trust between the doctors and the family. His mother commented on the above verdict,” I am pleased about the part of the judgement when the judges made it clear that doctors have got to at least listen to the parents and if it can’t be resolved between parents and the medical staff, then go to court”.

The family had, in the October, pulled Master G. from the bed to provoke his breathing – thus saving David’s life. The doctors condemned this as “cruel” (would they condemn other doctors who put paralysed children into swimming pools and nurses who poke and prod such children because they believe the children not to be physically ill despite obvious evidence that they are?). Master G. is alive today

Despite saving his life they were charged with violent disorder (!!!!!) In court 3 relatives denied the charge. The prosecutor claimed that diamorphine was administered to the brain damaged boy to help him breath, but it was expected that the boy would die within hours. The family present objected to this, accusing the doctors of trying to kill him. The doctors complied with the family’s objection and left claiming there was nothing else they could do.

It is from this point that 2 versions of events were given in court. The doctors claim THEY were attacked. According to the Q.C. Dr. W. was prevented from leaving by a relative/one of the defendants who told her, “Your not going, I want you to witness the death of a child you have killed” (understandable) as well as threatening to break her neck if Master G. died. It is then alleged that as this Dr. tried to raise the alarm she was assaulted by Ms. W. Then outside the room she was also attacked. Dr. A (male) was bitten by Ms. W. and kicked by Mr. D. Police Officers claim they saw the boys mother attack Dr. A. The mother and Mr. D. denied being involved in the violence whilst Ms. W. said her actions (who bite Dr. A) was in self defence as Dr. A. had punched her, (in Mr. O’Callaghan’s case a DSS Dr. tried assaulting him. He caught the Dr. on audio recording shouting when Mr. O’Callaghan wouldn’t let him). And then fell on the female Dr.

At about this time in another near bye port, doctors were being given self defence lessons, prompting the then newly formed Patients First to propose to offer self defence lessons to patients.

More recently it was found that Capsticks solicitors were interested in this case. Why?

J). Solicitors Dangerously Brand Freedom Of Speech “Harassment”.

After 10 years of suffering medical negligence, Mr. O’Callaghan has had to launch a political party so to create the legal powers to force the doctors to investigate and treat both his and others, disabling medical conditions.

He has blown the whistle, using undercover audio and video recordings of doctors committing purposeful medical negligence, placing these images and quotes in his own news sheet (10,000 produced with borrowed money). The doctors freaked out at their exposure and whilst their Police have mobilised to shut him up, the authorities and media (e.g. News Shopper) have covered up his plight, forcing him into hiding for 6 months.

A mild medication, which is commonly known about of amongst doctors for his illness, was with held from him by doctors for 9 years, till he discovered it through research and then his 4th G.P. (now gone) gave it to him. Had he had it a lot sooner he would have not have needed a walking stick to steer with and not lost his entire 20’s.

Now the Hospitals Trust Putney solicitors, Capsticks, has described his peaceful campaign for treatment as “harassment” which is WHY he is launching this political party. Despite the obvious evidence he’s telling the truth about what the doctors said, Capsticks accuses him of “defamation” against the Trust (they’re the ones who have “defamed him in files) and that he’d made “implicit and explicit threats of violence” in his news sheet and subsequent correspondence

with the Trust!!! He has NEVER threatened to harm a Dr. or incite others to lay a finger on a Dr. NEVER. His

warned that “other people” in a similar situation to him could resort to violence after seeing by his case that the law protects negligent doctors, due to the authorities sending “out the message” that peaceful methods like his would not be allowed. This is a case of “shoot the messenger”, (he supposes Capsticks view that phrase as threatening violence?)

A person representing my patients group, telling a west London hospital manager (where Mr. Blair was being interviewed live by the BBC) that doctors negligence is inciting patients to violence. She was immediately accused by the manager of threatening violence for simply TALKING ABOUT OTHER PEOPLES VIOLENCE and escorted from the building!!! (a BBC Press Officer present ran away at this point!). Both his case and this latter incident prove that the levels of ward rage doctors and health officials claim, just CAN’T be believed as they are paranoid about violence. So next time you hear this paranoia on TV, DON’T BELIEVE IT.

Capsticks’ clients are responsible for losing him 8 of his past 10 years of life by denying him the mild medication of Serc suffering dozens of attacks and robbed him of his 20’s, stuck at home on average 6 days a week for 9 of those years. The evil Capsticks want to shut him up so he suffers in silence (at home or, if he stops campaigning, locked up as mad so he could lose another 10 years)., whilst their clients receive Foundation status… (Oddly they only threatened legal action if he continue his campaign, not for all the 1,000’s of news sheets already delivered! Why?…). Capsticks are the ones making threats to his freedom of speech so he is passing their details to anti-fascist groups (they have been kind enough to put themselves on the web site Talk about stupid). His “correspondence” will be available on the British Unicorn Party web site so you can read for yourself that his the one telling the truth, unless Capsticks block it. The doctors can sue him but he can’t sue them (even if he paid he has been told!!!!).

Doctors excluded from Human Rights Act.

Whereas as Dr. or health official can just pick up the phone and have a solicitor pronto, patients like Mr. O’Callaghan can spend years trying to find a solicitor to act on either legal aid or by paying them. No solicitor would help. As he lay in bed unable to lift knife/fork etc in ’94, his Mum called the Greenwich & Bexley Chief Medical Advisor, Mr. MacClullogh, for help; he said Mr. O’Callaghan should play football!!! A health help line said he should attend the Dr. alone, so he’d be verbally abused with out a witness as he had been. The local M.P., Peter Bottomley, was on holiday.

His Mum approached various solicitors from 1995 to 2003 including: Leigh, Day & Co. (the opposite to Capsticks-supposedly specialising in helping the patients) who said he should try AVMA who he’d already tried (see next section) and they were told in the covering letter he had tried AVMA already, proving they were too lazy to read the letter (they were also acting for smokers on a “no win, no fee basis” who had MADE themselves ill). Bindmans, (who’s Geoffrey Bindman regularly appears on C4 News) shockingly claimed he did not have a case!!! Other solicitors: Russell, Jones & Walker; Detlaff; Evill & Coleman; Clarkson, Wright & Jakes; Charles Russell; and Jack Rabinowitz; Louise Christian (who is now active it’s reported with another new political party involving a Redgrave actress) of Christian Fisher would not help, or Lord Andrew Phillips (who ignored his Mum’s letter) or Dr.-solicitor Anthony Barton. Solicitors said he didn’t have a case because the medical files are missing, yet that proves cover up.

Since releasing Real News the solicitors CONTINUE to refuse to help, still making up their minds in 1phone call (never having listened and watched the recordings, so don’t get excited Capsticks). Solicitors claim his case is not human rights case and now 1in Woolwich has just claimed it is not even a medical negligence case. Are they terrified of hearing the recordings and matching them to the evidence.

By refusing to help these solicitors wrongly justifies violence.

——————————————————————————————————————————————-

HEALTH POLICY 22: A new Government Department will be established for and run by, victims of medical negligence, which will monitor levels of medical negligence and report if any changes are required to laws. In addition a Chief Alternative Health Medical advisor post will be created, with equivalent status to the present Chief Medical Advisor.

HEALTH POLICY 23: Anyone who physically attacked a Dr. or other health worker, who was NOT drunk or on illegal drugs, and did so because they or the relative (normally a child) was being medically neglected, yet was found guilty and punished, will have the court decision reversed and the Judge and jury will be hunted down the Guard and put in prison for the length of time their victim was detained for.

HEALTH POLICY 24:Vacination/cures for Bird flu to be stock piled. Currently there is only enough, apparently, for important people, like the ‘Royal’ Family who don’t do anything to help society.

HEALTH POLICY 25: M.M.R. controversy genuinely investigated.

HEALTH POLICY 26: All cases of mental illness to be reviewed for cases of negligence victims being branded mental and even locked up to cover up negligence, as Mental Health services view criticism/exposure of doctors negligence by patients as a form of mental illness (as Oxleas NHS Trust’s Timothy Sowter has proved in Paul O’Callaghans case).

If something is not done soon to punish the doctors for selecting patients to neglect (who they’re prejudiced against) , the violence against doctors will continue to rise by those wronged by doctors. It will increase to such an extent that it will not only lead to killings of doctors (probably by a distraught relative at losing their child to killer negligence), but could even lead to the destruction of a hospital, or (if the victim/relative was arrested and punished by the authorities for trying to take on the doctors) the assassination of a Judge, Jury members or destruction of a Police Station, (as the latters are not surrounded by innocent patients this is more likely than the destruction of a hospital)

Paul O’Callaghan’s case proves that a person can NOT even publicly condemn doctors, secretly record them or publicise one’s plight, so therefore the authorities are showing others in a similar or worse situation than Mr. O’Callaghan’s plight, will find the law on the side of the doctors. So such persons will take the law into their own hands.

HEALTH POLICY 27:

Department of Health to have the legal right to take direct control of a failing Hospital or Primary Care Trust, (just like Northern Ireland can be ruled direct from London).

HEALTH POLICY 28: Dyslexia to be identified and treated by doctors, Osteopaths, Herbalists and Homeopaths and NOT psychologists as dyslexia is officially a physical medical condition.

HEALTH POLICY 29: Free dentistry and spectacle tests and lenses.

HEALTH POLICY 30: It will be a crime for anyone (e.g. those in authority) to cause medical negligence and to hinder a negligence victim’s fight for treatment.

HEALTH POLICY 31: doctors are to be made accountable/brought under the remit of the Human rights Act, (e.g. so that the Act gives patients the right to demand treatment from a Dr. Patients having the final say because normally a patient does not choose to be a patient whereas a Dr. does.

HEALTH POLICY 32: Doctors to be barred from cutting about a person’s body when the latter has passed over/died, when relatives and friends forbid it, unless Police request the autopsy.

HEALTH POLICY 33: All judges, juries, solicitors, Police Officers, journalists, M.P.s, Government ministers, Whitehall civil servants who, since 1980 gagged/hindered a medical negligence victim’s moral fight to expose, criticise and condemn doctors (even by creating laws to do this) will be classed as inciting violence. Such hinderers will face automatic trial charged with inciting violence against doctors.

If a patient (or their surviving relatives and friends) can not seek justice against negligent doctors or force the doctors to treat them: through the courts because no solicitor will act for them or a court (judge and jury) has ruled against the patient (or relative/friends of the patient or fighting for justice for the dead patient) from continuing their (or the relatives) campaign for treatment; that the Government, health officials, M.P.s human and patients rights groups and journalists refuse to help such patients (relatives/friends of dead patients) then they are all giving the person(s) they refuse to help/rule against NO choice but to commit violence. If psychobabblists are then used to shut the patient/relatives/friends of the patient, up, then those psychobabblists would also be inciting the patient/relative/friend to violence.

HEALTH POLICY 34: Three Homeopaths Herbalists and Osteopaths, working independently of each other normally, will be able together, be able to override a doctor’s diagnosis and denial of physical health treatment.

We should update here that an Asian family who tried to just start up a petition for a public enquiry into the death of their daughter who the family accuse the doctors of murdering, have been barred by a court injunction from even being able to just carry out a simple petition. We the B.U.P. are only able to make this reference because we are not identifying the doctors, hospitals and location of the family. However both judges involved in granting the court order are to be3 grabbed and punished (with all Judges who protect doctors) when we come to power.

HEALTH POLICY 35: Fluoride outlawed as it is bone rotting (skeletal fluorosis) and brain dumbing.

SECTION 4 EDUCATION & EMPLOYMENT REFORM POLICIES

Education Introduction

Primary school age children are increasingly disrespectful and abusive to complete strangers, lacking any fear. Why?

One TV producer has stated how 2 well known TV presenters were perfect for Kids TV programmes because they didn’t talk down to the children, but treated children as equals.

That’s the problem – children are being treated like adults. Being given adult responsibilities before they’re old enough to have them.

Not only do the media treat children like adults but so do schools.

Childhood has been replaced by encouraging the primary school age children to be far more responsible in adult ways, than they are ready for: Working Class children are using language Working Class Kids in the 1980’s didn’t use; they’re being encouraged to analysis situations through role play (which we haven’t ruled out as being psychology based); children are even being encouraged to act as mediators! Teachers are supposed to teach behaviour-not kids.

Primary school age children are children. They’ve been supposed to have an innocent childhood, playing. It’s the one time a person should “live in the now” – not in adult life. A child doesn’t need to analyse their emotions etc at such a young age, because they’re still developing. Analysing themselves and others destroys their child hood.

Yes the media need a kick up the ass for mistreating children as adults and we’ll give it to them. But neither should primary schools treat children as adults.

Schools are about introducing BASIC practicalities of life to children and helping them discover their TALENTS, in order that they can understand their purpose(s) in life.

By treating children like adults, giving them adult responsibilities, children will think they can cheek adults due to this equality of adult responsibility.

Whilst we, the B.U.P., intend to introduce Contemplation Groups to secondary schools to enhance the help children need to find their talents and purpose in life, to gain an emotional and spiritual level adults have to cope with life. But, we are NOT going to do this in primary schools because the average child is then too young to comprehend everything and their natural growing up through childhood would be distorted. The C.P. Groups could be called, by New Ageists, “rights of passage”, that’s up to them.

Why do people think primary and secondary schools are not single schools? Think.

This, “treat children like adults” rubbish began when psychobabblists influence increased in schools…

Yes, we’re going to reduce the age of criminal responsibility to 8 years of age, but it’s only temporary so to deal with the children who would already have been damaged by this, ‘treated like an adult’ rubbish. After 5 years of our education policies to restore childhood, childhood for those under 11, would be restored so the age of criminal responsibility will be set at 11, (with the exception of murder which will be set at 6 years old, as by that age a child should know not to kidnap or kill babies. People go soft on such person’s because psychobabblists refuse to accept people can be born evil. Thankfully it is very rare).

POLICY 1: All secondary schools are to concentrate on teaching pupils who are willing to learn, not the continuously disruptive pupils, regardless of pupils intelligence levels.

POLICY 2: Pre-1960’s teaching methods will be used in maths, English, science and geography. In English lessons, their will be elocution lessons so to save the letter “T” from being dropped/reversed the dumbing down of the English language.

POLICY 3: In Primary and Secondary schools U.K. History lessons will be compulsory, children NOT being asked for their opinion on historical events, but learning when, how and why historical events took place. In addition they will learn how these events impacted on social life of the public of the time. Most importantly, they will learn how past events have shaped present day Britain. Plus they will learn about the inventions of each period in history and about those who had a significant impact on an historical events.

Pupils will be taught one of the following Historical periods in each school term:

Early Britain’s & Celts (Term1)
2.Roman Britain (Term 2)

3.Dark Ages & Anglo-Saxons

4.The Norman Era

5.Middle Ages

6.16th, 17th and 18th centuries

7.19th and 20th centuries

After Term 7, the pupils would re learn each era again per term, but in a more detailed fashion., until School Year 10. Once they enter Year 10, pupils can choose which era they wish to specialise in.

They will also learn Hidden History.

POLICY 4: Maths, English, Science, U.K. History (both official and Hidden) and Geography will be compulsory subjects which a G.C.S.E. exam must be taken in.

In particular, The Fight For Democracy, will be a History subject all pupils will be required to know: the events and WHY they happened. Starting with the Magna Carter and going through the English Civil War, the Glorious Revolution (1788-9), the third Reform Bill of 1884 (giving the vote to male householders with property valued £10 at least, thus giving farm workers the vote) the 1911 House of Commons victory over the House of Lords, Women’s Rights (suffrage) to our Reforms. However, in particular, this subject will be dominated by the campaign for democracy of 1816 to 1832. This period is being forgotten by historians, when many people had paid for this fight with their lives. These events and their causes were:

The reaction to the Highland Clearances; Land Reform; High Taxes; 1815 Corn Laws; Poor Law Relief; Authorities fear of a French style Revolution and it’s causes; Cotton Mills; 1819 Peterloo Massacre; The Times’ coverage of Peterloo Massacre; Child Labour; Six Acts of Parliament for magistrates to crush demos like Peterloo, gag press reporting, ban meetings; poverty increase; the 1820 Cato Street Conspiracy; 1820 uprising at Bonnymuin, Scotland led by James Wilson, John Baird and Andrew Hardie a weaver (all executed); Manchester Guardian paper launched; the execution for minor crimes penalty, abolished in 1823; Industrial unrest of 1826, (strike of colliers in Glasgow and Lancashire handloom workers smashing looms); Reform of corrupt boroughs; Duke of Wellington anti-democracy views; William Corbett leading pro-democracy reforms and his journey of Britain; Henry Hanel; 1831 battle to pass first Reform Bill and then it’s passing in 1832; 1833 slavery abolished; 1843 Tolpuddle Parties; 1834 new laws to help the poor; first House of Commons burnt down; 1838 Peoples Charter and the actions of the Chartists (six points) and killing of Chartists in Gwent in 1839, and the collapse of the Chartists in 1842; Corn Laws abolished IN 1845.

These facts would be taught with the information that this period in history is that portrayed by Jane Austin and then Charles Dickens, and during this time was the first railways and first Police Services.

POLICY 5:Parents will be able to withdraw their child from school if the parent pays for a private tutor to teach the child maths and English. If the parent or child can teach themselves U.K. History Geography and Science, then a Tutor for these subjects will not be required. However a Parent can only with draw their child from school if the school is failing the child or that the child learns better in a non-school environment (e.g. being bullied). It will be only advised that the parent make sure the child under takes a physical activity, as some children are medically neglected and so ill are disabled, yet

If they don’t go to school, the parents are threatened with losing custody of their child!!!!! Once the B.U.C.P. have been in power for a year this problem will cease to exist as those who make such threats/negligent doctors would have been hunted down and punished.

POLICY 6: The cane will be re introduced into secondary schools for BULLIES ONLY.

POLICY 7: Lessons on religions, spirituality and debates on any subject will be combined with a Contemplation Group will be combined as a 1 hour session at the end of each school week, to help children prepare for the emotional upheavals of Life and to help them find their purpose(s) in life. This will only apply to Middle and Secondary schools.

Basic Contemplation Groups will be, at the end of each school week where pupils would begin the session by learning about the pro’s and con’s of one of the religion (Christianity, Buddhism, Islam, Judaism, Osho Movement, Sikhism, Hinduism) or a pagan or New Religion. Plus they would also learn about Common Sense Philosophy.

The structure would be more informal: The pupils would be sitting on the floor on cushions in a circle, barefoot, (to encourage them to accept that everyone is equal regardless of race, disability, age etc). The teacher would also allow their Christian name to be used. For the first 5 minutes a period of relaxtion. Then for 20 minutes the teacher would give a talk on a religion or Common Sense Spirituality or Charter or a pupil will present a speech on any subject. This is then followed by a debate on the subject of the talk. Thereafter, the pupils would have a 10 minute contemplation session, to contemplate what they have just learnt or discussed, how it could apply to life and even their own life. They would also learn about an aspect of Common Sense Philosophy and how it’s superior to psychology.

This would be followed by a pupil giving a speech on an issue in society and how they think Common Sense Philosophy could solve it. Or a report on a religion to show if they understand that religion and give their opinions of it, using common sense. This is then followed by a debate about the speech, which will stimulate pupils minds.

The date and location of the birth of each religion will be taught.

In Primary Schools Christianity only will be taught as it’s historically the U.K. religion.

POLICY 8: Work Experience for Year 11 will be converted into an exam course: Through the Contemplation groups and the lessons, pupils will discover (if they didn’t know sooner) their talents and will be able to match their talents to a career they want or, if they don’t have a career they want to do, then found, with school help, a career to match their talents. The school would then contact the Department for Education & Employment (having the employment aspect moved from the Trade Dept. to Education will make more sense), for the Employment part of the Dept. to arrange Work Experience at the job which the child (or if not the school) thinks matches their talents, regardless of the child’s social class background. Obviously professions like airlines and Policing won’t be able to give Work Experience to pupils as airline pilots or Police Officers, so pupils would have to have a second choice career for work experience in, but they could still be taught the ins and outs of their first chosen career by the adults who work in that profession. An Act of Parliament will be passed to have businesses take on pupils for Work Experience. There is NO interface for school/college leavers to use where the educating establishment can get a person a job which matches the leaving pupil’s talents.

If the pupil passes (their abilities and of course behaviour are good in their Work Experience), will increase the chances of an employer in that profession employing them after they leave school. The Employment Dept. will be able to arrange with a relevant business to employ that school leaving pupil (or after they have attended University) if the pupil wishes it (an Act of Parliament will be established to make or induce businesses choose from a list of school leavers who have been identified by passing the exam, as being ideal for that businesses type of work). So if this works it will mean the right people will be in the right jobs and so productivity will be better in U.K. industry and business and in the State professions.

POLICY 9: Drama lessons to be merged into a Performing Arts lesson, so that Music, Singing and dance will also be taught by schools, alongside drama (1 subject per term). Drama will be required to be taught in primary schools.

POLICY 10: There will be 1 P.E./exercise lesson a week, in all secondary schools, replacing one of the sports lessons.

POLICY 11: School uniforms to be compulsory in all schools, regardless of religious dress for symbolic reasons, as to reinforce that everyone is equal regardless of religion. Makes it harder to conceal knives.

POLICY 12: Foreign languages to be taught in final years of primary schooling.

Proposed POLICY 13: For children who behave aggressively WHEN THEY HAVE NOT BEEN WRONGED and who are not bullying in class, will not be punished by a detention, but lose there lunch break and instead have some form of New Age type aggression release session. The F.P. are still investigating this New Age practise and hope to have a full understanding of this technique so to pilot it in schools. The problem with the New Age is that they view criticism as anger which it is not, so obviously critical children would NOT be allowed to undergo such a session as they don’t need it. Those who do would be the one’s who have a ‘lower boiling point’. The Human race are an animal species which have shed most of their animalistic behaviour, but some people have difficulty controlling theirs, so may need to release it, (like a saucepan on a cooker bubbling away quietly most of the time, but has a limit where it boils over. Some peoples limit in boiling over their aggression is lower than others because every body is different to every body else). It would be piloted in some Secondary Schools and if it works extended to all secondary schools and such sessions could be forced on adults like rioting football fans.

POLICY 14: University and college students will be able to apply for grants for practicable courses, (e.g. plumbing NOT drama).

POLICY 15: Citizenship Classes to be binned.

POLICY 16: Dormitory’s for children to be outlawed in all establishments in Britain (e.g. boarding schools and New Age communes).

POLICY 17: Psychobabble (mistakenly referred to by others as “political correctness”) rubbish, (e.g. children conditioned how to “feel” about themselves) to be obliterated in all schools. Instead children to be taught knowledge in the pre-1960’s manner.

POLICY 18: All schools to have allotments so to teach children how to be self-sufficient.

POLICY 19: British Cultural lessons will be introduced, so to teach British values established by such events as the Magna Carta of 1215; the civil war of the 16th century; the 1682 Bill of Rights; the Reform Act of 1832 and the Peterloo massacre of 1819; abolition of slavery in1833; House of Lords first reform of 1911; the suffragette movement.

Plus these lessons will be about Cornish, English, Irish, Manx, Scottish and Welsh legends and folk hero’s. In addition, British, Inventions, Arts (e.g. Morris Dancing, Stick Fighting (for older pupils who have good behaviour), Folk Music and architecture.

POLICY 20: The new secondary school week will consist of 4 and a half days, leaving the second half of the 5th day set aside for pupils to work on an activity of their choosing which will directly help them achieve their career ambition.

BRITAIN WILL BE BEHIND THE EVER INCREASING ECONOMY OF CHINA SOON, UNLESS SOMETHING IS DONE TO IMPROVE BRITAINS WORK OUTPUT.

Policy 21: The introduction of the status of Semi Adult for those aged 16 to 18 will be introduced, requiring this age group to attend school sixth forms or colleges for half the school week during which they will receive lessons in all aspects of adult life. See the constitution section for more details on semi adult status.

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Policy: Judges & Juries To Be Punished: When a Judge or/and Jury rules against Paul O’Callaghan (as Judges/Juries always rule for Drs due to prejudsices) in anyway, despite the immense evidence he has, it will prove Judges are institutionalized in their bias, legitimising us having a policy to hang all Judges and magistrates. Under C.S.P. a judge/jury can be punished if the verdict is based on prejudice, (if the verdict is opposite to that which the evidence points to).

SECTION 5:TRANSPORT & ENVIRONMENT POLICIES

Environment, Transport, Immigration & Energy (Green Issues) are intertwined

The world faces 2 environmental disasters: One of them is well known, pollution destroying the ozone layer, warming up the earth.

However the second is the Peak Oil issue, which is also helping cause the first disaster.

Peak Oil is the moment when oil starts to be supplied according to how much oil is available, rather than how much the human race want, (as has been the case before the Peak Oil moment).

Not only is Peak Oil dictated by how much oil can be refined for use, but also by the actual action of refining oil, as the world does not have enough capacity to convert the heavier types of crude oil into the middle distillates. Obviously increasing the oil refineries will not solve the Peak Oil problem or the environment, so the debate on refineries is about the short term.

Obviously oil, powers people’s car’s (as diesel), people’s foreign holidays by plane, and for heating. Britain’s lorries haul food from farms and ports, to supermarkets. Without oil, all this would grind to a halt, (thanks to people’s attitudes and Dr. Beeching closing most of Britain’s railways).

Approximately for every six barrels of oil a day consumed, only the equivalent of 1 barrel is discovered. Since 2000, 7 million barrels a day are consumed by the world population. China was once self-sufficient in oil, but due to it’s growing economy. According to 1 report, dealing with the Peak Oil crisis will take 10 to 20 years in preparing for, but some people claim the point of Peak Oil has been passed or is immanent.

When oil becomes scarce (or even just a little less available than today), everyday British life for the majority (Working Class) people will be affected.

The B.U.C. P. propose to prepare Britain for this with various policies, but all geared up to create a Britain of self-sufficient eco-residencies, serving themselves and others.

The number of British farms will need to increase as will Hot Houses for fruits, and allotments will need to be massively increased. The transport system (particularly railways) will need to be increased to replace the lorry haulage industry, (at least to restrict lorries for short distances between a station and the town it serves). The Wensleydale community Railway in North Yorkshire, could be the pilot for this.

All schools will need to teach children how to grow their own vegetables, cultivating the land. Houses will have to be constructed to be more energy sufficient, whilst being able to keep out noise. Immigration will need to be reduced, (regardless of where immigrants come from) over time. Britain needs to produce more goods FOR Britain so to stop relying on countries abroad for two reasons: 1. the transfer of goods from abroad are transported using a lot of oil. 2. When the Peak Oil crisis happens many countries will be producing goods for themselves, (those who can’t Britain will help, providing we are prepared for the Peak oil crisis in time so we can help other nations).

Basically we Chartists intend to heave British society’s dependence on oil, over to self-sufficiency here. Without oil, Britain’s method of supplying food would fall apart. In 2000, the farmers strikes led by Farmers For Action, caused lorries with food to be unable to deliver their food. Next time it will be because of a lack of oil.

Turning towns, villages and city suburbs (the big challenge for any eco-campaigner) into self-sufficient eco-communities is not to turn them into self serving only phifdoms, but as a confederation of communities helping both themselves and each other out. Some could specialise on the side, in producing food, which could only be grown in warmer parts of Britain, and then transported by train, to colder parts of Britain. This could be experimented with today, if a permaculture community in say Cornwall, were to grow such food and transport it to say a permaculture community in Scotland.

These new self-sufficient eco-communities we are talking about would share wind, solar and (by the coast) wave power sources. There would be a National Renewable Energy Source. Once a full, safe, public railway system is in place, people will be able to leave their car at home, (unless they live some where really remote). The bus services across Britain need to be massively improved (and replaced by electric buses). Primary and secondary schools will need to be increased, but reduced in size so to create an ACTUAL (not “sense of” which is a psychobabble term for illusion) experience of community, as well as saving oil on a school run.

One major policy idea is to complement every petrol station with the facilities to charge up electric cars, (this policy is still on the drawing board).

Because everybody is a unique individual some people do not like each other, usually due to one of them holding a prejudice against the other or due to the other person’s arrogance. Some disputes are about disagreements. Some of the activities of permaculture and New Age communities (once any psychology has been ripped out and replaced with it’s opposite, common sense) would be useful in helping people work together who don’t like each other, at least to the extent where they could tolerate each other.

The planned Unicorn Retreat Centre and Residency is to be based on the almshouses behind the church at Cobham, Kent: Having a communal main building (like most New Age retreat centres have) with almshouses built on to it to form a square court yard. Thus a communal lifestyle is created, but still with people having their own homes for privacy.

This is what we propose on a grander scale for villages, towns and suburbs in a similar way: people still living in their homes and having their careers, but would help each other out on food growing/cultivation, running Hot houses and share local renewable energy, as well as manage local buses or community railways so the transport operates when it suits the community.

The spirituality of Common Sense Philosophy, points out we are all at One with each other between lives which explains how people can live in a community. It also explains that life is about being individuals so to achieve our purpose(s) in life, hence the need to live life as individuals/not wanting to live as a community all the time. So the B.U.P. proposal for living as a community for creating the necessities to live on, but still retaining our individuality for the rest of the time, will be accepted by the people.

If the British people can be made PROUD of making such a cultural shift then they will be more likely to not wait for another nation to make the upheaval first.

British Unicorn is not a party of wishy washy Green’s. We know the down side will be other countries, who have not opted for self-sufficiency in time and see Britain not suffering like they are, may decide to blackmail the British people into giving what the other country wants, or may even invade.

This is why we can’t rely on our energy resources from abroad for such things as gas. If one country has got plenty of gas reserves but is not self-sufficient in any other way, yet Britain relies on the said country for gas, then the latter could make unreasonable demands in return for it’s gas. Look at what happened to the Ukraine when it had it’s dispute with Russia who had gas reserves. If Britain was faced with such blackmail, it could force people to return to oil to use to improvise generating electricity.

Hence why Britain needs a good defence policy for environmental reasons, so it doesn’t get dragged into any more energy wars (which has already happened in Iraq, criminally).

Some eco-campaigners have quite rightly warned that if Britain was not self-sufficient by the time the oil crisis hits, permaculture residencies could be attacked, robbed of their food and energy facilities, by local people from villages and towns. So such eco-campaigners have stated that permacultural settlements should help the local villages and towns so that when the oil crisis happens, local villagers and towns people will protect the permacuture settlements.

This is a mini version of what Britain should do before and when the peak oil crisis hits, in relation to other countries.

Britain, as an island nation, should be leading the way in renewable energy equipment production, not the Scandinavians or the Germans.

Could one imagine not just towns like New Age, eco aware Totnes based on the Findhorn settlement, but suburbs of London like New Eltham, (which still has an allotment to start with) or even Downham council estate, near Catford, Once Totnes is done, eco-campaigners should move on to these places and others, to the poorer Working Class areas.

Like the Lynton & Barnstaple Railway was, New Eltham’s self-sufficiency is “not dead, but merely sleepeth” awaiting to be awoken.

So the B.U.C. P. Environmental policies encompass: Education,, Energy, Immigration, Transport, Defence and Foreign Affairs, and of course Environment. Even our5 Independent health centre’s for the medically neglected, will be powered by renewable power.

Policy 1. All chicken farms to be free range, (imports banned).

Policy 2: Reopening of trunk railways;

Policy 3: Airline fuel taxed;

Policy 4: Sunday closing reintroduced;

Policy 5:UK to be self sufficient in energy (so can’t be blackmailed by foreign powers) and food production, so regenerating poverty areas, and help individuals produce their own food/ energy.

Policy 6: New schools (teaching of self food production) and homes built with allotments. Policy 7: Energy to be environmentally friendly, all homes built on Brown Field sites with sound proof materials.

Policy 8: 1 car and 1 van per city home. Policy 9:Green Energy Pass for people to pay less tax if they 80% recycle and use public transport.

Policy 9: Councils to have Eco villages.

Policy 10: Yurts to be able to be constructed without council/planning permission.

Policy 11: Annual race of environmentally friendly vehicles between Woolwich and Newhaven ferries to promote such transport.

POLICY 12: To establish, within 20 years of election 80% of all electricity to emanate from wind, solar and wave power (so the need for electricity from France ceases).

POLICY 13: All blood sports outlawed.

POLICY 14:Railways to be: made as safe as possible; re-nationalised, bringing back British Rail. Each region would be marketed just like the old Network SouthEast region was (which will be brought back for the south East region).

POLICY 15: Closed ex-railway ‘Trunk’ routes reopened with freight facilities:

A). Oakhampton To Bude

B). Reconnect the City of Wells

C). Builth Road to Newtown via Rhayder, and Afonwen to Bangor via Caernarvon (so the Welsh can travel from North to South and vise-versa, by train without having to go into England (as is also required in written constitution)

D). Douglas To Peel

E). Shanklin To Ventnor.

POLICY 16: Railways To Be Reopened Where A Heritage Railway Exists By Extending It (Giving the heritage railway use of the reopened line/the extension at Weekends and Bank Holidays, in return for allowing B.R. trains over their heritage lines in weekdays).

Witham To Glastonbury (a major international tourist town) via Shepton Mallet and City of Wells, (East Somerset Railway).
Uckfield To Lewes (making use of the Lavender Line).
Cheltenham To Stratford Upon Avon (making use of the G. & W.R.)
Holt –Melton Constable – Fakenham –Dereham and Wells Next The Sea (North Norfolk, Mid-Norfolk and Wells & Walsingham railways).
Boscarne Junction-Wadebridge-Padstow (Bodmin Steam Railway).
Matlock To Buxton (Peak Rail).
Louth To Grimsby (Lincolnshire To Wolds Railway).
Penrith To Keswick.
Barnstaple- Bideford (Bideford To Instow Group)
Oswestry-Gobewn (Cambrian railway groups)
Lewes-Uckfield (Lavender Line)
POLICY 17: Railways To Be Considered For Re openings: Bridport-Maiden Newton; Bala – Corwen

; St. Ives (Cambrigeshire); Rhyl – Denbeigh; Pen-y-ffopqd – Mold; Dunfries –Stranraer.

POLICY18: Freight Lines To Be Reopened To Passenger Services: Appledore – Lydd (a service from Lydd through to Ashford) and from Hoo Junction to Grain and a rebuilt Allhallows branch for through service to Gravesend and London.

POLICY 19: In urban areas more light rail schemes introduced with at least 2 security guards on each tram.

POLICY 20: AFTER the above rail plans have been introduced, all those living in URBAN areas, will be restricted to 2 vehicles per house/flat hold, so to reduce pollution.

POLICY 21: All road building to cease (except for by-passes of towns WHEN they are required to make towns safer).

POLICY 22: All house building on green filed sites to be banned.

POLICY 23: To save the countryside disappearing and people being squeezed to live too close together in existing buildings and on Brown Field sites, immigrants to the U.K. from ANYWHERE in the world, will be banned from living in the South East, Midlands or North of England, as these regions are just too densely populated and driving voters into the arms of racist parties. Therefore, to keep immigration going, but reduce the threat of racist party victories, immigrants will be directed to live in the other regions: Westcountry, Anglia and the National regions of Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. When these areas can no longer take house building/recycling, then immigration will be banned.

POLICY 24: New river barriers for the Thames and Severn

POLICY 25: Further funding for countryside bus routes

POLICY 26: All experiments on animals to cease, their perpetrators and their protectors punished.

POLICY 27: Recycling rubbish collection to be a service mandatory of all councils to provide, so that recycling can be made mandatory.

POLICY 28: All homes are provided with eco-friendly condenser boilers.

POLICY 29: All new homes and offices being built to have their own solar or/and miniature wind turbines to generate electricity.

POLICY 30: When a railway is closed, railway preservationists will be given the first opportunity to buy the line within a 2 year time limit. Thereafter, the Sustrans organisation will have the right to buy it before anybody else.

POLICY 31: Ways of reducing noise pollution will be undertaken, particularly by aircraft. Various specific policies are being considered and will be added to this Manifesto in an Update attached sheet, (e.g. all new houses having to be built with solid materials which keep out droning noises; Airplanes to be fuel taxed).

POLICY 32: Only by-passes for the safety of villages and towns will be built. Not for economical reasons;

POLICY 33: Public transport increased/ made safe, before urban homes are taxed for having a 2nd car.

POLICY 34: Britain will be self-sufficient in energy needs by becoming the lead country in Green Energy, (so UK can NOT be blackmailed by foreign countries).

POLICY 35: New homes will: NOT be built of concrete/glass, walls will be sound proofed, have solar panels/mini-wind turbines with water recycling facilities and community allotments (community interaction, using common sense NOT psychology, encouraged so economic resources like allotment tendering, can be shared).

POLICY 36: Funds from reduced Monarchy to fund mini-wind turbines for the poorest homes.

POLICY 37: Water renationalised (everyone has a right to live/ have water and have it provided).

POLICY 38: Airline fuel to be taxed. Regions will have a minister for these Green issues so problems can be solved.

POLICY 39: Anyone going Green (recycling/using public transport) will have a Green Energy Pass so to pay less tax.

POLICY40: Planning permission to erect mini-wind turbines on unlisted houses and on free standing poles in centre and back of gardens, will cease to require planning permission.

POLICY 41: A new reservoir and a new water link (using aqueducts) proposed in the 170’s to supply water from the Wales to the south east of England, will be put into operation.

POLICY 42: Airline Fuel to be taxed, to help pay for environmental policies.

POLICY 43: All new housing estates and where possible, existing ones will have allotments installed for communities to run.

POLICY 44: A new Green Energy Pass will be introduced whereby for recycling rubbish, using renewable energy, using public transport etc, people will gain points on their Pass in order to pay less tax.

Policy 46: Gluten in foods will be outlawed.

POLICY 45: Legislation will be introduced making it easier for permaculture/ecovillage settlements to establish themselves, in particular regard to buildings and renewable energy. Rather than allow councils to block or drag on for years planning permission for such aspects of said seettlements, every borough/district council will be required to establish a permaculture etc settlements in their area, which will help encourage the area’s population to go Green and help the area prepare for the Peak oil crisis.

POLICY 46: Central Government funding for established/operating heritage railways whom lack a rail link to the national network/Network Rail and wish to re-establish such a link. The Govt would fund half the required finances of such links provided the heritage railway link is no more than 5 miles long, at least one town is already served by the heritage railway, the nearest national network station to the town is over 5 miles away, and the heritage railway will allow a national operator to operate a passenger train service at peak times every hour along the heritage railway to the nearest town on the national network.

Examples of railways which would qualify: Llangollen Railway missing link between Llangollen and Ruabon, in return for allowing a national train operator to operate between Wrexham, Ruabon, Llangollen and Corwen.

Another example: The Kent & East Sussex Railway missing link between Bodiam and Robertsbridge, in return for a national operator operating trains between Hastings, Battle, Northiam and Tenterden.

Railways which would not qualify: Great Central as it’s towns are served by the Midland Mainline of National Network.

SECTION 6: ECONOMY & BUSINESS POLICIES:

POLICY 1: Adults to be offered Basic Contemplation Groups so they can discover any neglected talents and be helped by the Dept. Of education & Employment to find a job matching their talents, regardless of their Social Class. Thereby improving Britain’s output.

POLICY 2: A ban on jobs going abroad which provide services to British people (e.g. Bank enquiry services).

POLICY 3: Financial support will be injected into those businesses starting up or having difficulties which make Britain more self-sufficient in manufacturing.

POLICY 4: Pound Sterling to be retained using Bradbury Pound (National Credit) status.

POLICY 5: A state tax will be created to pay for state services (e.g. health, policing) whilst a separate council tax will be created which parts tax payers would only pay for if they used them (e.g. up keep of roads, pavements) and those council projects they agree with (e.g. projects for youths), as currently a person has to pay tax towards council projects which are failing (e.g. in Bromley, Cray Youth Radio).

More economic policies to follow;

POLICY 6: Currently the B.U.C.P. lacks a policy for pensions, however a discussion paper, Peoples Thinking for the 21st Century by The New Economics Foundation, offers ideas upon what a policy could be based upon. Stand by for a policy on this.

Half of the British Unicorn Charter Party policies can be funded by redirecting funds from daft/useless existing Government schemes. An economic blueprint to fund the other half of the policies will be ready by next General Election.

SECTION 7:SOCIAL AFFAIRS POLICIES

UPDATE 2015: This Manifesto was produced prior to our leader, Paul O’callaghann being found guilty of harassment and conveying a malicious message for HAVING and promoting policies in the average way of all Parties, and then (because he co-authored a commissioned Public Report exposing using LOTS OF EVIDENCE that psychology and psychiatry were not sciences and used to cover up medical negligence and surpressing freedom of thought and speech, the psychiatreist the Judge ordered assess him, objected to the Report’s findings and recommended Paul be locked up for a year in a mental clinic and pumped with anti psychotic drugs torturing him to death).

In other words our Leader is to be committed to an asylum to surppress our political party policies and the findings of a Public Report into the Courts and psychobabblists.

NEW POLICY 1). In these extreme circumstances, Party members have concluded that this policy must be pursued: Any psychiatrist or Judge who covers up medical negligence or surppresses freedom of thought or speech, will be execucted by hanging with piano wire, unless they beg publicy for forgiveness and if not will have been deemed to have lost their selfd-preservation instinct so are insane so canot make judgements. They will then be placed under section until they regain their self-preserervation instinct. .

NEW POLICY 2). Secondly anyone who is imprisoned for killing a Judge or psychiatrist for committing the above acts, will be FORGIVEN by being released from prison and compensated.

Please refer to the Public Report ‘Health Charter’ for the case of Sophia Mirza, tortured and killed by psychiatrist.

POLICY 3: All forms of psychobabble (psychology, psychiatry, psycho analysis, psychotherapy, counselling and Agony Aunt columns) will be outlawed

POLICY 4: Common Sense Philosophy will replace all forms of psychobabble where the latter exists today in society, (Experts in Common Sense will replace Psychiatrists and both Basic and Spiritual Contemplation Groups will replace the other forms of psychobabble).

After our Health policies, our next priority policies are regarding the infestation of society of psychobabble. Time and again, psychology and psychiatry have been used to inflict and cover up medical negligence.

This is not surprising as the Mental Health Act 1983, fails to define mental illness. Psychiatry is a false science, as it is based on the opinions of psychiatrists and the false science founders. There is nothing which can be checked in a real manner, (there are NO facts to anchor their conclusions to).

For just using psychology and psychiatry to commit medical negligence, justifies both being outlawed.

Meanwhile, psychology has infected all areas of life, people becoming psychologists coming from all walks of life,. Clinical psychology is closing in on Chemistry for the place of having the biggest PhD’s in any subject and has become very popular at A Level.

Psychologists, and persons with psychology degrees but not working as psychologists, can be found in health, education, business, sports, journalism, politics… they’re everywhere.

Both these main forms of psychobabble (along with the other 3 psychobabbles to a lesser extent) have been one of the 2 main causes of suffering in British society since 1945, (the other cause being the centuries old one of Social Class). In 1941, there were only just over 800 members of the British Psychological Society. This rose to 20,000 in the mid-1990’s (when psychobabble in medical negligence took off noticeably), no doubt due to the events in the 1970’s when a lot of those who became psychobabblists then and were Left wing, were guilt ridden for failing to improve society (as they saw it) at the end of the 1960’s. In 2006, there were over 33,000 members.

Psychobabble is used to condition people into behaving in a set manner the Authorities and their servants demand people to be, (be like Sheep).

In 1996, our co-founder, Paul O’Callaghan, realized that psychobabble had to be destroyed, but it could not be done until a replacement was found for dealing with such people as the real mentally ill (some people psychobabblists class as mental are not, and others are mental but classed as sane!!!).

In 2003, he realized that common sense was not just the opposite of psychology (and in practise all forms of psychobabble) but that it could be CLARIFIED as a working, practical, philosophy.

The only psychologists who could make the transition to common sense are in the Netherlands and linked to the Osho Movement. There’s psychology movement in Britain.

The rest are beyond hope, because common sense is about learning about people/life through experience, whilst psychology is about learning about people/life through study.

Hence why psychobabblists are beyond help.

REMEMBER: COMMON SENSE KILLS PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHIATRY, DEAD!

The justification for the policies is Social Affairs:

CAMPAIGN TO DESTROY THE NEW NAZISM: PSYCHOBABBLE

By Paul O’Callaghan

This document is the background on which this campaign is based, giving various examples of events that have been recorded. It proves that psychobabble is a threat to the rights of the individual and society at large. It will however prove that the aims of psychobabble and the philosophy which can obliterate psychobabble. This document is based on reports in SAD Times (UK’s only medical negligence news journal) and the 1999 public report; Enlightenment of the Doctor, by the Society Against Do-Gooders (renamed Patients First in 2002).

Since the 1970’s, psychologists have been stating that people will behave in a specific manner depending on whether they have siblings, and if so, where they come in the sibling age line up. Whilst “Middle Children” are classed as “rebellious” (!), an Only Child is classed as “attention seeking” and “selfish”. Well I can state (as many others would agree) that until 2004 (when I was forced to launch my campaign for treatment after 10 years of negligence) I shunned the limelight and have always been concerned and wanting to help others. The psychologists latest delusion of Middle Child Syndrome, would be funny if it was not so serious, because, as my case proves, doctors use this deluded fantasy of psychologists to misdiagnose patients, (discrimination).

In my case the doctors have IGNORED the visible abnormalities (as well as other physical symptoms obviously caused by balance organ damage), and instead, after FIRST establishing I had “no siblings”, they refused to listen to any further symptoms. This went on for 2 years, until after Howlett. Subsequent doctors have realized their predecessor’s negligence has massive implications for doctors (e.g. that they discriminate) so have continued the negligence.

It’s common sense (the opposite of psychology) that if a patient has visible, physical symptoms, then they have a physically caused illness. My case alone proves that doctors are infected, dangerously, with psychology, using that to misdiagnose patients instead of using visible symptoms to diagnose.

It’s enough evidence to justify the criminalisation of the practise of psychology, which is exactly what the B.U.P. will do.

Common Sense kills psychology, dead.

INTRODUCTION

Psychobabblists, psychologists, psychiatrists, psychoanalysts, psychotherapists, councillors and agony aunts have spread through British society like a disease, their psychobabble infecting every aspect of society: health and education services, parenting, business, media, policing, politics and judiciary. Even their psychobabble language is now used by the public in everyday speech! This insidious take over since the 1960’s is responsible for the immoral and insane laws in Britain which causes innocent people to suffer.

During this feature, reference will be made to Social Class, as this DOES effect peoples ability and how others treat them but is one thing the psychobabblists will NOT tackle. One can not improve society without tackling social class.

This campaign’s objectives are:

Destroy/ outlaw psychology, psychoanalysis, psychotherapy and counselling.
Replace all of the above with common sense philosophy.
Abolish current (psychobabble) psychiatry.
Replace current (psychobabble) psychiatry with common sense based psychiatry.
To have all psychobabblists locked up, until they are cleansed of psychobabble, by the government.

Psychobabble is an idiots way to power and status (not that psychobabblists are all the same kind of idiot) so they can manipulate other people’s lives (both directly to an individual and/or our society generally). They require constant justification for their existence, coming up with ever more deluded ideas for why they’re required and can increase in number. They don’t need to do very much real work to achieve their power and status, because psychobabble is based on study not experience. Psychobabble was one of the two most popular college/university courses around in 2002/2003. Those in authority allow psychobabble to increase in society as well as just exist, because psychobabblists are useful tools with which authorities can condition and manipulate society, so keeping them subdued into accepting the authorities desires…. There is currently a theory that the dumbing down of society, is not natural/ accidental due to the clear involvement of psychobabble in the dumbing of down society and the formers links to authority. Frightening isn’t it!

When people come into direct clear contact with psychobabble it’s usually when one of these 2 objectives of the psychobabble:

To explain away events/ facts that scientists can’t explain the cause ( to cover up the current limits of science).
To explain away physical medical problems doctors can’t/won’t explain so to cover up their negligence/prejudices.

Other ways people come into contact with psychobabble are less clear but will be explained latter, after dealing with the second point; doctors, physical illness and psychobabble.

PART 1 : DOCTORS, PHYSICAL ILLNESS & PSYCHOBABBLE

First and foremost, here is where psychobabble poses the greatest threat: where doctors refuse to recognise a patients obviously physically caused physical symptoms, instead claiming the symptoms are psychological.

CASE 1

The boy in this first case was suffering from a physical disease. However, his G.P. arrived at his home with a social worker and a court order to remove the boy to a “place of safety”. An ambulance then arrived and took him to the local hospital for six months.

His illness had rendered him helpless so the doctors, who refused to recognise his disease, inflicted psychobabble treatment on him: This involved turning the boy upside down (when he was lying down) so he would have to force himself to turn over in order to breath (sadistic), put him in a swimming pool (of course he’d sink) and on a ghost train ride to try to make him jump with shock. They even put him in a standing frame (he was in a wheelchair normally) so to straighten his legs. On one occasion they left him like this so long, he collapsed. A psychologist and a social worker went along with the doctors misdiagnosis, asking the boy if he was on his (psychologists) “side”(agreeing with the psychologist and doctors misdiagnosis)!

This is just one of many examples of a doctors “place of safety” which really means a place where doctors can safely torture their victims, with support from a judge (judges never punish doctors for negligence). Judges always love doctors and psychobablists -(see Patient’s Lack of Rights document).

CASE 2

In 1996 another boy fell ill with a disease that the doctors refused to recognise was physical. The consultant brought in a psychiatrist who advised the boy should receive psychiatric treatment. This treatment the psychiatrist liked to inflict was supposed to stop their child victim supposedly “dwelling” on their symptoms by forcing the child to be more active. Of course there was no improvement (as he was physically ill). The fact the boy was not psychiatrically ill did not serve the psychiatrists purposes. The boy could not see, move or feed himself. After the so-called treatment he was being tube-fed at the local hospital.

However the deranged doctors wanted the boy to attend a unit at a certain world famous children’s hospital, to undergo the same so-called treatment. His parents visited the unit in advance and were horrified at it, so sought a second opinion.

As in Case 1, the doctors were so desperate to ill treat the child that they got a doctor loving judge(s) who, after a six month legal battle, ruled in favour of/obeyed the doctors, granting a court order for the boy to be removed from his parents care, for compulsory psychiatric treatment in the hands of the disturbed doctors. This order of court was made despite the boy achieving the age of 16, so legally he was an adult.

The judge ruled the boy could only be referred to as “Child X”.

The parents fled with their son to Europe. The police (obeying doctors/ Dr. loving judges as usual) alerted Interpol! The boy’s father returned to Britain (why is still unknown) and was arrested for contempt of court and was told the boy must be returned by the end of the week. The boy’s mother returned with him. At dawn next day the police raided his home, snatched the boy away to this world famous, supposedly caring hospital.

Whilst at the hospital psychiatric ward he told another patient how both doctors and nurses were not listening to him (nurses are trained in psychology and sociology before learning how to do a drip feed. The nurses thought the boy’s disability was him being awkward.

A psychiatrist visits his/her patient/victim once a week as part of a Team, (which can consist of over a dozen people) who are involved in the patient/victim’s case, to ascertain if the latter is being subservient. Anyone in this Team, can ask very personal questions, (including about libido!).

He had entered the hospital able to walk but whilst there was made so physically ill, he was reduced to a zimmer frame, his chin on the bar and ankles scrapping on the floor. To add insult to injury a doctor asked the boy, if he knew how much his bed was costing and staff even threatened to take him into the city, which he could not physically cope with.

After 8 months of separation from his parents, the parents won/ regained ward ship of the boy. Court restrictions on the boy and his family, continued to prevent identification, despite him being 17.

Yet another case proving doctors use psychobabble to treat a physically ill person and gain support from psychiatrists and the courts.

It’s because of cases like these that Patients First propose to use their future retreat centre to protect such doctors victims on the run from the doctors.

CASE 4

Staying with this “beloved hospital”; A six year old girl attended the hospital. Her medical consultant had not accepted the parents “worries” about their daughter who had been suffering breathlessness and fatigue. The consultant told the parents they were “imagining” their daughter’s problems and “should seek counselling or psychiatric treatment”!!!

It was eventually identified that the girl had a congenital heart defect. The consultant decided to operate by a risky method of using a balloon catheter to clear a blockage in the girl’s heart. The parents refused to give their consent, but the consultant went ahead anyway, despite the parents being reassured the operation would not be done using the risky method. The girl died the next day……

The coroner recorded a verdict of misadventure, saying the consultants actions were “unwise” and “erroneous”. The GMC in 1998 did not strike the consultant doctor off (as is usual for most cases), giving the consultant a six month suspension that the family proposed to the hospital.

This case is featured here to prove the point that doctors tell people to have “counselling/ psychiatric treatment” when it’s physical treatment which is required.

This ‘first insult then injure/kill’ doctor was one of 4 doctors exclusively linked (by the SAD Times editor/author of this document) at the same hospital who were accused by a the father of a boy they operated on, of “murdering” his son. The father tried photographing these doctors for his poster campaign advertising what they had done. The courts and judges went after the father for this.

Doctors don’t only accuse parents of imaging their childs symptoms but the patient child as well. One 10 year old boy was branded “attention seeking” by doctors instead of in identifying sooner a tumour in his leg. Of course he died. His mother said she had been treated like a “neurotic”.

CASE 5

In another case, a girl had a disease (causing pains in her arms and legs) which the doctors refused to recognise, claiming the fatigue she suffered was due to “depression” and they recommended psychiatric exercises as treatment!!!

Like the boy in case 3, she went into hospital walking, but came out disabled (in a wheelchair). In May/June of 1998 the doctors recommended more of this treatment despite it being shown to make her more ill.

Her mother said no, so these callous doctors (as usual) took the following bullying course of action; launch child protection proceedings so the girl could be subjected to their treatment. A legal battle ensued. An NHS consultant recognised the girls disease, so the child was allowed to remain with her mother. Note courts always believe the doctor over the parent and child. Sinister.

In the next 2 cases both girls already had recognised physical health problems, but they were still subjected to psychobabble.

CASE 6

At 10 years old a girl kept on suffering (recognised) Chicken Pox. Eventually the pox made her so ill that walking 5 yards was impossible for 8 months. Then she recovered.

At 12 she caught Glandula Fever rendering her so ill in bed for months that she was in terrible pain. Her legs began going numb. She then attended a children’s hospital. She had no appetite and became dehydrated, having to be fed by a tube.

At one point she became blind, paralysed from the waist down and both hand and feet would “claw up”. Her sight returned six months later, after being taken off a certain course of orthodox (drugs) medicine…

The doctor’s, nurses and physiotherapists kept telling her that her illness was all in the mind (psychological).

A male psychiatrist and physiotherapists stripped her down to her underwear and put her, paralysed (except for her right arm with which tried to defend herself) into a swimming pool.

She recounted how she sunk to the bottom of the pool looking up whilst the doctor and physio just looked on. Her mother came in, saw what was happening and jumped in to save her daughter from drowning. Neither health worker was charged with anything, let alone attempted murder. If they had been a patient or parent hitting a negligent doctor once, then they would have got a 12 month prison sentence, proving there is something wrong with our Police and Judges.

When her case was last reported she was having 220 to 230 fits a day and hearing and skin were hypersensitive. Tests showed up a large tumour above her right temporal lobe but later scans were reported as not showing it.

This was a case that the NSPCC had said that if it happened then such cases had nothing to do with them. Television personality; Ester Rantzen commented on these methods on children were as if “to shock them out of their paralysis using methods used in the medieval days to punish witches”.

Case 7

The other girl to suffer at the hands of doctors had had a brain tumour removed at 12 years of age (guess where)…a certain world famous children’s hospital. Again the same psychiatrist was involved in her case as in Case 3, after the girl developed a number of viral infections that led to a disease. So the hospital proposed the girl attended the same psychiatric unit as the boy in Case3. The parents complied thinking it was a rehabilitation programme. Her health of course worsened at the hospital. She was to stay there for a further 4 months, but the parents refused and withdrew their daughter, sending her to a local hospital (ignoring the doctors protests at her withdrawal). The G.P. said that if the girl had remained at the famous hospital she would not have recovered.

What’s odd about this case is that the doctors did not try to remove the daughter from her parents and that this case received a lot of publicity. Why? Of course it couldn’t have anything to do with the parents being ‘posh’, the mother an author and ex billionaire, could it?

Case 8

Mr. Charles Cawood saved 2 children from being killed by a run away horse and cart. However as he did so, he was kicked in the head by the horse, causing brain damage.

Instead of being treated as a HERO and treated for the physical damage to his head, causing deafness, he was not only medically neglected (the hospital just discharged him), but placed in the mental institution, Cane Hill, Croydon, because he didn’t know the names of the Royal Family! He repeatedly begged to be released from there, which he was horrifically caged in for many years. His adult children say they tried. When he was released he obviously was unable to go to work, suffering absolute proper poverty, losing his tiny home (2 rooms above a shop, with dangerous steps leading up to it), Lewisham/L.C.C. Council never housing them. So in his final years he and his wife had to live with their son and daughters, but separate from each other as none of their children could house them together. He died separated from his wife. Yes he was kicked in the head in the 1930’s and died in the 1960’s when the welfare state existed (so could have housed him), but these other cases prove psychobabblists and medical doctors haven’t changed…

*****A HERO WHO HAS NEVER BEEN HONOURED.

The final example ( dubbed by the courts, “Case B”) is another patient who’s identity has been hushed up (no doubt so the doctors can’t be identified):

CASE 9

A 13 year old boy was diagnosed with a disease and a specialist said he should stay at home to get better. The local doctor disagreed, saying the boy should go into hospital for intensive “treatment”.

The parents said no, and again the doctors fought through the courts to snatch the boy. They unusually failed. His mother said “the professionals seem to embark on a way of imposing their views and don’t give any thought at all to the families”. This quote could be applied to all these cases.

In the First World War, at a North Sea battle an admiral commented “There’s something wrong with our bloody ships”.

Well there is something wrong with our bloody doctors.

Part 2: How Psychobabble Has Dangerously Taken Over Society

If a victim of doctors or psychobabblists like those in the above cases said they were being “persecuted” this would be treated as another sign of supposed mental illness: Conveniently for doctors “feeling persecuted” claims are officially classed as a sign of depression. How convenient for psychobabblists and doctors to give themselves this protection.
—————————————————————————————————————————————-

Doctors brand victims of negligence who’s physical illness keeps them at home “depressed”. If such victims have children, the doctors can have the children removed from their parent/victim such is the power of doctors aided by judges who all love doctors as totally faultless people.
The doctors use also the following factors caused by physical illnesses they’re neglecting in a patient, to say that patient is mental:

“losing interest in usual hobbies and activities including in sex”; “poor concentration; losing appetite or weight; feeling tired; giddiness; and/or fainting; headaches; sweating; fast heart beat and taking short quick breaths distressed; suffering aches and pains; lack of co ordination”.

The source for this information comes from “mental Illness. The Health of The Nation series of booklets and “Mental Health Towards A Better Understanding”, both by the Department Of Health, 1999.

So when a Dr. dislikes a patient so will not treat them or have to cover up a colleagues negligence (or their own incompetence) and the patient has 1 or more of the symptoms just listed, caused by a physical illness, then the Dr. will use the symptom to brand the patient as mental.

The booklets state that to combat mental illness one should “keep physically active and involved with other people”. Just like the psychobabblists were inflicting on patients in Part 1….

—————————————————————————————————————————————

Doctors and psychobabblists can detain you/cover up their negligencewithout your consent for up to 72
hours during which time you can receive their side effecting drugs.

Many tribunals of any kind in the U.K. consist of fools looking for a little bit of power and status over others. So don’t expect the Mental Health Review Tribunal who, after holding you for 72 hours will review your case, to release you from your incarceration, (how else can so many physically ill children go on being held?).

A Dr. can also have you forcefully admitted to a ‘hospital’ with the approval of a social worker (these puppets of doctors never go against a doctors instructions and a case above confirms this). Police will be used to “transfer” you to a “place of safety” ( and you know what that means after reading Part 1). Under the Mental health Act Section 5 (2) the Dr. can then keep you in their hands, (even if you voluntarily went, obviously).

—————————————————————————————————————————————-

If you are a child too ill to go to school, you can be branded “school phobic” and be threatened with being taken away from your parents, so your parents have to carry you into school, (as happened to 1 boy).
—————————————————————————————————————————————–

A charity advises patients to write down their symptoms for a Dr. to help the Dr. Yet when you do this, as the charity says it’s O.K. to do so, the doctors will claim you are obsessed with your illness, so he can brand your illness as mental.
———————————————————————————————————————————————-

In 1999, Social Psychologists (there’s a type of psychobabblists for every part of society showing how much they influence society) carried out studies to make the ‘discovery’ that women complain more about their mother in laws than men. This is a classic case of psychobabblists trying to justify their existence, as such a report is not required in society.
———————————————————————————————————————————————

As the law stands a psychologist, psychiatrist and counsellor can continue to treat patients even when they’re struck off.
———————————————————————————————————————————————-

Doctors class a person being on/requiring sleeping tablets as a sign of mental illness, regardless of the fact that the person’s sleeping pattern is ruined byphysical ill health.
———————————————————————————————————————————————–

Police have locked up at least 1 known protestor to stop him going on a demonstration, by sectioning him, under the Mental Health Act for 3 days. He successfully sued. The Mental Health Act, does NOT define mental illness, allowing psychiatrists to define it how they deem fit, so it is open to abuse. It only takes 2 medical practitioners (doctors) and a social worker (puppets of doctors) to section someone. If their victim (i.e. a child with a physical illness) stands their ground stating they are not mentally ill, their correct self-diagnosis is regarded by the psychobabblists as evidence they are mentally ill, (a no win scenario). The farce that is a victim’s appeal, takes place at a Mental Health Review Tribunal. These consist of a psychiatrist (soprejudicing the out come); a powerless lay person (who could easily be influenced by the other 2); and a solicitor (solicitors, like Judges, like to respect other ‘professional’ Classes’ judgements).
———————————————————————————————————————————————-

Psychobabblists are now sayingthat children who play with the opposite sex and young boys who play with dolls, need sex lessons (destroying their child hood) and prepare them for a sex change in their teens. This is how perverted psychobabblists are.
———————————————————————————————————————————————-

At Oxford University there’s a Department Of Psychology where monkey’s are experimented (tortured) on.
———————————————————————————————————————————————-

A TV production company is even named Psychology News.
———————————————————————————————————————————————–

STRESS

The word “stress” though a word centuries old, was NOT used in the context it is used today generally until AFTER World War 2. The earliest psychobabblist to corrupt the word was R.Z. Lazarus. Modern stress research was led by Dr. Hans Selye who defined stress as being an organism non specific responses to demands placed upon it.

It is “stress” upon which many medical doctors base their negligence upon, claiming their victims’ physical illness is caused by stress (e.g. “A levels” causing stress when the patient is suffering a severe infection), a psychological condition/illness.

Stress in today’s context of the word covers: Physical illness; exhaustion; medically neglected illness; emotional strain; distress; mental illness and mental weakness.

So when a patient suffers from any of these, the Dr. does say the patient is “stressed” and therefore clarify the latter as mental, prescribing psychobabble treatment for a physical illness. Not uncommon….

In 2001 it was announced that everyone suffered from a mental illness at some point in their lives. Yet so many physically ill people are misdiagnosed as mental, it proves the 2001 claim is flawed.

Stress is claimed to be caused by anything, so whatever physical illness people may have the negligent Dr., looking for a reason to blame a patients physical illness without investigating it, on (because they don’t like the patient or just want an easy time) will have plenty of things to CHOOSE FROM, as at least one of the so-called causes of stress is practised by everybody. Stress is also used to dismiss witness accounts of events (authorities wanted covered up) by claiming the witnesses were “under stress”.

The fundamental belief is that: When a person is distressed they will experience fear or hate or another emotion, depending on the situation causing them the stress. These emotions will cause the person to tense their muscles or breath quicker/fast heart rate. The psychobabblists claim this increase in heart rate or tension will then cause not only physical illness, but an actual disease.!!!

This then means that negligent doctors can blame a patients physical illness on a stressful situation, so medically neglecting the real cause. Quite common. This is because, conveniently for the medical doctors, the tell tale symptoms of stress are also the same symptoms for physically caused illnesses. Co-incidence?

So for example, if a person is having breathing difficulties due to undiagnosed asthma, the Dr. (and other doctors who are protecting the first Dr.) will misdiagnose it as caused by stress and the patient goes away to die from an asthma attack. The Dr. will instead offer counselling or Cognitive Behavioural Therapy or even a psychiatrist to their victim instead of investigating the illness or trying medication. The doctors know they will get away with their actions because medical negligence is NOT a crime. If the victim is becomes angry or their parent, the Dr. will also say that’s a sign of stress. There are many cases of negligence where a Dr. will blame a client’s physical illness on stress.

—————————————————————————————————————————————

Psychoneuroiminuology
‘Thinker’, Rene Discartes wrote how he was not just “lodged” in his body as a “pilot” in a boat, but was so well lodged he and his body created a “certain unity”.

Psychobabble has ditched the “pilot” aspect (soul) and kept the “boat” (arguing therefore that the mind is purely part of the body-not inhabited by a soul/spirit. In other words a person is purely their body/cells which make up one’s brain are suppose to be who we are/our consciousness . So rejecting the supernatural belief that a person is a soul/ spirit with a body. If I were a priest I’d be very worried about the existence of psychobabblists. Conveniently for psychobabblists the evidence that a person has a soul/spirit, Out Of Body Experiences, psychobabblists claims in the mind ). Thankfully not everyone excepts this (cells=person) and a debate is happening re-sparking the contemplation that the mind IS the soul.

I’ll return to the supernatural later.

The reason I bring up the soul here is because our emotions (extensions of who we are), psychobabblists are claiming have their own cells whilst therefore that there emotional cells fight physical ill health and therefore justify psychobabble claims that physical illness can be caused and cured emotionally/psychologically:

The idea that physical illnesses are caused psychologically has resulted in many deaths of patients.

Psychobabblists believe the brain and the mind (the person) are 1in the same. Is a person their brain then? Psychobabble/science researches believe that cells which destroy disease (macrophages) interact with so-called cells which behave “like” chemical versions of emotions! The word “like” shows the researches DON’T actually know for certain even, yet these researches claim it can justify (explain) the belief they peddle that emotion can be effect physical illness.

So followers of this psychobabble, known as psychoneuroimmnuology (the old term being psychosomatic) like doctors, claim that physical illness is being caused psychologically (emotionally), therefore they’re justified in prescribing psychological “techniques” instead of carrying out an investigation into the illness and prescribe physical medication. So patients keep dying.

The reality is a person is NOT simply their brain. A person is a spiritual being (even if the cells which behave like emotion do exist, the Mind IS the spiritual being/soul). The brain is (pardon the pun) the nerve centre of the body.

So yes, it does control macrophages, but a person ‘s emotions can NOT influence actual physical illness (e.g. “positive attitude” or “positive thinking” – phrases really used to condition people) will NOT change the illness. Anyone in the health professions who says otherwise is highly dangerous and should have their career ruined immediately.

Some idiots authors in the in the New Age movement (which many doctors, nurses and social workers are part of) are also talking this deadly dribble that a persons attitude to their illness effects their recovery from physical ill health!!! For example, if a patient does not have the right attitude to their illness (e.g. has instead a mental image of themselves suffering even though it is the correct image, if they are to have any image, because they are suffering) then the symptoms will continue till the sufferer dies!!! That’s like saying, if you have been knocked on the head with a hammer you have to forget about it so to get rid of the pain (so not even to rub it)!!! Idiots.

Of course it’s common sense that symptoms caused by a physical illness like an infection/disease will cease as soon as that physical illness is physically cured.

The sooner psychobabble is destroyed and common sense re-instated in it’s place, the sooner levels of medical negligence will reduce.

It’s because of psychobabble why doctors/psychobabblists can refuse to recognise an illness.

Psychobabble like this gives it’s practitioners jobs and justifies similar people in joining this ‘profession’ . It’s like a gravy train.

—————————————————————————————————————————————–

15.COGNITIVE THERAPY:

What Is It?

Cognitive Therapy is used in conjunction with/as part of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and is a main tool psychobabblists/medical doctors employ when they are committing medical negligence of a physically caused illness. C.T. was, like other forms of psychobabble, created by an American in the late 1960’s.

The target of C.T. practitioners are those the latter’s perceive as having a perception or evaluation of themselves, others or an experience which causes them to reach the wrong conclusion about themselves, others or an experience. This is then supposed to cause them distress or emotional upset.

The psychobabblists (e.g. behavioural therapist) will be the person to identify “cognitive distortions” in their client!!! These distortions are also referred to as “errors in thinking”…

The treatment (cognitive restructuring) consists of 3 types: Working in a 1 to 1 situation of client and practitioner, where the practitioner tries to reason with the client about what the latter views as the formers distortion; in a group where emotional experiences take place; and the most popular method is one where the client’s behaviour pattern is altered. Victims of doctors negligence have been told during the negligence, that they need Cognitive Behavioural Therapy as psychobabblists believe themselves that behaviour influences a person’s perceptions of themselves and attitudes. It’s common sense that it’s the opposite way round.

The Danger

A). It’s not just a threat, as it is actually coming up in medical negligence cases. People who have been medically neglected have been told during the negligence, that if they changed their perception of themselves/their illness they will get better. Of course they didn’t, the treatment making them more ill because their illness was physical, physically caused, but the medical doctors/psychobabblists refused to accept that.

If such a patient does not realise they’re physically ill or is unable to prove their being medically neglected, they will believe their attitude towards themselves/their illness is making them ill, but because it’s not a psychological illness the C.B.T. will not improve them so they will become depressed (becoming genuinely mentally ill to the delight of you know who’s). So both the doctors and the psychobabblists get away with negligence.

B). The other danger is it’s ability to condition people. It’s the psychobabblist who decides what a patients errors of thought are.

So if a victim of negligence is critical of doctors, the psychobabblists will say that that is a cognitive distortion and try and change the victim’s view of the guilty doctors or/and those protecting them. No doubt even if the doctors were caught on vide tape committing the negligence, the psychobabblist would still try to change the victim’s view, thereby proving beyond doubt the bias of psychobabblists to protect doctors and justifying their mass destruction.

Central government could also have psychobabblists use C.B.T. to condition people into perceiving their criticism of the Government’s policies as being “errors of thought”, as well as freedom of speech.

There are instances when people DO need to change their perceptions in order to build confidence (but not to the ego levels of yobs), BUT it’s up to THAT PERSON to decide which of their own perceptions need to change. Not somebody else, particularly NOT someone who doesn’t know them.

More facts on C.B.T.

1.Supposedly rigorously tested scientifically.

2.Emory Uni. (Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A.) scientists, claim that C.B.T. could treat fertility.

3.C.B.T. is being used to treat bulimia, depression, phobia’s, schizophrenia, obsessive compulsive disorder, obesity, and the physically caused M.E. disease, (which many doctors negligently refuse to accept is caused physically).

4.C.B.T. operates on a BELIEF system: that it is the way you think of yourself (i.e. in wrong ways) the world and other people. SO NO ACTUAL EVIDENCE then? Just a BELIEF. C.B.T. is about making such person’s think differently about themselves, the world, other people. A tool easier to misuse, and has been. Did the Nazis invent C.B.T. like they did psychotropic drugs ?

Doctors, nurses, physiotherapists, social workers, occupational therapists and of course, psychobabblists can inflict C.B.T.
C.B.T. patient’s receive “homework” (a diary of why they did something they are receiving C.B.T. for, and how felt at the time, and what action they took and, most alarmingly, how they physically felt. This last point the C.B.T. practitioner covers regards as relevant is alarming. It proves the C.B.T. practitioner believes physical symptoms are caused by psychological aspects, (which is stupid).
Unsurprisingly, it is being used a lot with M.E. disease victims. M.E. is regarded by many doctors, wrongly, as a psychological illness because they are unable or too stupid, to understand the physical cause of M.E. Psychobabble exists to cover up/explain away a scientist or doctors failures here. Plus psychobabblists want to increase their power and status by trying to prove that psychological problems cause physical illness. This would suit the doctors free up time and the Authorities with another tool to lock up critics…

Another reason for C.B.T. is that it is economically cheaper. The Government quango, National institute for Clinical Excellence, (N.I.C.E. an organisation which covered up the evidence of secret recordings of doctors committing negligence on purpose) have begun recommending C.B.T. as a primary and complementary treatment.

The department of health (also guilty of the same offence as N.I.C.E. are) is diverting money to C.B.T. from other forms of psychobabble, so no wonder the psychobabblists are arguing over whether CBT can treat all, disorders.

C.B.T. is the ultimate non-violent weapon doctors have to condition a patient into accepting the doctors medical negligence. C.B.T. must be, and will be, outlawed.

Frighteningly, an economist close to the British Government, wishes to have C.B.T. forced upon people receiving Incapacity Benefit for mental illness. However, what the economist does not account for is that a lot of these people are victims of medical negligence, who’s physical illness has been misdiagnosed and covered up as mental illness-something C.B.T. can not solve, (e.g. M.E. is physical but viewed as mental). It will just make things worse, the physically ill having to undergo C.B.T. to get benefits but no improvement will mean the patient is blamed for not recovering and the benefit stopped. They will be unable to pay for utilities, food and even lose their home.

This is why cognitive beliefs/treatment must be outlawed. If this psychobabble alone was destroyed it would be a major set back for psychobabble negligence.

Middle Child Syndrome

The latest cr*p from the psychologists is that people who are the Middle (of 3 children) Child born, will behave in a rebellious manner because they can be bossed around by their older brother/sister, yet don’t receive the attention their younger brother/sister receives, (isolated in their family).

Psychologists claim the Middle Child means friendship much more to their lives than those who are first born or third born.

They are supposed to think they are, “overlooked” and “unimportant”, “feel like they don’t belong”!

First born children are supposed to be good maths and sciences, and, with Only Children, can be I.D. by having an exacting career and a desire to please their parents, but Middle Children and younger, are supposed to be good at Art and sports. They are supposed to have low I.Q.s, earn less money and have a high risk of teenage pregnancies, (says a research from Norway).

Since the 1970’s psychologists have been conducting 100’s of studies to discover, where you are born in a family, your birth order, could explain how siblings from the same family, can grow up being the opposite.

The bigger question here is, WHY should psychobabblists want to discover why siblings grow up differently. Everyone is uniquely different to every one else.

We the B.U.P., have a serious concern this laughable bullsh*t has serious implications for victims of medical negligence, because of the effect Only Child psychobabble has inflicted.

—————————————————————————————————————————————

Psychobabble & The Supernatural
As referred to earlier, psychobabblists also try and explain away supernatural events because science can’t explain them and, as stated earlier, supernatural events prove the soul exists.

I don’t need to go over lots of supernatural events and psychobabblists attack it as many others have recorded them doing so. TV programmes alone are full up with supernatural cases with evidence which science can’t explain (e.g. supernatural abilities), but then strangely, as if obligatory, have a psychobabblist on to debunk the accounts/abilities of the person who has experienced the supernatural, accusing them of imagining it, (in effect calling the person a liar and saving scientists from looking stupid).

In 1999 I referred to psychobabble as the “new religion”. Now other writers have begun to do so. People turn to psychobabble on TV and in books for help like they once did to a clergyman. Psychobabble could easily be called a cult, (some forms of psychobabble are now featured in books on New Religious movements and sects!), taking control of society.

BE SCARRED. BE VERY SCARRED

—————————————————————————————————————————————

L.P. (NEURO LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING)

Neuro = Behaviour which implies (but is not explicit) the neurological process behind peoples behaviour.

Linguistic = (Latin): Language to be relevant by use as communication so to affect a persons structure and sequencing of their behaviour.

Programming = Setting one’s behaviour in order to achieve the chosen outcome.

Origins:

N.L.P was created by a linguist and a mathematician. They studied the interactions of U.S. therapists, including

Fritz Pearls (founder of Gestalt). N.L.P. was an off shoot of the studies were based on among other aspects, Gestalt and psychology (both psychobabble). These 2 men found that the communication areas of study were useful in business, education,, registration and mediation. In 1979, N.L.P. was described as “the most powerful vehicle for change in existence”.

N.L.P. is supposed to describe how and why a person behaves in each situation.

N.L.P. practitioners are suppose to be different to other experts who study to understand human behaviour, in that N.L.P. practitioners take into account the effect the N.L.P. practitioners have on who/what they’re studying. An N.L.P. practitioner is trained to I.D. distortions and generalisations in a clients linguistic and behavioural patterns. Who are N.L.P. practitioners to think they can identify what is a distortion in a person’s speech with out knowing them, only having been “trained” to deal with a client?

N.L.P. Target:

N.L.P. practitioners believe that people express how they view the world through language and behaviour (bleedin’ obvious), but then believe that one’s language shows how people can disregard information, distort one’s view of the world and generalise to the extent that it cause people to have a bad view of the world!!!!!

N.L.P. practitioners are supposed to unpeel a clients words so to discover a deeper meaning and the context behind the clients words. To do this the N.L.P. practitioner listens for the deletions, distortions and generalisations in the person’s speech.

Examples Of N.L.P. Use As Treatment: Part 1.

If a person says they “don’t like flowers” the N.L.P. practitioner will use specific questions to discover (in this example) that the person is allergic to some flowers.

The N.L.P. practitioner will bizarrely believe that because the person has used the phrase that they “don’t like flowers” it would mean that the client will not go near any flowers!

N.L.P. is flawed, as the next example will confirm:

If a person spots a famous person and says, “I know you” the speaker is not meaning by their language they know the famous person, but are simply relating they recognise the famous person.

So N.L.P. practitioners should return to the drawing board on how they perceive a person’s speech can indicate a problem with their clients attitude of themselves/others/the words.

The Use Of N.L.P.: Part 2: Curing The Supposed Problem

However, if the N.L.P. practitioner strikes it lucky with a client who’s speech reflects what they think of themselves/others, then what will the N.L.P. practitioner do next?The N.L.P. practitioner believes that to cure the client of their (in effect) attitude problem, being influenced by how they relate the problem verbally, is by taking certain actions, explained by the following example: If a person says they can’t do something the N.L.P. practitioner will ask what they mean by can’t, as the practitioner will refuse to believe the client can’t do something (can’t being a word which is viewed as a person “limiting” themselves in changing and therefore is a “language violation”).

*Now this explains why so many psychobabblists don’t accept a client can’t do something even though external factors dictate the client can’t.

The psychobabblists will behave like this due to their in experience of life (e.g. how a client lives) and their voluntary (due to their own idiocy) subjugation to be conditioned to be conditioned in psychobabble.

*N.L.P. therefore explains/is a likely source for psychobabblists using N.L.P. beliefs on patients who are physically ill but the psychobabblist (e.g. psychiatrist) view the illness as mental.

HENCE WHY N.L.P. IS DANGEROUS.

IN ORDER FOR N.L.P. TO BE SUCCESSFUL, IT’S PRACTITIONERS, DO NEED TO HAVE EXPERIENCED THE PROBLEMS OF THE CLIENTELE THEY ARE LIKELY TO HAVE (E.G. IF A CLIENT LIVES IN POVERTY, THE N.L.P. PRACTITIONER OR OTHER PSYCHOBABBLIST USING N.L.P. METHODS, NEEDS TO HAVE LIVED IN/BE IN POVERTY SO THEY KNOW THAT, FOR EXAMPLE WHEN A CLIENT SAYS “CAN’T” THEY REALLY DO MEAN “CAN’T”.

N.L.P. PRACTITIONERS ALSO BELIEVE THAT PERSON’S BODY LANGUAGE INDICATES A PARTICULAR STATE OF MIND.

EXAMPLE: N.L.P. PRACTITIONERS BELIEVE THAT IF A PERSON IS HAPPY OR THINKS BACK TO WHEN THEY WERE HAPPY, THAT PERSON’S BREATHING WILL CHANGE IN RATE OR THAT THEIR MUSCLES MAY TENSE OR RELAX DEPENDING ON WHAT THE CLIENT IS EXPERIENCING/REMEMBERING!!!!

THE N.L.P. PRACTITIONERS BIZARRELY (THERE’S BETTER WORDS BUT THEY’D SUE IF I USED THEM), BELIEVE THAT BY HAVING THE CLIENT CHANGE THEIR BODY LANGUAGE CONSCIOUSLY WHEN THINKING OF A PAST BAD EXPERIENCE, TO HOW THEY WOULD UNCONSCIOUSLY BEHAVE WHEN THINKING OF A GOOD EXPERIENCES, THAT THIS CHANGE WILL ALSO CHANGE THE PERSON’S FEELINGS ABOUT THAT BAD EXPERIENCE.

Knowing the psychobabblists, probably “feelings” means thoughts/opinions which makes N.L.P. again dangerous in that trying to alter another person’s moral and legal right to have those thoughts of an experience. So N.L.P. could be used by those in power to condition society.

N.L.P. followers also believe that body language can dictate (not just indicate) how a person is feeling.

A person can be angry and show it though body language, but not WHY he/she is angry. N.L.P. does not take account of this so in order to understand why a person is angry you need to find out why verbally. You have to ask.

It’s influence on society is massive. The New Age movement, which influences society, is dominated by it, (just go into a New Age or even average High Street bookshops and there arte more N.L.P. books than spiritual books).

Is it because of N.L.P. why TV camera operators are obsessed with filming peoples hand movements? When camera operators can’t film a person’s hands because the latter has put them in his pockets, the camera operator will film their shoeless feet moving about under a table, when the person is explaining something!!! The camera operator should film a person face/shoulder area when a person is explaining something. Idiot. (Details on TV journalists hand movements to come). Body language can not be relied upon alone.

*N.L.P. explains the behaviour of psychobabblists/medical doctors methods when they can’t accept a patient (who really is) physically ill.

*Example: The patient tells the Dr./psychobabblist they can’t stand up or swim because they’re so helplessly ill, the latter will reply yes they can, if they change their attitude to the illness by not saying “can’t”. This argument can also be applied to the greater threat of cognitive behavioural therapy which should be outlawed, as it not only deals in speech.

If N.L.P. was destroyed/outlawed the psychobabblists and doctors would lose a useful tool to commit negligence.

Children learn in allegedly in not 2 but 3 ways: Visual learners do so by reading and looking at pictures; Auditory learners do so by listening; and kinaesthetic learners do so by acting out.

N.L.P. is used with the so-called kinaesthetic children by having them copy and perform as learning.

In other words dumbing down education so to appeal to those who don’t want to behave. So because of these yobs, other pupils lessons are being dumbed down. I’m not surprised that kinaesthetic learning is popular such pupils: the 1 class I hated in secondary school was the 1 where yobs ran riot the most, drama.

Rather than reduce drama in schools and allow other performing arts a higher effect in schools, the education establishment (full of psychobabble) increase drama and introduce role play to English and foreign language lessons. Had I had role play in an English lessons in the late ‘80s I would not have my good pass in G.C.S.E English

—————————————————————————————————————————————–

COUNSELLING

Counselling is a fashion craze from America which has gripped Britain, significantly so since the early ‘90’s.

Patients First carried out a sting operation in 1998/9 by having a parent of a child, who was being medically neglected, relate on a radio programme phone in to 3 Do-Gooders, how, the child was being medically neglected on purpose by doctors.

One Do-Gooder, an Agony Aunt, said she had “counselled” people with the child’s illness and told the parent phoning in, “ I’m really quite concerned that you’ve had a really bad time and your feeling quite angry”, (what’s wrong with being like that), “about everything that’s happened. I really recommend you get help and support through some counselling. Find a local counsellor who might be able to help you through this”. She also recommended the child receive counselling as well!

The agony aunt didn’t condemn the doctors or say the parent should “get help and support through” a solicitor or to try alternative health treatments or ask the radio station to have the journalists report the case so the publicity would pressurise the doctors to treat the child. The agony aunt was far more concerned about the “anger” rather than WHY the parent was angry, because the anger was criticism of her fellow do-gooder profession, doctors. So her prescription was to allow the negligence to continue and have the parent and child use up their little energy and time on counselling so to keep them quiet and prevent them from fighting for treatment. The Agony Aunt viewed “anger”/criticism of doctors as abnormal, proving she was at least prejudiced, if not abnormal.

Counsellors don’t normally criticise doctors either, if anything they defend doctors from criticism.

The counsellors can hide behind the fact that they are supposedly not allowed to give advice to a client but do automatically assume verbally that doctors know what’s best for the client, proving a prejudice bias by the counsellors.

The British (Radical) press describe counselling as a “real ego trip” for the counsellor who they describe as the “rejected individual” who “gain authority and status” (authority being power over other people), despite only having only “mediocre knowledge” (lack of experience of continued hardships).

To prove how insane counselling is, counsellors are supposed to highlight a clients phrases the latter tends to use and have the client cease using the phrases, so supposedly solving (!) the clients problems (sounds like N.L.P. and cognitive garbage)!! It’s common sense that all this does is to make the client delude themselves that the problem(s) actually remain. This is conditioning and a useful tool for authorities to use with unhappy/WRONGED people…

To reinforce the (Radical) press findings, I have discovered through (printed) research that in Britain those running counselling courses are admitting that many of their student counsellors are in therapy!!!

So we’ve got loonies for counsellors deciding if somebody referred to them requires counselling or whether the referral was doing was wrong.

On some counselling courses, students have to undergo counselling themselves even though they may not need it! So obviously people (students) are being conditioned to view normal behaviour and experiences in their own lives as REQUIRING them to receive counselling. So anybody else who goes to them (the student counsellor) who has had similar experiences/ behaviour will also be given counselling for it as that is what the counsellor was conditioned to give counselling for. Evidence of gravy train and conditioning of society in action.

The N.S.P.C.C. children’s charity in November 2003 called for counsellors to be put into ALL schools. No wonder school counsellors (e.g. in Croydon) believe the victims of bullies need counselling , as they were in therapy themselves whilst training to be counsellors. It’s common sense that the only person who is in the wrong in a bullying case is the bully, not the victim, so it’s only the bully who should receive counselling. Psychobabble drama, role play, was also being introduced into Liverpool schools in 1999, supposedly to improve children’s behaviour, being run by educational psychologists (more evidence of the different areas of society psychologists have infected).

In the United States, TV investigative reporter Michael Moore (in his documentary, Bowling For Columbine about 2 boys who murdered other pupils and a teacher in 1999) featured reference blame being put on school counsellors for creating the atmosphere for the killing spree: counsellors encouraging competitiveness/that if one child is achieving good sports results so pressurising their clients/victims to achieve the same result, thereby creating jealousy (though psychobabblists may have forgotten what jealousy means as they say “negative” for anything bad) because the child/victim is not capable of achieving good sports results but can in other areas. So those children who are born evil will be given that final push to kill by the counsellor. What counsellors should be doing is helping the child/ victim discover their talent(s) and so creating to achieve good results in that.

As counsellors/psychobabblist have increased their number in schools, so violent behaviour in schools will go up. And who are the N.S.P.C.C. who want these Dr. loving practitioners to go into schools? The same charity who’s Christopher Cloke wrote that “cruelty maybe perpetrated by doctors” (when confronted by case 6), (“maybe” !!! Just ask Esther Rantzen for confirmation) and IF it is perpetrated it is NOT a case for the N.S.P.C.C. Would the N.S.P.C.C. stay out of a case of a child being put paralysed into a pool if the perpetrator was a parent and not a Dr.?

I think not. 1 rule for doctors and 1 for everyone else.

A full stop should be made to this charity’s existence, especially if they do succeed in putting counsellors into all schools. Patients First are to hold the charity responsible when the levels of violence increase in schools.

Training counsellors can whittle out those who would not conform to psychobabble and have their own mind (e.g. prepared to criticise a Dr. or challenge the psychobabble, being told they “need something deeper”), so doctors can be safe in the knowledge that in referring a negligence victim to these persons, as they will endorse the doctors negligence with out question. So counsellors are YES MEN.

To be a counsellor one needs REALLY to have experience of CONTINUED hardships, but like other psychobabblists, counselling is based on study not experience. It’s interesting to note that in 1999, even psychologiosts concluded that giving a victim of tragedy, counselling may make them feel worse (though this realization could be due to psychobabblists getting jealous of another).

The U.K.s ONLY expert in commonsense compared learning psychology to “teaching a parrot to speak. A person don’t understand what they’re saying but just repeat what they’re taught. This analogy could be extended to counselling training.

In January 2003, the Department Of Health’s Director for Heart Disease said that the British Heart Foundation would provide counselling for people simply wanting to access the performance of heart surgeons. Back in 1998, Dr. Howard Stoate M.P. a G.P. said that before patients view their dead child’s medical records, they should have counselling before hand!!! Why?….

To end this exposure of counselling one should remember it’s not just a vulnerable child (all the children if the N.S.P.C.C. get their way. Not if Patients First have anything to do with it) who will have to endure these creatures. It also features in businesses gallor, (e.g. a U.S. owned U.K. business had a policy where if an employee swore he/she would have to undergo counselling.

This brings us to the next point of psychobabble:

——————————————————————————————————————————————–

ANGER
Anger is perceived by psychobabblists as criticism of doctors. The Agony Aunt incident exposed by Patients First (see No.16) proves that being “angry” is regarded as the problem-not the reason for the anger being the problem, as Common Sense Philosophy dictates. If you are critical of a Dr. or, increasingly anyone in authority, you are labelled angry and told to “calm down”. The psychobabblists are so desperate/obsessed to get people to suppress their “anger” that they are bizarrely claiming it causes cardiac problems! Now they claim anger is “un forgiveness”!!!! They claim that if one forgives those who wronged them rather than have them punished, it would be better for the victim’s physical health!!!!!!!

Why this obsession with anger?

Well, translating this un forgiveness into practise it means allowing wrong doers to get away with committing immoral and illegal acts and can go on to commit more harm. The psychobabblists don’t claim we should agree with the wrong doers active but simply to let the wrong doers get away with their wrongs.

Taking into account that the employers or/and those who allow them to exist and increase are governments, doctors etc.

NOW ALL RADICALS TAKE NOTE:

The government(s) create/enforce a (new) law or start a war which is unpopular. People get angry so the government wants to shut them up. So the psychobabblists are sent in to persuade the public that they should forgive the government for the sake of the public’s own physical health. When that fails to persuade the public to submit to the governments actions, the government can have the public who are angry/protesting at the governments actions, branded mental and locked for their own safety!!!

Psychobabblists don’t care why a person is angry and certainly then won’t try and solve the reason for a person being angry because that would mean punishing a Dr. or some other person in authority, so will tell their victim instead to “calm down”.

This phrase is particularly popular amongst Police Officers. What “calm down” means in practise is: “I don’t care what is causing your problem to make you angry. I just want you to suppress your anger and live with the problem causing your anger”.

How many psychobabblists are training people who training to be Police Officers? The Sevenoaks & Area Mental Health Group had been involved in training 149 Kent Police Officers in mental health. This group has issued statistics which this document proves can easily be flawed. This group comes up again later.

Maybe increasing the Police Officers in number (by dropping the ban on strong spectacle lens wearers from joining) so Police can then also solve a person’s problem if it’s causing them anger.

Update: Now counsellors are claiming anger causes depression! Nuts! It’s thanks to anger that wrong doers are caught and punished.

Many simply view psychobabble as daft and no threat to society. As this document is proving, to view psychobabble as no threat is foolish.

——————————————————————————————————————————————

Further Conditioning/Psychobabble Speech
Already I’ve referred to the fact that psychbabblists want people to suppress their anger and live with it, and society is being conditioned to accept psychobabblist as knowing what’s best for society on the grounds they’re “experts”!!!

And most worryingly of all, psychobabblists are protecting doctors who have committed medical negligence or/ and are too stupid/prejudiced to help a patient. Plus, the governments of the world embrace psychobabble.

People are more likely to accept psychobabble in daily life if they’re using aspects of it, such as how psychobabblists relate their perverted science. So it’s not surprising how psychobabble language is now used in everyday speech, people not realising what the words mean something different to what they think they do. Until the 1990’s these words/phrases were normally only used by psychobabblists in their books. By 1999 they were used throughout society.

The word, “positive” is one which in a medical test means BAD news. There’s also “positive lightening”, obviously another bad thing. In everyday speech it means the opposite in a number of ways: Good; Hopeful; confident or pleased.

Whilst the word “negative” which means good news in medical tests, has been corrupted to mean: jealous; bad; disillusioned; angry (!) and depressed.

So both words are distorting the English language/grammar (the N.L.P. practitioners are NOT dealing with this oddly enough).

Example: Person 1could say to Person 2 that Person 3 had been “negative”, but Person 2 would not know if by “negative” Person 3 had been jealous, angry or depressed.

Another term is “self-esteem” which really means ego, but not everybody knows that. This ignorance is useful for psychobabblists who can claim yobs behave like they do due to “low self-esteem”. Translated as “little ego” would expose psychobabblists claim for the cause of yobbishness as flawed, as yobs don’t have too little ego but a big ego (they like showing off their yobbishness). In the East, people believe ego is something which needs to be reduced, but in the West it’s something which needs to be increased. No wonder yobbishness is increasing and it’s thanks to psychobabble why no one can touch the little darlings (yobs).

Another term is “a sense of”. This psychobabble really means an “illusion of” when translated in the context it’s used in, (e.g. giving children a sense of achievement, meaning they DON’T actually achieve anything but are conditioned to think they have).

Example: If somebody switches on an electric fire’s lights, but NOT the actual heaters, then it is correct to say the fire is giving a “sense of warmth” by it’s glowing light which is mentally associated with heat, but NO actual heat is forthcoming as the heaters are switched off. So it’s an illusion of heat.

No doubt psychobabblists will start dribbling that people will be kept warm by a sense of heat, on instructions of the so heating bills can be increased.

The dumbing down/conditioning of people to accept psychobabble gets more serious still:

People no longer ask for a person for their thoughts when enquiring about their opinion, but ask for their “feelings” (e.g. TV journalists asking Iraqi’s “How do you feel about Saddam Hussein?”. An opinion is a THOUGHT, not an emotion. Ironically the one time it does make sense to ask for a person’s opinion by asking for their feeling is when asking for psychic or instinctive thought. Sadly the psychobabblists view psychic ability as all in the mind, like the rest of the supernatural.

In 2002, the BBC employed 10 psychologists to help staff in “culture analysis, 60% degree feedback, coaching development and team building” (classic psychobabble speech). One psychobabblists made the discovery of the bleedin’ obvious again, (if they’re not harming people the only thing there good at is stating what everybody else already knows, proving psychobabble is for stupid people), that differences at work cause conflict. So the BBC is definitely under the influence of psychobabble, and through the staff society at large. (Don’t forget in both British and obviously American, drama psychobabble beliefs are worked into scripts so to be portrayed as a good thing…

Psychobabblists have also proved they waste their time when in 1999 psychiatrists claimed to have found a way of detecting if some one is genuine by their smile (by studying a person’s laughter lines, located at the corner of the eyes) at an Institute for psychiatry! More garbage of no real use to anyone.

A German New Age guru, currently all the rage, (so influencing people) writes in his philosophy that thinking is a disease!!! Maybe his books should be renamed ‘A Dictators Guide To Enslaving Their People Thoughtless So Being Easily Manipulated”.

Whilst psychobabblists quite happily allow the eroding of the English language/grammar which will make their perversions more acceptable to society (TV journalists hanging on every word of a psychobabblist, not challenging the psychobabblist to prove what they say is correct) they also don’t criticise the dropping of “T”s in words on purpose: Posh people under the delusion that they will sound like and be therefore able to relate to (another delusion, your author is looking for evidence the psychobabblists are behind this) Working Class people, if they drop their “T”s in words! Just listen to posh actors trying to sound Working Class. This practise dramatically increased from 1997.

After a few years of such posh people dropping their “T”s (e.g. in the media) Working Class people in the street also began increasingly since, (encouraged no doubt by believing posh peoples portrayal of Working Classes to be accurate and encouraged (by psychobabblists?) to be proud of their background, rather than try and better themselves).

*It’s actually common sense for people to improve themselves, not necessarily losing their accent/dialect.

Amusingly, these same posh toffs who are saying, “puri’an, complica’ed, par’y, be’’er, etc can say in the same breath, “yuerrr”, the posh person’s way of saying year, which is how the Working Classes pronounce it. Posh people can’t say “year”, thereby giving away they are really posh, despite dropping the “T”s.

It can’t be denied that dumbing down one’s speech is a fashion craze now, but it appears to have backfired for the posh toffs: Their children are now speaking in this dumbed down speech naturally, reducing the chance of having a good career, so increasing a well spoken Working Class person’s chances of getting a good job.

However in most cases if the Working Classes are dumbing down their English, then it makes it harder for them to make articulate arguments with those in authority (normally posh/highly educated persons). How convenient for the authorities…

Taking into account that the BBC employs psychobabblists, is it they (through internal circulars) who are teaching reporters, “hand gestures” (the mad hand waving reporters make) on the news? Apparently having “open hands, palm towards camera and then point at graphic” is to make viewers think they are “included” (what on earth are these idiots going on about now?). Is this why BBC and ITN newsreaders turn to the camera and say “Lets speak to..” when the newsreader is about to talk to a reporter live, when it’s the newsreader doing the speaking, not the viewer? Either it’s this insane training which is why newsreaders say this or they’re very bad at grammar or just plain stupid.

So it’s no surprise that a TV chief has admitted that performance skills are THE priority in TV journalism and a journalists who has journalistic conviction is regarded as a problem! Just add the fact that role play is used in some journalist courses and journalists ask people how they “feel” about an issue proves journalist are under the influence of psychobabble.

I should add that psychobabblists are also controlling political parties as advisers and through political Think Tanks (which produce reports upon which political policies can be based).

——————————————————————————————————————————————–

Humanistic Psychology & The Human Potential Movement/How Businesses & Christianity Is Being Damaged By Psychobabble.
Humanistic Psychology was created by a psychobabblist (American of course) because older forms of psychobabble he found limiting. H.P. highlights certain aspects of human nature which supposedly can be applied to all people (but everyone is a unique individual). Amongst these highlights are consciousness, mental health and the potential of people, plus taking into account.

The H.P. founder went on to help create Transpersonal Psychology to deal with spiritual and extensive consciousness experiences can have an effect on a person, without actually acknowledging the spiritual experience was real. In effect it’s psychobabble playing spirituality, whilst sitting on the fence. This psychobabble like other kinds, has spread throughout society infecting neuroscience/business, politics, pharmacology and of course, other kinds of psychobabble like counselling and psychiatry. This psychobabble has been influenced by eastern religions, which suffer from an over emphasis of the self, (other writers also suggest this).

Returning to Humanistic Psychology, it’s founder believed that once a healthy person had their basic needs for survival met, that person would discover they need to more in that they needed to give their lives purpose, (proving why posh people dominate the Human Potential Movement, particularly during the 1960’s, as the Working Classes were too busy, and generally still are, trying to achieve the need for survival). Of course it’s common sense that some people are just born morons and never want to achieve anything beyond a comfortable life, other than keep breeding. These are what are known as the Common Class. They can only be identified by their behaviour as they normally live amongst the Working Classes. Commoners, when they bother to vote at elections, always vote for the same party because they have voted for that party all their lives.

This need to search for the fulfilling of one’s need (or in Common Sense terms searching for a reason for their lives), the H.P. founder claimed would cause the person to achieve everything they are capable of. This search by such people conduct and those who help them search are known as the Human Potential Movement.

The H.P. founder believed that eastern religions would be the best way in which a person could fulfil their needs, so both psychobabble and spirituality (generally eastern religions) came together to create the New Age (in Britain it’s capital is in Totnes, not Glastonbury as the former is more psychobabble dominated than the latter which has an even balance of psychobabble and spirituality).

The New Age movement today can be regarded as a selfish movement where SOME people spend their lives naval gazing about what they want out of life rather than helping others as the Christians religion preaches.

This is no surprise as H.P.M. popped up from the Human potential Movement in the 1960’s as a backlash against traditional psychobabble and as a tool against society’s traditional values and the Christian Church. So it’s not surprising that so many people, ashamed to be born posh and expected to grow up posh by their parents, embraced this psychobabble simply because it was DIFFERENT, which is also why they became hippies in the 1960’s. This need to do the opposite to the traditional way of life in their country simply for the sake of doing so is really a mental illness, but no psychobabblist has declared it such, otherwise they would have to call themselves mad).

So instead of helping others to be spiritual, those who could afford it, (normally Upper and Middle Classes) put themselves first to explore themselves. No wonder the Church has dropped in attendance.

Interestingly the origin for the obsession in the media for the word “empowerment” (giving one’s self power, normally an illusion of power) should be pursed if one thinks they can’t help others. The result is that a person will perceive that they have helped society by helping themselves, but in fact is simply an illusion as it will leave others to suffer and reduce the number of agitators in the world so agitating against bad authorities/laws reduce. So H.P.M. is also a threat to freedom of the individual.

This is why the Christian church has declined in number because of H.P.M. which also brought to peoples attention much more eastern religions which they became followers of. H.P.M. has caused psychobabble to be more accepted by Buddhism, thereby infecting Buddhism.

The most dangerous aspect of this modern spiritualization of H.P.M. is that New Ageists believe that evil does not exist and is an illusion. They also believe that poverty and illness are all an illusion and can be overcome by a person achieving a higher level of consciousness (being). Idiots.

Firstly: Looking at it from a Common Sense Spirituality view point (for New Ageist readers); If a person is into
life with the purpose of experiencing/achieving in life then life is to be tacked, not dismissed as an illusion.

2 Secondly this following of H.P.M./New Age belief helps to explain why so many health workers are telling their clients their illnesses are all in the mind, when it’s physically caused, (so patients keep dying due to medical negligence). A significant amount of New Ageists are health workers.

So if somebody whacks a New Ageist on the head with a hammer, the New Ageist will just imagine it away? I doubt it. The reality would be the New Ageist screaming for the nearest hospital for physical health treatment.

Thirdly this belief that there is NO evil explains why so many evil people are released from prison. Maybe all the evil prisoners should be sent to live in Totnes? How long would it be before the New Ageists started screaming
Returning to H.P.M.: it has today spread into business training and management courses, where psychobabble techniques are used (transactional analysis, role play etc), thereby proving Britain’s business are under the control pf psychobabble. Businesses believe they improve workers out put, but Britain’s industries have become much a lot less. If employers/teachers adopted Common Sense Philosophy by discovering other peoples talents and giving them the job, which matches their talent, then business out put in Britain would increase significantly. That would be too complicated for psychobabblists and would require binning Social Class.

———————————————————————————————————————————————–

Psychobabble & Real Mental Illness

As the psychobabblists are so busy persecuting the physically ill and trying to control others, one would expect to have run out of mentally ill patients.

WRONG: Psychobabblists are ignoring great swaths of mentally ill (which should not be surprising as so many psychiatric patients are released into the community to kill people they’ve never met, as so often is reported in the media).

If mental illness was truly defined, a lot of psychiatrists would be out of a job and so suffer a loss of power and status. So we expect them to object strongly to Common sense Philosophy definition of mental illness, which we/the B.U.P. recognise as the definition.

Football fans rioting over entertainment (a football game) are bizarrely not locked up under the Mental Health Act when there is no just cause for their behaviour. Victims of negligence and protestors are sectioned because they are supposedly a danger to others or themselves when they are NOT, yet football fans rioting clearly ARE a danger to others but they’re not sectioned. This proves how insane and dangerous psychobabblists are because they will lock up sane people because they’re a threat to the doctors or others in authority but not rioters as mad.

Then there are those who have body piecing which not only damages their body but can cause blood infections (a recognised fact). In the U.S. in 2001, a woman suffered difficulty walking and clumsiness after a stud was removed from her tongue which had become infected. She only recovered after brain surgery and anti-biotics. The part of the body which is impossible to make sterile is the mouth. Yet psychobabblists are not trying to have people with tongue studs sectioned on the grounds they are a danger to themselves.

Psychobabblists blamed a rapists behaviour on him having a learning disability and so wanted to “assert” himself because of low self-esteem!!!!

Another point is already touched upon: the psychobabblists find no problem in the Upper and Middle Classes dumbing down their speech when the latter’s are ashamed to have been born privileged. It’s common sense to improve one’s self, not dumb down (ironically psychobabblists believe a person’s background can dictate if a person is mentally ill or not!). Across the media, posh people are being classed as Middle Class frequently. Is it the motive again due to mentally ill shame? Further investigations required.

Psychobabblists don’t view doctors who physically attack and verbally abuse helplessly ill patients as mental. As doctors are prejudiced against patients, obsessively asking if the patient has any “siblings” or if they have a “father” living at home, the psychobabblists should declare such doctors behaviour as mental illness, but they don’t, despite in some cases these questions being asked of a patient and NONE about visible physical ill health symptoms!!! Instead psychobabblists categorise victims of medical negligence fighting for treatment as being “obsessed with their illness!!!!

A final example is that of people obsessively worried about their appearance, undergoing plastic surgery, or worried about the appearance of an object rather than it’s structure (e.g. a house).

The reason why psychobabblists are not justifying their existence on these real mentally ill people is because they themselves behave like this and are prejudiced in favour of doctors.

——————————————————————————————————————————————

FLAWED STATISICS

G.P. Bromley, Kent, claimed in 1998/9, “G.P.s see a wide range of mental health problems. About TWO THIRDS of consultations have a psychiatric component and 1 person in every 6 have a mental health problem at some time in their life”.

The Mental Health booklets, health Of The Nation claim between 5,000 and 12,000 children could show psychiatric problems. Their symptoms to indicate this include disturbed sleep. This can actually be caused in reality by physical ill health. Under DSS criteria disturbed sleep is regarded as a mental health problem!!!!

In 1999 the Mental Health Foundation’s report, the Bright Future’s, using 1,000 sources of evidence accumulated over 2 years, said 1/5 of children were suffering from psychological problems. Sources included both child and mental health experts (experts being psychobabblists-you can even get child psychologists, proving further infection of society).
The report went on to claim that poverty damages mental health. Is this why doctors only carry out their selection process of who to treat and who not to (depending on their prejudices) from the Working Classes (hence why BBC reporter Emily Catto had NOT experienced medical negligence of this kind)? This report was also one of many publications which classes “anxiety and depression” as psychological conditions.

The Chairperson of the Sevenoaks & Area Mental Health Group has claimed “1 in 4 of the population will suffer from a mental health problem, (stress, anxiety, depression) in any 1 year”.
As this document proves, psychobabble is classing physically ill people as mental, so to cover up negligence, explain away what science can’t explain, make up justifications for psychobabblists to exist and gag freedom of speech, whilst ignoring REAL mental illnesses. Therefore all these statistic’s are bollocks.

I could go on with this document (e.g. add the New Age practise of being non-judgemental which is spreading throughout society, despite half of the New Age beliefs being based on psychology which is all about being judgemental of others, along with their belief of living in the NOW, being On The Road To Nowhere (the 1980’s song of the same name could be their music for meditation periods).

Did you know that E.C.T. (Electron Convulsive Therapy) was developed in Italy when it was ruled by the Fascists. And did you know it is likely (due to evidence) that Nazi Germany developed psychotropic medication.
And did you know that drug companies are alleged to have significant influence over psychiatrists who use their drugs to drug most of their patients. If a victim objects to being drugged this act is viewed as being part of the mental illness.

Further facts about psychology:
A). Clinical psychologists spectrum are patients/clients with depression/mental illness, neurological disorders and learning difficulties. They can assess, diagnose and treat, in hospitals and health centres and work along side social workers.

Threat rating 10/10 as life and death can be effected.

B). Educational psychologists work with pupils with learning and behavioural problems, assessing some with special needs, (bizarrely, dyslexia, despite being a physical condition, is diagnosed not by doctors, but by these psychologists! This will be changed when the B.U.P. come to power). Did you know that one used to have to be a qualified teacher in order to be an educational psychologist.

Threat rating; 8/10 as their danger is restricted to schools but can inter fear still in home life.

C). Counselling psychologists are relatively new and are a general pest as they can be found in businesses, schools and health/social care professions.

Threat rating 8/10

D). Forensic psychologists work with prison staff and offenders and are able to analysis crime, rehabilitate prisoners, take part in hostage negotiation, give evidence in court.

Threat rating 8/10 as a person’s freedom depends on a psychologist.

E). Occupational psychologists workplace is in studying how people do their jobs, so they can advise the business leaders of how to increase job productivity.

Threat rating 6/10 as even though they can cause a work force to over work, currently it is still possible for such victims to walk away from such a job.

F). Health psychologists encourage preventative medicine, working in G.P.s surgeries and Hospitals and are suppose to support people.

Threat rating 5/10 because even though they can support a doctor committing negligence, they’re no threat without a Dr.

G). Sports psychologists are to just train sports person’s mentally for sport. Threat rating 4/10, because a person can refuse or choose to have them.

However I’ll end the report here.

PART 3 CONCLUSION:

The fact that psychobabblists have a criteria in mind of what they regard as ‘normal’ individual (and other “personality types”), whereby the pattern of evidence to “indicate” what a normal individual is like means they are: subordinate to authorities; dumbed down so can easily be manipulated; has 2 parents and a “sibling”; embraces psychobabble; does not follow a spiritual belief system; are never miserable (sounds like a BBC TV’s 1988 episode of Dr, Who show The Happiness Patrol… No doubt this will now become part of a psychobabble course to study like EastEnders is!!), though some psychobabblists are so desperate for wages, they claiming happy constantly is wrong/mental!;

However psychobabble, as well as having a criteria for the perfect person, also has a criteria for those who don’t meet with their perverse belief for the perfect individual.

Psychobabblists believe that by studying one person from a particular background and their experiences, they can predict and understand the behaviour and motives of another person they DON’T know. Psychobabble can then categorise people into types of personality. For example: University psychobabblists have made the (another waste of time) discovery that by observing how a person speaks at work to another, the former can be identified as having a dominant personality or not. They have labelled those who are dominant as “high dom” and those who are not as “low dom”. Yet this analysis is wrong as an individual who is dominant at work may not be dominating at home, being dominated by their spouse.

In 1930’s & 40’s Germany there were people who had an idea of the perfect human/person and categorised those they thought were apart from those they thought were not. They were called Nazis. They wanted subordination by their public who were meant/encouraged to be as dumb as possible.

What will psychobabblists do next? Prominent psychobabblist Carl Jung was an ant-semite yet psychobabblists still follow him! Whilst Sigmund Freud was an atheist and cocaine addict who’s ideas were perverted.

Will Freud’s followers ban religion one day (as doctors are already saying praying to angels is mental illness), whilst the slandering of those who psychobabblists view as not ‘normal’ becomes full persecution?

The one thing which frightens psychobabblists is common sense.

Common sense means a person having a good sense in practical matters gained through EXPERIENCE of life, NOT by special study.

Psychology means the STUDY of the mind (deduced from behaviour) and how it works.

Since Common Sense Philosophy was first published within a fact sheet (c2002/3) the common sense phrase has not only increased in use (10 months after publication), but has been attacked by psychobabblists. In the U.K.’s legal system, a circular was issued warning judges NOT to use common sense, whilst university psychobabblists have derided common sense as NOT being a guide to reality, (psychobabble is killing people so psychobabble is not reality). Now a newspaper columnist has tried to class something he was attacking as being part of common sense, so he could repeatedly slag off common sense.

The fact that common sense can only be learnt through experience and not through study means it’s harder (too hard no doubt) for psychobabblists to understand, as they don’t want to experience it.

They can’t understand life through experience so to obtain power and status (and be useful to authorities so to obtain that power) over others they claim to achieve this understanding through “studying” other peoples (dead perverted psychobabblists) writings.

(Some psychobabblists in the Netherlands are trying to teach psychology through experience and do recognise the existence of spirituality, it’s meditations being practised by Japanese businesses. Though it sounds that these psychobabblists are worth endorsing/helping them adapt to common sense, however they’re part of an old Indian sex cult, (who’s members in the 1980’s/early ‘90’s are accused of failing their children) believe in the Mind-Body dangerous rubbish, so can never be endorsed. No doubt after reading about these psychobabblists, Britain’s psychobabblists will go to the Netherlands no doubt).

In conclusion, psychobabblists are hurting society both of their own accord and being tools of others, whilst psychobabble alone is used by doctors wanting to harm through negligence, a patient.

Psychobabble needs to be obliterated and common sense replace it for both patient’s and the need to retain democracy as psychobabble is a tool to destroy democratic freedoms.

I have clarified common sense as a philosophy (philosophy is suppose to “question psychology”).

Please join the Patients First/Radical News Service campaign to destroy psychobabble/psychobabblists, so common sense can return to our public services, reducing the suffering in society and improving our democratic freedoms.

UPDATE: Psychobabblists Are A Threat To Freedom Of Speech/Whistle Blowers

Since first publishing the facts about psychobabble the authorities and mental health staff are now using psychobabble to try and gag the author of the above report, Paul O’Callaghan.

He made undercover audio and video recordings of doctors purposefully selecting him to medically neglect, verbally abusing and one Dr. even physically attacking him. He then published his own newspaper across the Bromley borough on the borders of Kent/London featuring the quotes and images of these doctors to support what he was exposing: that doctors commit medical negligence on purpose.

The hospital, rather than punish their exposed staff, called in the Police and the local press lied about what Mr. O’Callaghan had exposed. He had condemned the doctors in the same way the same local newspaper editor had condemned car thieves, who received support from the local Police Chief, publicly. The Police launched an investigation and dragged off his house sitter to find him. Mr. O’Callaghan went into hiding. He has NEVER had anything to do with the local mental health services supplier, but they were contacted by the Police to deal with him. Despite the blatant evidence of being physically ill and negligence being on purpose and only exercising his freedom of speech/being a whistle blower, the mental health trust’s Tim Sowter wrote to Mr. O’Callaghan wanting to talk to him, thereby PROVING that psychobabblists view criticism of doctors/freedom of speech as mental. In comparison he exposed yobs, who were smashing up his home because the neighbours had encouraged them to do so to chase away his mother who the woman thought would run away with her pensioner husband (so she banged on the walls, cut his mother’s washing line and plants and called for the Andrew Parkes’ proposed “death squads” to be established by the government to be extended to deal with the yobs,. Yet Mr. Sowter has not taken action to lock the neighbours and yobs up despite them being the one’s who have committed violence). The government (health officials) covered up his evidence. P.M. Tony Blair thanking him for his letter, but taking no action to help him. After being made aware of the evidence the health department moved to give the hospital trust the green light to go ahead with it’s application to obtain Foundation Hospital Status….

The media covered up his case (the only profession corporate journalists never expose/secretly record medical doctors).

Now a law firm has accused him of “defaming” the hospital trust, despite the clear evidence of the hospital’s guilt. Plus of making “explicit and implicit threats of violence” when Mr. O’Callaghan had NEVER stated any such things, instead writing about other people in a similar situation to his own, resorting to violence unless something was done to stop negligence.

So he co-founded a political party, British Unicorn, where his campaign for treatment and punishment/exposure of the doctors are official policies, (giving the law firm a legal “headache, according to Mr. O’Callaghan).

His above revised report on psychobabble originally to be published by Patients First is published by the British Unicorn Party.

Published By The British Unicorn Party, 2005

Further UPDATE: Paul O’Callaghan is to be placed under section for “insultating the specilalities of psychology and psychiatry and not recognizing their legitimacy, because he wrote a Public Report about the epidemic of medical negligence and how the judes, CPS and Police, with psychiatrsis are always on the sidfe of negligent (white) Doctors and that psychiatry and psychology are tools to suppress freedom of thought and speech so to condition and control. Paul is now on the run.

POLICY 3: All psychobabblists are to be rounded up by the R.P.G. and taken to a Scotish Isle. There a prison built especially for psychobabblists will hold them until theses individuals are cleansed of their psychobabble beliefs.

Experts in both Common sense Philosophy and have experience of CONTINUED hardships will try and have the psychobabblists come to terms with the harm they have done both directly and in directly committed.

POLICY 4: Common Sense Hit Squads will be established to go abroad and educate peoples of other countries as to the danger of psychobabble (e.g. in the worlds biggest nest of psychobabblists, the U.S. State of California, the Squad will educate schools as to the danger of having counsellors).

POLICY 5: Sundays are to be reinstated as a day of rest for businesses, (small local shops allowed to be open till 2pm and Public Houses until 4pm).

POLICY 6: England to receive the National Bank Holiday of St. Georges Day.

POLICY 7: Cornwall and Scilly people to have their own Bank Holiday.

POLICY 8: AVMA to lose its charitable status and Liberty closed down for only helping those who have their liberty taken away by a select few professions (e.g. by Police but not by doctors). See Health Policy 1 for more details.

POLICY 9: No more birds kept in cages.

POLICY 10: No more exporting of animals abroad for any of the above reasons or for food.

POLICY 11: Zoos to be phased out.

POLICY 12: Abortions to be barred after 12 weeks of pregnancy, except when the pregnancy is a risk to the woman’s physical health/life.

POLICY 13: All shops to be closed on Bank Holidays and on Sundays (except newsagents before 2pm).

POLICY 14: People on income (or none at all) which causes them poverty are to receive every winter (October – April) free heating, food, water and shelter.

A). A Mini-wind turbine (they do exist and are being promoted) fitted, free, to each poverty stricken home to generate heating.

B). Coupons issued each Autumn to each person of a poverty stricken home to pay for the amount of food each person needs to survive upon.

C). The equivalent of 2 bottles of water a day, per person of a poverty household, to be free from the tap.

D). Councils, building societies etc etc, to be barred from repossessing homes during the October to April period.

The funding for A), B). and C). will come from the savings made by the reduction of the Royal family and seizure of Elizabeth and Charles Windsor’s assets.

Those who are homeless to be given shelter where they can register so to be able to apply for a job application. These homeless people will be helped to get a job their talents are useful for.

POLICY 15: Any organisation who claims to help people or campaign against issues within their remit, but don’t actually do so will have their assets seized and made illegal (for an example refer to AVMA and Liberty).

POLICY 16: All animal rights demonstrators and rescuers to be released immediately from prison.

POLICY 17: Homeless centres to be established where the basic needs of the homeless can be met, where they can also use as a place they can use to register when trying to obtain work.

SECTION8:CONSTITUTIONAL & POLITICAL RESTRUCTURING POLICIES

In South Africa there has been Black Majority Rule because for democracy to exist those who make up a majority in a society of a country should be the dominant element of people in control of that country.

Under Common Sense Philosophy, one finds that in Britain democracy does not exist, predominantly because those of the largest Social Class (Working Class) have never been the dominant element in control of Britain. Like South Africa was not democratic when it was White Minority Rule, Britain has always been, Posh Minority Rule. To be a true democracy, Britain needs Working Class Majority Rule.

A second reason for Working Classes to dominate parliament and Government (the official control of Britain) is that experience of continued hardships is only suffered by the Working and Common Classes and to have experience of hardships is a superior way to understanding/knowing their causes, than studying them. Posh people can only study them, so this is why posh Governments and Inquiries (always led by posh persons) fail to solve the continued hardships of the Working Classes.

POLICY 1: A written constitution to be established guarantying:

A). Freedom of Speech in any manner on any issue

B). Freedom to protest peacefully in a public place WITHOUT prior notice to authorities on any issue.

C). The right for the people to overthrow a government which brought in National Service and conscription in time of war or peace.

D). National Wage limit guaranteed.

E). Every person in Britain to have the legal right to the amount of shelter, heating, food and water required to survive in winter.

F). In order for a Prime Minister to mount an offensive war, they must obtain support from the majority of M.P.s and the Head Of State, the Lord Protector (see below).

G). The Prime Minister will be able to order a defensive war if Britain is about to be or is being attacked, without the head Of States backing, (the latter will also be able to order this action if the Prime Minister has not done so).

H). To guarantee the constitutional changes proposed here.

POLICY 2: The House of Lords will be abolished and replaced by the House of Republican Lords (Republican Lords for short). All Republican Lords will be elected by the people (each Lord having a constituency the size of an M.E.P.s’). To stand for election, candidates over 21will only need to be republican/opposed to the Monarchy and experienced CONTINUED hardships. The Republican Lords will represent republicans in Britain and give republicans the option of becoming Legislators (law makers) as an oath to the Monarch is required to sit in the House Of Commons.

POLICY 3: THE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CLOSURE OF A PARLIAMENT

500 cross party M.P.s received Paul O’Callaghan’s news sheet (see Health Policies 1 and 2) yet refused to become involved. Their excuse was that Mr. O’Callaghan’s case was only an Orpington issue as that was where he lived, rather than a national issue as a number of the doctors exposed are suppose to deal with patients from across Britain, (for example, Professor Linda Luxon of the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery caught on camera with a colleague she later denied in a letter was present and ignored a physiotherapists findings!).

As he had to go into hiding, his M.P., John Horam, has declared Mr. O’Callaghan as no longer being his constituent so enabling Mr. Horam to do nothing, even though his constituents are clearly in danger. The 500 M.P.s chose to protect the

PARLIAMENT TO BE REPLACED

BECAUSE POLICE HAVE NO RIGHT TO ARREST ANYONE

Whilst it is a well known fact that the House of Lords, because it’s members are un elected makes it undemocratic, it is less well known that the House of Commons is in fact an illegitimate parliament thereby making all laws it makes, void so illegitimate, (in practise, unenforceable). There are five reasons why the Commons is illegitimate under Common Sense Philosophy: 1. In order to solve the continued hardships of the masses it’s better to experience those problems rather than study them, (also why Common sense is superior to psychology), yet whilst the masses are Working Class and Common Class, the Commons is dominated by Aristocratic, Upper (pronouncing year as, “yuerrr”) and Middle Classes; 2. A parliament’s members (like the media) should reflect the make up of society, the majority of society being Working Class and Common Class, whilst Middle, Upper and Aristocratic Classes make up minorities in society. Yet the Commons is dominated by Aristocratic, Upper and Middle Classes; 3. The M.P.s are elected by First Past The Post, which is not democratic, when it should be by Proportional Representation; 4. The parliament has not granted land within the U.K. for people to go and live who wish to opt out of the Rule of Law, (every piece of land in the world is subject to the Rule of Law of one country or another) as when a person is born they are not consenting to being subject to laws, but having laws imposed upon them. An illegitimate parliament can be brought down by a peaceful General Strike. It is our policy, “To replace parliament with one legitimate under C.S.P. because the Acts of Parliament are illegitimate (e.g. establishing the C.P.S., anti-terror laws, security laws, etc, even the laws giving Police the power of arrest). The House of Lords will be replaced. Think Tanks will be outlawed as M.P.s should think for themselves. It is due to a lack of experience of continued hardships by M.P.s and the higher social classes contempt for the Working and Common Classes why M.P.s fail.

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

It is based upon these 4 points we justify our policy to close the House of Commons and replace by the better Parliament where all candidates standing for election must be elected by Proportional Representation and have proven they have experience of CONTINUED hardships (meritocracy).

POLICY 4: The Glastonbury Common Sense Charter – The Constitution For The UK

In light of part time Judge (June Venters Q.C.) deciding to block a political party (British Unicorn) from having and promoting policies, denying the public the right to decide if they wanted to vote for these policies or not, denying a political Party the use of the ballot box to gain power (so frighteningly legitimizing civil unrest and a coup technically), it is now vital a written constitution is created, blatantly stating that political parties can have any policy they want to put to the electorate to vote on. This is because denying the public the right to vote on a policy is an attack on the fundamental cornerstones of democracy in addition to freedom of thought and speech. Thus, with British Unicorn Party under immense attack, this document proposes a pressure group, the Glastonbury Common Sense Charter League, to campaign to have this Charter of 21 Principles (so far) adopted as the United Kingdom & Northern Ireland of Great Britain’s written constitution. In this document simply known as “Britain” to save repeating this long name. It is British unicorn Party policy rto allow Northern Ireland to join with the republidc of Ireland as only the Royalists want Northern Ireland to remain part of Britain and we’re Republican.

This document consists of the Principles for the Constitution for Britain which are mainly the Principles of Common Sense Philosophy.

A written constitution guaranteeing rights is NOT like a politician or civil servant who can break promise4s (guarantees) or lie. The guarantees of a written constitution can’t be broken or be twisted by ego or fear or be blackmailed. It’s worth campaigning for this Charter to become our written constitution far more than campaigning for any politician.

For those who don’t wish to join any political party or are members of another political party and not British Unicorn, but agree with this Charter and want it as Britain’s constitution, should join this League.

Currently there is no Principle, for example, addressing the issue of how much land and property a single person or family can own, (one could argue the limit is one upon which one can survive on. The Duke of Westminster owns extensive property, his son-in-law being TV historian Dan Snow).

This is the first if many future Principles the League can debate and create. Any new Principle can not be adopted if it contradicts those first/original 21 Principles which can not be removed without the Charter changing from it’s original purpose.

This constitution will guarantee Britain to be a psychobabble free society with freedom of speech, thought and to protest with basic survival needs met. As a Written Constitution for Britain it will be known as the “Glastonbury Constitution”.

The Principles

Principle 1. Only those with the experience of continued hardships (plural) will be able to make/legislate laws in the legislature (so only those with the experience of continued hardships can stand for election to Britain’s parliaments and county, town and parish councils). This is due to learning through experience of suffering being superior to learning through study to understand the causes of continued hardships/suffering, so are better placed to know how to solve them. In addition, by suffering one has more empathy for others suffering, whilst having a life of privilege creates contempt for the poor and ill, prioritizing instead the value of making money.

Continued hardships (more than one hardship) means living a life of poverty or just above the po0verty line, WITH many additional acute hardships and chronic ill health, often neglected.

Of Britain’s social classes, usually only the Working Class and Common Class would be able to display they have experience of continued hardships, but SOME Middle Classes who, through extreme hard work and luck, or through marriage, have achieved Middle Class, would have experienced continued hardships in the past.

The Upper and Aristocratic Classes (those who pronounce year as “yuerrr”), do not have experience of continued hardships.

Principle 2: That Judges are elected by the People, so giving Judges Legitimacy as they will be accountable, but must have a knowledge of the Law, this Constitution as the bedrock of the Law and have experience of Continued Hardships because of their need for empathy and avoid contempt in influencing their judgements of the poor. Magistrates have no knowledge of the Law so have no place to exist.

Principle 3: That the legislature (parliament) has supremacy over the verdicts (decisions) of Judges, both whilst Judges are unelected and elected.

This is because to have Authority one must be accountable for their decisions. The highest Authority (those with the ‘Final Say’) must be accountable to the greate4st number of people. Parliament is the institution with the highest number of people (the masses) it is accountable to, therefore have Authority over the Judges.

Principle 4: The House of lords will be a totally elected chamber by Proportional Representation. It’s roles:

A). To continue the existing functions of the existing House of Lords.

B). To elect amongst themselves a Head of State (by deciding amongst themselves who has the most experience of continued hardships), titled the Lord Protector.

C). To act as the Final Say on the legal Appeal

D). To keep Britain free of psychology, psychiatry and Monarchy.

E).

Principle 5: It is the right of the electorate (public) to decide which policies they wish to vote and NOT a Judge, magistrate or civil servant. To deny the public thi8s right would be an attack on freedom of speech and thought of both the public and the political party, which means for a political party denied the use of the ballot box, would have no option but to resort to inciting a coup to gain power, risking civil war.

Principle 6: Freedom of thought, speech and (anytime, anywhere in a public place during daylight hours without permission) to protest/demonstrate through verbal, written and visual expression’s is THE fundamental principle of democracy and any suppression of this (no matter how perverse or funny) would legitimize parliaments overthrow as democracy would have ended and would require being restored.

Principle 7: Britain is coming frighteningly close to restoring the death penalty. This is the Charters response that the Christian and Bhakti Yoga (Hara Krishna) principle of Forgiveness is adopted in that:

A). Whilst the crimes of CHOOSING to torture and kill innocent people has been punishable by execution as these are the worst crimes (obviously) if the torturer/killer publicly begs for Forgiveness for this/these crime(s) they were found gu7ilty of, their life MUST be SPARED.

B_). That anyone who chooses to be executed is not mentally fit to make such a judgement as they have lost their self-preservation instinct (which occurs when they are NOT sacrificing themselves in a different context to execution to save others), so instead of being executed they must be committed to a Common Sense Mental Health Unit (secured) until their self-p preservation instinct is restored.

c). That a Life Sentence in prison means a life sentence to remain in prison until the torturer/killer dies.

Principle 8: That every person is entitled to water to drink and wash, basic food, basic shelter, basic heat, medical treatment and (as a child) basic education.

By “basic” it is meant enough to survive each day. By “£basic education” it is meant: lessons in English spelling and speech, Human Biology, Maths, Science, Encyclopaedia History(official and hidden) and Spiritual & Debate Workshops (to encourage thought).

Principle 9: That because Common Sense is based on evidence and fact using experience to learn about life, whilst psychology and psychiatry are based on rumour, guesswork and prejudice, Britain and all professions within it, must practise common sense, whilst psychology and psychiatry (used to conceal medical negligence and suppress freedom of thought and speech repeatedly) are cleansed from Britain.

Principle 10: That monopolies lead to poor service due to a lack of competition but privatization to create competition leads to profit (greed) before quality of service and staff needs, ignoring minority needs. Therefore all state owned services should be split from 2 to 4 organizations in each state run profession so quality of service can be maintained, avoiding greed, but also avoid sloppiness of service (the BBC has a monopoly on the licence fee and there is only one Police Service in each county, legitimizing a British F.B.I.)

Principle 11:

A). That as the spiritual/supernatural evidence of existence beyond death now exists, that this evidence and NOT dogmatic beliefs of religions, is used as the justification to officially recognize there is existence beyo9nd death.

B). That many of the Peoples need for Oneness with others is due to the state of existence beyond death, before rebirth, is one of Oneness (as near Death Experiences have shown).

C). That having other lives is True (as evidence has shown) and this is officially recognized.

Principle 12: That as death gives people Oneness and life gives them Individuality, then a group of people (wrongly referred to as “community” often) do not have the right to outweigh the rights of the individual.

Principle 13: Self-regulation is wrong in all professions (Doctors, police, Banking etc.), as it leads to corruption via self-protectionism. Outsiders to a profession must regulate that profession.

Principle 14: That the Alternative Health Professions of pure Homeopathy, Herbalism and Osteopathy, have equal medical status to Orthodox (Doctors) medical profession by having, for their patients, the right to commission and direct radiologists to look for medical problems in scans.

Principle 15: That the human race are an animal species, but are the most curious about life which drives the need to learn. Therefore, whilst as an animal species we have sex and eat other animals to survive but strive to become vegetarian, we must reject the killing of other animals other than to eat or in self-defence. To kill animals for sport, ritual or experimentation is evil.

Principle 16: That until the 5 social classes become one through NATURAL means, only those with the experience of continued hardships can govern, but on race, sex and gender all men and women are equal in rights to all careers not requiring experience of continued hardships (governing and media) and services.

Principle 17: That in their homes, healthy consenting adults can do what they like amongst themselves, (by adult it is meant those aged 18 years and over).

Principle 18: That a status of semi-adult should exist for 16 to 18 year olds, during which they are entitled to indulge in an adult lifestyle but only amongst those who are also semi-adults. This protects this age group from being taken advantage of due to their inexperience of adult life by older/more experienced adults. Sixth Forms and Colleges for this age group should be compulsory for half a day so they can run courses in all aspects of adult life as part of an extended school curriculum.

Principle 19: The media must p[practise Encyclopaedia Journalism – listing every fact they find instead of prioritizing the news’ presentation using story telling journalism, (which may use the brain washing tool of NLP). The motive of the news event must always be given, even if it is a guess based on facts added together. The media must always give all aspects of society a voice, placing experiences of people above that of opinion, and give both perspectives of a news subject (a voice to those who support and oppose the news) equally.

It’s vital that the media (journalists, Editors, producers) consist of men and women having had the experience of continued hardships so the prime news output (which is rightly about continued hardships but in all areas of society), gains the greatest understanding of it and thus it’s causes enabling journalists to report this to all aspects of society, including political parties equally.

If the media fail in any of the above they are suppressing freedom of speech, so undermining Britain’s stability. It is therefore correct in these circumstances of failure for the media output to be hijacked by those denied a voice so to be heard (e.g./ a small political party denied a voice through the General Election Political Broadcasts can knock out a TV transmitter and then use their own one to transmit their General Election Broadcast – and jam Outside Broadcasts).

Principle 20: That the Monarchy is abolished and the Windsor’s and their acolytes punished. Monarchy is an abomination against nature (persons, such as a family, claiming superiority by bloodlines/birth (royal), when it is not scientifically/phys9ically possible, rendering the claims of being born superior (royal) with no evidence to prove this, is a fraud. It is evil to claim such status so to leach parasitically off the masses who are poor and ill and die as a result (a crime of Genocidal Manslaughter – e.g. not enough medical drugs for illness because it is spent on the Windsors to gamble at horse racing, holiday in the Alps and live in palaces), and demand respect for such parasitic behaviour , (justifying the term Parasite Family). In addition, the Chief Parasite (Monarch) takes official pleasure in peoples imprisonment when IT (she) is guilty of genocidal manslaughter. Therefore it is right that the Chief Parasite is punished for the pleasure of prisoners, by which is meant in the presence of prisoners for their “pleasure”.

Therefore Monarchy in Britain has no place and any family claiming superiority by birth and their acolytes (royalists) punished, (the latters for actively helping the Parasite Family remain in their status of parasitic privilege). To believe a family to be born superior and leaching off the public on these grounds, without requiring any evidence, is a sign of true insanity so supporters of Monarchy require Common sense Mental Health treatments.

Principle 21: That the United Kingdom of great Britain & Northern Ireland is renamed the Republic of Great Britain, (“with Northern Ireland”allowed to join with the Republic). The National Flag (union Jack) incorporating the black of the Cornish flag and at the centre the dragon of the welsh flag. Cornwall and Wales to be given equal status to Scotland, but NO regional parliaments within England as this undermines the Union and takes devolution to destructive levels, rendering Britain to fragment and be consumed by the European Union. The people of England, Scotland, Wales and Cornwall are entitled to travel from one

of their kingdom to the other without passing through another of the old Kingdoms, so Wales is entitled to the reopening of the Rhyader and Protmadoc – Bangor railway lines.

Principle 22: The extent of land ownership. The lowest limit is the amount of land upon which one can survive, but the highest limit is to be set by the League:……

-=—————————————————————————–

Policy 5: The European and world-wide institution of the Monarchy will be abolished, saving millions of pounds to be spent on the poorest people having mini-wind turbines. In practise, the only person’s to be eligible to be Royals will be: the Head of State and their spouse; the immediate heir to the thrown and their spouse; subsequent heir to the throne and their spouse (and so on). Brothers and sisters of any heir will only receive protection till they are 16 years of age. Anyone other than the Head of state, the heirs and their spouses, will NOT be eligible to be Royals so will have to go out and get a job. Only Buckingham Palace will be available to the Royals, the rest being sold off to British citizens or opened to the public as museums. The income from these actions along with the income from the Duchy of Cornwall and Duchy of Lancaster, will fund the mini-wind turbines for the poorest homes so they no longer freeze to death of a winter due to sheer poverty.

POLICY 6: The Republican Lords will retain the same legal powers as the current House of Lords, but will be able to block an offensive war (a war where Britain attacks a country which has not attacked Britain or any other country in previous six months).

POLICY 7: It is common sense that those who are intelligent and have experienced continued hardships will have a better understanding of how to solve the problems/hardships which exist in society. Therefore government positions will only be available to those who are intelligent and experienced continued hardships. No more posh twits as Ministers.

POLICY 8: A religious parliament (of Buddhists, Christians, Hindus, Muslims, Jews, Osho Sannyasins, Pagans and Sikhs) will be set up, to introduce Common Sense Philosophy to their religions and reduce religious extremism. Parliamentary seats will be allocated reflecting the religions size in the U.K.). The parliament would sack any clergy who could not speak English, or was not learning about British culture or who was inciting physical violence, from the religions.

POLICY 9: British culture to be taught in ALL schools with a Bank Holiday introduced for England on St. Georges Day.

POLICY 10: The Union Jack flag will be re launched by having the Cornish black cross and a small Welsh red dragon added (in the centre of the cross) so to give those old kingdoms equal status in the flag, to England, Scotland and Ireland.

POLICY 11: Central Government to have the powers to control how councils spend their money if the central government desires to exercise this right on a failing council. Councils can sometimes finance projects to appease yobs whilst denying funding to disabled people. In such cases the central government could step in and take control of the council, dismissing local councillors and the executive civil servants, holding fresh local elections within 12 months. In addition the Government would be able to take control of a council if it was supporting racism.

Example: Bromley Council:

Another Report The NEWS SHOPPEr Covered Up

HEALTH BODY PUTS YOBS BEFORE PATIENTS.COUNCIL UPS YOUTH CRIME?

As referred to earlier (Health Policy 1)Jane Meek and Claire Perry of Bromley Health Authority refused Mr. O’Callaghan a specialist hospital for 1 out-patient’s appointment because of “finite resources”, (when he could afford it privately the hospital then said he could only attend by NHS appointment – when they knew about his negligence!). Bromley Community Health Council (C.H.C.) confirmed he was not the only one denied referral to this hospital. B.H.A. said his funding would “compromise higher clinical priorities”. In 1996 Meek & Perry spent “finite resources” instead on the Cray Youth Radio project (£1,700) to reduce youth crime, alcohol and drug addiction (people who MAKE themselves ill, unlike him) by encouraging the youths to play at Cray Radio instead of crime. Instead youth crime rocketed. Claire Perry’s successor Michael Kerin claimed the project had been “evaluated” and found to improve mental health and “reduced drugs misuse”. Another of Perry’s successors, Jackie Spibey, said that Cray Radio was “likely to result” (so she didn’t know for certain) “in lower levels of smoking and alcohol use”. Neither would offer any evidence to substantiate their claims. Meek’s/Perry’s £1,700 was to fund a “feasibility study”(to ask the yobs if they wanted a high-tech radio station) according to Melanie Nock of what is now Community Links, Bromley. Kerin, asked as to what he meant by “an initial £1,700”, past this question about what he said to CLIVE UREN. Both in letters and in papers, BHA/ Perry had always admitted to funding Cray Radio. Uren however said, “Bromley Health Authority has not provided funding for this initiative”. His colleague Dr. Angela Bhan admitted, “Our predecessor organisation B.H.A. funded a feasibility study for the radio station back in 1996 and paid £1,700 to the project”. Uren is now Bromley Primary Care Trust boss….

THE NEWSSHOPPER covered up a petition of 100’s of names to have health funds spent on patients instead of Cray Radio, the reporter refusing even to look down at the list, (instead reporting on petitions with NO signatures)! My Mum with a friend on camera conducted interviews with Bromley shoppers. All condemned the funding, e.g., “Bromley Health should spend the money on having their heads examined”. The video recording was covered up by the NewsShopper and Editor Parkes has refused to give it back (theft?).

CONFUSION CRAY YOB RADIO: fighting vertigo in 2001 Mr. O’Callaghan interviewed St. Paul’s Cray and Orpington people with a micro. recorder and microphone to discover if youth crime was down. It had actually risen since Fusion, Cray Youth Radio went on air, possibly appearing as a reward to yobs: Mr. Reeves said, “It’s awful round here but it (Cray Radio) hasn’t done much good. That’s a dead cert”. Mr. Butler: “I would say it has failed” (to reduce youth crime). 2 women arguing with youths motor cycling on recreation ground said youth crime had, “trebled, trebled” pointing at the youths and saying “they know all about crime, youth crime” to which 1 replied, “Yeah”. Another youth turned out to be a Cray Radio D.J. (confirmed later by Cray Radio). The women were too scared to give their names. There was a lot more condemnation. The NewsShopper had reports about youth crime surrounding a report on Cray Radio where it’s manager Shelia Smith said the area was quieter when on air-the paper did NOT challenge her on this.

Mr. O’Callaghan requested, very ill, an interview with Cray Radio, so to produce a report to pressurise the health authority into giving him a hospital referral. After waiting the 2 weeks in which a publicly funded body like Cray Radio had to reply within, he visited Cray Radio with a friend on camera. They arrived when Smith and Daniella Hammond, youth worker, were on air (not the youths!) who on hearing of our arrival broadcast how “exciting” it was a “television crew” had arrived. Hammond came out and requested the camera be turned off on hearing why they were there. Then when Smith came out Hammond bundled her through a side door before she came to speak to us. Smith said, “You’ve got youth questions so you need a youth worker”, yet Hammond admitted “Shelia has got it (Cray Radio) up, I’m just a worker here”. Hammond attacked the camera. Clearly there was confusion about who was responsible. They refused to answer any questions. 48 hours later suddenly Bromley Youth Agency who operate Cray Radio replied, claiming to have contacted the Police, (they never did because they knew they were in the wrong.

Mr. O’Callaghan again interviewed local people, angry at Cray Radio’s refusal to be accountable: e.g. Mrs. Joan Coney said of Smith and Hammond, “So they don’t do a proper job?! This is not a holiday. I don’t think they should be on the air at all. They should be off their arses and they should actually do something for the kids. If nobody’s going to it why are we paying for them. What are they scared of in not talking to you? What are they scared of! God knows what they do. Just boost their own ego’s”. Tony Morris said that if they were “spending public money, they should be accountable”.

Mr. O’Callaghan sent my findings to Capital Radio’s Help A London Child (who had given Cray Radio £3,500) who decided not to wait for Cray Radio to fill in a Project Report Form but contacted them immediately. People decided to boycott Banardoes on hearing they funded Cray Radio (Banardoes gave a “no comment”). Locals accused the News Shopper of having “something to hide”.

From 2002 till April 2004 the NewsShopper boycotted reporting on Cray Radio, going from supporting appeasement for yobs to launching Shop A Yob and now back to supporting an ‘appeasing yob project’. The Kentish Times did report Mr. O’Callaghan’s mother’s criticism of the project, but then boycotted criticism.

Meanwhile Cray Radio offered now to be interviewed but without Smith and no recording. So no interview was conducted. Bromley C.H.C.’s Chairman Patrick Parker (now on the board of Bromley Hospitals trust) gagged Cray Radio being debated at a public meeting despite it being on the written agenda. Association of CHC Chairman Peter Walsh said, “the vast majority of CHCs do a good job as local NHS watchdogs”, so implying that Bromley CHC didn’t maybe? The name Peter Walsh has since come up with AVMA. Maria Goldenberg of the Community Care Protection Group, who claims to campaign for more patient beds did not reply to my letters. If Goldenberg wanted more money for beds why did she not demand the £1,700 be put into more beds? When Bromley Youth Music Trust faced loss of council funds they did not demand Cray Radio’s council funding, despite being informed of all of the above.

Cray Radio no longer lets Smith give the press interviews and a youth DJ who Mr. O’Callaghan pointed out was too old to be a youth (Davina McFayden, 26 who thinks the Isle Of Sheppey is in London) has retired

In addition when Bromley Council was exposed and condemned for doing nothing about neighbour harassment (neighbours banging on walls and cutting washing line, (caught on video tape) and throwing food into gardens), the council moved against the home owners, making threats of legal action about non-existent noise, rather than the neighbours, who had been exposed as racist (against Pakistani’s).

BROMLEY COUNCIL & POLICE SUPPORT NEIGHBOURS FROM HELL

In ‘95 a woman moved into a house with her ill son into ex-boyfriend’s house the only one available in the area’ for cash’ & to be near Homeopath; neighbours Nora (was abusive from moving in, the woman ignored it)+Charles Revett (ignored too), 13 Wimborne Avenue, who’d never caused her ex-boyfriend problems, have e.g.’ crashed on her walls, metal/bins etc in garden until she got up!‘every’ morning since ’95; says the woman’s “lazy” and her washing is for someone else because it’s “so clean”; thought they hadn’t woke her up by twice trying/banging, so cut her washing line!’ (on videotape but Police lost 2 copies of the video (then tie their’s in her land!) & tiny plants/destroys etc IN her garden!& saying she’s “no right” to them etc. even resents 24hr.carer/disabled,ill the woman on top of ladder to clean windows-let alone paint, in pain, top/outside house wall/wallpaper etc; she sings to keep herself going & for the pain etc. Nora wanted to get “an injunction against her/silly singing”!; Charles is put in hospital because of just pains in his head!-returns to drive car etc! & on shed as he builds it! he gets treated! Her son even heard her ’say “I’m just going next door to wake‘ em up” and then, a crash on our door – then she’ runs away!-’twas her all yrs. awaking her to no-one too! when she’ did up’ gardens Nora moaned to other side about o.k. (except for’ their’ dog’s mess) pavement! IAN WATTS of Bromley Council thinks that’s O.K;. the police serve anti-social behavioural orders on young yobs, yet will NOT on fit pensioner criminal yob blaming her torture/suffering on her son’s illness which forces him to sleep in mornings due to being so helplessly ill & battling vertigos & tinnitus nights ‘til 5+am! One P.C. even asked her what her job was-as if one’s occupation is taken into consideration! Another said she lied & it’s o.k. for kids to always be on others’ land etc. ‘NORA’ has ruined her feet-&’finished’ her knees etc.-dangerously depriving her any sleep &’incited’ other side neighbours Sullivans-knowingly embraced such evil + Sullivan wife says she’s a psychic‘healer’!-to abuse the woman too; Sullivans son/friends throwing stones/paint at our house-now do to others (when they told Nora they did,so she turned the other way’: Tony Sullivan-(kept, too, etc. ‘staring’ at the woman; knelt in our garden for hrs & hrs +! with injured pigeon awaiting woman’s return! then he & wife left it to die rather than drive it in 1of their 3 cars to a vet) called woman (who does NOT own a car) “a lazy filthy lunatic like your :son” ,so yobs knock on door repeating it-videotaped like the rest; Bromley Police Chief Dillnutt (who used to knock on Bromley doors and run away as a boy so stone-throwing yobs will be the next police officers) didn’t want to know, sexually discriminating against the woman by only wanting to see men at a public meeting about their problems; his police officers have ’lost’ 2 video recordings of the yobs & the neighbours’ criminal activities; police last said the woman had “a history of complaints”(only a 2nd one!) – which is why they did nothing!!!

The Police Training Centre need to change the application rules so people with medium & strong spectacle lenses can apply, instead of first having to undergo highly dangerous laser eye surgery (which has caused so much suffering the Medical Defence Union in 2003 has publicly blamed patients for expecting too much from the surgery!). To add insult to injury, the police will let in people with not 2-but 4+ criminal convictions and awaiting 2 Hearings for further charges. People should be able to join the Police service regardless of how strong their spectacle lenses are, as yobs are less likely to wear spectacles because they don’t bother to learn/read at school, let alone teach themselves. The police already have people who wear spectacles but below the spectacle lens strength of 6/12 and 6/6. The limit should, at least, be raised. People can keep spectacles on with elastic bands around the ears, like they are in Taekwondo classes. This would increase the Police numbers which Bromley councillors keep calling for.. If you agree with this idea write to those in authority. An anti-social & criminal order needs to be taken out against above N.Revett of Orpington. ‘She’ really needs a padded cell. With a seriously ill son and neighbours’ persecution, so ill, the woman’s been crying to police because the neighbours consistently purposely deprived her of sleep; She tried twice to move since 1998 (then she was even more ill) but she had to turn down 2 lone women from purchasing because of ‘Nora’. Charles erected a high fence because he thought “Pakis” people might move in!

POLICY 12: Freedom to people to pay only for those council services they use (e.g. pavements and rubbish collection) and thereafter be up to the individual to pay for services for others if they agree with such services (e.g. projects to appease yobs like Cray Youth radio, in Bromley)

POLICY 13: All Judges and magistrates to be elected at local council elections. All candidates must have experienced continued hardships and use common sense. Of course there can be draw backs with Judges elected as in America has shown, but it’s an improvement on the current UK system of un accountable individuals passing judgement on others.

POLICY 14: Emergency powers to be granted for 3 years upon election, to our leader Paul O’Callaghan so he can begin replacing those judges, magistrates and juries who have come to the wrong decision’s rounded up and punished, whilst he appoints judges and magistrates to replace those being rounded up. In addition to have republican police Guard take control of main Police Stations and military establishments, (so no losing parties can mount a coup/reverse the electorates decision to install us). R.P.G.’s will already be inside the Police and armed forces to help secure the two latter professions. Houses Of Commons and Lords to be suspended for six months until so all policies are implemented. This way the policies the people voted for can be implemented with out the losing parties trying to kill or change the policies during the parliamentary processes (e.g. in Committee stages or dragging the parliamentary debates on for so long the policy never becomes law because it runs out of time,(which is how the anti-fox hunting policies as Bills never, became Acts of Parliament/laws )

On the day AFTER you elect us, Radical News Centre’s journalists will begin jamming the BBCTV News and ITN broadcasts, replacing these broadcasts with Anglo-Celtic Broadcasting News reports of all the news cases BBC and ITN had covered up/ “filed” so you would not know about them. Meanwhile other radical journalists will literally kick the BBC/ITN posh journalists (i.e. all of the journalists!) out of their newsrooms/studio’s so for the FIRST time on BBC and ITN newsreaders will say “year” because none of the radical journalists will posh. The recordings of the doctors selecting patients to neglect was covered up by ALL the TV news and current affairs programmes as these journalists valued the careers of doctors above that of patients lives. Once safely we’re installed in Government, Anglo-Celtic Broadcasting will begin a full service of programmes replacing half the BBC TV and radio channels, using half the existing licence fee (so NO increase in fee which will be eventually replaced).

POLICY 15: Anthony Blair and his government ministers and Whitehall civil servants to go on trial for war crimes: illegal war against Iraq and the bombing of the civilian Serbian State Television. In addition to go on trial for undermining the United Nations so giving the green light to smaller nations to invade each other.

POLICY 16: The B.U.C.P. will have Britain opt out from the European Union’s food supplement laws (which came in on the 1st August 2005 despite court action to block this), so popular vitamin, nutrient and mineral supplements can once more be available.

POLICY 17: All political parties will be banned from putting up more than 5% of it’s candidates from posh backgrounds, (justified by Common Sense Philosophy – refer to introduction at top of this section).

SECTION 9 FORGEIGN & DEFENCE POLICIES:

POLICY 1: Had the British Unicorn Party been in government in 2003 there would have been NO British involvement in the Iraq war. Armed forces to be used only if Britain is attacked or about to be attacked or if another country is attacked/invaded like Kuwait and Poland were. Members of the armed forces are not toys for politicians to play with.

POLICY 2: Britain to remain a member of NATO

POLICY 3: Nuclear weapons to be reduced as the U.S. and China etc reduce theirs (British Unicorn Party government to actively encourage further reductions in such weapon until all have ceased to be).

POLICY 4: British Unicorn Party to concentrate on Home Affairs, but will support campaign for Tibetan independence.

POLICY 5: The B.U.P. will impose sanctions on the Military Government of Burma to concede to being replaced by a democratically elected Government.

POLICY 6: To help countries struggling to be self-sufficient in preparing for or dealing with (if it’s already happened) the peak oil crisis.

Policy 7: UK pulled out of EU;

Policy 8: Wales, England and Cornwall to have equal status to Scotland.